Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:05:05.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olive ridley turtle Lepidochelys olivacea in French Guiana: back from the brink of regional extirpation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Laurent Kelle
Affiliation:
WWF France, Bureau Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana.
Nicolas Gratiot
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’étude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, Grenoble, France.
Benoît de Thoisy*
Affiliation:
Association Kwata, BP 672, F-97335 Cayenne Cedex, French Guiana
*
*Association Kwata, BP 672, F-97335 Cayenne Cedex, French Guiana. E-mail [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The estimated number of olive ridley marine turtles Lepidochelys olivacea nesting annually in 2002–2007 in French Guiana was 1,716–3,257, the highest ever recorded in the country and similar to nesting numbers recorded in neighbouring Suriname c. 40 years ago, where the species has now severely declined. A shift of nesting females from Suriname to French Guiana beaches and improvement of nationwide marine turtle monitoring appear to be the most plausible explanations for the current high level of nesting recorded in French Guiana. The species' nesting status in French Guiana therefore appears less critical than previously documented but ongoing threats suggest the need to reinforce regional conservation efforts in the West Atlantic.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2009

Ocean ecosystems have been severely damaged by human pressures (Roberts, Reference Roberts2003) and marine turtles are one of the most affected groups (IUCN, 2007). Major rookeries of loggerhead Caretta caretta (Turtle Expert Working Group, 2000), green Chelonia mydas (Troëng & Rankin, Reference Troëng and Rankin2005) and leatherback marine turtles Dermochelys coriacea (Fossette et al., Reference Fossette, Kelle, Girondot, Goverse, Hilterman and Verhage2008) are reported on the western shores of the Atlantic Ocean. In comparison, the olive ridley marine turtle Lepidochelys olivacea is less abundant, and its phylogeography indicates a recent colonization of the Atlantic (Bowen et al., Reference Bowen, Clark, Abreu-Grobois, Chaves, Reichart and Ferl1998).

The beaches of Suriname and French Guiana host major marine turtle aggregations (Reichart & Fretey, Reference Reichart and Fretey1993; Girondot et al., Reference Girondot, Godfrey, Ponge and Rivalan2007). Suriname was formerly identified as an important olive ridley turtle nesting site (Pritchard, Reference Pritchard1973) but the number of nests decreased from 2,875 in 1967 to 1,070 in 1975 (Schulz, Reference Schulz1975), and to 585 in 1989 (Reichart, Reference Reichart1993). Monitoring was interrupted during the early 1990s when the main nesting sites were occupied by rebels (Reichart, Reference Reichart1993). In 1995 only 335 olive ridley turtle nests were recorded (Hoeckert et al., Reference Hoeckert, Schouten, Van Tienen and Weijerman1996). Because of the difficulty of accessing some nesting sites only fragmentary information on olive ridley turtle nesting has been collected recently in Suriname (Fig. 1). Estimates for the early 2000s, based on limited monitoring efforts, were 150–200 olive ridley turtle nests per year (Hilterman et al., Reference Hilterman, Tordoir, Goverse, Reichart, Kalb, Rohde, Gayheart and Shanker2008).

Fig. 1 Olive ridley turtle nest numbers in Suriname and French Guiana, with median error bars (Gratiot et al., Reference Gratiot, Gratiot, Kelle and de Thoisy2006), during 1967–2007. Suriname data: 1967–1975 from Schulz (Reference Schulz1975), 1976–1989 from Reichart (Reference Reichart1993), 1994–1999 from Mohadin (Reference Mohadin, Kelle, Lochon, Thérèse and Desbois2000), and 2002 from de Djin (2003). Note that monitoring coverage is not detailed in Mohadin (Reference Mohadin, Kelle, Lochon, Thérèse and Desbois2000), and that de Djin (2003) considered the data to be incomplete. French Guiana data: 1987 from Fretey (Reference Fretey1989), when monitoring coverage did not include Cayenne Peninsula. Cayenne Peninsula was the only nesting area monitored in 2000 and 2001. Data for 2002–2007 are the minimum numbers of nests laid, as some minor nesting sites were not continuously monitored.

Historical data on olive ridley turtles in French Guiana are sporadic. Reports indicated the presence of the species on the coast (Fretey & Lescure, Reference Fretey and Lescure1979), and nesting appeared to be common on the Cayenne peninsula in the early 1970s (J. Fretey, pers. comm.). A survey in 1987 recorded 582 nests (Fretey, Reference Fretey1989; Fig. 1). Intensive monitoring was implemented in 2000 on the Cayenne peninsula (Talvy & Vié, Reference Talvy, Vié, Kelle, Lochon, Thérèse and Desbois2000); this facilitated the development of a model that defines the temporal distribution and numbers of olive ridley nesting, with a correlation of r ≥ 0.97 (Gratiot et al., Reference Gratiot, Gratiot, Kelle and de Thoisy2006). Fragmentary data from other beaches (Amana Nature Reserve and Kourou beaches, monitored since 2002) extrapolated using this model gave estimations for each nest site for the entire nesting season, with errors of 10–15% when the monitoring lasted ≥ 50 days (Gratiot et al., Reference Gratiot, Gratiot, Kelle and de Thoisy2006). Based on this extended monitoring coverage we estimated 1,716–3,257 olive ridley turtle nests per year for 2002–2007 in French Guiana. These numbers are the highest reproduction rates recorded for the species in the north-west Atlantic since 1967–1970, when Schulz (Reference Schulz1975) estimated 1,665–3,290 nests in Suriname (Fig. 1).

As suggested by Marcovaldi (Reference Marcovaldi, Eckert and Abreu-Grobois2001) we consider that three hypotheses could potentially explain the high number of olive ridley turtle nests recorded in French Guiana since 2002. Firstly, the population recovery could be due to long-term conservation efforts (Hays, Reference Hays2004). Because of over-harvesting of eggs (Reichart, Reference Reichart1993) and incidental catch related to shrimp trawling (Reichart & Fretey, Reference Reichart and Fretey1993) the olive ridley turtle was formerly considered the most threatened marine turtle in the Guianas (Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana; Tambiah, Reference Tambiah, Bjorndal, Bolten, Johnson and Eliazar1994). On beaches, egg poaching is limited to 5% of clutches (ONCFS, pers. comm.) in French Guiana. However, the olive ridley is the marine turtle most vulnerable to offshore shrimp trawling in French Guiana, and informal interviews suggested that c. 1,000 olive ridley turtles are caught annually (Gueguen, Reference Gueguen2000). Turtle Excluder Devices are not mandatory in French Guiana, as they have been in Suriname since 1992 (Mohadin, Reference Mohadin, Kelle, Lochon, Thérèse and Desbois2000). Thus, it seems unlikely that the resident population of olive ridley turtles in French Guiana has recovered because of long-term conservation.

Secondly, nesting females could have moved south from Suriname to French Guiana beaches. In the Guianas natural modifications of the coastline can cause marine turtles to change their nesting location (Hilterman et al., Reference Hilterman, Tordoir, Goverse, Reichart, Kalb, Rohde, Gayheart and Shanker2008), as happened with the leatherback turtles now nesting at Awala Yalimapo in French Guiana (Girondot et al., Reference Girondot, Godfrey, Ponge and Rivalan2007; Kelle et al., Reference Kelle, Gratiot, Nolibos, Thérèse, Wongsopawiro and de Thoisy2007).

Thirdly, the species’ occurrence in French Guiana could have been underestimated until 2000. Since the late 1970s marine turtle monitoring was mostly focused on leatherback turtle nesting beaches, and current major olive ridley turtle nesting sites (Kourou, Cayenne Peninsula) were rarely visited. Also, the olive ridley turtle sometimes adopts a particular nesting behaviour, coming ashore in large waves known as arribadas (Pritchard, Reference Pritchard1967). Between such events few adults come ashore, resulting in underestimation of nesting activity. As monitoring was limited in French Guiana until 2000, the species’ occurrence has probably remained underestimated there.

Only long-term monitoring at a large geographical scale is suitable for the assessment of marine turtle nesting trends (Schroeder & Murphy, Reference Schroeder, Murphy, Eckert, Bjorndal, Abreu-Grobois and Donnelly1999). In Suriname and French Guiana monitoring of olive ridley turtles has been both temporally and spatially heterogeneous and, therefore, no regional nesting trend can be identified. Based on nest numbers it appears that the population in French Guiana is only c. 2,000 adults, and is nearly extirpated as a breeding species in Guyana and Suriname. Despite a reported increase of the species in Brazil (de Castilhos & Tiwari, Reference de Castilhos and Tiwari2006) olive ridley turtles in the West Atlantic still face interactions with non-selective trawling gears, both in French Guiana and Brazil (Gueguen, Reference Gueguen2000; da Silva et al., Reference da Silva, de Castilhos, Lopez and Barata2007). As a consequence the olive ridley turtle continues to be threatened in the West Atlantic, despite a revision of its global IUCN Red List status from Endangered to Vulnerable (IUCN, 2008). Such an apparent discrepancy between local and global Red List assessments reinforces the need for regional assessments for such widely distributed species (Seminoff, Reference Seminoff2004; Mast et al., Reference Mast, Seminoff, Hutchinson and Pilcher2006).

The apparent increase in nesting by the olive ridley marine turtle in French Guiana therefore probably reflects the combination of a potential shift in nesting from Suriname to French Guiana and increased monitoring. Further investigation of the olive ridley turtle population structure in the West Atlantic is required. A transnational programme focusing on olive ridley turtles has recently been developed between Suriname and French Guiana, with joint genetic and satellite tracking research. This will produce a better understanding of the genetic signatures of rookeries and elucidate the species’ behaviour at sea. Similarly, such a collaborative initiative could be developed with Brazil to clarify gene flow between Brazilian and French Guiana nesting cohorts, the two main olive ridley turtle nesting aggregations in the West Atlantic. This would facilitate the identification of potential conservation units and the development of a comprehensive conservation strategy for the olive ridley marine turtle in the West Atlantic.

Acknowledgements

We thank Bill Maroney, Jean-Yves Georges, Scott Eckert and two anonymous reviewers for comments, and J. Fretey, N. Pilcher, R. Mast, P. Pritchard and ONCFS for personal communications. Funding of fieldwork was provided by Diren-Guyane, Ministère de l'Ecologie et du Développement Durables, European Union, WWF (Netherlands, Guianas and France) and Région Guyane. The most recent nesting data came from the Coordinated Approach to Restore Endangered Turtles project, supported by Interreg funds. Data used in this communication come from the Base de données tortues marines de Guyane and from published research. We thank Henri Reichart, Greg Talvy and Freddy Kusapero for their expertise and dedication to marine turtle conservation.

Biographical sketches

Laurent Kelle works on marine conservation in French Guiana for WWF on projects that include monitoring of nesting beaches, capacity building, promotion and testing of selective fishing gears, and development of regional cooperation. Nicolas Gratiot is working at the French Institute of Research for Development on the transport of sediment in watershed, estuarine and coastal zones and its impact on ecosystems. Since 2001 he has been studying the evolution of the coast of the Amazon and its impact on mangroves and turtles. Benoît de Thoisy is the scientific director of the NGO Kwata in French Guiana. His field studies focus on habitat and fauna management and on focal species such as otters, caimans, primates, jaguars and marine turtles.

References

Bowen, B.W., Clark, A.M., Abreu-Grobois, F.A., Chaves, A., Reichart, H.A. & Ferl, R.J. (1998) Global phylogeography of the Ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys spp.) as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Genetica, 101, 179189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, A.C.C.D., de Castilhos, J.C., Lopez, G. & Barata, P.C.R. (2007) Nesting biology and conservation of the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) in Brazil, 1991/1992 to 2002/2003. Journal of Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom, 87, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castilhos, J. & Tiwari, M. (2006) Preliminary data and observations from an increasing olive ridley population in Sergipe, Brazil. Marine Turtle Newsletter, 113, 67.Google Scholar
de Djin, B. (2003) Campagne de suivi des tortues marines au Suriname, saison 2002. In Actes du 6ème colloque regional tortues marines du Plateau des Guyanes. 18–20 novembre 2002. Rémire-Montjoly, Guyane (eds Nolibos, I., Kelle, L., Thoisy, B. & Lochon, S.), pp. 1113. Collection Sépanguy, Cayenne, French Guiana.Google Scholar
Fossette, S., Kelle, L., Girondot, M., Goverse, E., Hilterman, M.J., Verhage, B. et al. . (2008) The world's largest leatherback rookeries: conservation-oriented research in French Guiana/Suriname and Gabon. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 356, 6982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretey, J. (1989) Reproduction de la tortue olivâtre (Lepidochelys olivacea) en Guyane française pendant la saison 1987. Nature Guyanaise, 1, 813.Google Scholar
Fretey, J. & Lescure, J. (1979) Rapport sur l’étude de la protection des tortues marines en Guyane française. Notes sur le projet de Réserve Naturelle de Basse-Mana. Ministère de l'Environnement, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Girondot, M., Godfrey, M., Ponge, L. & Rivalan, P. (2007) Modeling approaches to quantify leatherback nesting trends in French Guiana and Suriname. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 6, 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratiot, N., Gratiot, J., Kelle, L. & de Thoisy, B. (2006) Estimation of a turtle nesting season from incomplete data: statistical adjustment of a sinusoidal function. Animal Conservation, 9, 95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueguen, F. (2000) Captures accidentelles de tortues marines par la flottille crevettière en Guyane Française. Bulletin de la Société Herpétologique de France, 93, 2736.Google Scholar
Hays, G.C. (2004) Good news for sea turtles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 349351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilterman, M.L., Tordoir, M.T., Goverse, E. & Reichart, H.A. (2008) Beaches come and beaches go: coastal dynamics in Suriname are affecting important sea turtle rookeries. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation (compilers Kalb, H., Rohde, A.S., Gayheart, K. & Shanker, K.), pp. 140141. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC. National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, USA.Google Scholar
Hoeckert, W.E.J., Neuféglise, H., Schouten, A.D. & Menken, S.B.J. (2002) Multiple paternity and female-biased mutation at a microsatellite locus in the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). Heredity, 89, 107113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeckert, W.E.J., Schouten, A.D., Van Tienen, L.H.G. & Weijerman, M. (1996) Is the Surinam olive ridley on the eve of extinction? First census data for olive ridleys, green turtles and leatherbacks since 1989. Marine Turtle Newsletter, 75, 14.Google Scholar
IUCN (2007) 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 2 January 2008].Google Scholar
Kelle, L.N., Gratiot, I., Nolibos, J., Thérèse, R., Wongsopawiro, & de Thoisy, B. (2007) Monitoring of nesting leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea): contribution of remote sensing for real-time assessment of beach coverage in French Guiana. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 6, 142147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcovaldi, M.Â. (2001) Status and distribution of the olive ridley turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea, in the Western Atlantic Ocean. In Proceedings of the Regional Meeting: Marine Turtle Conservation in the Wider Caribbean Region (eds Eckert, K.L. & Abreu-Grobois, F.A.), pp. 5256. WIDECAST, IUCN-MTSG, WWF and UNEP-CEP, Dominican Republic.Google Scholar
Mast, R.B., Seminoff, J.A., Hutchinson, B.J. & Pilcher, N.J. (2006) The role of the IUCN Marine Turtle Specialist Group in setting priorities for sea turtle conservation. Marine Turtle Newsletter, 113, 1618.Google Scholar
Mohadin, K. (2000) Sea turtle research and conservation in Suriname: history, constraints and achievements. In Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting on the Sea Turtles of the Guianas (eds Kelle, L., Lochon, S., Thérèse, J. & Desbois, X.), pp. 59. Programme de conservation des tortues marines de Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P.C.H. (1967) To find the ridley. International Turtle and Tortoise Society Journal, 1, 2935.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P.C.H. (1973) International migrations of South American sea turtles (Cheloniidae and Dermochelidae). Animal Behaviour, 21, 1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichart, H.A. (1993) Synopsis of Biological Data on the Olive Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz 1829) in the Western Atlantic. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-336. National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, USA.Google Scholar
Reichart, H.A. & Fretey, J. (1993) WIDECAST Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for Surinam. UNEP-CEP Technical Report No. 24. UNEP-Caribbean Environment Programme, Kingston, Jamaica.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M. (2003) Our shifting perspectives on the oceans. Oryx, 37, 166177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, B. & Murphy, S. (1999) Population surveys (ground and aerial) on nesting beaches. In Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles (eds Eckert, K.L., Bjorndal, K.A., Abreu-Grobois, F.A. & Donnelly, M.), pp. 4555. IUCN/Species Survival Commission Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Schulz, J.P. (1975) Sea turtles nesting in Surinam. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 143, 1143.Google Scholar
Seminoff, J.A. (2004) Sea turtles, red listing, and the need for regional assessments. Marine Turtle Newsletter, 106, 46.Google Scholar
Talvy, G. & Vié, J.-C. (2000) Evaluation of the importance of French Guiana eastern beaches as nesting sites for turtles. In Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting on the Sea Turtles of the Guianas (eds Kelle, L., Lochon, S., Thérèse, J. & Desbois, X.), pp. 2629. Programme de conservation des tortues marines de Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana.Google Scholar
Tambiah, C.R. (1994) Saving sea turtles or killing them: the case of US regulated TEDs in Guyana and Suriname. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation (compilers Bjorndal, K.A., Bolten, A.B., Johnson, D.A. & Eliazar, P.J.), pp. 149151. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-351. National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, USA.Google Scholar
Troëng, S. & Rankin, E. (2005) Long-term conservation efforts contribute to positive green turtle Chelonia mydas nesting trend at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Biological Conservation, 121, 111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turtle Expert Working Group (2000) Assessment Update for the Kemp's, Ridley and Loggerhead Sea Turtle Populations in the Western North Atlantic. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-444. National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, USA.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Olive ridley turtle nest numbers in Suriname and French Guiana, with median error bars (Gratiot et al., 2006), during 1967–2007. Suriname data: 1967–1975 from Schulz (1975), 1976–1989 from Reichart (1993), 1994–1999 from Mohadin (2000), and 2002 from de Djin (2003). Note that monitoring coverage is not detailed in Mohadin (2000), and that de Djin (2003) considered the data to be incomplete. French Guiana data: 1987 from Fretey (1989), when monitoring coverage did not include Cayenne Peninsula. Cayenne Peninsula was the only nesting area monitored in 2000 and 2001. Data for 2002–2007 are the minimum numbers of nests laid, as some minor nesting sites were not continuously monitored.