Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:17:08.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix 3 - Population Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Spike Gibbs
Affiliation:
Universität Mannheim, Germany

Summary

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Appendix 3 Population Estimates

The estimates of total population and the population of adult males used in this book are based on a series of national taxation records that survive between 1327 and 1603. These consist of the 1327 lay subsidy, the 1377–81 poll taxes, the 1524–5 lay subsidies, and the 1563 and 1603 diocesan population returns, although the records do not survive for each return for all the case studies. In each case, the records only account for a varying proportion of the actual population of the communities surveyed, and thus various multipliers were applied to the numbers given in the documents to achieve estimated ranges of population. These multipliers are based on those found in relevant secondary literature.

Table a3.1 summarises the actual returns and multipliers applied, while the footnotes detail the sources of both the returns and the multipliers used. As a final set of caveats, it is vital to remember that these are very imprecise estimates of population, and likely reflect trends better than absolute levels of population. It is further important to remember that none of the returns used the manor as a basis for assessment, but rather the vill for the lay subsidies and poll tax, and the parish for the diocesan population returns. This means that these estimates are not necessarily related to the number of tenants, with inhabitants included who may not have held land in the manor, and non-resident manorial landholders excluded.

Table a3.1 Population estimates

ManorDateType (geographical unit)Number of individualsMethod 1Minimum–maximum multiplier unitMethod 2Total population minimum–maximumMethod 3Minimum–maximum adult males
Horstead1327
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

51 taxpayersAssume covers 25–33% of householdersFootnote 1153–204 householdersAssume multiplier of 4.75727–969Assume adult males 30% of populationFootnote 2218–291
1379
  • Poll tax

  • (vill)

96 listed (57 taxpayers)
  • 96

  • adults 16 and over

Assume multiplier of 1.323–1.454Footnote 3127–14057
1524
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

27 taxpayersAssume covers 72–97% of menFootnote 4
  • 28–38

  • men

Assume multiplier of 3.33Footnote 594–12528–38
1603c.100 communicants (given as estimate)Footnote 7100 communicantsAssume covers 50–65% of populationFootnote 8154–200Assume adult males 30% of population46–60
Cratfield1327
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

33 taxpayersAssume covers 25–33% of householders100–132 householdersAssume multiplier of 4.75475–627Assume adult males 30% of population143–188
1525
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

51 taxpayersAssume covers 72–97% of men53–71 menAssume multiplier of 3.33175–23653–71
1603
  • Diocesan register

  • (parish)

200 communicants200 communicantsAssume covers 50–65% of population308–400Assume adult males 30% of population167–217
Little Downham1327
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

31 taxpayersAssume covers 25–33% of householders
  • 93–124

  • householders

Assume multiplier of 4.75442–589Assume adult males 30% of population133–177
1377
  • Poll tax

  • (vill)

267 taxpayers (with Littleport)Assume ratio of taxpayers the same as 1524 lay subsidy (102:93)Footnote 9
  • 140

  • adults aged 14 and over

Assume multiplier of 1.323–1.454185–204Assume adult males 30% of population56–61
1524
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

102 taxpayersAssume covers 72–97% of men
  • 105–142

  • men

Assume multiplier of 3.33350–472105–142
1563
  • Diocesan register

  • (parish)

80 householders
  • 80

  • householders

Assume multiplier of 4.75–5Footnote 10380–400Assume adult males 30% of population114–120
Worfield1327
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

60 taxpayersAssume covers 25–33% of householders
  • 180–240

  • householders

Assume multiplier of 4.75855–1140Assume adult males 30% of population257–342
1524
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

112 taxpayersAssume covers 72–97% of men
  • 115–156

  • men

Assume multiplier of 3.33384–518115–156
1563
  • Diocesan register

  • (parish)

134 householders
  • 134

  • householders

Assume multiplier of 4.75–5637–670Assume adult males 30% of population191–201
Fordington1327
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

70 taxpayersAssume covers 25–33% of householders212–280 householdersAssume multiplier of 4.751,008–1,330Assume adult males 30% of population302–339
1524
  • Lay subsidy

  • (vill)

121 taxpayersAssume covers 72–97% of men125–168 menAssume multiplier of 3.33415–560125–168
1603
  • Diocesan register

  • (parish)

361 communicants361 communicantsAssume covers 50–65% of population555–772Assume adult males 30% of population167–217

Sources: Cambridgeshire and the Isle of Ely: Lay Subsidy for the Year 1327, Names of the Tax-Payers in Every Parish, trans. J.J. Muskett and ed. C.H. Evelyn White (London, 1900); Poll Taxes, ed. Fenwick; Lay Subsidy Returns, ed. Sheail; Diocesan Population Returns, eds. Dyer and Palliser; Smith, Worfield; Farnhill, Guilds and the Parish Community; The Dorset Lay Subsidy Roll of 1327, ed. A.R. Rumble, Dorset Record Society, 6 (Dorchester, 1980); TNA, e179/149/7.

1 Following B.M.S. Campbell and K. Bartley, England on the Eve of the Black Death: an Atlas of Lay Lordship, Land and Wealth, 1300–49 (Manchester, 2006), 329.

2 Following B.M.S. Campbell, ‘The population of early Tudor England: a re-evaluation of the 1522 muster returns and 1524 and 1525 lay subsidies’, Journal of Historical Geography, 7 (1981), 145–54, at 152.

3 Following Poos, Rural Society, 299.

4 Following Campbell, ‘Population of early Tudor England’, 152.

5 Following Footnote ibid.

6 This excludes Stanninghall which was part of the civil but not ecclesiastical parish of Horstead: Diocesan Population Returns, eds. Dyer and Palliser, 411 n. 111.

7 Unfortunately, the census only states that the number of communicants were ‘the like nomber’ to Coltishall, where a number of 100 communicants is given. Therefore, these figures are very much estimates: Diocesan Population Returns, eds. Dyer and Palliser, 442 n. 112.

8 Following Tompkins, ‘Peasant society’, 190.

9 Unfortunately the returns of the Isle of Ely were given together in the tax (excluding the City of Ely), thus putting Downham and Littleport together. This methodology assumes population decline was similar in that in these neighbouring communities owing to their proximity. Pleasingly, the ratio between the 140 estimate for 1377 and the 31 taxpayers in 1327 of 1:4.52 is very close to that of 1:4.47 calculated for Cambridgeshire as a whole, suggesting a number that is at least plausible.

10 Following Tompkins, ‘Peasant society’, 190.

Footnotes

1 Following B.M.S. Campbell and K. Bartley, England on the Eve of the Black Death: an Atlas of Lay Lordship, Land and Wealth, 1300–49 (Manchester, 2006), 329.

2 Following B.M.S. Campbell, ‘The population of early Tudor England: a re-evaluation of the 1522 muster returns and 1524 and 1525 lay subsidies’, Journal of Historical Geography, 7 (1981), 145–54, at 152.

3 Following Poos, Rural Society, 299.

4 Following Campbell, ‘Population of early Tudor England’, 152.

5 Following Footnote ibid.

6 This excludes Stanninghall which was part of the civil but not ecclesiastical parish of Horstead: Diocesan Population Returns, eds. Dyer and Palliser, 411 n. 111.

7 Unfortunately, the census only states that the number of communicants were ‘the like nomber’ to Coltishall, where a number of 100 communicants is given. Therefore, these figures are very much estimates: Diocesan Population Returns, eds. Dyer and Palliser, 442 n. 112.

8 Following Tompkins, ‘Peasant society’, 190.

9 Unfortunately the returns of the Isle of Ely were given together in the tax (excluding the City of Ely), thus putting Downham and Littleport together. This methodology assumes population decline was similar in that in these neighbouring communities owing to their proximity. Pleasingly, the ratio between the 140 estimate for 1377 and the 31 taxpayers in 1327 of 1:4.52 is very close to that of 1:4.47 calculated for Cambridgeshire as a whole, suggesting a number that is at least plausible.

10 Following Tompkins, ‘Peasant society’, 190.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Population Estimates
  • Spike Gibbs, Universität Mannheim, Germany
  • Book: Lordship, State Formation and Local Authority in Late Medieval and Early Modern England
  • Online publication: 13 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009311847.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Population Estimates
  • Spike Gibbs, Universität Mannheim, Germany
  • Book: Lordship, State Formation and Local Authority in Late Medieval and Early Modern England
  • Online publication: 13 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009311847.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Population Estimates
  • Spike Gibbs, Universität Mannheim, Germany
  • Book: Lordship, State Formation and Local Authority in Late Medieval and Early Modern England
  • Online publication: 13 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009311847.011
Available formats
×