Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:57:50.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

Ana Vila-Concejo*
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences and Marine Studies Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, and Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Chowder Bay, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Thomas E. Fellowes
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences and Marine Studies Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, and Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Chowder Bay, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Shari Gallop
Affiliation:
School of Science, University of Waikato, Tauranga, New Zealand Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Irene Alejo
Affiliation:
Marine Research Centre (CIM), University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Donatus B. Angnuureng
Affiliation:
Centre for Coastal Management—Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR), University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
Javier Benavente
Affiliation:
INMAR/Earth Sciences Department, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
Jorn W. Bosma
Affiliation:
Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Emmanuel K. Brempong
Affiliation:
Centre for Coastal Management—Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR), University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (DFAS), University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana LEGOS, OMP, UMR 5566 (CNES-CNRS-IRD-University of Toulouse), Toulouse, France
Pushpa Dissanayake
Affiliation:
Coastal Geology and Sedimentology, Institute of Geosciences, University of Kiel, Germany, and NLWKN, Lower Saxony Government, Germany
Md Yousuf Gazi
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences and Marine Studies Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, and Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Chowder Bay, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Geology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Rita González-Villanueva
Affiliation:
Marine Research Centre (CIM), University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Ricardo Guimarães
Affiliation:
Programa de Engenharia Oceânica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
David M. Kennedy
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
John L. Largier
Affiliation:
Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute, University of California Davis, Bodega Bay, CA, USA Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Marlies A. van der Lugt
Affiliation:
Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Juan Montes
Affiliation:
INMAR/Earth Sciences Department, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
Mara Orescanin
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
Charitha B. Pattiaratchi
Affiliation:
Oceans Graduate School & The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Luci Cajueiro Carneiro Pereira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Pará Instituto de Estudos Costeiro, Bragança, Brazil
Remo Luan Marinho da Costa Pereira
Affiliation:
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain
Timothy Price
Affiliation:
Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Maryam Rahbani
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
Laura del Río
Affiliation:
INMAR/Earth Sciences Department, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
Michael Rosenthal
Affiliation:
Rhelm Consulting, Neutral Bay, NSW, Australia
Matthieu de Schipper
Affiliation:
Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Anne M. Ton
Affiliation:
Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
Lukas WinklerPrins
Affiliation:
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Zhongyuan Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
*
Corresponding author: Ana Vila-Concejo; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a relative lack of research, targeted models and tools to manage beaches in estuaries and bays (BEBs). Many estuaries and bays have been highly modified and urbanised, for example port developments and coastal revetments. This paper outlines the complications and opportunities for conserving and managing BEBs in modified estuaries. To do this, we focus on eight diverse case studies from North and South America, Asia, Europe, Africa and Australia combined with the broader global literature. Our key findings are as follows: (1) BEBs are diverse and exist under a great variety of tide and wave conditions that differentiate them from open-coast beaches; (2) BEBs often lack statutory protection and many have already been sacrificed to development; (3) BEBs lack specific management tools and are often managed using tools developed for open-coast beaches; and (4) BEBs have the potential to become important in “nature-based” management solutions. We set the future research agenda for BEBs, which should include broadening research to include greater diversity of BEBs than in the past, standardising monitoring techniques, including the development of global databases using citizen science and developing specific management tools for BEBs. We must recognise BEBs as unique coastal features and develop the required fundamental knowledge and tools to effectively manage them, so they can continue providing their unique ecosystem services.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

We bring together an international team of researchers to bring a comprehensive review and perspective on beaches on estuaries and bays (BEBs). Our work delves into recent research drawn from eight case studies spanning the Africa, Americas, Asia, Australia and Europe. By contextualising this research within the existing literature on BEBs, we have achieved a unique perspective that sheds light on the intricate challenges and complexities involved in conserving and managing these delicate ecosystems. We believe this perspective offers valuable insights into the field. Furthermore, our paper outlines our vision for the trajectory of future research in this domain. We delineate a series of progressive steps that should serve as guideposts for upcoming research on BEBs, aiming to facilitate a more holistic understanding of these environments. Our findings show that the key to setting the future research agenda for BEBs is to first broaden our research focus to include a greater diversity of BEBs, based on the great variation in the relative importance of the many factors that drive BEB morphodynamics. We recommend including more focus on mapping and monitoring BEB locations and morphology and long-term monitoring of hydrodynamic processes. Future studies should consider BEB evolution in relation to evolution and processes of the whole the estuary/bay to identify potential mitigation measures based on nature-based solutions.

Introduction

When considering beaches in estuaries and bays (BEBs), generally low energy, narrow landforms come to mind. However, the environmental settings and morphology of such beaches are highly diverse in terms of planform, cross-shore profile shape and hydrodynamic drivers. BEBs can be exposed to various combinations of ocean-generated waves and those generated inside the estuary/bay, in addition to other hydrodynamic forcing such as currents generated by rivers and tides (Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Largier, Jackson and Short2020). While geological inheritance is a first-order control on the location, shape, volume and stability of BEBs, the geology can also control the contemporary dynamics, for example pocket BEBs between rocky outcrops (Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Kennedy, Loureiro, Naylor, Muñoz-Pérez, Jackson and Fellowes2020a). Moreover, many BEBs are in highly modified estuaries and bays, with hard engineering works and dredging also being important controls on their form and behaviour (Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021). Indeed, engineering interventions in estuaries and bays such as port development have caused the loss of entire BEBs systems, or their creation through artificial means (e.g. nourishments associated with groynes).

There is a relative lack of research, models and management tools for BEBs compared with open ocean beaches (Figure 1) (e.g. Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Largier, Jackson and Short2020; Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2021). Based on observations in the NE USA, Nordstrom (Reference Nordstrom1992) provided a general background to BEBs, which was followed by other work on low-energy and sheltered beaches, such as Hegge et al. (Reference Hegge, Eliot and Hsu1996) on reef-controlled, sheltered beaches on the open coast and Jackson et al. (Reference Jackson, Nordstrom, Eliot and Masselink2002), who focused on non-estuarine BEBs. There have been several classifications developed for low-energy beaches, but not specifically for BEBs. This includes the Short (Reference Short2006) and Short and Woodroffe (Reference Short and Woodroffe2009) classifications of tide-modified/dominated beaches focused on the open coast; the work of Travers (Reference Travers2007), Travers et al. (Reference Travers, Eliot, Eliot and Jendrzejczak2010) on the morphodynamics of BEBs in SW Australia and classifications of fetch-limited beaches based on the importance of wave, tidal and river forcing (Freire et al., Reference Freire, Jackson and Nordstrom2013, Reference Freire, Ferreira, Taborda, Oliveira, Carrasco, Silva, Vargas, Capitão, Fortes, Coli and Santos2009). Importantly, in all these studies locally generated wind waves, sometimes modulated by the tidal forces, were considered the major control for BEBs morphodynamics. There have also been studies on the dynamics of specific BEBs in Spain (Alejo et al., Reference Alejo, Costas and Vila-Concejo2005; Costas et al., Reference Costas, Alejo, Vila-Concejo and Nombela2005; Gonzalez-Villanueva et al., Reference Gonzalez-Villanueva, Costas, Alejo and Perez-Arlucea2007; Bernabeu et al., Reference Bernabeu, Lersundi-Kanpistegi and Vilas2012), Portugal (Carrasco et al., Reference Carrasco, Ferreira, Matias and Freire2012, Reference Carrasco, Ferreira, Davidson, Matias and Dias2008; Freire et al., Reference Freire, Jackson and Nordstrom2013), France (Dissanayake et al., Reference Dissanayake, Yates, Suanez, Floc’h and Krämer2021), Germany (Dissanayake and Brown, Reference Dissanayake and Brown2022), Hong Kong, China (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Switzer, Lau, Yeung, Chik, Chiu, Huang and Pile2013), SE Australia (Kennedy, Reference Kennedy2002; Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Harley, Rahbani and Largier2020b; Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021; Rahbani et al., Reference Rahbani, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Gallop, Winkler-Prins and Largier2022) and California, USA (Winkler-Prins et al., Reference Winkler-Prins, Largier, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Fellowes and Rahbani2023) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. World map of BEBs in the peer-reviewed literature (black dots) and case studies presented in this paper (blue dots).

While many BEBs have been lost to urbanisation, the remaining BEBs in urban environments provide important places for people to connect with nature and ecosystem services such as providing habitat and feeding areas and protective buffers for wetlands (Nordstrom and Jackson, Reference Nordstrom and Jackson2012), as well as providing safe swimming areas (Largier and Taggart, Reference Largier and Taggart2006). This socio-ecological role is highlighted by artificial BEBs created to upgrade flood defences and to provide a more natural transition between land and water than traditional shore protection works, such as in the Netherlands (Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2023) and California (SFEI and Baye, Reference Baye2020). While many BEBs are often protected from large waves, severe erosion can still occur when storms come from directions that can propagate large swells inside estuaries/bays (Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Harley, Rahbani and Largier2020b) In fact, further research has shown that BEBs in those environments are mostly controlled by the swell energy propagating into the estuaries and bays (Rahbani et al., Reference Rahbani, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Gallop, Winkler-Prins and Largier2022). Moreover, recovery of BEBs after erosive events can be slow and take years (Nordstrom, Reference Nordstrom1980; Costas et al., Reference Costas, Alejo, Vila-Concejo and Nombela2005; Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021). As such, with their generally low-lying nature, sensitivity to changes in wave direction or extreme winds and slow recovery, BEBs are highly sensitive to climate-driven changes in wave forcing and impacts of compound events including precipitation and storm surge. Maintaining healthy BEBs contributes to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals number 11, 14 and 15 (UN, 2015). Vila-Concejo et al. (Reference Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Largier, Jackson and Short2020) provide a complete overview on the geological setting and oceanographic conditions that determine where BEBs form and what they look like.

Despite recent increased research on BEBs, the need remains to better understand their processes to develop models to underpin their management. We take a step towards this here by bringing together an international group of BEB researchers and practitioners to share and consolidate understanding of BEB morphodynamics and set a collective research agenda. Our aim is to highlight diverse morphologies of BEBs in estuaries, bays and coastal lagoons from around the world and their management issues. This paper provides case studies from seven regions with BEBs in Ghana, Brazil, USA, Australia, China, Spain and the Netherlands, selected for their diverse morphodynamics and management issues. The case studies include pristine BEBs (e.g. Northern Brazil) and with large anthropogenic impact and undergoing erosion (e.g. China). The tides in the cases studied go from microtidal (e.g. SE Australia) to mesotidal (e.g. San Francisco, USA) to macrotidal (Northern Brazil), and they include BEBs that never receive any swell energy (e.g. the Netherlands) and those that may be controlled by swell (e.g. SE Australia). This is followed by discussion of the key challenges in conserving and managing BEBs in modified estuaries, bays and lagoons, and our perspectives on the future agenda of BEB research against the backdrop of climate change and increased infrastructure development resulting from population growth.

Case studies

BEBs in the lower Volta Delta (Ghana, West Africa)

West African beaches have undergone rapid changes in recent years due to natural and anthropogenic factors (Alves et al., Reference Alves, Angnuureng, Morand and Almar2020). The Volta Delta situated on Ghana’s eastern coast is a prime example of a highly dynamic and erosion-prone region (Figure 1). The Volta Estuary of the Volta Delta is at the mouth of three major West African rivers that drain large parts of Ghana, Togo, Burkina Faso and smaller portions of Côte d’Ivoire, Mali and Benin and accommodate many BEBs that have great significance. These BEBs typically front narrow sandy barriers that are facing significant erosion, posing risks to coastal settlements and natural ecosystems. On the open coast, beaches are wave-dominated, with an average Hs of 1.4 m and peak wave period (Tp) of 11 s (Angnuureng et al., Reference Angnuureng, Jayson-Quashigah, Almar, Stieglitz, Anthony, Aheto and Appeaning Addo2020). The tidal range is about 1 m (Addo et al., Reference Addo, Nicholls, Codjoe and Abu2018). The Volta Delta coast has extensive swamps with intermittent mangrove areas of predominantly red mangrove (Kortatsi et al., Reference Kortatsi, Young and Mensah-Bonsu2005) and savannah woodlands (Boatema et al., Reference Boatema, Addo and Mensah2013). Due to increased flooding and the construction of the Akosombo Dam in 1963 on the Volta River, the BEBs inside the Volta Estuary and adjacent open-coast beaches have experienced rapid shoreline transgression. For example, the open-coast Fuveme community, west of the mouth, lost 37% of its area, resulting in the displacement of people and the destruction of houses with the entire community being lost in November 2021. Ada Foah beach to the east of the mouth suffered from both erosion and flooding, also causing the loss of schools and settlements (Addo et al., Reference Addo, Nicholls, Codjoe and Abu2018). Wave overtopping occurs on the coastal area of the Delta due to its low-lying nature, thus causing salinisation within the BEBs. This has the potential to degrade the freshwater ecosystems within the Delta, perhaps an unexpected consequence arising from BEB erosion. Although there is a lack of studies on the evolution of BEBs in this estuary, it is evident that like the beaches on the open coast, most of the major BEBs near the estuary entrance have also undergone severe erosion over decades since the dam construction. As the shoreline has adjusted to changes in catchment sediment yields, beach erosion has been further exacerbated as residents have attempted ad hoc hard infrastructure protection such as placing rocks on the beach. To effectively manage the BEBs in the Volta Estuary, there is a need for a deeper understanding of their processes, targeted models and management practices with particular attention being paid to the regional and local sediment budgets.

BEBs in south and Southeast China (Asia)

BEBs in China, often encompassing tidal flats, are extensively developed along the S and SE coasts and associated to large rivers like the Yellow, the Yangtze and the Pearl (Figure 1). The most prominent geographical setting of these BEBs is the high supply of fluvial materials (sediment, discharge and nutrients), combined with strong coastal tidal/wave currents and the presence of densely urbanised landscapes (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Chen and Luo2016; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Milliman, Zhao, Cao, Zhou and Zhou2018). However, the construction of large dams along with rising marine hazards, for example saltwater intrusion and coastal erosion, has largely affected the habitats on BEBs (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Wang, Finlayson, Chen and Yin2010; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Cheng, Xu, Li and Zheng2016). Consequently, dams now prevent the transport of sufficient sediments into the estuaries, and therefore, BEBs are eroding with hard engineering structures in place to prevent coastal erosion. This is particularly concerning when considering potential seasonal high energy conditions induced by tropical storms (typhoons) from the West Pacific Ocean. Examples of these profoundly modified BEBs can be found in the metropolitan city of Shanghai and Guangzhou inhabited by 18–20 million people. These socio-ecological settings in China’s estuaries are alarming to the stakeholders underscoring the urgent need for legislative action at both municipal and national levels to curb further degradation of BEBs.

BEBs on the Amazon and South Atlantic coasts (Brazil, South America)

Brazil has a broad range of BEBs in its diverse estuarine systems. BEBs along the Marajó estuary, part of the Amazon River estuarine system (Figure 1), are exposed to macro-/mesotides (3–6 m) that modulate the low-to-moderate waves (Hs = 0.5–1.5 m) propagating over the inter- to subtidal sand-/mudbanks (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Vila-Concejo, Short, Short and Klein2016). On the eastern side of the estuary, there are 157 beaches along 265 km of mangrove-dominated shoreline, intersected with rivers and creeks forming bays, distributary islands and extensive tidal shoals (Anthony et al., Reference Anthony, Gardel, Gratiot, Proisy, Allison, Dolique and Fromard2010). Some of these BEBs are narrow (up to 50–70 m width) and have a high-gradient intertidal zone (> 5°) with reflective characteristics, composed of medium sand (e.g. Murubira; Figure 2). Other BEBs have intermediate characteristics, are wide (up to 350–450 m) and have a low-gradient intertidal zone (1°) (e.g. Colares; Figure 2).

Figure 2. BEBs case study locations and photographs. For world location, please refer to Figure 1.

In southern Brazil, the microtidal (0.25 m tidal range) Patos Lagoon (Figure 1) plays a significant role in the regional sediment dynamics (Marques et al., Reference Marques, Fernandes, Moraes, Möller and Malcherek2010). Export rates of suspended sediment to the coast are up to 1.37 107 t/year of total suspended matter (Marques et al., Reference Marques, Fernandes, Moraes, Möller and Malcherek2010). The area of fresh-/salt water mixing extends 60 km from the lagoon’s entrance, which is mostly composed of fine sand in the shallower sections transitioning to silt and clay within the deeper channels (Marques et al., Reference Marques, Fernandes, Moraes, Möller and Malcherek2010). BEB morphodynamics inside this estuary are controlled largely by the river discharge, together with the wind patterns. For example, Praia do Laranjal (Figure 2), a BEB bounding the west jetty of the Patos Lagoon mouth, is highly dissipative with a low intertidal gradient (2°) and mostly wave-dominated (Hs = is up to 0.6 m, compared to the average of 1–1.5 m on the open coast) (Tozzi and Calliari, Reference Tozzi and Calliari2000), typically presenting multiple bar systems (Guedes et al., Reference Guedes, Pereira and Calliari2009).

One major issue for BEBs in Brazil, both in the North and in the South and especially with climate change, is the lack of specific tools and models with sufficient local data to help inform management.

BEBs in San Francisco Bay (USA, North America)

San Francisco Bay (Figure 1) has many BEBs, including the urban Crissy Field beach (Figure 2), located 0.5 to 2 km from the entrance on the southern side of the estuary and near the flood tide delta – a sandy BEB connected to a small marsh, facing towards the NE Pacific. Offshore waves that can propagate into the estuary typically approach from the north-west (NW) with Hs between 1 and2 m (peak periods >10s), although it is not unusual for Hs to exceed 5 m outside the mouth during storms (with Tp approaching 20 s). Ocean waves that reach Crissy Field have refracted and decayed with dominant directions from the north-NW and heights between 0.2 and0.4 m. In addition, strong sea breezes over a fetch of 2–3 km can generate high-frequency waves with similar amplitudes, and infragravity waves also occur at this beach. All waves propagate from the west causing strong eastward littoral transport. Given the BEB’s proximity to the bay entrance, the sand supply to Crissy Field is a combination of tidal and wave-driven transport, with sand originating on nearby beaches seawards of the mouth (Barnard et al., Reference Barnard, Foxgrover, Elias, Erikson, Hein, McGann, Mizell, Rosenbauer, Swarzenski, Takesue, Wong and Woodrow2013) (Figure 1). The BEB encloses a marsh and small 0.07 km2 tidal lagoon that closes intermittently, typically when the offshore wave height exceeds 3.5 m driving strong littoral drift across the lagoon mouth (Battalio et al., Reference Battalio, Danmeier and Williams2007; Hanes et al., Reference Hanes, Ward and Erikson2011; Hanes and Erikson, Reference Hanes and Erikson2013). Under low-wave conditions, the tidal currents driven by the 1–2.25 m tides can scour the inlet channel and maintain the lagoon–bay connection (Battalio et al., Reference Battalio, Danmeier and Williams2007). When open, outflow from the lagoon builds a small ebb-tide delta and disrupts longshore transport, accounting for a step in the shoreline with the BEB being narrower east of the inlet.

BEBs beyond the influence of ocean waves in San Francisco Bay are shaped by waves generated in the bay (Talke and Stacey, Reference Talke and Stacey2003), with longer period and larger waves incident from directions with longer wind fetch. Wind-generated waves can approach BEBs from multiple directions, resulting in seasonal cycles; for example, Marina Bay beach, further into the estuary, is worked by SW wind waves during winter as well as by refracted NW wind waves during summer (Accordino, Reference Accordino2022). Here, and at other BEBs in the bay, compound events result in morphological change, such as sand overwash fans and beach/marsh erosion. Increasingly BEBs are being included in designs for marsh restoration around the bay (SFEI and Baye, Reference Baye2020).

Swell-dominated BEBs in SE Australia

The coast of SE Australia is microtidal with mean tidal ranges of 1.6 m and 1.3 m for spring and neap tides, respectively. It receives swells with Hs of 1.6 m and a 10-s peak period (Short and Trenaman, Reference Short and Trenaman1992). This moderate wave climate has important repercussions for those BEBs located inside estuaries with wide mouths that allow swell penetration (Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Hughes, Short and Ranasinghe2010; Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Harley, Rahbani and Largier2020b). Indeed, the wave energy controlling BEB morphodynamics in those estuaries is dominated by swell waves under all conditions, particularly under high-energy conditions (Rahbani et al., Reference Rahbani, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Gallop, Winkler-Prins and Largier2022). The relatively recent urban development of Australian cities and the high wave energy in the open coast have led to engineering developments inside estuaries (Figure 2). For example, Sydney Airport and its commercial port were developed in Gamay estuary (Aboriginal name of Botany Bay) and the engineering works including coastal reclamation, river deviation, revetments, seawalls and dredging led to the erosion of urban BEBs that were deemed sacrificial for the sake of urban development (Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021). At the same time, some of Australia’s most expensive real estate in Sydney Harbour is protected by BEBs (Figure 2), and some of the most prominent erosion hotspots correspond to BEBs, for example Jimmy’s Beach in Port Stephens (Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Largier, Jackson and Short2020, Reference Vila-Concejo, Hughes, Short and Ranasinghe2010).

Modified BEBs in the bay of Algeciras (southern Spain, South-Western Europe)

The Bay of Algeciras (Figure 1) faces south into the Strait of Gibraltar, is microtidal (mean spring tidal range 0.98 m) and sheltered from ocean-generated waves. Waves approach mostly from the SE and have significant wave heights (Hs) less than 0.1 m, with 1.5 m Hs being exceeded several times per year (Montes, Reference Montes2021). The Rinconcillo–Palmones System (RPS) on the NW side of the bay includes an urban beach (Rinconcillo) and a sandspit (Palmones) (Figure 2). The RPS is adjacent to Bahía de Algeciras Port, one of Europe’s most important ports.

The Algeciras port interrupts the prevailing northward longshore drift and was enlarged significantly in 2000 and 2010, currently extending more than 1.5 km into the sea. This modified the local wave patterns adjacent to seawalls and jetties. BEBs are very sensitive to changes in wave direction (Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Harley, Rahbani and Largier2020b), and consequently, the RPS is now rotating counterclockwise because of these changes, except for at the spit end, which is controlled largely by currents at the mouth of the Palmones River. Since 2000, the shoreline has prograded at rates over 4 m/yr. at the southern end of the RPS (next to the port), while the northern area has eroded at a rate of around 1 m/yr (Montes, Reference Montes2021). In areas behind the narrowing beach, there is more frequent damage to private property and infrastructure during storms. As occurs at other BEBs (e.g. Costas et al., Reference Costas, Alejo, Vila-Concejo and Nombela2005; Harris et al., Reference Harris, Vila-Concejo, Austin and Benavente2020), beach recovery at RPS, which does not usually reach pre-storm state, requires several months of calm conditions (Montes, Reference Montes2021).

The RPS has a bimodal longshore drift that transports eroded sand alongshore and into deeper areas offshore (Montes, Reference Montes2021). Northward sediment transport occurs during modal conditions transporting material towards the Palmones river mouth and ebb-tidal delta. From there, sediment can be lost to deeper areas in the Bay of Algeciras as depths greater than 50 m occur very close to the coast. Southward sediment transport occurs during storms, when material is transported from the north, where an eroded dune system occurs (Figure 2) and deposited adjacent to the port. The modified sediment transport pathways, because of the port construction and later expansion, have caused the southward sediment transport mode to now become prevalent.

Artificial BEBs in the Netherlands (North-Western Europe)

Dutch estuarine and lake shores are often lined with hard (i.e. asphalt, concrete and stone) flood defences, which require regular reinforcement to withstand current and future marine processes. In recent years, the creation of artificial beaches (e.g. Prins Hendrikzanddijk; Figure 2) in front of hard defences is a paradigm shift from reinforcement of old coastal infrastructure with hard material to nature-based or hybrid solutions (Perk et al., Reference Perk, van Rijn, Koudstaal and Fordeyn2019). Despite ample experience in nourishing large volumes of sand at the wave-dominated Dutch open coast (Brand et al., Reference Brand, Ramaekers and Lodder2022), the understanding of artificial BEBs mainly stems from a “learning by doing” approach, in which continuous monitoring is key to understanding and predicting their development, ultimately enabling safety assessments.

The BEBs in the northern Netherlands are subjected to locally generated wind waves with mean Hs of 0.1 to 0.3 m, reaching up to 1.5 m. Longshore currents include relatively strong tidal currents (~0.6 m/s) which are strongly influenced by wind-driven circulation (~0.25 m/s) in the (semi-) enclosed regions (Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2023). As the nourishment sediment is often coarser than the native material (to limit erosion), the surface armouring provided by these coarser sediments causes beach response to be mostly event-driven.

The subsequent equilibration of the profile and planform shape by natural forces depends on the orientation and geometry of the beach with respect to the hydrodynamic forcing. Cross-shore profile adjustment often involves a strong retreat and steepening of the beach face, coinciding with the development of a more concave upward profile and a relatively stable platform at water depths around the depth of closure (Hallermeier, Reference Hallermeier1980, Reference Hallermeier1978), where the surface waves reach the limit of their erosive action (Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2021). In addition, longshore drift further redistributes and sorts the nourished sediment, leading to beach rotation, spit formation (10s of meters per year) and the development of cuspate shorelines (van Kouwen et al., Reference van Kouwen, Ton, Vos, Vijverberg, Reniers and Aarninkhof2023).

Challenges for conserving and managing BEBs in modified estuaries

The case studies above highlight the diversity of the environmental settings and morphodynamics of BEBs, and the many common (and unique) management issues they face worldwide. While BEBs are common globally, they are still relatively small morphological features that require the right balance of conditions to form including accommodation space, sediment supply and wave conditions to build and then maintain the beach. The case studies highlight the variety of tidal (micro- to macrotidal), wave conditions and hydrodynamic circulation that maintains BEBs. This includes swell-dominated environments such as BEBs in SE Australia (e.g. Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Hughes, Short and Ranasinghe2010; Rahbani et al., Reference Rahbani, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Gallop, Winkler-Prins and Largier2022) and BEBs near the entrance of San Francisco Bay (e.g. Hanes and Erikson, Reference Hanes and Erikson2013), through very low energy environments where the main forcing is the wind-driven waves and circulation (Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2021), to BEBs where locally generated wind waves are the main forcing (e.g. Nordstrom, Reference Nordstrom1992; Nordstrom and Jackson, Reference Nordstrom and Jackson2012; Winkler-Prins et al., Reference Winkler-Prins, Largier, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Fellowes and Rahbani2023). The role of boat wakes on BEB morphodynamics has also been acknowledged but not studied in depth (e.g. Parnell and Kofoed-Hansen, Reference Parnell and Kofoed-Hansen2001; Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, FitzGerald, Howes and Rosen2007; Bilkovic et al., Reference Bilkovic, Mitchell, Davis, Herman, Andrews, King, Mason, Tahvildari, Davis and Dixon2019).

Historically, BEBs have lacked the “status” necessary to consider protection and have often been sacrificed to development. This is obvious both in the case studies and in the published literature. The sacrificial status of BEBs is exacerbated by their sensitivity to erosion combined with slow recovery. Many BEBs exist in highly modified coastal environments with many competing stakeholders who often benefit from this lack of status (e.g. Nordstrom, Reference Nordstrom1992; Vila-Concejo et al., Reference Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Largier, Jackson and Short2020), for example private property owners wanting their own beach front often via engineered means (e.g. Alterman and Pellach, Reference Alterman and Pellach2022; Iveson and Vila-Concejo, Reference Iveson, Vila-Concejo and Low2023), coastal infrastructure altering local waves (e.g. Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021; Montes, Reference Montes2021) and dam construction changing the sediment discharge in coastal estuaries (e.g. Ly, Reference Ly1980; Addo et al., Reference Addo, Nicholls, Codjoe and Abu2018). However, as urban sprawl and gentrification reshape estuarine cities of the world, some of these often-derelict sacrificial BEBs become valued enough to be protected, such as in Gamay, Sydney (Fellowes et al., Reference Fellowes, Vila-Concejo, Gallop, Schosberg, de Staercke and Largier2021) and San Francisco Bay (SFEI and Baye, Reference Baye2020).

All case studies in this paper emphasise the lack of knowledge, classifications/models and management tools specific for BEBs (Figure 3). The management of open-coast beaches is underpinned by the knowledge on the drivers of erosion and recovery processes on beaches and the existence of classification models. Often, one-size-fits-all management guidelines such as erosion prone area mapping are developed based on open-coast processes which are, in turn, and inappropriately, applied to BEBs. While ocean waves and locally generated wind waves may be the cause of erosion under high-energy events (e.g. Gallop et al., Reference Gallop, Vila-Concejo, Fellowes, Harley, Rahbani and Largier2020b); in other cases, erosion might be caused by engineering interventions, sometimes nearby, sometimes hundreds of kilometres away, that alter the sediment pathways to the BEBs. Moreover, in the case of some Dutch artificial beaches, it is the wind-driven circulation combined with very-low-energy waves that may cause erosive processes (Ton et al., Reference Ton, Vuik and Aarninkhof2023). Another key consideration is accounting for where eroded sediment goes after being removed (such as during a storm). BEBs seldom have subtidal bars where the eroded sand can be stored; indeed, in the case studies, this is only described for some of the BEBs in Brazil. More often, the eroded sand is transported into the estuary where it can be lost to deep basins/channels or transported to shoals and/or the flood tide delta. In any case, the pathways and mechanisms by which this lost sediment may be restored to the BEBs are unknown or non-existent. The complexity of BEB morphodynamics is exacerbated further in that many have a mixed sediment composition including sand, clay, shells and often gravel (Nordstrom, Reference Nordstrom1992).

Figure 3. Conceptual diagram showing the challenges of managing BEBs in modified estuaries and a summary of the future steps arising from this paper.

Recent decades have seen the advent of “nature-based” engineering solutions for coastal protection that aim to replicate nature rather than to work against it. Our paper highlights the potential of BEBs for this approach, through their ability to protect crucial human infrastructure, in case of the Dutch artificial beaches, and through their inclusion in marsh restoration projects in the San Francisco Bay. Indeed, BEB research and management constitutes an important example of a socio-ecological challenge where the complexity of the relationships between the ecological and social realms remains unexplained (Diedrich and Tintoré, Reference Diedrich and Tintoré2012). Research has shown that comparing what people perceive with what is occurring in environmental management scenarios can help identify potential discords and, hence, shape environmentally significant behaviour (Diedrich and Tintoré, Reference Diedrich and Tintoré2012). One example of this complex socio-ecological challenge is the common disagreement between the priorities of beach managers and the needs identified through research. For example, in countries where tourism represents an important industry, management typically prioritises the socio-economic objectives (tourism) over the ecological objectives (e.g. environmental conservation) (Ariza et al., Reference Ariza, Jiménez and Sardá2008). Despite both academic circles and governance having adopted a holistic view of coastal management including both social and ecological realms, at a lower than national level, private interests and sectorial approaches make the social override of the ecosystem approach (Ariza et al., Reference Ariza, Pons and Breton2016). Recent developments of nature-based solutions (Temmerman et al., Reference Temmerman, Meire, Bouma, Herman, Ysebaert and De Vriend2013; Narayan et al., Reference Narayan, Beck, Reguero, Losada, Wesenbeeck, Pontee, Sanchirico, Ingram, Lange and Burks-Copes2016) represent opportunities to consolidate a socio-ecological approach to engage with oyster reef restoration, living shorelines and other ecosystem restoration projects in which BEBs should be considered.

Future steps in BEBs research

In this section, we present four steps to guide future research on BEBs based on our discussions above (Figure 3). The first two are focused on data acquisition, and the last two are focused on tool development.

The key to setting the future research agenda for BEBs is to first broaden our research focus to include a greater diversity of BEBs, based on the great variation in the relative importance of the many factors that drive BEB morphodynamics. For example, including different types of estuaries and bays in different parts of the world as current research is clustered sporadically around the globe (Figure 1) and tends to focus mostly on wind waves as the key driver, with little focus on swell, infragravity and tidal waves. Moreover, the influence of anthropogenic activity such as reclamation and impacts from boat wakes should also be considered. In addition, given the importance that extreme storms have on BEBs, with many BEBs typically exhibiting relict post-storm morphology (Costas et al., Reference Costas, Alejo, Vila-Concejo and Nombela2005), future research should focus on storm erosion and recovery processes, including focus on the mechanism by which BEBs recover, as many have an absence of swell waves and yet erosion may not be a one-way process. Despite such research requiring multi-year data sets (e.g. van der Lugt et al., Reference van der Lugt, Bosma, de Schipper, Price, van Maarseveen, van der Gaag, Ruessink, Reniers and Aarninkhof2023), sediment transport pathways within the estuaries and bays will clarify the relative importance of cross- and long-shore processes and how these relate to estuarine/bay circulation and geomorphology.

We recommend including more focus on mapping and monitoring BEB locations and morphology and long-term monitoring of hydrodynamic processes, drawing inspiration from approaches focused on the open coast (e.g. Luijendijk et al., Reference Luijendijk, Hagenaars, Ranasinghe, Baart, Donchyts and Aarninkhof2018; Vos et al., Reference Vos, Harley, Turner and Splinter2023). Future studies should consider BEB evolution in relation to evolution and processes of the whole estuary/bay to identify potential mitigation measures based on nature-based solutions. This should include findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data acquisition programmes that could involve citizen science programmes such as the Victorian Coastal Monitoring Programme (Ierodiaconou et al., Reference Ierodiaconou, Kennedy, Pucino, Allan, McCarroll, Ferns, Carvalho, Sorrell, Leach and Young2022) or Coast Snap (Harley and Kinsela, Reference Harley and Kinsela2022).

The new data sets will be used to develop specific tools to understand and manage BEBs. For example, new quantitative methods for morphodynamic classification that will allow direct comparison of the diverse BEBs and that can be used to underpin management and inform policy. Subsequent research should also focus on developing numerical models to predict BEB evolution at decadal scales. As anthropogenic climate change modifies our environment driving sea-level rise and changes in wave and wind climates, the ecosystem service of coastal protection provided by BEBs, as well as the other contributions to SDGs 11, 14 and 15, will become more important. Understanding BEB morphodynamics is essential for the success of ecosystem restoration practices such as ecosystem restoration or “living shorelines” that are needed to ensure the future of our coastal estuaries and the cities they serve. Long-term coastal prediction can only be meaningful for BEBs if we study their idiosyncrasies and consider them properly in our classification models and coastal management tools and interventions.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2024.7.

Data availability statement

This manuscript does not present any new data.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the NSW Government Chief Scientist and Engineer Conference Sponsorship Program for the initial workshop to develop this publication. The ICCE 2022 organisers in Sydney helped us disseminating the workshop. JLL and AVC were supported by University of Sydney partnership funding. SLG is grateful to the Marsden Fund Council from New Zealand Government funding, managed by Royal Society Te Apārangi. JWB, MAdS, TDP and MAvdL were supported by NWO grant #18035 EURECCA. J.M. was supported by contract BES-2015-073218 (MINECO ADACOSTA project, grant CGL2014-53153-R). This work is a contribution to the research group RNM-328 of the Andalusian Research Plan (PAI) and to project CRISIS (grant PID2019-109143RB-I00) funded by MICINN and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). PD is supported by REST-COAST: EU Horizon 2020 Green-Deal project. AMT was supported by Rijkswaterstaat, the Netherlands, through the LakeSIDE project. LCCP was supported by CNPq (314037/2021-7). This work is a contribution to IGCP Project 725 “Forecasting Coastal Change.” This work has received financial support from the Xunta de Galicia (Centro de Investigación de Galicia accreditation 2019-2022) and the European Union (ERDF). We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers who provided feedback that substantially improved this manuscript.

Author contribution

A.V-C., T.E.F. and S.L.G. conceived the research and organised a workshop that was attended by most other authors. A.V-C., T.E.F. and S.L.G. led the writing and figure design. All authors participated in their regional case studies and contributed to writing and editing the text and figures.

Financial support

This research was partially funded by the following sources:

  • - The NSW Government Chief Scientist and Engineer Conference Sponsorship Program

  • - University of Sydney – University of California, Davis partnership funding

  • - Marsden Fund Council from New Zealand Government funding, managed by Royal Society Te Apārangi.

  • - NWO grant #18035 EURECCA

  • - Contract BES-2015-073218 (MINECO ADACOSTA project, grant CGL2014–53153-R)

  • - Project CRISIS (grant PID2019-109143RB-I00) funded by MICINN and ERDF

  • - REST-COAST: EU Horizon 2020 Green-Deal project

  • - LakeSIDE project Rijkswaterstaat, the Netherlands

  • - CNPq (314,037/2021–7)

  • - Financial support from the Xunta de Galicia (Centro de Investigación de Galicia accreditation 2019–2022)

  • - European Union (ERDF)

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

References

Accordino, MFM (2022) Studies on an Estuarine Beach: Short- and Long-Term Morphological Change of Marina Bay Beach in San Francisco Bay. (MSc Thesis). University of California Davis.Google Scholar
Addo, KA, Nicholls, RJ, Codjoe, SNA and Abu, M (2018) A biophysical and socioeconomic review of the Volta Delta, Ghana. Journal of Coastal Research 34, 12161226. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-17-00129.1.Google Scholar
Alejo, I, Costas, S and Vila-Concejo, A (2005) Littoral evolution as a response to human action: The case of two sedimentary systems in a Galician ria. Journal of Coastal Research SI, 6469.Google Scholar
Alterman, R and Pellach, C (2022) Beach access, property rights, and social-distributive questions: A cross-National Legal Perspective of fifteen countries. Sustainability 14, 4237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074237Google Scholar
Alves, B, Angnuureng, DB, Morand, P and Almar, R (2020) A review on coastal erosion and flooding risks and best management practices in West Africa: What has been done and should be done. Journal of Coastal Conservation 24, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00755-7.Google Scholar
Angnuureng, DB, Jayson-Quashigah, P-N, Almar, R, Stieglitz, TC, Anthony, EJ, Aheto, DW and Appeaning Addo, K (2020) Application of shore-based video and unmanned aerial vehicles (drones): Complementary tools for beach studies. Remote Sensing 12, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030394.Google Scholar
Anthony, EJ, Gardel, A, Gratiot, N, Proisy, C, Allison, MA, Dolique, F and Fromard, F (2010) The Amazon-influenced muddy coast of South America: A review of mud-bank–shoreline interactions. Earth Science Reviews 103, 99121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.008.Google Scholar
Ariza, E, Jiménez, JA and Sardá, R (2008) A critical assessment of beach management on the Catalan coast. Ocean and Coastal Management 51, 141160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.02.009.Google Scholar
Ariza, E, Pons, F and Breton, F (2016) Is “socio-ecological culture” really being taken into account to manage conflicts in the coastal zone? Inputs from Spanish Mediterranean beaches. Ocean and Coastal Management 134, 183193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.10.006.Google Scholar
Barnard, PL, Foxgrover, AC, Elias, EPL, Erikson, LH, Hein, JR, McGann, M, Mizell, K, Rosenbauer, RJ, Swarzenski, PW, Takesue, RK, Wong, FL and Woodrow, DL (2013) Integration of bed characteristics, geochemical tracers, current measurements, and numerical modeling for assessing the provenance of beach sand in the San Francisco Bay coastal system. Marine Geology 345, 181206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2013.08.007.Google Scholar
Battalio, B, Danmeier, D and Williams, P (2007) Predicting closure and breaching frequencies of small tidal inlets? A quantified conceptual model In Coastal Engineering 2006. World Scientific Publishing Company, pp. 39373949. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812709554_0331.Google Scholar
Bernabeu, AM, Lersundi-Kanpistegi, AV and Vilas, F (2012 ) Gradation from oceanic to estuarine beaches in a ría environment: A case study in the Ría de Vigo. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 102103, 6069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.03.001.Google Scholar
Bilkovic, DM, Mitchell, MM, Davis, J, Herman, J, Andrews, E, King, A, Mason, P, Tahvildari, N, Davis, J and Dixon, RL (2019) Defining boat wake impacts on shoreline stability toward management and policy solutions. Ocean and Coastal Management 182, 104945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104945.Google Scholar
Boatema, MAA, Addo, KA and Mensah, A (2013) Impacts of shoreline morphological change and sea level rise on mangroves: The case of the Keta coastal zone. E3 Journal of Environmental Research and Management 4, 03590367.Google Scholar
Brand, E, Ramaekers, G and Lodder, Q (2022) Dutch experience with sand nourishments for dynamic coastline conservation – An operational overview. Ocean and Coastal Management 217, 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.106008.Google Scholar
Carrasco, AR, Ferreira, Ó, Davidson, M, Matias, A and Dias, JMA (2008) An evolutionary categorisation model for backbarrier environments. Marine Geology 251, 156166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARGEO.2008.02.009.Google Scholar
Carrasco, AR, Ferreira, Ó, Matias, A and Freire, P (2012) Natural and human-induced coastal dynamics at a back-barrier beach. Geomorphology 159, 3036.Google Scholar
Chen, Z, Wang, Z, Finlayson, B, Chen, J and Yin, D (2010) Implications of flow control by the three gorges dam on sediment and channel dynamics of the middle Yangtze (Changjiang) river, China. Geology 38, 10431046. https://doi.org/10.1130/G31271.1.Google Scholar
Costas, S, Alejo, I, Vila-Concejo, A and Nombela, MA (2005) Persistence of storm-induced morphology on a modal low-energy beach: A case study from NW-Iberian Peninsula. Marine Geology 224, 4356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2005.08.003.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, P and Brown, J (2022) Modelling the Effect of ‘Roller Dynamics’ on Storm Erosion: Sylt, North Sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10030305.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, P, Yates, ML, Suanez, S, Floc’h, F and Krämer, K (2021) Climate Change Impacts on Coastal Wave Dynamics at Vougot Beach, France. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9, 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9091009.Google Scholar
Diedrich, A and Tintoré, J (2012) Multi-method approach to exploring social–ecological dimensions in a Mediterranean Suburban Beach setting. Coastal Management 40, 301311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2012.677636.Google Scholar
Fellowes, TE, Vila-Concejo, A, Gallop, SL, Schosberg, R, de Staercke, V and Largier, JL (2021) Decadal shoreline erosion and recovery of beaches in modified and natural estuaries. Geomorphology 390, 107884. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2021.107884.Google Scholar
Freire, P, Ferreira, Ó, Taborda, R, Oliveira, F, Carrasco, AR, Silva, A, Vargas, C, Capitão, R, Fortes, C, Coli, A and Santos, J (2009) Morphodynamics of fetch-limited beaches in contrasting environments. Journal of Coastal Research 2009, 183187.Google Scholar
Freire, P, Jackson, NL and Nordstrom, KF (2013) Defining beaches and their evolutionary states in estuaries. Journal of Coastal Research 65, 482487. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI65-082.1.Google Scholar
Gallop, SL, Kennedy, DM, Loureiro, C, Naylor, LA, Muñoz-Pérez, JJ, Jackson, DWT and Fellowes, TE (2020a) Geologically controlled sandy beaches: Their geomorphology, morphodynamics and classification. Science of the Total Environment 731, 139123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139123.Google Scholar
Gallop, SL, Vila-Concejo, A, Fellowes, TE, Harley, MD, Rahbani, M and Largier, JL (2020b) Wave direction shift triggered severe erosion of beaches in estuaries and bays with limited post-storm recovery. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 45, 38543868. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5005.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Villanueva, R, Costas, S, Alejo, I and Perez-Arlucea, M (2007) Morphological changes forced by the tidal cycle in a low energy estuarine beach. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 50, 10101014.Google Scholar
Guedes, RMC, Pereira, PS and Calliari, LJ (2009) Morfodinâmica da Praia e zona de arrebentação do Cassino, RS através de técnicas de vídeo imageamento eperfis de Praia. Pesquisas em Geociências 36, 165180. https://doi.org/10.22456/1807-9806.17863.Google Scholar
Hallermeier, RJ (1980) A profile zonation for seasonal sand beaches from wave climate. Coastal Engineering 4, 253277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(80)90022-8.Google Scholar
Hallermeier, RJ (1978) Uses for a Calculated Limit Depth to Beach Erosion 1493–1512. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872621909.090.Google Scholar
Hanes, DM and Erikson, LH (2013) The significance of ultra-refracted surface gravity waves on sheltered coasts, with application to San Francisco Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 133, 129136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.08.022.Google Scholar
Hanes, DM, Ward, K and Erikson, LH (2011) Waves and tides responsible for the intermittent closure of the entrance of a small, sheltered tidal wetland at San Francisco, CA. Continental Shelf Research 31, 16821687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2011.07.004.Google Scholar
Harley, MD and Kinsela, MA (2022) CoastSnap: A global citizen science program to monitor changing coastlines. Continental Shelf Research 245, 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2022.104796.Google Scholar
Harris, DL, Vila-Concejo, A, Austin, T and Benavente, J (2020) Multi-scale morphodynamics of an estuarine beach adjacent to a flood-tide delta: Assessing decadal scale erosion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 241, 106759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106759.Google Scholar
Hegge, B, Eliot, IG and Hsu, J (1996) Sheltered Sandy beaches of southwestern Australia. Journal of Coastal Research 12, 748760.Google Scholar
Hughes, ZJ, FitzGerald, DM, Howes, NC and Rosen, PS (2007) The impact of natural waves and ferry wakes on bluff erosion and beach morphology in Boston Harbor, USA. Journal of Coastal Research SI 50, 497501.Google Scholar
Ierodiaconou, D, Kennedy, DM, Pucino, N, Allan, BM, McCarroll, RJ, Ferns, LW, Carvalho, RC, Sorrell, K, Leach, C and Young, M (2022) Citizen science unoccupied aerial vehicles: A technique for advancing coastal data acquisition for management and research. Continental Shelf Research 244, 104800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2022.104800.Google Scholar
Iveson, K and Vila-Concejo, A (2023) Beachfront protection as beach privatisation: Coastlines, properly lines and climate change adaptation in Sydney. In Low, S (ed.), Beach Politics: Illiberal Urbanism and the Privatization of Public Space. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, NL, Nordstrom, KF, Eliot, IG and Masselink, G (2002) Low energy” sandy beaches in marine and estuarine environments: A review. Geomorphology 48, 147162.Google Scholar
Kennedy, DM (2002) Estuarine beach morphology in microtidal middle harbour, Sydney. Australian Geographical Studies 40, 231240.Google Scholar
Kortatsi, BK, Young, E and Mensah-Bonsu, A (2005) Potential impact of large scale abstraction on the quality of shallow groundwater for irrigation in the Keta strip, Ghana. West African Journal of Applied Ecology 8, 10pp. https://doi.org/10.4314/wajae.v8i1.45780.Google Scholar
Largier, JL and Taggart, M (2006) Improving water quality at enclosed beaches. In A Report on the Enclosed Beach Symposium and Workshop (Clean Beaches Initiative). Bodega Bay: State of California State Water Resources Control Board Clean Beaches Initiative.Google Scholar
Luijendijk, A, Hagenaars, G, Ranasinghe, R, Baart, F, Donchyts, G and Aarninkhof, S (2018) The state of the World’s beaches. Scientific Reports 8, 6641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24630-6.Google Scholar
Ly, CK (1980) The role of the Akosombo dam on the Volta river in causing coastal erosion in central and eastern Ghana (West Africa). Marine Geology 37, 323332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(80)90108-5.Google Scholar
Marques, WC, Fernandes, EHL, Moraes, BC, Möller, OO and Malcherek, A (2010) Dynamics of the Patos lagoon coastal plume and its contribution to the deposition pattern of the southern Brazilian inner shelf. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 115, 22pp. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006190.Google Scholar
Montes, J (2021) Vulnerabilidad costera ante los procesos de erosión e inundación en el marco del cambio climático en la Bahía de Cádiz y Bahía de Algeciras. PhD Thesis, 225 p (PhD Thesis). Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.Google Scholar
Narayan, S, Beck, MW, Reguero, BG, Losada, IJ, Wesenbeeck, B v, Pontee, N, Sanchirico, JN, Ingram, JC, Lange, G-M and Burks-Copes, KA (2016) The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based Defences. PLoS One 11, e0154735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154735.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, KF (1992) Estuarine Beaches: An introduction to the physical and human factors affecting use and management of beaches in estuaries, lagoons, bays and fjords. Elsevier Science Publishers, Essex.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, KF (1980) Cyclic and Seasonal Beach response: A comparison of Oceanside and bayside beaches. Physical Geography 1, 177196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1980.10642199.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, KF and Jackson, NL (2012) Physical processes and landforms on beaches in short fetch environments in estuaries, small lakes and reservoirs: A review. Earth Science Reviews 111, 232247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2011.12.004.Google Scholar
Parnell, KE and Kofoed-Hansen, H (2001) Wakes from large high-speed ferries in confined coastal waters: Management approaches with examples from New Zealand and Denmark. Coastal Management 29, 217237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750152102044.Google Scholar
Pereira, LCC, Vila-Concejo, A and Short, AD (2016) Coastal morphodynamic processes on the macro-tidal beaches of Pará state under tidally-modulated wave conditions. In Short, AD and Klein, A (eds.), Brazilian Beach Systems. Springer, pp. 95124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30394-9_4.Google Scholar
Perk, L, van Rijn, L, Koudstaal, K and Fordeyn, J (2019) A rational method for the Design of Sand Dike/dune Systems at Sheltered Sites; Wadden Sea coast of Texel, the Netherlands. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090324.Google Scholar
Rahbani, M, Vila-Concejo, A, Fellowes, TE, Gallop, SL, Winkler-Prins, L and Largier, JL (2022) Spatial patterns in wave signatures on beaches in estuaries and bays. Geomorphology 398, 108070. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2021.108070.Google Scholar
SFEI and Baye, P (2020) New Life for Eroding Shorelines: Beach and Marsh Edge Change in the San Francisco Estuary (No. SFEI Publication #984). San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Short, AD (2006) Australian beach systems - Nature and distribution. Journal of Coastal Research 22, 1127. https://doi.org/10.2112/05a-0002.1.Google Scholar
Short, AD and Trenaman, NL (1992) Wave climate of the Sydney region, an energetic and highly variable ocean wave regime. Marine and Freshwater Research 43, 765791. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9920765.Google Scholar
Short, AD and Woodroffe, CD (2009) The Coast of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talke, SA and Stacey, MT (2003) The influence of oceanic swell on flows over an estuarine intertidal mudflat in San Francisco Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58, 541554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00132-X.Google Scholar
Temmerman, S, Meire, P, Bouma, TJ, Herman, PMJ, Ysebaert, T and De Vriend, HJ (2013) Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504, 7983. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12859.Google Scholar
Ton, AM, Vuik, V and Aarninkhof, SGJ (2023) Longshore sediment transport by large-scale lake circulations at low-energy, non-tidal beaches: A field and model study. Coastal Engineering 180, 104268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104268.Google Scholar
Ton, AM, Vuik, V and Aarninkhof, SGJ (2021) Sandy beaches in low-energy, non-tidal environments: Linking morphological development to hydrodynamic forcing. Geomorphology 374, 107522. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2020.107522.Google Scholar
Tozzi, HADM and Calliari, LJ (2000) Morfodinâmica da Praia do Cassino, RS. Pesquisas Em Geociências 27, 2942. https://doi.org/10.22456/1807-9806.20176.Google Scholar
Travers, A (2007) Low-energy beach morphology with respect to physical setting: A case study from Cockburn sound, southwestern Australia. Journal of Coastal Research 23, 429444.Google Scholar
Travers, A, Eliot, MJ, Eliot, IG and Jendrzejczak, M (2010) Sheltered sandy beaches of southwestern Australia. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 346, 2342. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp346.3.Google Scholar
UN (2015) THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development (WWW Document). U. N. Sustain. Dev. Goals. Available at https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed 21 August 2023).Google Scholar
van der Lugt, MA, Bosma, JW, de Schipper, MA, Price, TD, van Maarseveen, MCG, van der Gaag, P, Ruessink, BG, Reniers, AJHM and Aarninkhof, SGJ (2023) Measurements of morphodynamics of a sheltered beach along the Dutch Wadden Sea. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 123. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-345.Google Scholar
van Kouwen, NC, Ton, AM, Vos, SE, Vijverberg, T, Reniers, AJHM and Aarninkhof, SGJ (2023) Quantifying spit growth and its hydrodynamic drivers in wind-dominated lake environments. Geomorphology 437, 108799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108799.Google Scholar
Vila-Concejo, A, Gallop, SL and Largier, JL (2020) Sandy beaches in estuaries and bays. In Jackson, DWT and Short, AD (eds.), Sandy Beach Morphodynamics. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102927-5.00015-1.Google Scholar
Vila-Concejo, A, Hughes, MG, Short, AD and Ranasinghe, RR (2010) Estuarine shoreline processes in a dynamic low-energy system. Ocean Dynamics 60, 285298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0273-7.Google Scholar
Vos, K, Harley, MD, Turner, IL and Splinter, KD (2023) Pacific shoreline erosion and accretion patterns controlled by El Niño/southern oscillation. Nature Geoscience 16, 140146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01117-8.Google Scholar
Winkler-Prins, L, Largier, JL, Vila-Concejo, A, Gallop, SL, Fellowes, TE and Rahbani, M (2023) Components and tidal modulation of the wave field in a semi-enclosed shallow bay. Estuaries and Coasts 46, 645659.Google Scholar
Wu, S, Cheng, H, Xu, YJ, Li, J and Zheng, S (2016) Decadal changes in bathymetry of the Yangtze River estuary: Human impacts and potential saltwater intrusion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 182, 158169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.002.Google Scholar
Wu, Z, Milliman, JD, Zhao, D, Cao, Z, Zhou, J and Zhou, C (2018) Geomorphologic changes in the lower Pearl River Delta, 1850–2015, largely due to human activity. Geomorphology 314, 4254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.05.001.Google Scholar
Yu, F, Switzer, AD, Lau, AYA, Yeung, HYE, Chik, SW, Chiu, HC, Huang, Z and Pile, J (2013) A comparison of the post-storm recovery of two sandy beaches on Hong Kong Island, southern China. Quaternary International 304, 163175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.04.002.Google Scholar
Zhang, H, Chen, X and Luo, Y (2016 ) An overview of ecohydrology of the Yellow River delta wetland. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16, 3944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.10.001.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. World map of BEBs in the peer-reviewed literature (black dots) and case studies presented in this paper (blue dots).

Figure 1

Figure 2. BEBs case study locations and photographs. For world location, please refer to Figure 1.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Conceptual diagram showing the challenges of managing BEBs in modified estuaries and a summary of the future steps arising from this paper.

Author comment: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Brad Murray,

Enclosed, please find our contribution entitled “Morphodynamics and Management Challenges for Beaches in Modified Estuaries and Enclosed Bays,” to which I am the lead and corresponding author.

In this paper, we present, as per your request, a comprehensive review and perspectives on the subject of beaches in estuaries and bays (BEBs). Our work delves into recent research drawn from six case studies spanning the Americas, Europe, and Africa. By contextualizing this research within the existing literature on BEBs, we have achieved a unique perspective that sheds light on the intricate challenges and complexities involved in conserving and managing these delicate ecosystems. We believe this perspective offers valuable insights to the field. Furthermore, our paper outlines our vision for the trajectory of future research in this domain. We delineate a series of progressive steps that should serve as guideposts for upcoming research on BEBs, aiming to facilitate a more holistic understanding of these environments.

We believe that our submission is well-suited for consideration in the journal Coastal Futures. Writing this paper has been a collaborative effort involving a diverse consortium of authors. With this publication, we aspire to catalyse knowledge dissemination and to initiate future collaborations.

We thank you for your time and consideration of our manuscript.

Recommendation: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R0/PR2

Comments

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to our journal. I apologize profusely for the delay in getting this decision to you. I now have received 2 reviews of your manuscript. Both reviewers found this review is important and interesting, which could fill the knowledge gaps in BEBs. However, they also expressed some concerns regarding more case studies and other problems. On the basis of the referees' reports, I recommend ‘Major revision’ and I encourage the authors to revise your manuscript before it could be accepted.

Decision: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R1/PR4

Comments

Please find enclosed the revised version of our manuscript “Morphodynamics and Management Challenges for Beaches in Modified Estuaries and Enclosed Bays,” to which I am the lead and corresponding author.

We have implemented most of the reviews and suggestions by the two reviewers and the editors and the manuscript has improved substantially. As per request of one of the reviewers, we have added a new author to our extensive list of contributors who has contributed a case study from China. We need to add this author to the author list, can you please let us know how to do that?

We thank you for your time and consideration of our manuscript.

Sincerely,

Ana Vila-Concejo

Recommendation: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R1/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R2/PR7

Comments

Dear Professor Tom Spencer and Dr Yining Chen,

Please find enclosed the revised version of our manuscript “Morphodynamics and Management Challenges for Beaches in Modified Estuaries and Enclosed Bays,” to which I am the lead and corresponding author.

First, I would like to present my apologies for the lateness of this review. I was first on holidays (Austral summer) and then had surgery followed by my intense teaching period. This delay has given us plenty of time to discuss and ponder the suggested review.

There was only one suggestion requesting a section detailing the theories and general/science research outcome. We have carefully pondered this suggestion, and after reviewing the Introduction carefully, we agree that we already touch upon the most significant points and previous studies. One of the co-authors suggested creating a Galloway diagram without realising that I had published such diagram in Vila-Concejo et al. (2020), and that the figure was cited in the first paragraph of our manuscript (that is the citation in Line 93). After much consideration, we cannot see how we could create an additional section without duplicating what is already in the introduction and published in the review Chapter that I led in 2020. We have therefore added a sentence to the Introduction (lines 136-138) stating: “Vila-Concejo et al. (2020) provide a complete overview on the geological setting and oceanographic conditions that determine where BEBs form and what they look like.”

We thank you for your time and consideration of our manuscript.

Sincerely,

Ana Vila-Concejo

Recommendation: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R2/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Morphodynamics and management challenges for beaches in modified estuaries and bays — R2/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.