Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:55:56.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-glacial Foraminifera of the incised Yangtze paleo-valley and paleoenvironmental implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

Xue Ke
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]
Baohua Li*
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]
Zongyan Zhang
Affiliation:
Wuhan Center, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430223, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉 〈[email protected]
Yi Wei
Affiliation:
Safety Engineering College, North China Institute of Science & Technology, Langfang 065210, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]
Fei Hu
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]
Dongwen Fan
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]
Li Sun
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]
Jianlei Xie
Affiliation:
Geological environment research, Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey, Shanghai 200072, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]
Junjie Yu
Affiliation:
Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]
Huazhou Yao
Affiliation:
Wuhan Center, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430223, Peoples Republic of China 〈[email protected]〉 〈[email protected]
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Three gravity cores (LZK1, ZKA4, and CSJA6) from the incised Yangtze paleo-valley comprise a thick sequence of the post-glacial deposit. Nineteen genera (26 species) of the benthic foraminifers are described from these cores, with detailed down-core foraminiferal variations to investigate their paleoenvironmental implications. Three foraminiferal assemblages are recognized for the lower, middle, and upper parts of the cores respectively. The lower part is dominated by Ammonia beccarii var. and Florilus decorus with lower abundance and diversity. In the middle part, the foraminifers are abundant and diverse, dominated by both Ammonia beccarii var. and Elphidium advenum. Cavarotalia annectens, Pararotalia nipponica, and porcellaneous benthic foraminiferal forms are always present, sometimes abundant. The upper part is characterized by the Ammonia beccarii-Elphidium magellanicum assemblage, except for the Core ZKA4, which is barren of foraminifers in this interval. AMS 14C dates and foraminiferal assemblages both confirm that the transgression-regression sequence in these cores belongs to the “Ammonia transgression” during the Holocene. In addition to documenting the post-glacial sea-level fluctuations, the benthic foraminifers also reflect a warmer climate during the early–middle Holocene. The foraminiferal differences among the three cores can be used to interpret the influence of seawater during the post-glacial sea-level fluctuations. The area in the vicinity of Core ZKA4 was affected by marine water only during the middle Holocene, which was much shorter than the areas of the other cores.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 

Introduction

Sediments of the coastal plains and the continental shelves record the dynamic history of the shoreline migration caused by the ~120 m sea-level changes during the Quaternary (Fleming et al., Reference Fleming, Johnston, Zwartz, Yokoyama, Lambeck and Chappell1998). Through regional micropaleontological and stratigraphic comparisons in the sedimentary cores from East China, four major marine transgressions have been recognized during the late Pleistocene. The last one, post-glacial “Ammonia transgression”, is the most notable and widespread along the coastline (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Min, Bian and Chen1981). Numerous boreholes have been drilled and studied in various parts of East China over the last several decades (Lin, Reference Lin1979; Wang and Min, Reference Wang and Min1979; Li et al., Reference Li, Bian and Wang1988; Zhu and Lin, Reference Zhu and Lin1990; Chen and Stanley, Reference Chen and Stanley1995; Stanley and Chen, Reference Stanley and Chen1996; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Yu, Tang, Zhao, Wang and Huang2002; Shu et al., Reference Shu, Xiao, Zhao, Zhang, Cheng and Li2010; Xiong et al., Reference Xiong, Hou, Li and Chen2010; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhuang, Saito, Chen, Zhan and Wang2012). However, introduction of old carbon and reworking resulted in less-reliable dates, which has hampered further study on the glacial-interglacial environmental changes in East China (Stanley and Chen, Reference Stanley and Chen2000).

Due to the lower last glacial sea level and excavation of previous marine sediments, the deeply incised Yangtze paleo-valley received a significant amount of post-glacial deposits, up to 80 m thick in this region (Li and Wang, Reference Li and Wang1998; Li et al., Reference Li, Chen, Zhang, Yang and Fan2000), which provides an excellent opportunity for reconstructing the post-glacial environmental changes in East China.

In this study, benthic foraminiferal assemblages are reported from three cores of the incised Yangtze paleo-valley. The foraminiferal fauna can be correlated with records of previous studies in the Yangtze Delta region. Based on reliable AMS 14C dates, the high-resolution foraminiferal data presented here provide new evidence for post-glacial variations in climate and depositional environments.

Geological setting

The Yangtze Delta has been developing in a sedimentary basin formed in association with the Quaternary neotectonic orogeny in East China (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Li, Xu, Li and Zhang1997; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Li, Tao and Xie2008). The Quaternary stratigraphic sequence of the Yangtze Delta is up to 300 m thick, consisting of the Haimen Formation (lower Pleistocene), Qidong Formation (Middle Pleistocene), Kunshan Formation (MIS 5), Gehu Formation (MIS 3), and Rudong Formation (Holocene) (Wu and Li, Reference Wu and Li1987). The Rudong Formation is represented by fluvial, estuary, shallow marine, and deltaic facies, and can be divided into three members: the lower member is composed of gray silt and grayish black slit clay; the middle is composed of gray or grayish black silt, fine-grained sand, and slit clay; and the upper member is composed of grayish yellow clay, clayey silt, and gray silt (Wu and Li, Reference Wu and Li1987).

The Yangtze Delta can be subdivided into three units: the incised paleo-valley and the northern and southern flanks (Fig. 1; Li et al., Reference Li, Chen, Zhang, Yang and Fan2000). The incised paleo-valley is an area where the estuary migrated, which contains several subdeltas and estuary bars. With rising sea level, the post-glacial marine transgression resulted in filling the incised valley and formation of the river channel, floodplain-estuary, estuarine-shallow marine, and deltaic sedimentary facies (Li et al., Reference Li, Chen, Zhang, Yang and Fan2000). Since the middle Holocene, the delta has been developing mainly in the incised valley, prograding to the east and southeast (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Sun, Zhang and Fan2002; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhan, Long, Saito, Gao, Wu, Li and Zhao2013).

Figure 1 Location map showing the cores studied in the paleo-incised Yangtze Valley (range of paleo-incised Yangtze Valley after Li et al., Reference Li, Chen, Zhang, Yang and Fan2000).

Materials and methods

The upper 42.2 m, 86 m, and 67 m of deposits in cores ZKA4, LZK1, and CSJA6, respectively, comprise the Rudong Formation. The sedimentary sequence varies from gravelly sand, coarse-grained sand in the basal part, fining-upward to the main part of gray, grayish yellow, brown, or slate gray silt, silty clay, and clayey silt. Planar bedding, lenticular bedding, and micro-erosional surfaces are locally present (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Variation of Lithology, benthic foraminiferal abundance, diversity, and H(s), planktonic foraminiferal content in the cores ZKA4, LZK1, and CSJA6, with reconstructed paleogeographic curve. Solid line represents BF abundance (/50 g); dashed line represents PF abundance (/50 g).

We analyzed 455 samples that were collected from the three cores at 10–50 cm intervals. All samples were air-dried and weighed, and soaked in water for one week. Diluted H2O2 (5%) was added to help disaggregate the indurated samples when needed. After the samples were washed through a 74μm sieve, the coarse fraction was oven dried at 60°C and stored for foraminiferal studies. All the foraminiferal specimens were picked, identified, and counted. The Shannon index (Hs) was calculated to evaluate the variation of benthic foraminiferal complex diversity (Shannon, Reference Shannon1948).

AMS 14C dating of Core ZKA4 and Core CSJA6 was performed on the plant debris, charcoal, or the whole sediments either at Beta Analytic Inc. or Peking University (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Hu, Yang, Zhang, Jiang, Ke and Lao2014; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Yu, Jiang, Zhang, Lao, Zhao and Wei2015; Table 1).

Table 1 AMS 14C dates of Core ZKA4 and CSJA6 (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Hu, Yang, Zhang, Jiang, Ke and Lao2014; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Yu, Jiang, Zhang, Lao, Zhao and Wei2015).

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

All cores examined in this study are from the paleo-valley of the Yangtze Delta, including one core from Shanghai (LZK1) and the other two from Jiangsu Province (ZKA4 and CSJA6; Fig. 1). Core LZK1 (31°20′N, 121°50′E) is just 0.25 m above the China National Vertical Datum (CNVD, 1985); cores ZKA4 (32°22′N, 119°37′E) and CSJA6 (32°05′N, 121°17′E) are 6 m and 4 m above the CNVD, respectively. All described specimens are housed at the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (NIGP), Chinese Academy of Science. Referred type specimens are housed at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. (USNM), CC=Cushman collection; MO=mollusk collection; The Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), HA=Heron-Allen slide collection, ZF=Zoology: Foraminifera; Geological Museum, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (LSUGM); and Tongji University, Shanghai (TJU), H=Hai (Marine in phonetics Chinese).

Systematic paleontology

The classification of the order Foraminiferida follows that given by He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965), Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988), and Loeblich and Tappen (Reference Loeblich and Tappen1988).

Order Foraminiferida Eichwald, Reference Eichwald1830

Suborder Miliolina Delage and Hérouard, Reference Delage and Hérouard1896

Family Miliolidae Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1839

Genus Quinqueloculina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1826

Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1839a

Figure 3.1–3.3

Figure 3 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Quinqueloculina lamarckiana: (1a) front view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K2–036; (1b) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K2–036; (2) rear view, LZK1, depth 31.9–32.0 m, Reg. No. K2–033; (3) front view, LZK1, depth 31.5–31.6 m, Reg. No. K2–032. (4–6) Quinqueloculina venusta: (4) front view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–004; (5) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–006 (6) rear view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–005. (7, 8) Spiroloculina exmia: (7) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–020; (8) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–016. (9, 10) Spiroloculina jucunda: (9) side view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K3–021; (10) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–022. (11) Lagena hispida, side view, CSJA6, depth 17.2–17.3 m, Reg. No. K2–007.

1839a Quinqueloculina lamackiana Reference d’Orbignyd’Orbigny, p. 189, pl. 11, figs. 14, 15.

1884 Quinqueloculina cuvieriana; Reference BradyBrady, p. 162, pl. 5, figs. 1–3.

1929 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 26, pl. 2, figs. 6a–6c.

1965 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 61, pl. 2, figs. 1a–1c.

1965 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana minuscule Reference He, Hu and WangHo, Hu, and Wang; He, Hu, and Wang, p. 61, pl. 2, figs. 2a–2c.

1988 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 127, pl. 13, figs. 10–12.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in the world oceans; Recent coastal water and Quaternary sediments of Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988); Pliocene in Taiwan, China (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965); Tropical Pacific (11–174 m; Jones, Reference Jones1994).

Remarks

This species was recognized by the broad elliptic shape and the sharply keeled periphery of the test. In this study, a wide variety was observed from nearly 0.1 mm (Fig. 3.1a, 3.1b) to 1 mm (Fig. 3.2, 3.3). The third chambers of the front view in the adult forms usually elevated as a keel, while juvenile forms have the convex, round ridge for this chamber. He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965) erected the smaller specimens to a new subspecies, which is considered here as a juvenile form of Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny (Reference d’Orbigny1839a). Cushman (Reference Cushman1929) pointed that the species has an elliptical neck with a narrow elongate tooth. He (1965) reported a bifurcate top of the tooth. The specimens observed in this study have a narrow elongate tooth with or without a much shorter neck.

Quinqueloculina venusta Karrer, Reference Karrer1868

Figure 3.4–3.6

1868 Quinqueloculina venusta Reference KarrerKarrer, p. 147, pl. 2, fig. 6.

1917 Quinqueloculina venusta; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 45, pl. 11, fig. 1.

1957 Quinqueloculina lamarckiana; Reference Todd and BronnimannTodd and Bronnimann, p. 27, pl. 3, fig.12.

1965 Quinqueloculina venusta; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 60, pl. 2, figs. 5a–5c.

1990 Quinqueloculina venusta; Reference UjiiéUjiié, p, 15, pl. 3, figs. 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b.

Occurrence

Pliocene in Japan; Miocene in Romania and Yugoslavia; Recent in Pacific and Atlantic oceans; Jiangsu and Shanghai, China (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965).

Remarks

Cushman (Reference Cushman1917) reported that this species has a short contracted neck with thickened lip and a short simple tooth. He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965) presented specimens with slightly bifurcate top of the tooth. In this study, no definite lip can be observed. Due to its elongated test and wide short tooth, the specimens of Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny (Reference d’Orbigny1839a) described by Todd and Bronnimann (Reference Todd and Bronnimann1957) are referred to Quinqueloculina venusta Karrer (Reference Karrer1868).

Genus Spiroloculina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1826

Spiroloculina exmia Cushman, Reference Cushman1922a

Figure 3.7, 3.8

1922a Spiroloculina exmia Reference CushmanCushman, p. 61, pl. 11, fig. 2.

1929 Spiroloculina exmia; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 42, pl. 8, figs. 7a, 7b.

1965 Spiroloculina exmia; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 72, pl. 4, figs. 5a, 5b.

Occurrence

Recent tropical Pacific; Jiangsu, China (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965).

Remarks

This species possesses rapidly increased and tapered chambers toward the apertural end. He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965) reported that the early chambers are inclined and convex. The specimens reported here have a comparatively shorter neck.

Spiroloculina laevigata Cushman and Todd, Reference Cushman and Todd1944

Figure 4.1, 4.2

Figure 4 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Spiroloculina laevigata: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–018; (2) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–019. (3, 4) Lagena spicata: (3) side view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K2–005; (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.8–13.9 m, Reg. No. K2–003. (5) Lagena substriata: side view, LZK1, depth 9.5–9.6 m, Reg. No. K2–008. (6, 7) Fissurina laevigata: (6) side view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–080; (7) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K1–079. (8a, 8b) Fissurina orbignyana: (8a) side view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–083; (8b) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K1–083. (9a, 9b) Globulina minuta: (9a) side view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–087; (9b) apertural view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–087. (10) Bulmina marginata, side view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–010.

1944 Spiroloculina laevigata Reference Cushman and ToddCushman and Todd, p. 67, pl. 9, figs. 26–29.

1965 Spiroloculina laevigata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 72, pl. 4, figs. 7a, 7b.

1988 Spiroloculina laevigata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 126, pl. 12, fig. 17.

Holotype

(USNM CC 41730 ) in National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Occurrence

Recent Pacific; Jiangsu, China (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965).

Remarks

This species is close to Spiroloculina exmia Cushman (Reference Cushman1922a). Compared with the latter, the test of this species is more symmetric, and the chambers keep the same width from the base to the apertural end. The specimens illustrated here are more elongate than the holotype.

Suborder Lagenina Lankester, Reference Lankester1885

Family Nodosariidae Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1838

Genus Lagena Walker and Jacob, Reference Walker and Jacob1798

Lagena hispida Reuss, Reference Reuss1858

Figure 3.11

1858 Lagena hispida Reference ReussReuss, p. 434.

1884 Lagena hispida; Reference BradyBrady, p. 450, pl. 57, figs. 1–4.

1965 Lagena hispida; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 77, pl. 5, fig. 12.

1988 Lagena hispida; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 135, pl. 16, fig. 12.

1990 Lagena hispida; Reference UjiiéUjiié, p, 18, pl. 5, fig. 2.

Occurrence

Oligocene in Germany; Quaternary in Denmark; Pliocene in U.S.A. and Japan; Recent in Pacific and Atlantic oceans; Yellow Sea and shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

The wall of this species is ornamented with fine spines. According to Brady (Reference Brady1884), the test varies from flask-shaped to subglobular, and in some specimens, the basal end is drawn out into a stout spine, which was also reported by Ujiié (Reference Ujiié1990). The stout spine out of the base was described, but not observed in the plates illustrated by He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965). The specimens here and reported by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) showed no spine for the subglobular test.

Lagena spicata Cushman and McCulloch, Reference Cushman and McCulloch1950

Figure 4.3, 4.4

1950 Lagena sulcata var. spicata Reference Cushman and McCullochCushman and McCulloch, p. 360, pl. 48, figs. 3–7.

1965 Lagena striata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 76, pl. 5, fig. 11.

1988 Lagena spicata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 135, pl. 16, figs. 9, 10.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in world oceans; seldom found in shelf sediments of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

There is a considerable amount of variation in this species. Cushman and McCulloch (Reference Cushman and McCulloch1950) erected this species from Lagena sulcata in having the basal end drawn out into a stout spine while the latter has coarse longitudinal costae, extending to the base and forming numerous spines. The specimens reported here and by Wang et al (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) have stronger stout spines than those from He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965). Circular costae can be observed on the neck of specimens in this study and in those of Wang et al (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988). The specimens in this study vary from flask-shaped to pyriform.

Lagena substriata Williamson, Reference Williamson1858

Figure 4.5

1858 Lagena vulgaris var. substriata Reference WilliamsonWilliamson, p. 7, pl. 1, fig. 14.

1913 Lagena striata var. substriata; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 20, pl. 8, figs. 1–3.

1923 Lagena substriata; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 56, pl. 10, fig.11.

1965 Lagena substriata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 77, pl. 5, figs. 7, 8.

1988 Lagena substriata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 134, pl. 16, fig. 17.

1990 Lagena substriata; Reference UjiiéUjiié, p. 19, pl. 5, fig. 7.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in coastal water of the world oceans; inner and middle shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

This species is characterized by the costulate surface extending up on to the neck, often to its end, and usually spirally arranged on the neck (Cushman, Reference Cushman1913). He (1965) and Ujiié (Reference Ujiié1990) reported specimens similar to those illustrated here. The test is elongate compared with Lagena spicata Cushman and McCulloch (Reference Cushman and McCulloch1950).

Family Polymorphinidae d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1839a

Genus Fissurina Reuss, Reference Reuss1850

Fissurina laevigata Reuss, Reference Reuss1850

Figure 4.6, 4.7

1850 Fissurina laevigata Reference ReussReuss, p. 366, pl. 46, fig. 1.

1965 Fissurina laevigata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 79, pl. 5, fig. 14.

1988 Fissurina laevigata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 144, pl. 19, fig. 13.

1990 Fissurina sp.; Reference UjiiéUjiié, p. 23, pl. 7, fig. 13.

1990 Fissurina periperforata; Reference UjiiéUjiié, p. 25, pl. 8, fig. 10.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in coastal water of the world oceans; shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988); 4–5715 m (Jones, Reference Jones1994).

Remarks

The species has a compressed chamber with single-keel periphery. The Fissurina laevigata specimen illustrated by Ujiié (Reference Ujiié1990) is different from the present species by lacking the distinct peripheral keel and having a smaller aperture. Fissurina sp. and Fissurina periperforata Ujiié (Reference Ujiié1990) are similar to the present species, although Fissurina periperforata Ujiié (Reference Ujiié1990) has a more elongate form.

Fissurina orbignyana Seguenza, Reference Seguenza1862

Figure 4.8a, 4.8b

1862 Fissurina orbignyana Reference SeguenzaSeguenza, p. 66, pl. 2, figs. 25, 26.

1971 Fissurina orbignyana; Reference MurrayMurray, p. 99, pl., 40, figs. 1–5.

1988 Fissurina orbignyana; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 144, pl. 19, figs. 6, 7.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in coastal water of the world oceans; Recent Pacific, Atlantic, and Gulf of Mexico; shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

This species is distinguished by its three-keel periphery and the most-prominent central one.

Genus Globulina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1839a

Globulina minuta (Roemer, Reference Roemer1838)

Figure 4.9a, 4.9b

1838 Polymorphina minuta Reference RoemerRoemer, p. 386, pl. 3, fig. 35.

1863 Polymorphina sororia Reference ReussReuss, p. 71, fig. 16.

1930 Globulina minuta; Reference Cushman and OzawaCushman and Ozawa, p. 83, pl. 20, figs. 3, 4.

1965 Globulina minuta; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 81, pl. 5, fig. 19.

Occurrence

Early Pleistocene in Italy; inner shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

This species is distinguished by the fusiform test and fewer chambers. The last chamber is much bigger than others. Polymorhina sororia Reuss (Reference Reuss1863) was considered a junior synonym of Globulina minuta (Roemer, Reference Roemer1838) by Cushman and Ozawa (Reference Cushman and Ozawa1930). The specimen reported here is comparatively acute for both the basal and apertural ends, with a tiny acicular spine developed in the basal end.

Suborder Rotaliina Delage and Hérouard, Reference Delage and Hérouard1896

Superfamily Buliminacea Jones in Griffith and Henfrey, Reference Griffith and Henfrey1875

Family Buliminidae Jones in Griffith and Henfrey, Reference Griffith and Henfrey1875

Genus Bulimina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1826

Bulimina marginata d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1826

Figure 4.10

1826 Bulimina marginata Reference d’Orbignyd’Orbigny, p. 269, pl. 12, figs. 10–12.

1922b Bulimina marginata; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 91, pl. 21, figs. 4, 5.

1965 Bulimina marginata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 84, pl. 6, fig. 7.

1965 Bulimina marginospinata ovata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 85 pl. 6, fig. 8.

1988 Bulimina marginata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 144, pl. 21, fig. 6, pl. 34, figs. 11–15.

Occurrence

Widely distributed in coastal water of the world oceans; inner and middle shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

This species has a great number of varieties for the juvenile and adult forms. Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) conducted a morphometric analysis of 200 tests from the surface sediments of the East China Sea, and displayed a concentrated and continuous distribution for tests of different length and breadth, which suggests that these short oval or/and high fusiform forms belong to the same species. The specimen illustrated here has a shorter test, resembling the juvenile form of Bulimina marginata d’Orbigny (Reference d’Orbigny1826). The rim of the early chambers has a series of short blunt spines, while the later chamber has a series of crenulations.

Family Bolivinitidae Cushman, Reference Cushman1927

Genus Bolivina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1839b

Bolivina robusta Brady, Reference Brady1881

Figure 5.1, 5.2

Figure 5 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Bolivina robusta: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.2–13.3 m, Reg. No. K1–023; (2) edge view. CSJA6, depth 13.2–13.3 m, Reg. No. K1–025. (3, 4) Brizalina striatula: (3) side view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–034; (4) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K4–009. (5, 6) Epistominella naraensis: (5) ventral view, right-coiled, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–067; (6) edge view, left-coiled, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–069. (7–9) Rosalina bradyi: (7) ventral view, LZK1, depth 30.7–30.8 m, Reg. No. K3–012; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 30.8–30.9 m, Reg. No. K4–038; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K3–013. (10–12) Buccella frigida: (10) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K1–036; (11) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 36.2–36.3 m, Reg. No. K4–008; (12) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K1–033.

1881 Bolivina robusta Reference BradyBrady, p. 57.

1922b Bolivina robusta var.; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 46, pl. 6, fig. 6.

1965 Bolivina robusta; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 87, pl. 6, fig. 13.

1965 Bolivina cochei; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 88, pl. 6, figs. 16, 17.

1965 Bolivina obscura; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 88, pl. 7, figs. 1–3.

1988 Bolivina robusta; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 147, pl. 34, figs. 1–5.

1994 Bolivina robusta; Reference JonesJones, pl. 53, figs. 7–9.

Holotype

Syntype (BMNH ZF1194) from Challenger Sta. 191A , Kai Island, Central Pacific (1061 m); (BMNH ZF1195) from Challenger Sta. 174B, Fiji, Pacific (2041 m).

Occurrence

Recent coastal water and Quaternary sediments of Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea and South China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988); 13–3475 m (Jones, Reference Jones1994).

Remarks

This species has great variability in morphology. Wang et al (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) reported the megalospheric and microspheric tests. The specimens illustrated here are elongated cuneiform with blunt basal end, resembling a microspheric test. It was also reported that a long sharp spine may exist for this species (Jones, Reference Jones1994, p. 58, pl. 53, figs. 8, 9).

Superfamily Discorbacea Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1838

Family Discorbidae Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1838

Genus Rosalina d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1826

Rosalina bradyi (Cushman, Reference Cushman1915)

Figure 5.7–5.9

1915 Discobis globularis var. bradyi Reference CushmanCushman, p. 12, pl. 8, fig. 1.

1931 Discorbis globularis; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 22, pl. 4, figs. 9a–9c.

1960 Rosalina bradyi; Reference BarkerBarker, pl. 86, fig. 8.

1965 Rosalina bradyi; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 89, pl. 8, figs. 5a–5c, 6a–6c.

1988 Rosalina bradyi; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 156, pl. 23, fig. 12.

Holotype

USNM 9027 from Alabatross station D4863 in 194 m off Japan (Cushman, Reference Cushman1915, pl. 8, fig. 1).

Occurrence

Neogene to Recent in Japan; Recent Pacific; East China Sea, South China Sea; inner shelf in East China Sea (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

The test of this species is compressed. The specimens illustrated here clearly show the wall difference between the coarse-perforated dorsal and fine-perforated ventral sides (Figure 5.8). The umbilical lobe of specimens is scattered and thickened.

Genus Buccella Andersen, Reference Andersen1952

Buccella frigida (Cushman, Reference Cushman1922c)

Figure 5.10–5.12

1922c Pulvinulina frigida Reference CushmanCushman, p. 144.

1931 Eponides frigida; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 45.

1952 Bucella frigida; Reference AndersenAnderson, p. 144, figs. 4–6.

1965 Buccella frigida; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 93, pl. 8, figs. 4a–4c.

1988 Buccella frigida; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 157, pl. 23, figs. 3, 4.

Holotype

Lectotype (USNM CC 3032) from station 5, bay between Black Whale and Olasks Harbors, east coast of Hudson Bay at 18 m water depth (Cushman, Reference Cushman1931).

Occurrence

Recent Arctic, Okhotsk Sea, Japan Sea, Bering Sea, Pacific, northern Atlantic; Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, northwest of East China Sea, and the South China Sea; Quaternary in Jiangsu Province (He et al.,Reference He, Hu and Wang1965, Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988); 34–402 m (Jones, Reference Jones1994).

Remarks

The dorsal side of this species is filled with an amorphous material radiating out from the umbilical region. These materials usually distribute along the sutures. Less amorphous material may be observed for the later sutures. Supplementary apertures lie at the ends of the sutures, forming bigger pores and usually covered by the same amorphous material (Fig. 5.11). The amorphous material may be more around the supplementary aperture than the central umbilicus area. A slightly keeled periphery was also observed (NHM ZF 2220–2221). However, the keel is indistinct in the specimens of this study.

Genus Helenina Saunders, Reference Saunders1961

Helenina anderseni (Warren, Reference Warren1957)

Figure 6.4–6.6

Figure 6 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Cancris auriculus: (1) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–044; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–046; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–045. (4–6) Helenina anderseni: (4) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–029; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K4–009; (6) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–030. (7, 8) Hyalinea balthica: (7) side view, CSJA6, depth 35.2–35.3 m, Reg. No. K4–023; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K4–024; (9–11) Cibicides lobatulus: (9) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 11.8–11.9 m, Reg. No. K1–047; (10) edge view, CSJA6, depth 17.2–17.3 m, Reg. No. K1–049; (11) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–048.

1957 Pseudoeponides anderseni Reference WarrenWarren, p. 39, pl. 4, figs. 12–15.

1957 Helenina anderseni; Reference SaundersSaunders, p. 374.

1961 Helenina anderseni; Reference SaundersSaunders, p. 148.

1988 Helenina anderseni; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 158, pl. 24, figs. 1, 2.

2011 Helenina anderseni; Reference Gennari, Rosenberg, Spezzaferri, Berger, Fleitmann, Preusser, Al-Shanti and MatterGennari et al., p. 249, pl. 1, figs. 1–6, pl. 2, figs. 1–4.

Holotype

(LSUGM 2009) from wet marsh on the northeast side of Crosscut Canal at Bay Pomme d’Or (Warren, Reference Warren1957, pl. 4, fig. 12–15).

Occurrence

Widely distributed in low-salinity coastal water; inner shelf of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Warren (Reference Warren1957) erected this species, which usually has supplementary apertures within the deeply incised sutures dorsally near the junction of spiral and septal sutures, and within the incised sutures ventrally near their middle points. Gennari et al. (Reference Gennari, Rosenberg, Spezzaferri, Berger, Fleitmann, Preusser, Al-Shanti and Matter2011) reported a large number of morphological varieties, especially for different shapes of the sutures. The specimens here are more inflated. The supplementary apertures of specimens can be observed on the middle part of the septal sutures instead of near the junction, and are much narrower, showing a deeply incised slit. The supplementary apertures reported by Gennari (2011) are wider near umbilical region, and even triangular.

Family Cibicididae Cushman, Reference Cushman1927

Genus Cibicides de Montfort, Reference de Montfort1808

Cibicides lobatulus (Walker and Jacob, Reference Walker and Jacob1798)

Figure 6.9–6.11

1798 Nautilus lobatulus Reference Walker and JacobWalker and Jacob, p. 642, pl. 14, fig. 36.

1884 Truncatulina lobatulus (Walker and Jacob); Reference BradyBrady, pl. 92, fig.10, pl. 93, figs. 1, 4, 5.

1931 Cibicides lobatula; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 118, pl. 21, figs. 3a–3c.

1978 Cibicides lobatulus; Reference Cheng and ZhengCheng and Zheng, p. 232, pl. 21, figs. 2a–2c.

1988 Cibicides lobatulus; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 162, pl. 25, figs. 12–14.

Holotype

(BMNH ZF2532) from Challenger Station 172, Friendly Islands, Pacific (33 m ) (Brady, Reference Brady1884, pl. 92, fig. 10).

Occurrence

Widely distributed in coastal water of the world oceans; middle and outer shelf of East China Sea and South China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Large variations in morphology are assigned to this species. Specimens with keeled periphery or depressed umbilicus were reported by Brady (Reference Brady1884). The specimens here are more inflated with a round periphery, while those of Cushman (Reference Cushman1931) and Wang (1988) have compressed chambers with obviously lobulated periphery.

Superfamily Rotaliacea Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1839

Family Rotaliidae Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1839

Genus Ammonia Brünnich Reference Brünnich1772

Ammonia pauciloculata (Phleger and Parker, Reference Phleger and Parker1951)

Figure 7.1–7.3

Figure 7 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Ammonia pauciloculata: (1) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–003; (2) edge view, LZK1, depth 27.7–27.8 m, Reg. No. K4–005; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–004. (4–6) Ammonia compressiuscula: (4) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K1–018; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K1–019; (6) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 21.5–21.6 m, Reg. No. K1–017. (7–9) Ammonia ketienziensis: (7) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K4–035; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K4–034; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K4–033. (10–12) Ammonia beccarii: (10) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–007; (11) edge view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–009; (12) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–008.

1951 “Rotalia” pauciloculata Reference Phleger and ParkerPhleger and Parker, p. 23, pl, 12, figs. 8, 9.

1965 Ammonia nantongensis Reference He, Hu and WangHo, Hu, and Wang; He, Hu, and Wang, p. 104, pl. 11, figs. 5a–5c.

1988 Ammonia pauciloculata; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 166, pl. 27, figs. 8–10.

Holotype

(Sample 1) from Core 498 (Phleger and Parker, Reference Phleger and Parker1951, pl. 12, figs. 8, 9).

Occurrence

Gulf of Mexico; coastal water in China seas, inner shelf of East China Sea; Quaternary coastal sediments in China; 0–50m (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Supplementary apertures that are perpendicular to the middle of the septal sutures on the ventral side, as noted by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988), can be observed in the holotype illustrated by Phleger and Parker (Reference Phleger and Parker1951). The specimens in this study and Ammonia nantongensis Ho, Hu, and Wang (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965) also show this morphological character, while the subspecies Ammonia pauciloculata major described by He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965) cannot be assigned to this species because it has a large number of chambers for the last whorl and straight sutures.

Genus Cavarotalia Müller-Merz, Reference Müller-Merz1980

Cavarotalia annectens (Parker and Jones, Reference Parker and Jones1865)

Figure 8.1–8.3

Figure 8 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Cavarotalia annectens: (1) ventral view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K1–004; (2) edge view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K4–001; (3) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K1–005. (4, 5) Cribrononion subincertum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, K4–012; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–013. (6, 7) Cribrononion vitreum: (6) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–014; (7) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K4–015. (8–10) Elphidiella kiangsuensis: (8) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–026; (9) edge view, CSJA6, depth 5.5–5.6 m, Reg. No. K1–055. (10) side view (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Li, Wang, Lan and Ding2014). (11, 12) Elphidium advenum: (11) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–056; (12) edge view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–057.

1865 Rotalia beccarii var. annectens Reference Parker and JonesParker and Jones, p. 387, pl. 19, figs. 11a–11c.

1940 Streblus annectens; Reference IshizakiIshizaki, p. 49, pl. 3, figs. 12a, 12b, 13a, 13b.

1965 Ammonia annectens; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 103, pl. 11, figs. 3a–3c.

1980 Cavarotalia annectens; Reference Müller-MerzMüller-Merz, p. 37, figs. 26, 27.

1988 Cavarotalia annectens; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 168, pl. 27, figs. 12, 13.

Occurrence

Miocene in India; shallow water in Pacific and Indian oceans; shelf of China seas; Quaternary in Taiwan, China; Quaternary coastal sediments in East China; 0–50 m, East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Deeply incised, fishbone-like sutures taper from the middle to the periphery in ventral side. The large transparent umbilical plug also distinguishes it from Ammonia.

Family Elphidiidae Galloway, Reference Galloway1933

Genus Cribrononion Thalmann, Reference Thalmann1947

Cribrononion subincertum (Asano, Reference Asano1950)

Figure 8.4, 8.5

1950 Elphidium subincertum Reference AsanoAsano, p. 10, figs. 56, 57.

1965 Cribrononion gnythosuturatum; Reference He, Hu and WangHe et al., p. 115, pl. 14, figs. 5a, 5b.

1965 Cribrononion sp.; Reference He, Hu and WangHe et al., p. 115, pl. 14, figs. 3a, 3b.

1978 Cribrononion incertum; Reference Zheng, Cheng, Wang and FuZheng et al., p. 58, pl. 8, figs. 15, 16.

1980a Cribrononion subincertum; Reference Wang, Min and BianWang et al., pl. 9, figs. 22, 23.

1988 Cribrononion subincertum; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 168, pl. 28, figs. 1–4.

Occurrence

Shallow water in high-latitude North Pacific and North Atlantic; Recent and Quaternary coastal sediments in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea; 0–50m in East China Sea; 10–30% salinity, coastal water off Jiangsu and Zhejiang, China (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

The specimens in this study possess the long slit sutures. Test slightly compressed, as show in Figure 8.4, or inflated (Fig. 8.5). Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) pointed out that the juvenile forms are often more inflated than the adult. It was reported that the aperture is made up of a row of pores (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965). Due to the granular cover on the base of the apertural face, the pores cannot be observed in the specimens illustrated here.

Cribrononion vitreum Wang and Gu, Reference Wang and Gu1980

Figure 8.6, 8.7

1980 Cribrononion vitreum;Reference WangWang and Gu, pl. 16, fig. 13.

1988 Cribrononion vitreum; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 169, pl. 27, figs. 14, 15.

2012 Cribrononion vitreum; Reference Li, Wang, Kong, Lin, Li and ZhangLi et al., pl. 2, figs. 11, 12.

Holotype

(TJU H1560) from Core Lp25, depth 24–35.91 m, east coast of Liaohe estuary, Panshan, Liaoning Province (Wang and Gu, Reference Wang and Gu1980, pl. 16, fig. 13).

Occurrence

Recent and Quaternary coastal sediments of Bohai Sea, East China Sea, and Yellow Sea; inner shelf and estuary in East China Sea, 10–30% salinity (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) pointed out that there are several pores on the middle of the aperture face, which also has been observed by Li et al. (Reference Li, Wang, Kong, Lin, Li and Zhang2012). The specimens illustrated here have lost the last chamber. But the aperture, a row of slits, is the same as those described by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988). The pores on the aperture face in this study cannot be observed.

Genus Elphidiella Cushman, Reference Cushman1936a

Elphidiella kiangsuensis (Ho, Hu, and Wang, Reference He, Hu and Wang1965)

Figure 8.8–8.10

1965 Cribrononion kiangsuensis Ho, Hu, and Wang; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 114, pl. 13, fig. 13.

1978 Elphidiella kiangsuensis; Reference Zheng, Cheng, Wang and FuZheng et al., p. 60, pl. 9, figs. 1, 13.

1988 Elphidiella kiangsuensis; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 171, pl. 29, figs. 12, 13.

2014 Elphidiella kiangsuensis; Reference Guo, Li, Wang, Lan and DingGuo et al., pl. 1, figs. 5, 6.

Holotype

(NIGP 14685) from Binhai, Jiangsu, China (He et al., pl. 13, fig. 13).

Description

Test planspiral, entirely involute, oval in side view, bilaterally symmetrical, sides nearly parallel in edge view; periphery rounded; chambers 8–10 in the last whorl, increasing gradually, gently inflated; umbilicus flattened; sutures curved, nearly flush with the surface, often consisting of two rows of small round pores; wall smooth, translucent, finely perforate; oval apertural face; aperture comb-like on the base of the face.

Occurrence

Quaternary and Recent coastal sediments in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

The pores in the sutures of specimens in this study are less distinct, the same as shown by He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965). The suture pores are more clear in the specimens (Fig. 8.10) reported by Guo et al. (Reference Guo, Li, Wang, Lan and Ding2014), in which two rows of pores form a wide suture zone. Depressed slit-like sutures also were reported in the East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Genus Elphidium de Montfort, Reference de Montfort1808

Elphidium hispidulum Cushman, Reference Cushman1936b

Figure 9.1, 9.2

Figure 9 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Elphidium hispidulum: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–060; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K4–029. (3) Elphidium limpidum: side view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–062. (4, 5) Elphidium magellanicum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 2.2–2.3 m, Reg. No. K1–065; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K1–066. (6, 7) Protelphidium tuberculatum: (6) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.5–13.6 m, Reg. No. K2–022; (7) edge view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K2–023. (8, 9) Pseudononionella variabilis: (8) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m Reg. No. K2–024; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 36.8–36.9 m, Reg. No. K2–025. (10–12) Florilus scaphus: (10) ventral view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–076; (11) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–078; (12) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K4–022.

1936b Elphidium hispidulum Reference CushmanCushman, p. 83, pl. 14, figs. 13a, 13b.

1978 Elphidium hispidulum; Reference Zheng, Cheng, Wang and FuZheng et al., p. 55, pl. 7, fig. 9.

1988 Elphidium hispidulum; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 170, pl. 29, figs. 16, 17.

Holotype

(USNM CC 23028) from 7–26 m, Albany Passage, Australia (Cushman, Reference Cushman1936b, pl. 14, figs. 13a, 13b).

Occurrence

Southern Australia and Gulf of Paria; surface sediments in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea.

Remarks

The bosses in the umbilicus are partially separated for specimens in this study. A row of low papillae in the early portion of the sutures is more distinct than those of Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) and He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965).

Elphidium magellanicum Heron-Allen and Earland, Reference Heron-Allen and Earland1932

Figure 9.4, 9.5

1932 Elphidium (Polystomella) magellanicum Reference Heron-Allen and EarlandHeron-Allen and Earland, p. 440, pl. 16, figs. 26–28.

1978 Elphidium magellanicum; Reference Zheng, Cheng, Wang and FuZheng et al., p. 56, pl. 8, fig. 3.

1978 Elphidiononion magellanicum; Reference Banner and CulverBanner and Culver, pl. 9, fig. 16.

1980b Elphidium magellanicum; Reference Wang, Min and GaoWang et al., p. 98, pl. 11, fig. 16.

1988 “Elphidium magellanicum”; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 169, pl. 28, figs. 5, 11–13.

Holotype

(BMNH HA508-90) from WS 89, depth 23 m, eastern entrance to the Straits of Magellan (Heron-Allen and Earland, pl. 16, figs. 26–28).

Occurrence

Coastal water and Quaternary coastal sediments in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988) pointed out that the specimens in the East China Sea are different from those of the Atlantic samples by a much inflated test. The specimens in this study have a less lobulate peripheral edge, close to that reported by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988). The umbilicus and the base of the apetural face are filled with fine granular matter in this study, but the granular region is much narrower and smaller than those described by Heron-Allen and Earland (Reference Heron-Allen and Earland1932).

Genus Protelphidium Haynes, Reference Haynes1956

Protelphidium tuberculatum (d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1846)

Figure 9.6, 9.7

1846 Nonion tuberculatum Reference d’Orbignyd’Orbigny, p. 108, pl. 5, figs. 13, 14.

1939 Nonion tuberculatum; Reference CushmanCushman, p. 13, pl. 3, figs. 12, 16, 17.

1980a Protelphidium tuberculatum; Wang and Gu, p. 60, pl. 16, fig. 7.

1988 Protelphidium tuberculatum; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 171, pl. 29, figs. 14, 15.

Occurrence

Coastal water and Quaternary coastal sediments in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea; Yellow Sea coastal cold water; inner shelf and Late Pleistocene outer shelf sediments in East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

This species differs from Elphidium magellanicum by a small elevated umbilicus filled with a few tuberculations, and evident slit sutures. It was reported that the early whorls in this species usually appears yellow in China seas (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Superfamily Cassidulinacea d’Orbigny, Reference d’Orbigny1839a

Family Caucasinidae Bykova, Reference Bykova1959

Genus Fursenkoina Loeblich and Tappen, Reference Loeblich and Tappen1961

Fursenkoina pauciloculata (Brady, Reference Brady1884)

Figure 10.1, 10.2

Figure 10 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Fursenkoina pauciloculata: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–086; (2) apertural view, LZK1, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K3–023. (3, 4) Nonion akitense: (3) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, K2–011; (4) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–012. (5–7) Nonionella jacksonensis: (5) ventral view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K2–015; (6) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K2–013; (7) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K2–014. (8, 9) Pullenia quinqueloba: (8) side view, ZKA4, depth 41.1–41.2 m, Reg. No. K2–027; (9) edge view, LZK1, depth 4.5–4.6 m, Reg. No. K2–028. (10, 11) Gyroidina nippoinca: (10) ventral view, LZK1, depth 19.8–19.9 m, Reg. No. K1–089; (11a) edge view, LZK1, depth 5.1–5.2 m, Reg. No. K1–090; (11b) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 5.1–5.2 m, Reg. No. K1–090.

1884 Virgulina pauciloculata Reference BradyBrady, p. 414, pl. 52, figs. 4, 5.

1965 Fursenkoina pauciloculata; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 84, pl. 6, fig. 7.

1994 Virgulina pauciloculata Brady; Reference JonesJones, pl. 52, figs. 4, 5.

Occurrence

Recent South Pacific; Jiangsu, China (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965).

Remarks

The shorter and wider specimens (Fig. 10.1) reported here are the same as those described by He et al. (Reference He, Hu and Wang1965); the elongate specimen (Fig. 10.2) is referred to those specimens described by Brady (Reference Brady1884), but lacks the short spine in the earliest chamber.

Superfamily Nonionacea Schultze, Reference Schultze1854

Family Nonionidae Schultze, Reference Schultze1854

Genus Nonionella Cushman, Reference Cushman1926

Nonionella jacksonensis Cushman, Reference Cushman1933

Figure 10.5, 10.6

1933 Nonionella jacksonensis Reference CushmanCushman, p. 10, pl. 1, figs. 23a–23c.

1965 Nonionella jacksonensis; Reference He, Hu and WangHe, Hu, and Wang, p. 119, pl. 14, figs. 11a, 11b.

1988 Nonionella jacksonensis; Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and ChenWang et al., p. 176, pl. 32, figs. 1, 2.

Holotype

(USNM MO 371678) from Cooper marl, 1.6 km (1 mile) south of Moncks Corner, Berkeley Co., S.C. (Cushman, Reference Cushman1933, pl. 1, figs. 23a–23c).

Occurrence

Upper Eocene in U.S.A.; surface shelf and Quaternary coastal sediments in Yellow Sea and East China Sea; common in inner shelf and estuary of East China Sea (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Min, Bian, Zheng, Cheng and Chen1988).

Remarks

It was reported that there is a slit-like aperture on the base of last chamber (He et al., Reference He, Hu and Wang1965). The aperture of specimens presented here cannot be observed due to the granular cover on the base of the apertural face. The latter chambers in this study increase slowly, comparatively.

Results

Foraminiferal specimens were only found from the depth intervals of 3–42.07 m, 1.8–65.7 m, and 0.6–46.1 m in cores ZKA4, CSJA6 and LZK1, respectively (Fig. 2). The foraminiferal abundance in Core ZKA4 is generally lower than those of the other two cores (Fig. 2). In cores CSJA6 and LZK1, the average abundance of benthic foraminifers is 50 and 33 specimens /50 g, respectively. In Core LZK1, the highest benthic foraminiferal abundance is 718 specimens /50 g at 13 m depth, while in Core CSJA6, the highest of benthic foraminiferal abundance is 385 specimens /50 g at 46.6 m depth. Most of the foraminifers are benthic forms, with planktonic types being <5% in each core.

Benthic foraminiferal species diversity trend is similar to the abundance trend, varying from a low of 20 in Core ZKA4 to 35–46 in cores CSJA6 and LZK1. The middle and upper parts of the Rudong Formation in the three cores have higher foraminiferal abundance and diversity. Of the benthic foraminifers, 115 species in 53 genera have been identified, most of which are hyaline tests. The porcellaneous forms are frequent in some layers, and arenaceous forms are occasionally observed.

The dominant species in the three cores is Ammonia beccarii var., which approaches 50% on average. Other species, such as Ammonia compressiusula, Ammonia ketienziensis, Ammonia pauciloculata, Cribrononion subincertum, Elphidium advenum, Elphidium magellanicum, and Florilus decorus are also present at high frequency. Some species, such as Hazawaia nipponica and Melonis barleeanum, are seldom found (Fig. 11).

Discussion

Based on the occurrences of benthic foraminifers in the cores, three assemblages can be recognized (Fig. 2). In Core CSJA6, for example, the three foraminiferal assemblages are, in ascending order, the Ammonia beccarii-Florilus decorus assemblage, the Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage, and the Ammonia beccarii-Elphidium magellanicum assemblage (Figs. 2, 12).

The lower parts of the cores (below 42.07 m, 34 m, and 52.9 m for ZKA4, LZK1, and CSJA6, respectively) are characterized by lower foraminiferal abundance and diversity, dominated by Ammonia beccarii var. and Florilus decorus. In addition, Cribrononion subincertum, Elphidium advenum, and Elphidium magellanicum occur in moderate abundance, indicating a hypohaline, low-temperature water environment. The Ammonia beccarii-Florilus decorus assemblage is comparable with the Ammonia beccarii assemblage of the lower part of Bed H I -1 in the South Yellow Sea shelf, both of which have low foraminiferal abundance and diversity (Yang, Reference Yang1985, Reference Yang1993; Yang and Lin, Reference Yang and Lin1996).

The foraminifers are abundant and more diverse in the middle parts of the cores (depth intervals of 3–42.07 m, 12–34 m, and 19.9–52.9 m for ZKA4, LZK1, and CSJA6, respectively), where the shallow-water species Ammoina beccarii var. and Elphidium advenum are dominant. In this interval, the porcellaneous benthic foraminfers are often relatively common. Cavarotalia annectens and Pararotalia nipponica are relatively abundant. For example, the Cavarotalia annectens content is up to 18% at the depth 32.2–32.3 m in Core CSJA6. The benthic foraminifers were typical of warm-water forms. This is corroborated by the relative large size of the foraminiferal tests, which also suggests an influence of high energy water. The Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage can be correlated with the Ammonia beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage of the upper part of Shanghai Formation in the Shanghai region (Wang and Min, Reference Wang and Min1979). It is also comparable with the Ammonia beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage of the middle part of the Beijian Formation in the Pearl River Mouth Basin (Yang and Lin, Reference Yang and Lin1996).

The foraminifers observed at the upper part of Core ZKA4 do not indicate a direct influence of sea water in this area. The other two cores, however, suggest that their vicinities were under continued influence of marine environment. The upper parts of LZK1 and CSJA6 have a relatively low benthic foraminiferal abundance and diversity, dominated by Ammoina beccarii var. and Elphidium magellanicum. The assemblage also includes Ammonia compressiuscula, Ammonia ketienziensis angulata, Ammonia pauciloculata, Cribrononion subincertum and Elphidium advenum. The Ammonia beccarii-Elphidium magellanicum assemblage may be correlated to the Ammoina keitienziensis-Astrononion tasmensis assemblage and Elphidium magellanicum assemblage of the upper part of Bed H I -1 in South Yellow Sea Shelf (Yang, Reference Yang1985, Reference Yang1993; Yang and Lin, Reference Yang and Lin1996) based on the common presence of Ammonia beccarii, Elphidium magellanicum, and Ammonia ketienziensis angulata in each fauna.

AMS 14C dating suggests that the studied sediments of the three cores accumulated during the post-glacial period. The three benthic foraminiferal assemblages can be correlated with the faunas of this region in previous work (Min and Wang, Reference Min and Wang1979), which documented the post-glacial transgresstion-regression history, referred to as the “Ammonia transgression” during the Holocene (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Min, Bian and Chen1981).

The Ammonia beccarii-Florilus decorus assemblage points to a weak marine transgression during the early post-glacial period. The Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage, however, suggests the strongest transgression during the early–middle Holocene, when the warm and relatively deep sea water invaded this region. The Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium magellanicum assemblage corresponds to the late Holocene marine regression, an episode of global sea level drop. Due to the difference in the locations of the studied cores, the results suggest that Core ZKA4 is first out of the influence of the marine water during the late middle Holocene, when the other two cores were still of marine environment during the late Holocene.

Conclusions

The occurrence of abundant foraminifers in three cores drilled in the incised Yangtze paleo-valley revealed post-glacial environmental changes. Three benthic foraminiferal assemblages are present, including the Ammonia beccari-Florilus decorus assemblage during the early post-glacial period, the Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium advenum assemblage during the early-middle Holocene, and the Ammoina beccarii-Elphidium magellanicum assemblage in the late Holocene. The assemblages can be correlated with the “Ammonia marine transgression” during the Holocene (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Min, Bian and Chen1981). The early–middle Holocene benthic foraminiferal assemblage also implies a warm environment because of the occurrence of abundant Cavarotalia annectens and Pararotalia nipponica, and porcellaneous forms. The difference in foraminiferal abundance and diversity suggests that the cores in the modern coastal area are influenced by ocean water since the early post-glacial period, while the upstream core witnessed the transgression only during the middle Holocene. With the global sea level drop, the ocean water retreated from the west since the late middle Holocene and gradually formed the estuary environment in the Yangtze Delta.

Figure 11 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu; Core ZKA4, Yangzhou, Jiangsu; and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. (1–3) Hazawaia nipponica: (1) ventral view, LZK1, depth 26.9–27.0 m, Reg. No. K1–092; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–094; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 21.5–21.6 m, Reg. No. K1–093. (4, 5) Melonis barleeanum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–009; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–010.

Figure 12 Down-core variations of main species and assemblages of benthic foraminifers in Core CSJA6.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. S. Stukins for arranging the observation on the foraminiferal collections at the Natural History Museum (London). We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive reviews, which considerably improved the manuscript. This study was supported by the NSFC (Grant No. 41276044), CAS Strategic Priority Project (Grant No. XDPB05), and the Foundation of Geological Survey of China (Nos. GZH201200506, 1212011120173, and 121201004000150021).

References

Andersen, H.V., 1952, Buccella, a new genus of the rotailed Foraminifera: Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, v. 42, p. 143151.Google Scholar
Asano, K., 1950–1953, in Stach, L.W., compl. & ed., Illustrated Catalogue of Japanese Tertiary Smaller Foraminifera, Parts 1–15, Suppl. 1: Tokyo, Kurogane Printing Co. & Hosokawa Printing Co., 183 p.Google Scholar
Banner, F.D., and Culver, S.J., 1978, Quaternary Haynesina n. gen. and Paleogene Protelphidium Haynes; their morphology, affinities and distribution: Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 8, p. 177207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R.W., 1960, Taxonomic notes on the species figured by H.B. Brady in his report on the Foraminifera dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Accompanied by a reproduction of Brady’s plates: Special Publications, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, no. 9, 238 p.Google Scholar
Brady, H.B., 1881, Notes of some of the Reticularian Rhizopoda od the “Challenger” Expedition. III: Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, n.s., v. 21, no. 81, p. 3171.Google Scholar
Brady, H.B., 1884, Report on the foraminifera dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876: Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S Challenger During the Years 1873–76, Zoology, v. 9, p. 1814.Google Scholar
Brünnich, M.T., 1772, M.T. Brünnich Zoologiae fundamenta. Grunde I Dyrelaeren: Hafniae et Lipsiae, Apud Frider. Christ. Pelt., 254 p.Google Scholar
Bykova, N.K., 1959, K voprosu o zakonomernostyakh filogeneticheskogo razvitiya foraminifer v usloviyakh periodicheski izmenyayushcheysya sredy (On the question of conformity in phylogenetic development of the foraminifera under conditions of a recurrent variable environment): Voprosy Paleobilogii i Biostratigrafii, Trudy—Sessii Vsesoyuznogo Paleontologicheskogo Obshchestva, Moscow, p. 63–75. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Chen, Z.Y., and Stanley, D.J., 1995, Quaternary subsidence and river channel migration in the Yangtze Delta Plain, Eastern China: Journal of Coastal Research, v. 11, p. 927945.Google Scholar
Cheng, T.C., and Zheng, S.Y., 1978, The recent foraminifera of the Xisha Islands, Guangdong Province, China (I): Studia Marina Sinica, v. 12, p. 149266. [in Chinese with part in English]Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1913, A monograph of the Foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 71, pt. 3, 110 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1915, A monograph of the Foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 71, pt. 5, 75 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1917, A monograph of the Foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 71, pt. 6, p. 198.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1922a, Shallow-Water Foraminifera of the Tortugas Region: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, no. 311, v. 17, p. 175.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1922b, The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean: United States Notional Museum Bulletin, v. 104, pt. 2, 137 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1922c, Results of the Hudson Bay expedition, 1920, I—The foraminifera: Contributions to Canadian Biology, 1921, Biological Board of Canada, no. 9, p. 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1923, The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 104, pt. 4, 178 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1926, Foraminifera of the typical Monterey of California: Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, v. 2, p. 5369.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1927, An outline of a re-classification of the foraminifera: Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, no. 3, 1–105.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1929, The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 104, pt. 6, 100 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1931, The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 104, pt. 8, 144 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1933, Some new recent foraminifera from the tropical Pacific: Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, v. 9, p. 121.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1936a, Some new species of Elphidium and related genera: Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, v. 12, p. 7889.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1936b, New genera and species of the families Vemeuillinidae and Valvulinidae and of the subfamily Virgulininae: Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminifera Research Special Publication, v. 12, p. 8384.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1939, A monograph of the foraminiferal family Nonionidae: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 191, p. 1100.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., and McCulloch, I., 1950, Some Lagenidae in the collections of the Allan Hancock foundation: Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, v. 6, p. 295364.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A., and Ozawa, Y., 1930, A Monograph of the foraminiferal family Polymorphinidae recent and fossil: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 77, pt. 6, p. 1–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J.A., and Todd, R., 1944, The genus Spiroculina and its species: Cushman Laboratory of Foraminiferal Research Special Publication, no. 11, 82 p.Google Scholar
de Montfort, P.D., 1808, Conchyliologie Systématique et Classification Méthodique des Coquilles: Paris, F. Schoell, 410 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1826, Tableau méthodique de la classe des Céphalopodes: Annales des sciences naturelles, ser. 1, v. 7, p. 245314.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1839a, Foraminifères, in de la Sagra, R., Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de l'íle de Cuba: Paris, Arthus Bertrand, v. 6, 224 p.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1839b, Voyage dans l’Amérique mérigionate-Foraminifères, v. 5, pt. 5: Paris and Strasbourg, P. Bertrand, 86 p.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1846, Foraminifères fossiles du Bassin Tertiaire de Vienne: Paris, Gide et Comp, 312 p.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., and Hérouard, E., 1896, Truité de Zoologie Concrète, v. 1, La Cellule et les Protozoaires: Paris, Schleicher Frères, p. 120124.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1838, Über dem blossen Auge unsichtbare Kalkthierchen und Kieselthierchen als Hauptbestandtheile der Kreidegebirge: Bericht über die zu Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, v. 1838, p. 192200.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1839, Über die Bildung der kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch unsichtbare Organismen: Physikalische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1838 (1840: separate 1839), p. 59–147.Google Scholar
Eichwald, C.E., von, 1830, Zoologia Specialis, v. 2: Vilnae, D.E. Eichwaldus, 323 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, K., Johnston, P., Zwartz, D., Yokoyama, Y., Lambeck, K., and Chappell, J., 1998, Refining the eustatic sea-level curve since the Last Glacial Maximum using far- and intermediate-field sites: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 163, p. 327342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J.J., 1933, A Manual of Foraminifera: Bloomington, Indiana, Principia Press, 483 p.Google Scholar
Gennari, G., Rosenberg, T., Spezzaferri, S., Berger, J.P., Fleitmann, D., Preusser, F., Al-Shanti, M., and Matter, A., 2011, Faunal evidence of a Holocene pluvial phase in Southern Arabia with remarks on the morphological variability of Helenina Anderseni : Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 41, p. 248259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J.W., and Henfrey, A., 1875, The Micrographic Dictionary, v. 1: London, van Voorst, 845 p.Google Scholar
Guo, Q.M., Li, B.H., Wang, W.M., Lan, X., and Ding, J.L., 2014, Age and paleoenvironment of the Oyster Layer in the Bailian Lake, Jiangsu Province: Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, v. 31, p. 147153. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Guo, Y.G., Li, Y.C., Xu, D.Y., Li, X.Q., and Zhang, X.H., 1997, Tectonic evolution of Yellow Sea and East China Sea continental shelf and adjacent areas: Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, v. 17, p. 111. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Haynes, J.R., 1956, Certain smaller British Paleocene foraminifera, Part 1. Nonionidae, Chilostomellidae, Epistominidae, Discorbidae, Amphisteginidae, Globigerinidae, Globorotaliidae and Gümbelinidae: Contributions of the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, v. 7, p. 79101.Google Scholar
He, Y., Hu, L.Y., and Wang, K.L., 1965, The Quaternary foraminifera of the east Jiangsu Province, China: Memoir of Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, v. no. 4, p. 51162. [in Chinese and Russian]Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E., and Earland, A., 1932, Foraminifera Part 1: the ice-free area of the Falkland Islands and adjacent seas: Discovery Report, v. 4, p. 291460.Google Scholar
Ishizaki, K., 1940, On Streblus schroeterianus (Parker et Jones) and allied species: Taiwan Tigaku Kizi, v. 11, p. 4961.Google Scholar
Jones, R.W., 1994, The Challenger Foraminifera: Oxford, New York, Tokyo, Oxford University Press, 149 p.Google Scholar
Karrer, E., 1868, Die Miocene Foraminiferen-fauna von Kostej im Banat: Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, v. 58, p. 121193.Google Scholar
Lankester, E.R., 1885, Protozoa, in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., Philadelphia, J. M. Stoddard Co., Ltd., v, 19, p. 830866.Google Scholar
Li, B.H., Wang, X.Y., Kong, X.M., Lin, C.M., Li, Y.L., and Zhang, X., 2012, Post-glacial foraminiferal record of the Southern Qiantang River Estuary and its paleoenvironmental implications: Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, v. 29, p. 121129. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Li, C.X., and Wang, P.X, 1998, Stratigraphy in the Estuary of Yangtze Delta During the Late Quaternary: Beijing, Science Press, 222 p. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Li, C.X., Chen, Q.Q., Zhang, J.Q., Yang, S.Y., and Fan, D.D., 2000, Stratigraphy and palaeoenvironmental changes in the Yangtze Delta during the late Quaternary: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 18, p. 453459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C.X., Wang, P.X., Sun, H., Zhang, J.Q., and Fan, D.D., 2002, Late Quaternary incised-valley fill of the Yangtze delta (China): its stratigraphic framework and evolution: Sedimentary Geology, v. 152, p. 133158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G.Z., Bian, Y.H., and Wang, P.X., 1988, Holocene marine transgression and its micropaleontological characteristics in the north-eastern waters of Beibu Gulf: Tropic Oceanology, v. 2, p. 6370. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Lin, J., 1979, The Quaternary foraminifera in Eastern Hebei: Journal of the Institute of Geology, v. 1, p. 6185. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R., and Tappen, H., 1961, Suprageneric classification of the Rhizopodea: Journal of Paleontology, v. 35, p. 245330.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R., and Tappen, H., 1988, Foraminiferal Genera and Their Classification: New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 970 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Yu, J.J., Jiang, R., Zhang, Z.Y., Lao, J.X., Zhao, L., and Wei, N.Y., 2015, Grain-size analysis of the Quaternary sediments in Borehole ZKA4 in the Yangtze River Delta and its paleoenvironment and paleoclimate implications: Journal of Stratigraphy, v. 39, p. 423432. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Min, Q.B., and Wang, P.X., 1979, Quaternary transgressions in Shanghai region: Journal of Tongji University, p. 109128. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Müller-Merz, E., 1980, Strukturanalyse ausgewählter rotaloider Foraminiferen (Structural analysis of selected rotaliid Foraminifera): Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen, v. 101, p. 570.Google Scholar
Murray, J.W., 1971, An Atlas of British Recent Foraminiferids: London, Heinemann Educational Books, 244 p.Google Scholar
Parker, W.K., and Jones, T.R., 1865, On some foraminifera from the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean, including Davis Straits and Baffin’s Bay: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, v. 155, p. 325442.Google Scholar
Phleger, F.B., and Parker, F.L., 1951, Ecology of Foraminifera Northwest Gulf of Mexico, Part 2: Foraminifera Species: Geological Society of America, Memoir, v. 46, p. 164.Google Scholar
Reuss, A.E., 1850, Neue Foraminiferen aus den Schichten des österreichischen Tertiärbeckens: Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschafter, v. 1, p. 365390.Google Scholar
Reuss, A.E., 1858, Ueber die Foraminiferen von Pietzpuhl: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 10, p. 433439.Google Scholar
Reuss, A.E., 1863, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der tertiären Foraminiferen-Fauna (Zweite Folge), Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, v. 48, p. 3671.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.A., 1838, Cephalopoden des Nord-Deutschen tertiären Meersandes: Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-Kunde, p. 381394.Google Scholar
Saunders, J.B., 1957, Emendation of the foraminiferal genus Palmerinella Bermudez, 1934, and erection of the foraminiferal genus Helena : Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, v. 47, p. 374.Google Scholar
Saunders, J.B., 1961, Helenina Saunders, new name for the foraminiferal genus Helenia Saunders, 1957, non Helenia Walcott, 1880: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, v. 12, p. 148.Google Scholar
Schultze, M.S., 1854, Über den Organismus der Polythalamien (Foraminiferen), nebst Bermerkungen über die Rhizopoden im Allgemeinen: Leipzig, Wilhelm Engelmann, 68 p.Google Scholar
Seguenza, G., 1862, Die Terreni Terziarii del Distretto di Messina. Parte II—Descrizione dei Foraminiferi Monotalamici delle Marne Mioceniche del Distretto di Messina: Messina, Capra, 84 p.Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E., 1948, A mathematical theory of communication: The Bell System Technical Journal, v. 27, p. 379423, 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, Q., Xiao, J.Y., Zhao, Z.J., Zhang, M.H., Cheng, Y., and Li, J.J., 2010, Environmental records in XH-1 core in northern Jiangsu Basin since about 780 Ka B.P.: Journal of Stratigraphy, v. 1, p. 2734. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Stanley, D.J., and Chen, Z.Y., 1996, Neolithic settlement distributions as a function of sea level-controlled topography in the Yangtze delta, China: Geology, v. 24, p. 10831086.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, D.J., and Chen, Z.Y., 2000, Radiocarbon dates in China’s Holocene Yangtze delta: record of sediment storage and reworking, not timing of deposition: Journal of Coastal Research, v. 16, p. 11261132.Google Scholar
Thalmann, H.E., 1947, Mitteilungen über Foraminiferen V: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae (1946), v. 39, p. 309314.Google Scholar
Todd, R., and Bronnimann, P., 1957, Recent foraminifera and theamoebina from the eastern gulf of Paria: Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication, v. 3, p. 143.Google Scholar
Ujiié, H, 1990, Bathyal benthic foraminifera in a Piston Core from East of the Miyako Islands, Ryukyu Island Arc: Bulletin of the College of Science, University of the Ryukyus, v. 49, p. 160.Google Scholar
Walker, G., and Jacob, E., 1798, An arrangement and description of minute and rare shells, in Essay on the Microscope, by the late George Adams, the Second Edition, with considerable additions and improvements, by Frederick Kanmacher, F.L.S.: London, Dillon and Keating, p. 629664.Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., 1980, Papers on Marine Micropaleontology: Beijing, China Ocean Press, 191 p. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., and Gu, S.Y., 1980, Quaternary transgressions in the Lower Liao River plain, Liaoning province, in Wang, P.X., ed., Papers on Marine Micropaleontology: Beijing, China Ocean Press, p. 130139. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., and Min, Q.B., 1979, Quaternary transgression in Shanghai region: Journal of Tongji University, v. 2, p. 109128. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., Min, Q.B., and Bian, Y.H., 1980a, Distribution of Foraminifera and Ostracoda in bottom sediments of the Northwestern part of the Southern Yellow Sea and its geological significance, in Wang, P.X., ed., Papers on Marine Micropaleontology: Beijing, China Ocean Press, p. 6183. [in Chinese with English contents]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., Min, Q.B., and Gao, J.X., 1980b, A preliminary study of foraminiferal and ostracod assemblages of the Yellow Sea, in Wang, P.X., ed., Papers on Marine Micropaleontology: Beijing, China Ocean Press, p. 84100. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., Min, Q.B., Bian, Y.H., and Chen, X.R., 1981, Strata of Quaternary transgressions in East China: ACTA Geologica Sinica, v. 1, p. 113. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, P.X., Zhang, J.J., Zhao, Q.H., Min, Q.B., Bian, Y.H., Zheng, L.F., Cheng, X.R., and Chen, R.H., 1988, Foraminifera and Ostracoda in Bottom Sediments of the East China Sea: Beijing, China Ocean Press, 438 p. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, S.H., Yu, M.T., Tang, Y.L., Zhao, X.T., Wang, X.M., and Huang, X.H., 2002, Holocene foraminifera and it’s environmental significance in Shenhu Bay, Fujian: Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, v. 21, p. 611. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, Z.H., Zhang, D., Li, X., Tao, S.K., and Xie, Y., 2008, Magnetic properties and relevant minerals of late Cenozoic sediments in the Yangtze River delta and their implication: Geology in China, v. 35, p. 670682. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Wang, Z.H., Zhuang, C.C., Saito, Y., Chen, J., Zhan, Q., and Wang, X.D., 2012, Early mid-Holocene sea-level change and coastal environmental response on the southern Yangtze delta plain, China: implications for the rise of Neolithic culture: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 35, p. 5162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.H., Zhan, Q., Long, H.Y., Saito, Y., Gao, X., Wu, X.X., Li, L., and Zhao, Y.N., 2013, Early to mid-Holocene rapid sea-level rise and coastal response on the southern Yangtze delta plain, China: Journal of Quaternary Science, v. 28, p. 659672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, A.D., 1957, Foraminifera of the Buras-Scofield Bayou region, southeast Lousiana: Contributions of the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, v. 8, p. 2940.Google Scholar
Williamson, W.C., 1858, On the Recent Foraminifera of Great Britain: London, Printed for the Ray Society, 100 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, B.Y., and Li, C.X., 1987, Quaternary Geology of Yangtze Delta: Beijing, China Ocean Press, 170 p. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Xiong, Z., Hou, K.M., Li, Q.H., and Chen, J., 2010, Standard well for Quaternary research and its geological interpretation in Qinhuai River Valley of Nanjing area: Geological Journal of China Universities, v. 4, p. 498508. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Yang, Z.G., 1985, Sedimentology and environment in South Yellow Sea Shelf since Late Pleistocene: Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, v. 5, no. 4, p. 119. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Yang, Z.G., 1993, The sedimentary sequence and Palaeogeographic changes of the South Yellow Sea since the Olduval Subchron: ACTA Geologica Sinica, v. 67, p. 357366. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Yang, Z.G., and Lin, H.M., 1996, Quaternary stratigraphy in China and its international correlation: Beijing, Geological Publishing House, p. 31107. [in Chinese with English contents]Google Scholar
Yu, J.J., Hu, F., Yang, Z.L., Zhang, Z.Y., Jiang, R., Ke, X., and Lao, J.X., 2014, Identification of Holocene foraminifera assemblages in Sijia Town of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, and its geological significance: Geological Bulletin of China, v. 33, p. 16091620. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Zheng, S.Y., Cheng, T.C., Wang, X.T., and Fu, Z.X., 1978, The Quaternary foraminifera of the Dayuzhang irrigation area, Shangdong Province, and a preliminary attempt at an interpretation of its depositional environment: Studia Marina Sinica, v. 13, p. 1678. [in Chinese and part of English]Google Scholar
Zhu, X.H., and Lin, M.H., 1990, Fossil fauna and transgression sequence of the Core QC2 in South Yellow Sea: ACTA Oceanologica Sinica, v. 9, p. 561578. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Location map showing the cores studied in the paleo-incised Yangtze Valley (range of paleo-incised Yangtze Valley after Li et al., 2000).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Variation of Lithology, benthic foraminiferal abundance, diversity, and H(s), planktonic foraminiferal content in the cores ZKA4, LZK1, and CSJA6, with reconstructed paleogeographic curve. Solid line represents BF abundance (/50 g); dashed line represents PF abundance (/50 g).

Figure 2

Table 1 AMS 14C dates of Core ZKA4 and CSJA6 (Yu et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2015).

Figure 3

Figure 3 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Quinqueloculina lamarckiana: (1a) front view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K2–036; (1b) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K2–036; (2) rear view, LZK1, depth 31.9–32.0 m, Reg. No. K2–033; (3) front view, LZK1, depth 31.5–31.6 m, Reg. No. K2–032. (4–6) Quinqueloculina venusta: (4) front view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–004; (5) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–006 (6) rear view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–005. (7, 8) Spiroloculina exmia: (7) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–020; (8) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–016. (9, 10) Spiroloculina jucunda: (9) side view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K3–021; (10) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K3–022. (11) Lagena hispida, side view, CSJA6, depth 17.2–17.3 m, Reg. No. K2–007.

Figure 4

Figure 4 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Spiroloculina laevigata: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–018; (2) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K3–019. (3, 4) Lagena spicata: (3) side view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K2–005; (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.8–13.9 m, Reg. No. K2–003. (5) Lagena substriata: side view, LZK1, depth 9.5–9.6 m, Reg. No. K2–008. (6, 7) Fissurina laevigata: (6) side view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–080; (7) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K1–079. (8a, 8b) Fissurina orbignyana: (8a) side view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–083; (8b) apertural view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K1–083. (9a, 9b) Globulina minuta: (9a) side view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–087; (9b) apertural view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–087. (10) Bulmina marginata, side view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–010.

Figure 5

Figure 5 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Bolivina robusta: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.2–13.3 m, Reg. No. K1–023; (2) edge view. CSJA6, depth 13.2–13.3 m, Reg. No. K1–025. (3, 4) Brizalina striatula: (3) side view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–034; (4) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K4–009. (5, 6) Epistominella naraensis: (5) ventral view, right-coiled, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–067; (6) edge view, left-coiled, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K1–069. (7–9) Rosalina bradyi: (7) ventral view, LZK1, depth 30.7–30.8 m, Reg. No. K3–012; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 30.8–30.9 m, Reg. No. K4–038; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K3–013. (10–12) Buccella frigida: (10) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K1–036; (11) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 36.2–36.3 m, Reg. No. K4–008; (12) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K1–033.

Figure 6

Figure 6 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Cancris auriculus: (1) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–044; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–046; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–045. (4–6) Helenina anderseni: (4) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–029; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K4–009; (6) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–030. (7, 8) Hyalinea balthica: (7) side view, CSJA6, depth 35.2–35.3 m, Reg. No. K4–023; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K4–024; (9–11) Cibicides lobatulus: (9) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 11.8–11.9 m, Reg. No. K1–047; (10) edge view, CSJA6, depth 17.2–17.3 m, Reg. No. K1–049; (11) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–048.

Figure 7

Figure 7 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Ammonia pauciloculata: (1) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–003; (2) edge view, LZK1, depth 27.7–27.8 m, Reg. No. K4–005; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 31.2–31.3 m, Reg. No. K4–004. (4–6) Ammonia compressiuscula: (4) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K1–018; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K1–019; (6) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 21.5–21.6 m, Reg. No. K1–017. (7–9) Ammonia ketienziensis: (7) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 33.8–33.9 m, Reg. No. K4–035; (8) edge view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K4–034; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 34.2–34.3 m, Reg. No. K4–033. (10–12) Ammonia beccarii: (10) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–007; (11) edge view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–009; (12) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m, Reg. No. K1–008.

Figure 8

Figure 8 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1–3) Cavarotalia annectens: (1) ventral view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K1–004; (2) edge view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K4–001; (3) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 21.7–21.8 m, Reg. No. K1–005. (4, 5) Cribrononion subincertum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, K4–012; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–013. (6, 7) Cribrononion vitreum: (6) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–014; (7) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K4–015. (8–10) Elphidiella kiangsuensis: (8) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K4–026; (9) edge view, CSJA6, depth 5.5–5.6 m, Reg. No. K1–055. (10) side view (Guo et al., 2014). (11, 12) Elphidium advenum: (11) side view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–056; (12) edge view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–057.

Figure 9

Figure 9 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Elphidium hispidulum: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–060; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K4–029. (3) Elphidium limpidum: side view, CSJA6, depth 46.5–46.6 m, Reg. No. K1–062. (4, 5) Elphidium magellanicum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 2.2–2.3 m, Reg. No. K1–065; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 20.8–20.9 m, Reg. No. K1–066. (6, 7) Protelphidium tuberculatum: (6) side view, CSJA6, depth 13.5–13.6 m, Reg. No. K2–022; (7) edge view, CSJA6, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K2–023. (8, 9) Pseudononionella variabilis: (8) ventral view, CSJA6, depth 7.5–7.6 m Reg. No. K2–024; (9) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 36.8–36.9 m, Reg. No. K2–025. (10–12) Florilus scaphus: (10) ventral view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–076; (11) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K1–078; (12) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K4–022.

Figure 10

Figure 10 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. All scale bars are 100 μm. (1, 2) Fursenkoina pauciloculata: (1) side view, CSJA6, depth 34.8–34.9 m, Reg. No. K1–086; (2) apertural view, LZK1, depth 25.5–25.6 m, Reg. No. K3–023. (3, 4) Nonion akitense: (3) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, K2–011; (4) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–012. (5–7) Nonionella jacksonensis: (5) ventral view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K2–015; (6) edge view, LZK1, depth 12.3–12.4 m, Reg. No. K2–013; (7) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 12.7–12.8 m, Reg. No. K2–014. (8, 9) Pullenia quinqueloba: (8) side view, ZKA4, depth 41.1–41.2 m, Reg. No. K2–027; (9) edge view, LZK1, depth 4.5–4.6 m, Reg. No. K2–028. (10, 11) Gyroidina nippoinca: (10) ventral view, LZK1, depth 19.8–19.9 m, Reg. No. K1–089; (11a) edge view, LZK1, depth 5.1–5.2 m, Reg. No. K1–090; (11b) dorsal view, LZK1, depth 5.1–5.2 m, Reg. No. K1–090.

Figure 11

Figure 11 SEM photos of the foraminifers from Core CSJA6, Nantong, Jiangsu; Core ZKA4, Yangzhou, Jiangsu; and Core LZK1, Hengsha Island, Shanghai. (1–3) Hazawaia nipponica: (1) ventral view, LZK1, depth 26.9–27.0 m, Reg. No. K1–092; (2) edge view, CSJA6, depth 47.6–47.7 m, Reg. No. K1–094; (3) dorsal view, CSJA6, depth 21.5–21.6 m, Reg. No. K1–093. (4, 5) Melonis barleeanum: (4) side view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–009; (5) edge view, CSJA6, depth 23.2–23.3 m, Reg. No. K2–010.

Figure 12

Figure 12 Down-core variations of main species and assemblages of benthic foraminifers in Core CSJA6.