Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:22:01.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bone health in Gambian women: impact and implications of rural-to-urban migration and the nutrition transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

S.E. Dalzell
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK
L.M.A. Jarjou
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, The Gambia
A. Prentice
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, The Gambia
K. Ward
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK
G.R. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, The Gambia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

Urbanisation and the associated nutrition transition have been linked with the rapid and recent rise in osteoporotic fragility fracture incidence in many countries( Reference Ballane, Cauley and Luckey 1 ). Predictions indicate that hip fracture incidence will increase 6-fold in Africa and Asia by 2050, partially attributed to demographic transition and population ageing( Reference Cooper, Campion and Melton 2 ). Differences in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) between rural and urban locations indicate that urban regions of high income countries (HIC) have lower aBMD and a higher incidence of hip fracture( Reference Brennan, Pasco and Urquhart 3 ). The few studies conducted in low and middle income countries (LMIC) provide inconsistent results; in contrast to HIC, most have found higher aBMD in urban populations( Reference Matsuzaki, Pant and Kulkarni 4 ).

In order to investigate the impact of migrating to an urban environment, we have conducted detailed studies of bone phenotype and factors affecting bone health in two groups of pre-menopausal Gambian women: urban migrant (n = 58) and rural (n = 81). Both groups spent their formative years in the same rural setting, urban women were known to have migrated when aged ≥16 years. Bone phenotype (bone mineral content (BMC); bone area (BA); areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and size-adjusted BMC (height, weight and BA) of the whole-body, lumbar spine and hip) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with further characterisation of bone phenotype by peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT). Data were also collected on anthropometry, body composition, food and nutrient intakes, physical activity, socio-demographic characteristics, vitamin D status and 24hr urinary mineral outputs (Na, K, P and Ca).

Mean age and height of rural and urban migrant groups were not significantly different (p > 0·05). Urban migrant women were significantly heavier (p < 0·01). Significant differences in BMC and aBMD were found between groups at all skeletal sites, with urban women having higher BMC and aBMD; BA was not significantly different. The greatest difference in BMC was found at the lumbar spine (8·5 % ± SE 3·0, p < 0·01). After adjusting for size, the differences between urban and rural spine BMC remained significant (6·2 % ± SE 2·1, p < 0·01). These results indicate that rural-to-urban migration is associated with higher BMC, with differences mostly attenuated by adjusting for body size, particularly weight. In this African population, higher SA-BMC may affect future fracture risk.

LS: lumbar spine, TB: total body, TH: total hip; a median b IQR (25th and 75th)

Acknowledgements

Supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) under programmes U105960371 and U123261351. This research is jointly funded by the MRC and the Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement. SD is in receipt of an MRC PhD studentship.

References

1. Ballane, G, Cauley, JA, Luckey, MM et al. (2014) J Bone Miner Res 29, 17451755.Google Scholar
2. Cooper, C, Campion, G, Melton, LJ 3rd (1992) Osteoporos Int 2, 285289.Google Scholar
3. Brennan, SL, Pasco, JA, Urquhart, DM et al. (2010) J Epidemiol Community Health 64, 656665.Google Scholar
4. Matsuzaki, M, Pant, R, Kulkarni, B et al. (2015) PLoS One 10, e0132239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar