Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:23:17.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Intertwin Birth Weight Discordance Among Same-Sex Twins in Lombardy, Northern Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2023

Giovanna Esposito*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Anna Cantarutti
Affiliation:
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
Paola Agnese Mauri
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Woman, Newborn and Child, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Matteo Franchi
Affiliation:
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
Francesco Fedele
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Giovanni Corrao
Affiliation:
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
Fabio Parazzini
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Nicola Persico
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Woman, Newborn and Child, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
*
Corresponding Author: Giovanna Esposito, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This population-based cohort study investigated the prevalence, potential risk factors, and consequences of birth weight discordance (BWD) among same-sex twins. We retrieved data from the automated system of healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy Region, Northern Italy (2007–2021). BWD was defined as 30% or more disparity in birth weights between the larger and the smaller twin. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of BWD in deliveries with same-sex twins. In addition, the distribution of several neonatal outcomes was assessed overall and according to BWD level (i.e., ≤20%, 21–29, and ≥30%). Finally, a stratified analysis by BWD was performed to assess the relationship between assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and neonatal outcomes. We identified 11,096 same-sex twin deliveries; 556 (5.0%) pairs of twins were affected by BWD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that maternal age ≥35 years (OR 1.26, 95% CI [1.05,5.51]), low level of education (OR 1.34, 95% CI [1.05, 1.70]), and ART (OR 1.16, 95% CI [0.94, 1.44], almost significant due to the low power) were independent risk factors for BWD in same-sex twins. Conversely, parity (OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) was inversely related. All the adverse outcomes observed were more common among BWD pairs than non-BWD ones. Instead, a protective effect of ART was observed for most neonatal outcomes considered among BWD twins. Our results suggest that conception after ART increases the risk of developing a high disparity between the weights of the two twins. However, the presence of BWD may complicate twin pregnancies, compromising neonatal outcomes, regardless of the modality of conception.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Society for Twin Studies

Twin pregnancy represents a health issue as it is well known to be more prone to maternal and fetal complications and perinatal mortality than a singleton pregnancy (Cheetham, Reference Cheetham2007; Rankin et al., Reference Rankin, Pearce, Bell, Glinianaia and Parker2005; Vogel et al., Reference Vogel, Torloni, Seuc, Betran, Widmer, Souza and Merialdi2013). Furthermore, during the last 40 years, a marked increase in the incidence of twin pregnancies — in particular, dizygotic ones — has been observed in most industrialized countries (Dawson et al., Reference Dawson, Tinker, Jamieson, Hobbs, Rasmussen and Reefhuis2015; Eriksson & Fellman, Reference Eriksson and Fellman2007), due to the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART; Dawson et al., Reference Dawson, Tinker, Jamieson, Hobbs, Rasmussen and Reefhuis2015; Fuster et al., Reference Fuster, Zuluaga, Colantonio and de Blas2008). Given the diffusion and the clinical implications, the study of twin pregnancies is of utmost epidemiological interest.

Among other adverse conditions typical of twin pregnancies, birth weight discordance (BWD), defined as the disparity of 15% and 40% in birth weights between the larger and the smaller twin respectively (Breathnach et al., Reference Breathnach, McAuliffe, Geary, Daly, Higgins, Dornan, Morrison, Burke, Higgins, Dicker, Manning, Mahony, Malone and Ireland Research Consortium2011; Breathnach & Malone, Reference BreathnachMd and Malone2012), complicates about 10% to 29% of pregnancies, according to the cut-off value used to describe discordance (Blickstein & Goldman, Reference Blickstein and Goldman2003; Miller et al., Reference Miller, Chauhan and Abuhamad2012). Up to a certain degree of discordance, the discrepancy in the birth weights of twins should be considered physiological; the mechanism whereby two fetuses exposed to the same intrauterine environment adopt significantly different growth patterns represents a final common pathway for several twin pregnancy conditions.

The presence of opposite-sex twins (Azcorra et al., Reference Azcorra, Rodriguez and Mendez2021; Blickstein & Weissman, Reference Blickstein and Weissman1990), placental dysfunction (Victoria et al., Reference Victoria, Mora and Arias2001), older maternal age, (Konar et al., Reference Konar, Sarkar and Paul2016; Sannoh et al., Reference Sannoh, Demissie, Balasubramanian and Rhoads2003; Tan et al., Reference Tan, Wen, Fung, Walker and Demissie2005) low maternal socioeconomic profile (Azcorra et al., Reference Azcorra, Rodriguez and Mendez2021; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Caughey, Yee and Cheng2019; Luo et al., Reference Luo, Wilkins and Kramer2006; Tan et al., Reference Tan, Wen, Fung, Walker and Demissie2005), primiparity (Blickstein et al., Reference Blickstein, Goldman and Mazkereth2000; Sannoh et al., Reference Sannoh, Demissie, Balasubramanian and Rhoads2003), and lower total twin birth weight (Blickstein et al., Reference Blickstein, Goldman, Smith-Levitin, Greenberg, Sherman and Rydhstroem1999; Tan et al., Reference Tan, Wen, Fung, Walker and Demissie2005) are factors that have been associated with BWD. Also chorionicity represents a relevant factor influencing BWD; in monochorionic pregnancies, vascular anastomoses due to the sharing of a single placenta may lead to an unbalanced intertwin transfusion and consequent asymmetric growth of twins (Denbow et al., Reference Denbow, Cox, Taylor, Hammal and Fisk2000; Homola et al., Reference Homola, Florjanski, Krolak-Olejnik, Fuchs, Lachowska and Bek2019; Lewi et al., Reference Lewi, Cannie, Blickstein, Jani, Huber, Hecher, Dymarkowski, Gratacos, Lewi and Deprest2007).

Further, given the significant contribution of ART to twin pregnancies, it appears interesting to investigate the role of ART on BWD. An increased risk of BWD was reported in ART versus spontaneous twins (Daniel et al., Reference Daniel, Ochshorn, Fait, Geva, Bar-Am and Lessing2000; Koudstaal et al., Reference Koudstaal, Bruinse, Helmerhorst, Vermeiden, Willemsen and Visser2000; Pinborg et al., Reference Pinborg, Loft, Rasmussen, Schmidt, Langhoff-Roos, Greisen and Andersen2004; Zadori et al., Reference Zadori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Kaali and Pal2004; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Liu and Zeng2013), but the evidence is still scarce and controversial (Suzuki & Murata, Reference Suzuki and Murata2007; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Choi, Nam, Kwon, Park and Kim2011).

Some studies have identified discordant twin growth as an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal consequences (Blickstein et al., Reference Blickstein, Mincha, Goldman, Machin and Keith2006; Harper et al., Reference Harper, Weis, Odibo, Roehl, Macones and Cahill2013; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Fung, Huang, Demissie, Joseph, Allen, Kramer and Cana2005; Yinon et al., Reference Yinon, Mazkereth, Rosentzweig, Jarus-Hakak, Schiff and Simchen2005), neonatal morbidity (D’Antonio, Thilaganathan et al., Reference D’Antonio, Thilaganathan, Laoreti, Khalil, Bahamie, Bhide, Deans, Egbor, Ellis, Gandhi, Hamid, Hutt, Matiluko, Morgan, Pakarian, Papageorghiou, Peregrine and Roberts2018; Di Mascio et al., Reference Di Mascio, Acharya, Khalil, Odibo, Prefumo, Liberati, Buca, Manzoli, Flacco, Brunelli, Benedetti Panici and D’Antonio2019), and intrauterine death (D’Antonio, Odibo et al., Reference D’Antonio, Odibo, Prefumo, Khalil, Buca, Flacco, Liberati, Manzoli and Acharya2018). Others have attributed the morbidity and mortality observed in discordant pairs to confounding factors (Cooperstock et al., Reference Cooperstock, Tummaru, Bakewell and Schramm2000; Fraser et al., Reference Fraser, Picard, Picard and Leiberman1994; Frezza et al., Reference Frezza, Gallini, Puopolo, De Carolis, D’Andrea, Guidone, Luciano, Zuppa and Romagnoli2011; Konar et al., Reference Konar, Sarkar and Paul2016; Patterson & Wood, Reference Patterson and Wood1990), such as gestational age at delivery, as a strong association between BWD and preterm births was observed, actual birth weight, gender discordance, and chorionicity. However, no clear picture of this issue has been defined.

In order to shed more light on this unfavorable condition, we analyzed the prevalence, potential risk factors and consequences of BWD in a cohort of same-sex twins in Lombardy, Northern Italy, during the period 2007 to 2021. In addition, we evaluated whether ART influences the outcomes of BWD twins.

Methods

Data Source and Study Cohort

Data for this study were retrieved from the automated system of healthcare utilization (HCU) databases from Lombardy, the largest region of Italy (about 10 million inhabitants), which includes a variety of information on residents who receive National Health System (NHS) assistance. We collected data about maternal sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history, the current mode of conception, pregnancy course, delivery and newborns’ outcomes from the certificate of delivery assistance (Certificato di Assistenza Al Parto [CedAP]) database. We linked records from CedAP and standard discharge form (Scheda di Dimissione Ospedaliera [SDO]) databases through a unique anonymized identification code for each subject. The analysis of the anonymous administrative database does not require ethics committee approval in Italy.

We identified twin births in Lombardy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. We included deliveries for which there was a SDO related to childbirth coded according to the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and/or the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) code, of mothers aged 15 to 55 years, and occurring between 22 to 42 gestational weeks. Deliveries with a lack of information concerning the mode of conception (i.e., spontaneous, nonspontaneous), birth weight, sex of at least one of the twins, and opposite-sex deliveries were excluded. For the cohort selection, the regional databases were accessed until March 2023.

Birth Weight Discordance (BWD) Definition

Information about the birth weight of each twin was collected from CedAP. Intertwin discordance was obtained by the formula $$100*{{larger\;twin\;weight - smaller\;twin\;weight} \over {larger\;twin\;weight}}.$$ Pregnancy was considered complicated by the BWD when the disparity was 30% or more (Jahanfar et al., Reference Jahanfar, Lim and Oviedo-Joekes2016; Vergani et al., Reference Vergani, Locatelli, Ratti, Scian, Pozzi, Pezzullo and Ghidini2004).

Statistical Analysis

First, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the potential factors (i.e., maternal age; nationality; level of education — university, high school, middle or primary school; parity; and mode of conception) associated with BWD. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were subsequently calculated. Stratified analysis by sex was also conducted.

Second, we compared the distribution of the adverse neonatal outcomes of interest, including preterm birth (36 gestational weeks or less), low birth weight (2500 grams or less), small for gestational age (SGA; having a birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age, according to the sex-specific Italian reference curve for normal fetal growth; Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Cortinovis, Bortolus, Fedele and Decarli1995), low Apgar score (7 or less), perinatal mortality, according to the BWD level (i.e., ≤20%, 21–29%, and ≥30%). The trend test was used to test differences in the above-mentioned outcomes according to the BWD’s levels. The same analysis was repeated, excluding preterm births from the cohort (N = 7009 pairs of twins).

Finally, we assessed the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs of the neonatal outcomes of interest and the mode of conception according to the presence or absence of BWD. Models were adjusted by maternal age, nationality, level of education, and parity.

We performed analysis using the Statistical Analysis System Software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

We identified 17,786 twin births that occurred in Lombardy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. Of these, we subsequentially excluded: 145 deliveries that did not match with a SDO related to childbirth and/or with the DRG code, 13 deliveries of mothers aged less than 15 years or more than 55 years of age, 32 deliveries occurred before 22 completed weeks or after 42 completed weeks. Out of 17,596 twin births, 89 without information concerning the mode of conception, birth weight, or sex of at least one twin were excluded. Finally, we considered only same-sex twins for a total of 11,096 deliveries.

Couples of females twins were 5620 (50.6%), and ones of males were 5476 (49.4%). In general, males were heavier in comparison to females; the average birth weight was 2309.2 g and 2232.8 g, respectively (p < .0001).

Births affected by BWD (i.e., discordance of 30% between the largest and smallest twin weight) were 556 (5.0%), 279 (5.0%) among females and 277 (5.0%) among males (p = .8204). More in particular, 6,175 (55.7%) twin deliveries presented a discordance of less than 10%, 3144 (28.3%) between 10 and 19%, 1221 (11.0%) between 20 and 29%, 377 (3.4%) between 30 and 39% and 179 (1.6%) over 40%.

ORs of BWD cases according to selected potential risk factors are provided in Table 1. Maternal age >35 years (OR 1.23, 95% CI [1.01, 1.50]), parous (OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]), and non-spontaneous conception (OR 1.33, 95% CI [1.10, 1.61]) were significant factors for BWD in univariate analysis. After adjusting for all potential risk factors, gestational age >35 years (OR 1.26, 95% CI [1.05, 1.51]), low level of education (OR 1.34, 95% CI [1.05, 1.70]), and parous (OR 95% CI [0.73, 0.60, 0.89]) were significantly associated with BWD. However, nonspontaneous conception was confirmed as a risk factor even if the estimate was not statistically significant due to the low statistical power (OR 1.16, 95% CI [0.94, 1.44]). The results were consistent in the subsets of males and females; however, most of the significance was lost, probably due to the lower statistical power.

Table 1. Odds ratios (ORs) of birth weight discordance (BWD) couples of twins according to selected potential risk factors. Lombardy, 2007–2021

Note: BWD, birth weight discordance.

a Univariate logistic regression model.

b Multivariate logistic regression model.

c 9 missing values.

Lowering the cut-off of discordance — BWD defined as 20% or more disparity in birth weights — in the multivariate analysis, advanced maternal age (OR 1.19, 95% CI [1.07, 1.33]) and ART (OR 1.17, 95% CI [1.03, 1.32]) remained associated with an increased risk of BWD and parity (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.69, 0.87]) with a reduced risk (data not shown).

Table 2 shows the distribution of the modality of delivery and the adverse neonatal outcomes according to the degree of weight discordance. Regarding the modality of delivery, in the group of BWD equal to 30% or more, cesarean sections during labor and cesarean sections without labor were over two-fold more common in comparison to the group of non-BWD. Preterm birth (61.2% vs. 69.0% vs. 83.6%, p trend ≤ .0001), low birth weight (when both twins experienced the outcome, 52.5% vs. 51.4% vs 67.7%, p trend ≤ .0001), small for gestational age (at least one twin, 17.9% vs. 46.7% vs. 80.8%, p trend ≤ .0001), low Apgar score (7 or less; at least one twin, 6.9% vs. 10.7% vs. 23.4%, p trend ≤ .0001), and perinatal mortality (at least one twin, 0.6% vs. 1.2% vs. 10.1%, p trend ≤.0001) were more common in twins with a discordance equal to 30% or more with respect to those with discordance between 20−29%, with respect to those with a discordance less then 20%. Excluding preterm births from the cohort, the positive association between adverse outcomes and BWD was still observed (data not shown).

Table 2. Modality of delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes according to the degree of birth weight discordance (BWD), Lombardy, 2007−2021

Note: SGA, small for gestational age; CS, cesarian section.

a The sum did not add up to the total because of missing data.

ART was inversely related to worst outcomes among both non-BWD and BWD twins (RR ranging from 14% to 6% from small for gestational age to preterm birth). No association was observed for perinatal mortality, probably due to the low statistical power (Table 3). Results were confirmed, also lowering the cut-off of discordance to 20% (data not shown).

Table 3. Adverse neonatal outcomes among birth weight discordance (BWD) and non-BWD pairs of twins according to mode of conception (i.e., spontaneous and after assisted reproductive technologies [ART]), Lombardy, 2007−2021

Note: RR, relative risk.

Discussion

In the current study, pairs of twins affected by a 30% or more disparity in birth weights between the larger and the smaller twin represented about 5% of a cohort of same-sex twins in Lombardy, Northern Italy, during the period 2007–2021. BWD was more common in women aged 35 years or more and those undergoing ART, but less frequent in parous women. The adverse neonatal outcomes observed (i.e., preterm birth, low birth weight, low Apgar score, SGA, and perinatal mortality) were more frequent among BWD twins.

As a concern for potential risk factors, we found that advanced maternal age (i.e., ≥35 years) was related to proneness to have a BWD, even if the association was of borderline significance. This finding is consistent with previous analyses conducted in populations from the United States and, more recently, from a tertiary care center in India (Konar et al., Reference Konar, Sarkar and Paul2016; Sannoh et al., Reference Sannoh, Demissie, Balasubramanian and Rhoads2003; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Fung, Huang, Demissie, Joseph, Allen, Kramer and Cana2005). All over the world, especially in high-income countries, maternal age at birth is rising. Thus, the evaluation of the consequences of this trend represents an issue of utmost importance because older maternal age has been associated with an increased risk of several adverse perinatal outcomes (Frick, Reference Frick2021). We also observed a positive relation between lower educational levels and BWD, as previous studies found (Azcorra et al., Reference Azcorra, Rodriguez and Mendez2021; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Caughey, Yee and Cheng2019; Luo et al., Reference Luo, Wilkins and Kramer2006; Tan et al., Reference Tan, Wen, Fung, Walker and Demissie2005). This condition may reflect lower incomes and unhealthier behaviors and influence the access to perinatal care, compromising the management of the course of pregnancy and delaying appropriate interventions. We also found that advanced maternal age (i.e., ≥35 years) was related to proneness to have a BWD, even if the association was of borderline significance. Regarding the use of ART, we confirmed the previously observed (Koudstaal et al., Reference Koudstaal, Bruinse, Helmerhorst, Vermeiden, Willemsen and Visser2000; Pinborg et al., Reference Pinborg, Loft, Rasmussen, Schmidt, Langhoff-Roos, Greisen and Andersen2004; Zadori et al., Reference Zadori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Kaali and Pal2004) increased risk of BWD among women undergoing these techniques versus those conceiving spontaneously. In addition, we also confirm primiparity findings (Blickstein et al., Reference Blickstein, Goldman and Mazkereth2000; Sannoh et al., Reference Sannoh, Demissie, Balasubramanian and Rhoads2003); in our cohort, parous women had about 25% reduced risk of BWD. Regarding the chorionicity, if dichorionic twins have completely separate circulation systems during intrauterine life, about 95% of monochorionic twins have vascular anastomoses on the single placental surface that connects the two circulations (Denbow et al., Reference Denbow, Cox, Taylor, Hammal and Fisk2000; Lewi et al., Reference Lewi, Cannie, Blickstein, Jani, Huber, Hecher, Dymarkowski, Gratacos, Lewi and Deprest2007). In monochorinic pregnancies, placental vascular anastomoses leads to twin-to-twin transfusion in 15% of cases, resulting in an assymetric growth of the fetus (Hack et al., Reference Hack, Nikkels, Koopman-Esseboom, Derks, Elias, van Gemert and Visser2008). On the other hand, opposite-sex twins also showed an increased risk for BWD compared to same-sex twins (Azcorra et al., Reference Azcorra, Rodriguez and Mendez2021), and it has been reported that females of opposite-sex twin pairs have a significantly increased risk of being growth discordant (Blickstein & Weissman, Reference Blickstein and Weissman1990); this finding may be justified by the higher measures of males in terms of birth weight and length (Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Cortinovis, Bortolus, Fedele and Decarli1995). The debate regarding the influence of the own sex and also of the sex of cotwin on the birth weight is still ongoing.

The management of BWD is challenging since no evidence assessing the different management options (expectant and intervention management) is available. In particular, prenatal identification of BWD may lead to a iatrogenic delivery before the term of pregnancy, attributing the aftermath of prematurity on both twins, regardless of whether one of the two may have a physiological growth.

Although some studies have identified BWD as an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal consequences (Blickstein et al., Reference Blickstein, Mincha, Goldman, Machin and Keith2006; D’Antonio, Odibo et al., Reference D’Antonio, Odibo, Prefumo, Khalil, Buca, Flacco, Liberati, Manzoli and Acharya2018; D’Antonio, Thilaganathan et al., Reference D’Antonio, Thilaganathan, Laoreti, Khalil, Bahamie, Bhide, Deans, Egbor, Ellis, Gandhi, Hamid, Hutt, Matiluko, Morgan, Pakarian, Papageorghiou, Peregrine and Roberts2018; Di Mascio et al., Reference Di Mascio, Acharya, Khalil, Odibo, Prefumo, Liberati, Buca, Manzoli, Flacco, Brunelli, Benedetti Panici and D’Antonio2019; Harper et al., Reference Harper, Weis, Odibo, Roehl, Macones and Cahill2013; Hartley et al., Reference Hartley, Hitti and Emanuel2002; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Fung, Huang, Demissie, Joseph, Allen, Kramer and Cana2005; Yinon et al., Reference Yinon, Mazkereth, Rosentzweig, Jarus-Hakak, Schiff and Simchen2005) others have attributed the morbidity and mortality observed in discordant pairs to confounding factors (Cooperstock et al., Reference Cooperstock, Tummaru, Bakewell and Schramm2000; Fraser et al., Reference Fraser, Picard, Picard and Leiberman1994; Frezza et al., Reference Frezza, Gallini, Puopolo, De Carolis, D’Andrea, Guidone, Luciano, Zuppa and Romagnoli2011; Konar et al., Reference Konar, Sarkar and Paul2016; Patterson & Wood, Reference Patterson and Wood1990), especially to preterm birth.

In our study we also evaluated the relationship between BWD and selected adverse outcomes. As shown previously by other studies and as can be expected from BWD management alternatives mentioned above, we observed that preterm births were more common among BWD twins compared with non-BWD twins. In general, all the other outcomes considered (i.e., low birth weight, SGA, low Apgar score, and perinatal mortality) were more frequent among BWD births. A recent study found that BWD infants had a higher antibiotic prescription rate than the concordant ones, even though the strep test results and newborn septicemia rates were similar, showing that BWD twins required early respiratory support (Jahanfar et al., Reference Jahanfar, Lim and Ovideo-Joekes2017). As we found that BWD twins frequently obtained a low Apgar score, our results are consistent with this finding. We also observed a higher proportion of perinatal deaths among BWD twins. A systematic review investigating perinatal mortality reported that both dizygotic and monozygotic twin pregnancies discordant were at higher risk of intrauterine death but not of neonatal death compared with pregnancies with concordant ones, especially when at least one fetus was SGA (D’Antonio, Odibo et al., Reference D’Antonio, Odibo, Prefumo, Khalil, Buca, Flacco, Liberati, Manzoli and Acharya2018).

Given the widespread use of ART, its great contribution to the conception of twins, and the evidence that ART may increase the risk of BWD (Daniel et al., Reference Daniel, Ochshorn, Fait, Geva, Bar-Am and Lessing2000; Koudstaal et al., Reference Koudstaal, Bruinse, Helmerhorst, Vermeiden, Willemsen and Visser2000; Pinborg et al., Reference Pinborg, Loft, Rasmussen, Schmidt, Langhoff-Roos, Greisen and Andersen2004; Zadori et al., Reference Zadori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Kaali and Pal2004; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Liu and Zeng2013), we investigated the role of ART on BWD outcomes. An analysis focusing on this topic suggested that the possible differences in the management of pregnancies after ART and spontaneous ones could moderate the sequelae of BWD (Zadori et al., Reference Zadori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Kaali and Pal2004). In our cohort, the proportion of all adverse outcomes investigated was higher among spontaneous than ART pregnancies in both discordant and nondiscordant twins.

Some study limitations need to be considered. First, data for this study were exclusively based on inpatient information, thus clinical diagnoses given in an outpatient setting or not recorded as one of the patient diagnoses in hospitalizations for delivery or during pregnancy were missing. Thus, no hypotheses could be made about the pathophysiological clinical pathway leading to BWD, such as unequal placental sharing, abnormalities of umbilical cord insertion, placental dysfunctions, and twin-to twin-transfusion. We tried to identify births reported in the corresponding SDO a code, in the main or in the secondary diagnoses, related to such conditions, but often even if reporting poor fetal growth, the underlying mechanism was not specified. Second, we decided to include only same-sex twins in the study cohort due to the well-known disparity in terms of birth weight and length between males and females. In this way, we included all the monochorionic pregnancies in a higher proportion than in the general population. In addition, another limitation of the study was the inability to distinguish the dizygotic from monozygotic pregnancies. According to the probabilistic Weinberg’s method (Weinberg, Reference Weinberg1901) assuming that sex gender is independently distributed in dizygotic, compared to monozygotic pregnancies, in our cohort, the difference between the total number of twins and twice the number of opposite-sex twins provides an estimated number of monozygotic twins of 4460, resulting in a proportion of 40.2%, higher compared with the proportion observed in the general population (31.7% estimated in spontaneously conceived twins in Lombardy, 2007–2017; Esposito et al., Reference Esposito, Dalmartello, Franchi, Mauri, Cipriani, Corrao and Parazzini2022). The major strength of the study is its population-based design, whereby a large cohort of twins is available over a span of more than 10 years.

In conclusion, the presence of BWD complicates twin pregnancies, compromising neonatal outcomes. Further evidence is needed to better identify potential risk factors and interventions to limit adverse consequences in order to improve the management strategy in BWD twins.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Lombardy Region, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study. The data used in this study cannot be made available in the manuscript, the supplemental files or in a public repository due to Italian data protection laws. The anonymized datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study can be provided on reasonable request, from the corresponding author, after written approval by the Lombardy region.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (“PRIN” 2017, project 2017728JPK). The grant provides financial support for the analysis of data.

Disclosure of interests

Giovanni Corrao received research support from the European Community (EC), the Italian Agency of Drugs (AIFA), and the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR). He took part in a variety of projects that were funded by pharmaceutical companies (i.e., Novartis, GSK, Roche, AMGEN and BMS). He also received honoraria as a member of the advisory board to Roche. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to Italian law, studies based entirely on registry data do not require approval from an ethics review board.

References

Azcorra, H., Rodriguez, L., & Mendez, N. (2021). The association between maternal and foetal factors with birth weight discordance in twins from Yucatan, Mexico. Annals of Human Biology, 48, 153156. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2021.1921847 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I., & Goldman, R. D. (2003). Intertwin birth weight discordance as a potential adaptive measure to promote gestational age. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 48, 449454.Google ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I., Goldman, R. D., & Mazkereth, R. (2000). Adaptive growth restriction as a pattern of birth weight discordance in twin gestations. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 96, 986990. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01079-6 Google ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I., Goldman, R. D., Smith-Levitin, M., Greenberg, M., Sherman, D., & Rydhstroem, H. (1999). The relation between inter-twin birth weight discordance and total twin birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 93, 113116. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00343-3 Google Scholar
Blickstein, I., Mincha, S., Goldman, R. D., Machin, G. A., & Keith, L. G. (2006). The Northwestern twin chorionicity study: testing the ‘placental crowding’ hypothesis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 34, 158161. https://doi.org/10.1515/Jpm.2006.028 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I., & Weissman, A. (1990). Birth-weight discordancy in male-1st and female-1st pairs of unlike-sexed twins. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 162, 661663. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)90977-F CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breathnach, F. M., McAuliffe, F. M., Geary, M., Daly, S., Higgins, J. R., Dornan, J., Morrison, J. J., Burke, G., Higgins, S., Dicker, P., Manning, F., Mahony, R., Malone, F. D., & Ireland Research Consortium, Perinatal. (2011). Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118, 94103. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd208 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BreathnachMd, F. M., & Malone, F. D. (2012). Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Seminars in Perinatology, 36, 175181. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2012.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, C. (2007). Perinatal death in twins ¾ Absolute risk: Better basis for decision making. British Medical Journal, 334, 651652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39164.420150.1F CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooperstock, M. S., Tummaru, R., Bakewell, J., & Schramm, W. (2000). Twin birth weight discordance and risk of preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183, 6367. https://doi.org/Doi10.1016/S0002-9378(00)55604-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Antonio, F., Odibo, A. O., Prefumo, F., Khalil, A., Buca, D., Flacco, M. E., Liberati, M., Manzoli, L., & Acharya, G. (2018). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 52, 1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18966 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Antonio, F., Thilaganathan, B., Laoreti, A., Khalil, A., Bahamie, A., Bhide, A., Deans, A., Egbor, M., Ellis, C., Gandhi, H., Hamid, R., Hutt, R., Matiluko, A., Morgan, K., Pakarian, F., Papageorghiou, A., Peregrine, E., Roberts, L., & Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). (2018). Birth-weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy: Analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 52, 586592. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18916 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, Y., Ochshorn, Y., Fait, G., Geva, E., Bar-Am, A., & Lessing, J. B. (2000). Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility, 74, 683689. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01491-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, A. L., Tinker, S. C., Jamieson, D. J., Hobbs, C. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Reefhuis, J., & National Birth Defects Prevention Study. (2015). Epidemiology of twinning in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2007. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 103, 8599. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denbow, M. L., Cox, P., Taylor, M., Hammal, D. M., & Fisk, N. M. (2000). Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: Relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182, 417426. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70233-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Mascio, D., Acharya, G., Khalil, A., Odibo, A., Prefumo, F., Liberati, M., Buca, D., Manzoli, L., Flacco, M. E., Brunelli, R., Benedetti Panici, P., & D’Antonio, F. (2019). Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 98, 12451257. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13613 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, A. W., & Fellman, J. (2007). Temporal trends in the rates of multiple maternities in England and Wales. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 626632. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.10.4.626 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esposito, G., Dalmartello, M., Franchi, M., Mauri, P. A., Cipriani, S., Corrao, G., & Parazzini, F. (2022). Trends in dizygotic and monozygotic spontaneous twin births during the period 2007–2017 in Lombardy, Northern Italy: A population-based study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 25, 149155. https://doi.org/PIIS183242742200019610.1017/thg.2022.19 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D., Picard, R., Picard, E., & Leiberman, J. R. (1994). Birth weight discordance, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal outcomes in twins. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 39, 504508.Google ScholarPubMed
Frezza, S., Gallini, F., Puopolo, M., De Carolis, M. P., D’Andrea, V., Guidone, P. I., Luciano, R., Zuppa, A. A., & Romagnoli, C. (2011). Is growth-discordance in twins a substantial risk factor in adverse neonatal outcomes? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 463467. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.14.5.463 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, A. P. (2021). Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 70, 92100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuster, V., Zuluaga, P., Colantonio, S., & de Blas, C. (2008). Factors associated with recent increase of multiple births in Spain. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 7076. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.11.1.70 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, K. E. A., Nikkels, P. G. J., Koopman-Esseboom, C., Derks, J. B., Elias, S. G., van Gemert, M. J. C., & Visser, G. H. A. (2008). Placental characteristics of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in relation to perinatal outcome. Placenta, 29, 976981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2008.08.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, L. M., Weis, M. A., Odibo, A. O., Roehl, K. A., Macones, G. A., & Cahill, A. G. (2013). Significance of growth discordance in appropriately grown twins. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 208, 393 e391395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.044 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, R. S., Hitti, J., & Emanuel, I. (2002). Size-discordant twin pairs have higher perinatal mortality rates than nondiscordant pairs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187, 11731178. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.126961 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homola, W., Florjanski, J., Krolak-Olejnik, B., Fuchs, T., Lachowska, M., & Bek, W. (2019). The impact of chorionicity and the type of twin growth on the early neonatal outcome in twin pregnancies ¾ 20 years of experience from one tertiary perinatal center. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58, 482486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jahanfar, S., Lim, K., & Ovideo-Joekes, E. (2017). Birth weight discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 45, 603611. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanfar, S., Lim, K., & Oviedo-Joekes, E. (2016). Optimal threshold for birth weight discordance: Does knowledge of chorionicity matter? Journal of Perinatology, 36, 704712. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.82 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, L. H., Caughey, A. B., Yee, L. M., & Cheng, Y. W. (2019). Association between the degree of twin birthweight discordance and perinatal outcomes. American Journal of Perinatology, 36, 969974. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675769 Google ScholarPubMed
Konar, H., Sarkar, M., & Paul, J. (2016). Perinatal outcome of the second twin at a tertiary care center in India. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 66, 441447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0724-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koudstaal, J., Bruinse, H. W., Helmerhorst, F. M., Vermeiden, J. P. W., Willemsen, W. N. P., & Visser, G. H. A. (2000). Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization: A matched control study in four Dutch University hospitals. Human Reproduction, 15, 935940. https://doi.org/DOI10.1093/humrep/15.4.935 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L., Cannie, M., Blickstein, I., Jani, J., Huber, A., Hecher, K., Dymarkowski, S., Gratacos, E., Lewi, P., & Deprest, J. (2007). Placental sharing, birthweight discordance, and vascular anastomoses in monochorionic diamniotic twin placentas. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 197, e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Z. C., Wilkins, R., Kramer, M. S., & Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. (2006). Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: A population-based study. CMAJ, 174, 14151420. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051096 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J., Chauhan, S. P., & Abuhamad, A. Z. (2012). Discordant twins: Diagnosis, evaluation and management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206, 1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.075 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parazzini, F., Cortinovis, I., Bortolus, R., Fedele, L., & Decarli, A. (1995). Weight at Birth by Gestational-Age in Italy. Human Reproduction, 10, 18621863. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136192 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, R. M., & Wood, R. C. (1990). What is twin birth-weight discordance. American Journal of Perinatology, 7, 217219. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Rasmussen, S., Schmidt, L., Langhoff-Roos, J., Greisen, G., & Andersen, A. N. (2004). Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10 362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Human Reproduction, 19, 435441. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, J., Pearce, M. S., Bell, R., Glinianaia, S. V., & Parker, L. (2005). Perinatal mortality rates: Adjusting for risk factor profile is essential. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 19, 5658. https://doi.org/DOI10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00625.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sannoh, S., Demissie, K., Balasubramanian, B., & Rhoads, G. G. (2003). Risk factors for intrapair birth weight discordance in twins. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 13, 230236. https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.13.4.230.236 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, S., & Murata, T. (2007). The influence of assisted reproductive technology on growth discordance in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 22, 372376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103299 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, H. Z., Wen, S. W., Fung, K. F. K., Walker, M., & Demissie, K. (2005). The distribution of intra-twin birth weight discordance and its association with total twin birth weight, gestational age, and neonatal mortality. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 121, 2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergani, P., Locatelli, A., Ratti, M., Scian, A., Pozzi, E., Pezzullo, J. C., & Ghidini, A. (2004). Preterm twins: What threshold of birth weight discordance heralds major adverse neonatal outcome? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191, 14411445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.053 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Victoria, A., Mora, G., & Arias, F. (2001). Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97, 310315. https://doi.org/Doi10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01111-X Google ScholarPubMed
Vogel, J. P., Torloni, M. R., Seuc, A., Betran, A. P., Widmer, M., Souza, J. P., & Merialdi, M. (2013). Maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancy in 23 low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One, 8, e70549. https://doi.org/ARTNe7054910.1371/journal.pone.0070549 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, W. (1901). Beitrage zur physiologie und pathologie der mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflugers Archiv für Gesamte Pysiologie, 88, 346350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, S. W., Fung, K. F. K., Huang, L., Demissie, K., Joseph, K. S., Allen, A. C., Kramer, M. S., & Cana, F. I. H. S. G. (2005). Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in a Canadian population: The effect of intrapair birthweight discordance. American Journal of Perinatology, 22, 279286. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-870899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Choi, Y. S., Nam, K. H., Kwon, J. Y., Park, Y. W., & Kim, Y. H. (2011). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies according to methods of conception: Spontaneous versus in-vitro fertilization. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 98103. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.14.1.98 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yinon, Y., Mazkereth, R., Rosentzweig, N., Jarus-Hakak, A., Schiff, E., & Simchen, M. J. (2005). Growth restriction as a determinant of outcome in preterm discordant twins. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105, 8084. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000146634.28459.e8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadori, J., Kozinszky, Z., Orvos, H., Katona, M., Kaali, S. G., & Pal, A. (2004). Birth weight discordance in spontaneous versus induced twins: Impact on perinatal outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 21, 8588. https://doi.org/DOI10.1023/B:JARG.0000027019.87795.4e CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X. R., Liu, J., & Zeng, C. M. (2013). Perinatal risk factors and neonatal complications in discordant twins admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Chinese Medical Journal, 126, 845849. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20121957 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Odds ratios (ORs) of birth weight discordance (BWD) couples of twins according to selected potential risk factors. Lombardy, 2007–2021

Figure 1

Table 2. Modality of delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes according to the degree of birth weight discordance (BWD), Lombardy, 2007−2021

Figure 2

Table 3. Adverse neonatal outcomes among birth weight discordance (BWD) and non-BWD pairs of twins according to mode of conception (i.e., spontaneous and after assisted reproductive technologies [ART]), Lombardy, 2007−2021