Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:36:53.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Larval development of the cat lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in the tropical freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

EVA-MARIA ZOTTLER
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Parasitology, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057 Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
MANUELA SCHNYDER*
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Parasitology, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057 Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author. Institute of Parasitology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel.: ++41 (0)44 635 85 25. Fax: ++41 (0)44 635 8907. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Aelurostrongylus abstrusus is a worldwide occurring lungworm affecting felids. This metastrongyloid nematode has an indirect lifecycle relying on slugs and snails as intermediate hosts. In the present study the development of first-stage (L1) to third-stage larvae (L3) in the tropical freshwater pulmonate snail Biomphalaria glabrata was assessed. A total of 306 snails were individually exposed to 300 A. abstrusus L1, which were obtained from a naturally infected stray cat. The species was confirmed by biomolecular analysis. Second stage larvae (L2) and L3 were first isolated by artificial digestion of snails in the second and fourth week post exposure (wpe), respectively. From 8 wpe onwards, all larvae had developed into L3. Snails remained infected for up to 26 wpe. Only 0.4% of the L1 had pursued their development into L3, indicating low suitability of this artificial intermediate host for production of infective A. abstrusus L3.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

INTRODUCTION

The nematode Aelurostrongylus abstrusus is a worldwide occurring cat lungworm with prevalences varying between 0.5 and 39.7% in Europe (Barutzki and Schaper, Reference Barutzki and Schaper2011; Knaus et al. Reference Knaus, Rapti, Shukullari, Kusi, Postoli, Xhaxhiu, Silaghi, Hamel, Visser, Winter and Rehbein2014), Australia (Palmer et al. Reference Palmer, Thompson, Traub, Rees and Robertson2008; Lacorcia et al. Reference Lacorcia, Gasser, Anderson and Beveridge2009), North and South America (Lucio-Forster and Bowman, Reference Lucio-Forster and Bowman2011; De Souza Ramos et al. Reference De Souza Ramos, Alves da Cruz Scheremeta, Soares de Oliveira, Sinkoc and de Campos Pacheco2013). Infected cats mostly show respiratory signs (Grandi et al. Reference Grandi, Calvi, Venco, Paratici, Genchi, Memmi and Kramer2005; Traversa et al. Reference Traversa, Di Cesare, Milillo, Iorio and Otranto2008), but non-pathognomic signs (Genchi et al. Reference Genchi, Ferrari, Fonti, De Francesco, Piazza and Viglietti2014; Schnyder et al. Reference Schnyder, Di Cesare, Basso, Guscetti, Riond, Glaus, Crisi and Deplazes2014) or asymptomatic cats are also commonly observed (Genchi et al. Reference Genchi, Ferrari, Fonti, De Francesco, Piazza and Viglietti2014). In some cases, an infection with A. abstrusus may result in death (Gerdin et al. Reference Gerdin, Slater, Makolinski, Looney, Appel, Martin and McDonough2011; Dirven et al. Reference Dirven, Szatmári, Van den Ingh and Nijsse2012; Philbey et al. Reference Philbey, Krause and Jefferies2014). Aelurostrongylus abstrusus has an indirect lifecycle in which gastropods serve as intermediate hosts (Hobmaier and Hobmaier, Reference Hobmaier and Hobmaier1935; Gerichter, Reference Gerichter1949) and various animals, such as rodents, reptiles and birds (Hamilton and McCaw, Reference Hamilton and McCaw1967; Scott, Reference Scott1973; Jezewski et al. Reference Jezewski, Bunkowska-Gawlik, Hildebrand, Perec-Matysiak and Laskowski2013) can serve as paratenic hosts. Since Hobmaier and Hobmaier's studies (Reference Hobmaier and Hobmaier1935), different molluscs have been used as intermediate hosts and the development of A. abstrusus from first (L1) to third stage (L3) larvae has been described (Gerichter, Reference Gerichter1949; Wallace and Rosen, Reference Wallace and Rosen1970; Ash, Reference Ash1970; Lopez et al. Reference Lopez, Panadero, Paz, Sanchez-Andrade, Diaz, Diez-Banos and Morrondo2005; Di Cesare et al. Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Di Giulio, Veronesi, Frangipane di Regalbono, Talone and Traversa2013; Giannelli et al. Reference Giannelli, Ramos, Annoscia, Di Cesare, Colella, Brianti, Dantas-Torres, Mutafchiev and Otranto2014).

Biomphalaria glabrata is a neotropical, freshwater pulmonate snail. Because of its essential role as a natural intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni, B. glabrata has been studied and maintained in laboratories for a long time. Consequently, suitable conditions for breeding and maintenance of this very rapidly reproducing snail are well known (DeJong et al. Reference DeJong, Morgan, Paraense, Pointier, Amarista, Ayeh-Kumi, Babiker, Barbosa, Brémond and Canese2001; Pointier et al. Reference Pointier, David and Jarne2005). B. glabrata has previously been used as an intermediate host for A. abstrusus (Ash, Reference Ash1970; Wallace and Rosen, Reference Wallace and Rosen1970; Jefferies et al. Reference Jefferies, Vrhovec, Wallner and Catalan2010). However, descriptions of the chronological and morphometric development of A. abstrusus L1 to L3 in this snail and the success rate of snail infections, which are key factors for the identification and recovery of infective larval stage for further experimental studies, were missing to date.

The aims of this study were to describe and assess the development rate from L1 to the infective and relevant L3 stage of A. abstrusus in the snail B. glabrata, as well as to evaluate the suitability of this species as an experimental intermediate host.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The A. abstrusus L1 used for the infection of 306 B. glabrata snails (sized 0.8–1.5 cm in diameter) were obtained from feces from a 2 to 3 months old naturally infected female stray cat with high-grade dyspnoea presented at the Animal Hospital of the Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zurich. L1 were isolated using the Baermann–Wetzel technique (Deplazes et al. Reference Deplazes, Eckert, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Zahner, Deplazes and Eckert2013) and analysed with a duplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Annoscia et al. Reference Annoscia, Latrofa, Campbell, Giannelli, Ramos, Dantas-Torres, Brianti and Otranto2014) to verify their species identity and to exclude a co-infection with the lungworm Troglostrongylus brevior.

The snails were bred at the Institute of Parasitology at the Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zurich and thus, had no previous contact with other parasites. Prior to infection, the snails were fasted for 24 h in order to increase the ingestion rate, and placed individually into the wells of a 24 well polystyrene cell-culture plate (Nunc™, Roskilde, Denmark) with 2–3 mL of tank water, each containing 300 L1 of A. abstrusus. After 24 h the wells were checked for remaining L1 with a stereomicroscope (Leica® MS 5, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and the snails placed into two large tanks. They were maintained under standardized conditions at constant temperature (24–26 °C) and fed on lettuce, in accordance with the accepted principles of animal welfare for invertebrates. Every week, five snails were randomly chosen, humanely euthanized by prompt crushing and digested individually for 1 h in 50 mL H2O, 1% HCl containing 0.12 g Pepsin (800–2500 U mg−1, Sigma P700, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) in a water bath rotary shaker (Aquatron®, Infors AG, Basel, Switzerland) at 45 °C. After digestion, the tubes containing the material were centrifuged at 500 ×  g for 3 min. Each pellet was re-suspended in tap water, centrifuged again and the sediment examined under the stereomicroscope. Larvae were stained with Lugol, photographed, measured by using a digital image processing system (Leica® DM 100 LED, Leica® DFC 420, Leica® LAS 4, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and morphologically identified based on previously described developmental stage characteristics (Gerichter, Reference Gerichter1949; Di Cesare et al. Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Di Giulio, Veronesi, Frangipane di Regalbono, Talone and Traversa2013). Starting from the day when all isolated larvae had developed into L3, the time interval between digestions was extended to every second week until the end of the trial (28 weeks post exposure, wpe). In the eighth and ninth wpe, 200 snails were removed to extract the L3 for other purposes.

Microsoft Excel 2010 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA) was used to calculate means and standard deviations (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using Windows IBM® SPSS ® Statistics (Version 22). The Mann–Whitney U-Test was used for comparing the number of larvae per snail across time points. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

As confirmed by PCR, A. abstrusus was the only parasite present in the cat feces from which L1 were isolated. Twenty-four hours after snail exposure to L1, a mean of 10.1 L1 (SD: 14.02 L1) per well were counted, indicating a penetration rate of 96.6%. Morphological features are presented in Fig. 1A–C. L1 presented the typical notched S-shaped tail with a dorsal dent, L2 displayed a characteristic outer sheath, and L3 showed a round knob at the tip of the tail.

Fig. 1. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae: (A) first-stage larva and detail of the tail end; (B) second-stage larva; (C) third-stage larva and detail of the tail end (stained with Lugol).

L1 were present until 6 wpe. In the first wpe a high number of L1 in the snails were damaged. The first L2 were obtained in the second wpe, while the first L3 occurred in the fourth wpe. After 8 wpe, all larvae had reached the L3 stage (Fig. 2). Except for one dead L3 observed after artificial digestion, all recovered L3 were alive and motile throughout the experiment. Larval sizes (length and width) are summarized in Table 1 and are presented with results from previously published studies. L3 were isolated from snails until 26 wpe, while at 28 wpe, the remaining last five snails were all found exempt of L3. Development times for the different larval stages of A. abstrusus are shown in Table 2, besides findings from other studies where different snail species were used.

Fig. 2. Occurrence of first (L1), second (L2) and third-stage larvae (L3) of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in Biomphalaria glabrata snails in weeks post exposure (=wpe).

Table 1. Morphometric data of the developmental stages (first stage (L1), second stage (L2) and third stage (L3)) of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae in intermediate hosts obtained from the present work and from reports published elsewhere (measurements in μm: L: body length, W: body width). n.m. = not mentioned

a Mean and range in brackets.

b Range.

c Mean and standard deviation.

Table 2. Key time points in the development from first- to third-stage Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae in different gastropods in days post exposure (dpe) from the present work and from previous reports

S, summer; W, winter; n.e., not evaluated.

From the first wpe (mean: 21.2, SD: 14.3) to the second wpe (mean: 4.4, SD: 8.3), we observed a significant reduction of larvae per snail (P < 0.05). Afterwards, the number of larvae per snail remained constant. From the second to the seventh wpe, a mean of 4.7 (SD: 0.5) larvae per snail were recovered (Fig. 3). After 8 wpe, a further non-significant decrease in the number of recovered larvae was noted, down to a mean of 0.6 (SD: 0.3; P > 0.05) larvae per snail. In total, only 0.4% of the L1 used for inoculation of the snails completely developed into L3 in the course of the study.

Fig. 3. Mean number of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae (first, second and third stage) per dissected Biomphalaria glabrata snail over 16 weeks post exposure (wpe).

DISCUSSION

Our data confirm the feasibility of experimental infections with the tropical freshwater snail B. glabrata as a potential intermediate host for the felid lungworm A. abstrusus. However, there are indications that this non-terrestrial snail species is not an adequate intermediate host for mass production of A. abstrusus L3.

Our measurements of total length and width of L1, L2 and L3 are in line with previously published numbers (Table 1). However, we obtained a broader range of length and width within each developmental stage than what others reported, while in our hands, L3 tended to be longer in size than previously described for L3 recovered from the same snail species (Ash, Reference Ash1970). As suggested elsewhere, the size of snails as well as the duration of the life cycle within the gastropods may influence the size of the larvae (Di Cesare et al. Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Bartolini, Iorio, Talone, Filippi and Traversa2015). Furthermore, also the fixative and brightening agents can influence the measured dimensions of larvae (Lopez et al. Reference Lopez, Panadero, Paz, Sanchez-Andrade, Diaz, Diez-Banos and Morrondo2005).

Comparing the larval development time to the L3 stage with prior studies (Table 2), the occurrence of L3 appears delayed in the present work (4 wpe) than in investigations carried out with the terrestrial snails Helix aspersa (15 and 21 dpi) and Cernuella virgata (18 dpi). Nonetheless, the time point when all larvae had reached the L3 stage (8 wpe) was consistent with the findings of the other authors.

As many as 96.6% of L1 had invaded the snails after 24 h, representing a higher penetration rate than described by Lopez et al. (Reference Lopez, Panadero, Paz, Sanchez-Andrade, Diaz, Diez-Banos and Morrondo2005), with 65.5% in experimentally infected C. virgata. The mechanisms for infecting aquatic and terrestrial snails are different, which may explain discrepancies in terms of penetration and development rate. Nematodes infect aquatic snails more often passively, through accidental ingestion by the snail, and less commonly by direct penetration of the snail tegument. In contrast, in terrestrial snails direct penetration, mostly through the foot, is a very common mechanism of infection (Morley, Reference Morley2010). In the study by Lopez et al. (Reference Lopez, Panadero, Paz, Sanchez-Andrade, Diaz, Diez-Banos and Morrondo2005) nearly 5% of the L1 developed into L3. Di Cesare et al. (Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Di Giulio, Veronesi, Frangipane di Regalbono, Talone and Traversa2013) obtained an even higher development rate, with up to 50% developing in H. aspersa. In the present study the percentage of larvae completing their development into L3 was limited to 0.4%. Therefore, a high ingestion/penetration rate is not necessarily an indication for a high development rate. The reasons behind this low development rate in the present study remain unclear. The snail species, size and age, the L1 isolate, its age and the infective dose, as well as the environmental conditions may all influence the development rate (Di Cesare et al. Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Bartolini, Iorio, Talone, Filippi and Traversa2015). Environmental conditions were described to have an important impact on larval development in intermediate hosts: the maturation is faster and more larvae start and complete their development at higher temperatures, respectively, in summer, i.e. in H. aspersa snails infected with A. abstrusus (Di Cesare et al. Reference Di Cesare, Crisi, Di Giulio, Veronesi, Frangipane di Regalbono, Talone and Traversa2013; Giannelli et al. Reference Giannelli, Ramos, Annoscia, Di Cesare, Colella, Brianti, Dantas-Torres, Mutafchiev and Otranto2014). As we kept the environmental factors constant at the indicated temperatures for B. glabrata under established experimental conditions, other reasons for this low development rate have to be considered. In the past, we used to have a higher development rate of A. abstrusus L3 in B. glabrata at our institute (data not shown). Since the L1 originated from different cats, a diverging infectivity of the isolate cannot be excluded. Concerning the infective dose per snail, Wallace and Rosen (Reference Wallace and Rosen1970) infected B. glabrata with 100–800 A. abstrusus L1, obtaining a higher development rate. Since we had minor loss of snails over 28 wpe (n = 6), we conclude that the number of L1 (n = 300) used in our study should have been well tolerated by the snails.

Previous studies showed that after snails are infected with nematode larvae, their defence mechanisms are activated (Sauerländer, Reference Sauerländer1976; Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Martins-Souza, Coelho, Lima and Negrao-Correa2006; Barcante et al. Reference Barcante, Barcante, Fujiwara and Lima2012). The difference between i.e. a penetration rate of 65.5% and a development rate of 9.96% into later stages suggested that a majority of L1 are destroyed during or shortly after penetration (López et al. Reference Lopez, Panadero, Paz, Sanchez-Andrade, Diaz, Diez-Banos and Morrondo2005). In the present study we observed a significant drop of L1 per snail from the first to the second wpe. Furthermore, in the first wpe a high number of L1 in the snails were damaged. This strengthens the concept that a high number of incorporated larvae may not start their development and are destroyed by the immune system of the snails. Other reasons for the reduction of larval numbers within snails over time are possible. The last A. abstrusus positive snails in this study were identified at 26 wpe, while it has been shown in H. aspersa that snails can remain infected for up to 2 years (Hamilton, Reference Hamilton1969). This might additionally suggest that in the most suitable intermediate hosts larvae may survive as long as the snails live. On the other hand, we cannot rule out the possibility that the absence of larvae at 28 wpe in B. glabrata was due to spontaneous departure of L3 from the snails, as it has been demonstrated for the same snail species infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum, another metastrongyloid nematode (Barcante et al. Reference Barcante, Barcante, Dias and Lima2003), or in H. aspersa infected with A. abstrusus (Giannelli et al. Reference Giannelli, Colella, Abramo, do Nascimento Ramos, Falsone, Brianti, Varcasia, Dantas-Torres, Knaus, Fox and Otranto2015).

Due to its high fertility and easy maintenance, Biomphalaria glabrata is not only a naturally occurring intermediate host but also a perfect experimental intermediate host for S. mansoni (DeJong et al. Reference DeJong, Morgan, Paraense, Pointier, Amarista, Ayeh-Kumi, Babiker, Barbosa, Brémond and Canese2001; Pointier et al. Reference Pointier, David and Jarne2005), and proved its suitability for experimental infections also with other metastrongylid parasites such as A. vasorum (Ash, Reference Ash1970; Barcante et al. Reference Barcante, Barcante, Fujiwara and Lima2012). The findings presented here describe in detail the development of A. abstrusus from L1 to L3 and the development rate in B. glabrata. In particular, this study provides new insights into the chronological development of A. abstrusus in the aquatic snail. Knowledge of the time needed for all larvae to reach the infectious L3 stage and awareness of the potentially very low development rate are critical for the planning of subsequent experimental studies with metastrongyloid parasites.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Stefan Müller and Annakatrin Häni for their support regarding maintenance of the infected snails, Dr Felix Grimm for his help with the biomolecular methods and Dr Lucienne Tritten for critical review of the manuscript. This publication is part of the doctoral thesis of Eva-Maria Zottler.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

We thank Bayer HealthCare Animal Health for financial support of the doctoral thesis of Eva-Maria Zottler.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the use of invertebrate animals.

References

REFERENCES

Annoscia, G., Latrofa, M. S., Campbell, B. E., Giannelli, A., Ramos, R. A., Dantas-Torres, F., Brianti, E. and Otranto, D. (2014). Simultaneous detection of the feline lungworms Troglostrongylus brevior and Aelurostrongylus abstrusus by a newly developed duplex-PCR. Veterinary Parasitology 199, 172178.Google Scholar
Ash, L. R. (1970). Diagnostic morphology of the third-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, and Anafilaroides rostratus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea). Journal of Parasitology 56, 249253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barcante, T.A., Barcante, J.M.P., Dias, S.R.C. and Lima, W.S. (2003). Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) Kamensky, 1905: emergence of third-stage larvae from infected Biomphalaria glabrata snails. Parasitology Research 91, 471475.Google Scholar
Barcante, T. A., Barcante, J. M., Fujiwara, R. T. and Lima, W. S. (2012). Analysis of circulating haemocytes from Biomphalaria glabrata following Angiostrongylus vasorum infection using flow cytometry. Journal of Parasitology Research, ID 314723. doi: 10.1155/2012/314723.Google Scholar
Barutzki, D. and Schaper, R. (2011). Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitology Research 109 (Suppl.), S45S60.Google Scholar
DeJong, R. J., Morgan, J. A., Paraense, W. L., Pointier, J.-P., Amarista, M., Ayeh-Kumi, P. F., Babiker, A., Barbosa, C. S., Brémond, P. and Canese, A. P. (2001). Evolutionary relationships and biogeography of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) with implications regarding its role as host of the human bloodfluke, Schistosoma mansoni . Molecular Biology and Evolution 18, 22252239.Google Scholar
Deplazes, P., Eckert, J., Von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. and Zahner, H. (2013). Diagnostische Methoden. In Lehrbuch der Parasitologie für die Tiermedizin (ed. Deplazes, P. and Eckert, J.), pp. 508524. Enke press, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
De Souza Ramos, D. G., Alves da Cruz Scheremeta, R. G., Soares de Oliveira, A. C., Sinkoc, A. L. and de Campos Pacheco, R. (2013). Survey of helminth parasites of cats from the metropolitan area of Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Revue Brasiliana Parasitolica Veterinaria 22, 201206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cesare, A., Crisi, P. E., Di Giulio, E., Veronesi, F., Frangipane di Regalbono, A., Talone, T. and Traversa, D. (2013). Larval development of the feline lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in Helix aspersa . Parasitology Research 112, 31013108.Google Scholar
Di Cesare, A., Crisi, P. E., Bartolini, R., Iorio, R., Talone, T., Filippi, L. and Traversa, D. (2015). Larval development of Angiostrongylus vasorum in the land snail Helix aspersa . Parasitology Research 114, 36493655.Google Scholar
Dirven, M., Szatmári, V., Van den Ingh, T. and Nijsse, R. (2012). Reversible pulmonary hypertension associated with lungworm infection in a young cat. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology 14, 465474.Google Scholar
Genchi, M., Ferrari, N., Fonti, P., De Francesco, I., Piazza, C. and Viglietti, A. (2014). Relation between Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae excretion, respiratory and radiographic signs in naturally infected cats. Veterinary Parasitology 206, 182187.Google Scholar
Gerdin, J.A., Slater, M.R., Makolinski, K.V., Looney, A.L., Appel, L.D., Martin, N.M. and McDonough, S.P. (2011). Post-mortem findings in 54 cases of anesthetic associated death in cats from two spay-neuter programs in New York State. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13, 959966.Google Scholar
Gerichter, C. B. (1949). Studies on the nematodes parasitic in the lungs of Felidae in Palestine. Parasitology 39, 251262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannelli, A., Ramos, R.A., Annoscia, G., Di Cesare, A., Colella, V., Brianti, E., Dantas-Torres, F., Mutafchiev, Y. and Otranto, D. (2014). Development of the feline lungworms Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior in Helix aspersa snails. Parasitology 141, 563569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannelli, A., Colella, V., Abramo, F., do Nascimento Ramos, R.A., Falsone, L., Brianti, E., Varcasia, A., Dantas-Torres, F., Knaus, M., Fox, M.T. and Otranto, D. (2015). Release of lungworm larvae from snails in the environment: potential for alternative transmission pathways. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003722.Google Scholar
Grandi, G., Calvi, L.E., Venco, L., Paratici, C., Genchi, C., Memmi, D. and Kramer, L.H. (2005). Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (cat lungworm) infection in five cats from Italy. Veterinary Parasitology 134, 177182.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.M. (1969). On the migration, distribution, longevity and pathogenicity of larvae of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in the snail Helix aspersa . Journal of Helminthology 43, 319325.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.M. and McCaw, A.W. (1967). The role of the mouse in the life cycle of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus . Journal of Helminthology 41, 309312.Google Scholar
Hobmaier, M. and Hobmaier, A. (1935). Intermediate hosts of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus of the cat. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 32, 16411647.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R., Vrhovec, M. G., Wallner, N. and Catalan, D. R. (2010). Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus sp. (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) infections in cats inhabiting Ibiza, Spain. Veterinary Parasitology 173, 344348.Google Scholar
Jezewski, W., Bunkowska-Gawlik, K., Hildebrand, J., Perec-Matysiak, A. and Laskowski, Z. (2013). Intermediate and paratenic hosts in the life cycle of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in natural environment. Veterinary Parasitology 198, 401405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, M., Rapti, D., Shukullari, E., Kusi, I., Postoli, R., Xhaxhiu, D., Silaghi, C., Hamel, D., Visser, M., Winter, R. and Rehbein, S. (2014). Characterisation of ecto- and endoparasites in domestic cats from Tirana, Albania. Parasitology Research 113, 33613371.Google Scholar
Lacorcia, L., Gasser, R. B., Anderson, G. A. and Beveridge, I. (2009). Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid examination and other diagnostic techniques with the Baermann technique for detection of naturally occurring Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection in cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 235, 4349.Google Scholar
Lopez, C., Panadero, R., Paz, A., Sanchez-Andrade, R., Diaz, P., Diez-Banos, P. and Morrondo, P. (2005). Larval development of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Angiostrongylidae) in experimentally infected Cernuella (Cernuella) virgata (Mollusca, Helicidae). Parasitology Research 95, 1316.Google Scholar
Lucio-Forster, A. and Bowman, D. D. (2011). Prevalence of fecal-borne parasites detected by centrifugal flotation in feline samples from two shelters in upstate New York. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13, 300303.Google Scholar
Morley, N.J. (2010). Aquatic molluscs as auxiliary hosts for terrestrial nematode parasites: implications for pathogen transmission in a changing climate. Parasitology 137, 10411056.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. S., Thompson, R. C., Traub, R. J., Rees, R. and Robertson, I. D. (2008). National study of the gastrointestinal parasites of dogs and cats in Australia. Veterinary Parasitology 151, 181190.Google Scholar
Pereira, C. A., Martins-Souza, R. L., Coelho, P. M., Lima, W. S. and Negrao-Correa, D. (2006). Effect of Angiostrongylus vasorum infection on Biomphalaria tenagophila susceptibility to Schistosoma mansoni . Acta Tropica 98, 224233.Google Scholar
Philbey, A. W., Krause, S. and Jefferies, R. (2014). Verminous pneumonia and enteritis due to hyperinfection with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in a kitten. Journal of Comparative Pathology 150, 357360.Google Scholar
Pointier, J. P., David, P. and Jarne, P. (2005). Biological invasions: the case of planorbid snails. Journal of Helminthology 79, 249256.Google Scholar
Sauerländer, R. (1976). Histological studies of the African giant snail (Achatina fulica) experimentally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum or Angiostrongylus cantonensis (in German). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 49, 263280.Google Scholar
Schnyder, M., Di Cesare, A., Basso, W., Guscetti, F., Riond, B., Glaus, T., Crisi, P. and Deplazes, P. (2014). Clinical, laboratory and pathological findings in cats experimentally infected with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus . Parasitology Research 113, 14251433.Google Scholar
Scott, D.W. (1973) Current knowledge of aelurostrongylosis in the cat. Literature review and case reports. Cornell Veterinarian 63, 483500.Google Scholar
Thiengo, S. C., Fernandez, M. A., Torres, E. J., Coelho, P. M. and Lanfredi, R. M. (2008). First record of a nematode Metastrongyloidea (Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae) in Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica (Mollusca, Achatinidae) in Brazil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 98, 3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traversa, D., Di Cesare, A., Milillo, P., Iorio, R. and Otranto, D. (2008). Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in a feline colony from central Italy: clinical features, diagnostic procedures and molecular characterization. Parasitology Research 103, 11911196.Google Scholar
Wallace, G. D. and Rosen, L. (1970). Maintenance of two feline lungworms in aquatic snails (Biomphalaria glabrata). American Journal of Veterinary Research 31, 809810.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae: (A) first-stage larva and detail of the tail end; (B) second-stage larva; (C) third-stage larva and detail of the tail end (stained with Lugol).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Occurrence of first (L1), second (L2) and third-stage larvae (L3) of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in Biomphalaria glabrata snails in weeks post exposure (=wpe).

Figure 2

Table 1. Morphometric data of the developmental stages (first stage (L1), second stage (L2) and third stage (L3)) of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae in intermediate hosts obtained from the present work and from reports published elsewhere (measurements in μm: L: body length, W: body width). n.m. = not mentioned

Figure 3

Table 2. Key time points in the development from first- to third-stage Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae in different gastropods in days post exposure (dpe) from the present work and from previous reports

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Mean number of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus larvae (first, second and third stage) per dissected Biomphalaria glabrata snail over 16 weeks post exposure (wpe).