Intrauterine growth restriction predisposes to immunological and metabolic adaptations( Reference Prentice and Moore 1 ) and manifests as low birth weight (LBW) with implications for child survival. Lacks of access to antenatal services and poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy( Reference Abrams and Parker 2 ) have been associated with high rates of LBW in Nepal. Recently, attempts have been made to increase accessibility to antenatal services and mitigate the problem( Reference Manandhar, Osrin and Shrestha 3 ). The objective of this study was to assess incidence of LBW in rural and urban Nepal.
A sample of 400 pregnant women were recruited from rural (n=200) and urban (n=200) areas of Nepal. A cross-sectional retrospective and prospective approach was employed to obtain pre-pregnancy information including usual food intake (via FFQ), and pre-pregnancy maternal weight and height. Repeat 24 hr recall, tracking of weight gain and antenatal clinic attendance were recorded. Relationships between maternal weight and outcome of pregnancy were compared using correlation co-efficient and significance tested using independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Chi Square test for non-parametric data.
Total LBW incidence was 27.9%, higher than previously reported in this population. The incidence was higher in rural (34.8%) compared to urban (21.2%) areas (χ2, p<0.05). Mean pregnancy weight gain from first trimester was 8.11 (±2.04) kg (median=8 kg) ranging from 4 kg to 16 kg and a rural:urban difference of Mean=7.85±1.69 kg v.Mean=8.36±2.32 kg (p<0.05). Subjects showed wide variations in energy and protein intake. Mean energy intake was 8.04 MJ/d (sd, 1.77; median, 7.85 MJ/d); mean protein intake was low (48.5 g/d; sd 14.45 g; median, 46.2 g/d). Birth weight was associated with energy (r=0.61, p<0.001) and protein (r=0.501, p<0.001) intake.
Pre-pregnancy maternal stunting and dietary intake during pregnancy were major contributory factors in the progress and outcome of pregnancy despite improved access to antenatal services with rural dwellers experiencing the worst outcome.
The study was partly supported by a British Nutrition Foundation (BNF) Dennis Burkitt Award 2010.