Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 22
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Perez-Perez, Guillermo Ignacio and Kienesberger, Sabine 2013. Foodborne Infections and Intoxications. p. 165.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
MacRITCHIE, L. A. HUNTER, C. J. and STRACHAN, N. J. C. 2013. A population-based exposure assessment of risk factors associated with gastrointestinal pathogens: aCampylobacterstudy. Epidemiology and Infection, Vol. 141, Issue. 5, p. 976.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kittl, Sonja Korczak, Bożena M. Niederer, Lilian Baumgartner, Andreas Buettner, Sabina Overesch, Gudrun and Kuhnert, Peter 2013. Comparison of Genotypes and Antibiotic Resistances of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on Chicken Retail Meat and at Slaughter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 79, Issue. 12, p. 3875.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Davis, Margaret A. Moore, Danna L. Baker, Katherine N. K. French, Nigel P. Patnode, Marianne Hensley, Joni MacDonald, Kathryn and Besser, Thomas E. 2013. Risk Factors for Campylobacteriosis in Two Washington State Counties with High Numbers of Dairy Farms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 51, Issue. 12, p. 3921.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Lévesque, Simon Fournier, Eric Carrier, Nathalie Frost, Eric Arbeit, Robert D. Michaud, Sophie and Chang, Yung-Fu 2013. Campylobacteriosis in Urban versus Rural Areas: A Case-Case Study Integrated with Molecular Typing to Validate Risk Factors and to Attribute Sources of Infection. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, Issue. 12, p. e83731.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Löscher, Thomas and Alberer, Martin 2013. Travel Medicine. p. 197.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bless, Philipp Justus Schmutz, Claudia Suter, Kathrin Jost, Marianne Hattendorf, Jan Mäusezahl-Feuz, Mirjam and Mäusezahl, Daniel 2014. A tradition and an epidemic: determinants of the campylobacteriosis winter peak in Switzerland. European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 29, Issue. 7, p. 527.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Fimlaid, Kelly A. Lindow, Janet C. Tribble, David R. Bunn, Janice Y. Maue, Alexander C. Kirkpatrick, Beth D. and Bereswill, Stefan 2014. Peripheral CD4+ T Cell Cytokine Responses Following Human Challenge and Re-Challenge with Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, Issue. 11, p. e112513.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Marotta, Francesca Garofolo, Giuliano Di Donato, Guido Aprea, Giuseppe Platone, Ilenia Cianciavicchia, Silvia Alessiani, Alessandra and Di Giannatale, Elisabetta 2015. Population Diversity ofCampylobacter jejuniin Poultry and Its Dynamic of Contamination in Chicken Meat. BioMed Research International, Vol. 2015, Issue. , p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Snelling, William J 2016. The Relationship between Human Campylobacteriosis and Broilers. Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access, Vol. 2, Issue. 6,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Skarp, C.P.A. Hänninen, M.-L. and Rautelin, H.I.K. 2016. Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 103.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rijks, J.M. Cito, F. Cunningham, A.A. Rantsios, A.T. and Giovannini, A. 2016. Disease Risk Assessments Involving Companion Animals: an Overview for 15 Selected Pathogens Taking a European Perspective. Journal of Comparative Pathology, Vol. 155, Issue. 1, p. S75.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Damborg, P. Broens, E.M. Chomel, B.B. Guenther, S. Pasmans, F. Wagenaar, J.A. Weese, J.S. Wieler, L.H. Windahl, U. Vanrompay, D. and Guardabassi, L. 2016. Bacterial Zoonoses Transmitted by Household Pets: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives for Targeted Research and Policy Actions. Journal of Comparative Pathology, Vol. 155, Issue. 1, p. S27.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Pintar, Katarina D.M. Thomas, Kate M. Christidis, Tanya Otten, Ainsley Nesbitt, Andrea Marshall, Barbara Pollari, Frank Hurst, Matt and Ravel, Andre 2017. A Comparative Exposure Assessment of Campylobacter in Ontario, Canada. Risk Analysis, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 677.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alina Weinberger, Miriam Paz, Shlomit Valinsky, Lea Agmon, Vered and Peretz, Chava 2018. Ambient temperature and age-related notified Campylobacter infection in Israel: A 12-year time series study. Environmental Research, Vol. 164, Issue. , p. 539.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hellgren, Josefin Hästö, Lovisa Staaf Wikström, Camilla Fernström, Lise‐Lotte and Hansson, Ingrid 2019. Occurrence of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Clostridium and Enterobacteriaceae in raw meat‐based diets for dogs. Veterinary Record, Vol. 184, Issue. 14, p. 442.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mughini-Gras, Lapo Kooh, Pauline Fravalo, Philippe Augustin, Jean-Christophe Guillier, Laurent David, Julie Thébault, Anne Carlin, Frederic Leclercq, Alexandre Jourdan-Da-Silva, Nathalie Pavio, Nicole Villena, Isabelle Sanaa, Moez and Watier, Laurence 2019. Critical Orientation in the Jungle of Currently Available Methods and Types of Data for Source Attribution of Foodborne Diseases. Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 10, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kienesberger, Sabine and Perez-Perez, Guillermo Ignacio 2021. Foodborne Infections and Intoxications. p. 165.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Conesa, A Garofolo, G Di Pasquale, A and Cammà, C 2022. Monitoring AMR in Campylobacter jejuni from Italy in the last 10 years (2011–2021): Microbiological and WGS data risk assessment. EFSA Journal, Vol. 20, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cui, Zhaohui Marder, Ellyn P. Click, Eleanor S. Hoekstra, Robert M. and Bruce, Beau B. 2022. Nearest-Neighbors Matching for Case–Control Study Analyses: Better Risk Factor Identification From a Study of Sporadic Campylobacteriosis in the United States. Epidemiology, Vol. 33, Issue. 5, p. 633.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2024

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Risk attribution of Campylobacter infection by age group using exposure modelling
  • Volume 138, Issue 12
  • S. BUETTNER (a1), B. WIELAND (a2), K. D. C. STAERK (a2) and G. REGULA (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881000155X
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Risk attribution of Campylobacter infection by age group using exposure modelling
  • Volume 138, Issue 12
  • S. BUETTNER (a1), B. WIELAND (a2), K. D. C. STAERK (a2) and G. REGULA (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881000155X
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Risk attribution of Campylobacter infection by age group using exposure modelling
  • Volume 138, Issue 12
  • S. BUETTNER (a1), B. WIELAND (a2), K. D. C. STAERK (a2) and G. REGULA (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881000155X
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.