Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:05:58.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficiency of monolaurin in mitigating ruminal methanogenesis and modifying C-isotope fractionation when incubating diets composed of either C3 or C4 plants in a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2009

Fenja Klevenhusen
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Department of Agricultural and Food Science, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Stefano M. Bernasconi
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Geological Institute, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Thomas B. Hofstetter
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Jakov Bolotin
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Carmen Kunz
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Department of Agricultural and Food Science, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Carla R. Soliva*
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Department of Agricultural and Food Science, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Carla R. Soliva, fax +41 44 632 11 28, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mitigation of methanogenesis in ruminants has been an important goal for several decades. Free lauric acid, known to suppress ruminal methanogenesis, has a low palatability; therefore, in the present study the aim was to evaluate the mitigation efficacy of its esterified form (monolaurin). Further, 13C-isotope abundance (δ13C) and 13C–12C fractionation during methanogenesis and fermentation were determined to evaluate possible microbial C-isotope preferences. Using the rumen simulation technique, four basal diets, characterised either by the C3 plants grass (hay) and wheat (straw and grain), or the C4 plant (13C excess compared with C3 plants) maize (straw and grain), and a mixture of the latter two, were incubated with and without monolaurin (50 g/kg dietary DM). Added to hay, monolaurin did not significantly affect methanogenesis. When added to the other diets (P < 0·05 for the wheat-based diet) methane formation was lowered. Monolaurin decreased fibre disappearance (least effect with the hay diet), acetate:propionate ratio, and protozoal counts. Feed residues and SCFA showed the same δ13C as the diets. Methane was depleted in 13C while CO2 was enriched in 13C compared with the diets. Monolaurin addition resulted in 13C depletion of CO2 and enrichment in CH4 (the latter only in the hay diet). In conclusion, monolaurin proved to effectively decrease methanogenesis in the straw–grain diets although this effect might partly be explained by the concomitantly reduced fibre disappearance. The influence on 13C-isotope abundance and fractionation supports the hypothesis that ruminal microbes seem to differentiate to some extent between C-isotopes during methanogenesis and fermentation.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from livestock, and thereby mainly ruminants, are estimated to be the second largest source of global agricultural non-CO2 greenhouse gases(1). In 2000, global enteric CH4 emissions were estimated to amount to 85·6 Gg equivalent to 1·8 Mt CO2 equivalents and are projected to increase by 32 % until 2020 relative to 1990(1). The search for ideal CH4-mitigating strategies revealed that diet supplementation seems to be especially promising(Reference Beauchemin, Kreuzer and O'Mara2). There is an increasing body of literature indicating that supplementing diets with lipids that are not protected from ruminal digestion can diminish enteric CH4 emissions(Reference Beauchemin, Kreuzer and O'Mara2). Saturated medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA), including caprylic acid, capric acid(Reference Ajisaka, Mohammed and Hara3), lauric acid(Reference Soliva, Hindrichsen and Meile4, Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Wasserfallen5) and myristic acid(Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer6, Reference Odongo, Or-Rashid and Kebreab7), as well as combinations of the latter two(Reference Soliva, Meile and Cieslak8), are among the most promising lipids for that purpose. Also coconut oil, a lipid especially rich in lauric and myristic acid, has proved to be very effective in mitigating CH4 formation in the gut of the ruminant (for example, Machmüller et al. (Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer9), Jordan et al. (Reference Jordan, Lovett and Monahan10) and Yabuuchi et al. (Reference Yabuuchi, Matsushita and Otsuka11)). So far, only a few studies have investigated the efficiency of potentially CH4-abating supplementation strategies in different diet types(Reference Machmüller12, Reference Machmüller, Dohme and Soliva13). Added to a concentrate-based diet, myristic acid showed a larger effect in suppressing CH4 formation in sheep than when supplemented to a forage-based diet(Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer6). Machmüller(Reference Machmüller12) concluded that, in the case of diets rich in structural carbohydrates, non-esterified rather than esterified MCFA should be fed, as the efficiency of esterified fatty acids strongly depends on the rate of ruminal lipolysis. Besides their anti-methanogenic effects, lipids are also helpful in increasing the energy density of the diet, which may improve animal performance in some situations(Reference Jordan, Lovett and Monahan10). However, feeding higher amounts of lipids to ruminants may have adverse side-effects. These include the possibility of a depressed DM intake(Reference Beauchemin, Kreuzer and O'Mara2) and, sometimes, a reduced ruminal fibre degradation(Reference Soliva, Meile and Cieslak8, Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Wasserfallen14). Furthermore, the most efficient anti-methanogenic MCFA, lauric acid, is known to be of low palatability, particularly due to its soapy taste, which may result in substantial feed refusals(Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Sutter15). This should be different with esterified lauric acid. At least, according to a large series of reports, refusals were never nearly as high when feeding coconut oil, consisting of about half of lauric acid in esterified form(Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Wasserfallen14), than those reported for pure lauric acid(Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Sutter15). Finally, the immediacy of the potentially adverse effects in the rumen should be reduced with monolaurin, since monolaurin, an ester of lauric acid, is known to be less corrosive and, therefore, might be less irritating for the ruminal environment than free lauric acid.

So far, analyses of stable C-isotopes in ruminant science have mostly been used to trace the feeding regimen in terms of dietary proportions of C3 and C4 plants(Reference Jones, Ludlow and Troughton16, Reference Knobbe, Vogl and Pritzkow17) that cattle have been subjected to by concluding from isotope ratios analysed in body tissue (meat), milk, urine or faeces. Few studies have analysed the stable C-isotopes of CH4 released from ruminants (for example, Rust(Reference Rust18), Schulze et al. (Reference Schulze, Lohmeyer and Giese19), Bilek et al. (Reference Bilek, Tyler and Kurihara20) and Levin et al. (Reference Levin, Bergamaschi and Dörr21)) and from ruminal fluid in vitro (Reference Metges, Kempe and Schmidt22). Diets tested were either mixtures of C3 and C4 plants in varying proportions or pure C3 and pure C4 plant diets. However, none of these studies investigated all versions analysed in the present study; neither did they determine the 13C isotope abundance (δ13C) and isotope fractionation in single SCFA. According to the authors' best knowledge, monolaurin was tested in the present study for the first time for its effectiveness in ruminal CH4 mitigation. Generally monolaurin is well known for its antimicrobial efficiency against gram-positive bacteria(Reference Kabara23), but it has been shown that also specific gram-negative bacterial species can be affected(Reference Preuss, Echard and Enig24).

In the present study the hypothesis tested was that an effective lipid source acts differently on methanogenesis when the carbohydrate types available for fermentation differ, which might be expressed in a different C-isotope fractionation. An in vitro approach using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) was chosen for the present study as this system allows the following of all processes taking place in the rumen quantitatively, which would be much more difficult to control in an in vivo approach including all extra-ruminal processes. In order to determine whether differences in CH4 formation and C-isotope fractionation exist, four basal diets characterised by either C3 plants (two diets; grass hay, wheat), C4 plants (one diet; maize) or C3 and C4 plants (one diet; maize and wheat mixture) were compared, either at a similar (C3 straw plus grain diet v. C4 straw plus grain diet) or at a differing carbohydrate profile (C3 grass hay diet v. C4 straw plus grain diet, i.e. easily degradable fibre v. starch).

Materials and methods

In vitro system and experimental diets

The in vitro experiment was conducted using an eight-fermenter Rusitec system as described in detail by Soliva & Hess(Reference Soliva, Hess, Makkar and Vercoe25). With this in vitro system four different basal diets were tested at 15 g DM/d both with and without monolaurin (chemically: C15H30O4, glycerol monolaurate) supplemented at 50 g/kg (on a DM basis) in a completely randomised design in six replicates per treatment. In the present study, Lauricidin® (purity >95 %; Med-Chem Laboratories, Galena, IL, USA) was used where, according to the producer's statement, lauric acid is esterified at the external position with glycerol and is shaped into mini-pellets without fill material. The basal diets consisted either of meadow-grass hay rich in ryegrass (second cut, beginning of shooting; forage-only), maize or wheat (always straw and grain mixed in the proportions being equivalent in estimated net energy content to that of the hay) (Table 1). A fourth basal diet consisted of a 1:1 mixture of the maize and the wheat diet. All diets were balanced in their calculated net energy for lactation content according to the Swiss Federal Research Station for Animal Production (RAP)(26). To increase the limiting dietary contents of ruminally degradable protein in the straw–concentrate-based diets, urea, being low in C content to minimise the addition of non-C3 or non-C4 plant carbon, was used as an N source.

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets

* 1:1 Mixture of the maize and wheat diets.

Supplemented at an amount of 15 g DM/d.

Experimental procedures and sampling

In six experimental runs, each time including all dietary treatments and lasting for 10 d, the daily portions of experimental feeds were put into nylon bags (70 × 140 mm) with a pore size of 100 μm(Reference Carro, Lebzien and Rohr27). Before that, hay and straw were ground to pass a 5 mm sieve whereas the grains were ground to a size of 3 mm. Ruminal fluid was obtained from a lactating rumen-fistulated Brown Swiss cow which was fed hay ad libitum and concentrate (1 kg/d administered in two portions). The cow was kept according to the Swiss guidelines for animal welfare. Before inoculation, ruminal fluid was strained through four layers of medicinal gauze with a pore size of about 1 mm. At the beginning of each experimental run the fermenters were filled with 100 ml pre-warmed buffer(Reference Soliva, Hess, Makkar and Vercoe25) and 900 ml strained ruminal fluid. Thereafter, two nylon bags were administered whereby the first one was filled with solid ruminal content (about 40 g fresh matter) and the second one with the respective experimental diet. On the second experimental day the bag containing the solid ruminal content was exchanged with another bag containing the experimental diet. Each feed bag was incubated for 48 h. To maintain anaerobic conditions the system was flushed with gaseous N2 for 3 min after exchanging the feed bags. The incubation temperature was kept constant at 39·5°C. Buffer flow to the fermenters was continuous and averaged 397 (sd 69) ml/d, resulting in a dilution rate of about 40 % per d. The resulting incubation fluid outflow was collected in bottles chilled at − 20°C.

Incubation fluid samples, collected directly from the fermenters via a three-way valve using a syringe equipped with a plastic tube 3 h before exchanging the feed bags, were analysed daily for redox potential and pH using the respective electrodes connected to a pH meter (model 634; Methrom AG, Herisau, Switzerland). Part of the incubation fluid samples taken were centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 rpm (Varifuge® K; Heraeus, Osterode, Germany) and the supernatant fraction was stored at − 20°C before being analysed for SCFA concentrations and the δ13C values of the SCFA. The first were determined by using high pressure liquid chromatography (System Hitachi Lachrom; Merck, Tokyo, Japan) according to the method of Ehrlich et al. (Reference Ehrlich, Goerlitz and Bourell28). For the determination of δ13C, 4 m-sodium chloride was added to the samples and pH was adjusted to 2·5 using 5 m-HCl. The SCFA were then extracted with solid-phase micro extraction adapted with a specific fibre (Carbowax/Divinylbenzene, Yellow-Green no. 57 337-U; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The isotope composition of the individual SCFA was analysed via online coupling to a GC-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) (Thermo Delta plus XL with Combustion Interface III and Thermo Trace GC; Thermo Electron Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). Measurements followed modified procedures as described by Dias & Freeman(Reference Dias and Freeman29) as well as Berg et al. (Reference Berg, Bolotin and Hofstetter30). The temperature programme of the GC was as follows: 60°C for 1 min, heating-up to 110°C at a rate of 20°C/min, heating-up to 135°C at a rate of 0·5°C/min, heating-up to 220°C at a rate of 60°C/min, 3 min at 220°C. Oxidation and reduction reactors in the combustion interface were maintained at 940°C and 640°C, respectively. The NiO, CuCO and Pt wires in the combustion unit were oxidised with O2 for 12 h at 940°C before being used. The solid-phase micro extraction/GC-IRMS method had an accuracy of ± 0·5 ‰ of δ13C.

After 48 h of incubation, dietary residues were washed with cold water in a washing machine and frozen at − 20°C until nutrient analyses were performed. Later the lyophilised and ground residues were analysed for DM and organic matter, via total ash (automatically by TGA-500; Leco Corporation, St Joseph, MI, USA), N (C/N analyser, Leco-Analysator Typ FP-2000; Leco Instrumente GmBH, Kircheim, Germany; crude protein = 6·25 × N) and neutral-detergent fibre. Analyses of neutral-detergent fibre were carried out with the Fibretec System M (Tecator, 1020 Hot Extraction, Höganäs, Sweden) with the addition of α-amylase but without sodium sulfite as suggested by Van Soest et al. (Reference Van Soest, Robertson and Lewis31). Starch content was determined polarimetrically(32) (model 343; Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA). Samples were extracted with hot ethanol (80 %) for the determination of total sugar content. After being filtered the samples were analysed with a colorimetric method using an orcin/sulfuric acid reagent in an autoanalyser (Cartridge Gesamtzucker (total sugar cartridge), Autoanalyzer II; Bran-Luebbe GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany).

The fermentation gases produced during 24 h were collected in gas-tight aluminium bags (TECOBAG 8 litres, PETP/AL/PE – 12/12/75 quality; Tesserau Container GmbH, Bürstadt, Germany). Gas was analysed daily for concentrations of CH4, CO2 and H2 with a GC (model 5890 Series II; Hewlett Packard, Avondale, PA, USA) equipped with a flame ionisation detector (to determine CH4), a thermal conductivity detector (to determine CO2 and H2) and a 2·34 m × 2·3 mm column, 80/100 mesh (Porapak Q; Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland). The total amount of gas produced was quantified by water displacement(Reference Soliva, Hess, Makkar and Vercoe25). This was accomplished by pressing the fermentation gas out of the gas-tight aluminium bags using plates of 2 kg weight. Fermentation gas was flushed into an Erlenmeyer flask and the water displaced from this flask then was collected in a second, graduated, flask.

Subsamples of the fermentation gases were analysed with a trace gas analyser (ANCA-TG II; SerCon Ltd, Crewe, Cheshire, UK) for the δ13C of CO2 and CH4. CO2 was separated cryogenically from CH4, N2 and O2, and subsequently measured in continuous-flow with a Sercon Ltd GEO 20/20 mass spectrometer. Methane was separated cryogenically from the other gases and combusted at 1000°C in a furnace containing CuO, Ni and Pt wires. Calibration and linearity corrections were accomplished by measuring variable amounts of an internal standard gas (1 % H2, 1 % O2, 7·99 % CH4, 40·18 % CO2, rest is N2; PanGas, Dagmersellen, Switzerland). The δ13C of the feeds and the fermentation residues was determined using an elemental analyser (model NCS 2500; Carlo-Erba, Rodano, Italy) coupled in continuous flow with an IRMS (Optima, Micromass, Crewe, Cheshire, UK). Sample material was combusted in the presence of O2 in an oxidation column at 1030°C. Combustion gases then passed a reduction column (650°C), and the N2 and CO2 produced were separated chromatographically and transferred into the IRMS via an open split for on-line isotope measurements. This method had an accuracy of ± 0·5 ‰ of δ13C for CH4, and of ± 0·2 ‰ for CO2.

Calculations and statistical evaluation

The abundance of 13C relative to 12C was determined in comparison with a generally accepted reference standard (δ13C) (‰) = ((Rsample − Rreference)/Rreference) × 1000, where Rsample is the isotope ratio (13C:12C) of the sample, and Rreference represents the isotope ratio of the conventional δ-notation for carbon with respect to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard. The factor α, describing the fractionation between the respective two fermentation gases, was calculated as αCO2/CH4 = (δ13CO2+1000)/(δ13CH4+1000)(Reference Whiticar, Faber and Schoell33). Because α is usually close to 1·0 the fractionation will be expressed as the enrichment factor ɛ(CO2–CH4) = (α − 1) × 1000. The equations used for calculating the C-isotope fractionation between diet and individual SCFA were ɛ(diet–SCFA) = (α − 1) × 1000, with αdiet/SCFA = (δ13diet+1000)/(δ13SCFA+1000). In order to avoid influences of the fermenters, diets were arranged completely randomised. For all data, the mean values of the last 5 d of each experimental run were subjected to ANOVA using the general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with diet and lipid supplementation as fixed effects while experimental run was assumed to be random. Multiple comparisons among means were performed with Tukey's method and differences were declared significant at P < 0·05.

Results

Independently of the presence of monolaurin, there was a clear basal diet effect (P < 0·001) on incubation fluid pH, with the lowest pH found with the hay diet (P < 0·001), while monolaurin supplementation resulted in an increase of pH in all treatments (P < 0·001). Monolaurin addition led to a decrease of total SCFA concentration (P < 0·001), and the molar proportion of propionate was increased (P < 0·001) at the cost of butyrate and acetate. In molar proportions of propionate and n-butyrate, an interaction (P = 0·003 and P = 0·011 respectively) between diet type and monolaurin supplementation was present due to the lack of response to monolaurin with the hay diet. The acetate:propionate ratio was affected (P < 0·001) by basal diet type and monolaurin supplementation. There was also an interaction (P < 0·001) between the two factors, as monolaurin had a larger depressive effect in the wheat and the maize–wheat mixed basal diet compared with the other diets. The addition of monolaurin reduced (P < 0·001) ciliate protozoal counts (Table 2).

Table 2 Effects of diet type and fatty acid addition on fermenter fluid traits and degree of ruminal nutrient disappearance (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)

(Mean values with pooled standard errors)

a–e Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* 1:1 Mixture of the maize and wheat diets.

Monolaurin supplementation decreased (P < 0·001) nutrient disappearances. The difference in crude protein disappearance between the hay diet and the other diets was higher in the presence of monolaurin (interaction, P < 0·001). Concerning the daily amount of CH4 produced during fermentation, the effect of the basal diet type was significant (P = 0·001), although this was apparent only for the lipid-supplemented diets when considered separately (Table 3). The addition of monolaurin resulted in a decline in CH4 formation (monolaurin effect: P < 0·001), except for the hay diet. The most pronounced decrease in daily CH4 formation due to monolaurin was found in the wheat diet ( − 63 %) and, less substantially, in the mixed and the maize diet ( − 38 and − 37 %, respectively). In multiple comparisons among means, the monolaurin supplementation to the wheat diet significantly decreased CH4 related to total SCFA formation. Monolaurin addition decreased CO2 (P = 0·048), except for the hay diet, but did not affect the daily amount of H2.

Table 3 Effects of diet type and fatty acid addition on the formation of fermentation gases (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)

(Mean values with pooled standard errors)

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* 1:1 Mixture of the maize and wheat diets.

Diets differed in their carbon isotope values, with the maize diets being most enriched in 13C, showing δ13C of about − 15 ‰ in the unsupplemented and − 17 ‰ in the monolaurin-supplemented treatments (Table 4). The hay diet, both supplemented and unsupplemented with monolaurin, was the one most depleted in 13C with a δ13C of − 30 ‰. After 48 h of incubation the feed residues still showed a similar δ13C profile as the original diets. There was no effect of monolaurin supplementation.

Table 4 13C-isotope abundance (δ13C) values of the diets, residues, SCFA and fermentation gases, and treatment effects on the enrichment factors ɛ(CO2–CH4) and ɛ(diet–SCFA) (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)

(Mean values with pooled standard errors)

a–e Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* 1:1 Mixture of the maize and wheat diets.

δ13C calculated as δ (‰) = ((Rsample − Rreference)/Rreference) × 1000, with Rsample being the isotope ratio of the sample (13C:12C) and Rreference representing the isotope ratio of the standard for carbon (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite; VPDB).

Statistical analyses of the δ13C ratios of the residues were done for the first four experimental runs (n 4).

§ ɛ(CO2–CH4), ɛ (‰) = (α − 1) × 1000, with αCO2/CH4 = (δ13CO2+1000)/(δ13CH4+1000)(38). ɛ(diet–SCFA), ɛ (‰) = (α − 1) × 1000, with αdiet/SCFA = (δ13diet+1000)/(δ13SCFA+1000)(38).

The δ13C ratios of the individual SCFA primarily reflected diet differences (P < 0·001) in δ13C; however, some changes were also observed. The δ13C of acetate was more positive than that of the respective diets, meaning richer in the 13C isotope, with the largest enrichment of about 6 ‰ occurring with the wheat diet, followed by the mixed and the hay diet. Monolaurin supplementation had a significant effect on the δ13C values of several SCFA. Accordingly, the wheat diet resulted in about 1·6 ‰ more 13C-depleted propionate with monolaurin than the corresponding diet, which had not been the case without monolaurin (interaction, P = 0·018). With respect to the C-isotope fractionation from diet to SCFA, there was a clear basal diet effect (P < 0·001) on the enrichment factors ɛ(diet–acetate), ɛ(diet–propionate) and ɛ(diet–n-butyrate; P = 0·027). A monolaurin effect (P < 0·001) on the enrichment was observed with ɛ(diet–iso-butyrate), where ɛ decreased by about 2 ‰ with the maize and the wheat diet, and by about 5 ‰ with the mixed diet. However, no influence of monolaurin was found with the hay diet, resulting in a monolaurin × diet interaction (P = 0·042). Monolaurin also influenced (P = 0·016) the enrichment factor ɛ(diet–n-valerate), with increases in the wheat (+2·2 ‰) and the hay diet (+1·7 ‰) and a slight decrease in the maize-containing diets. Interactions (P < 0·001) between diet type and monolaurin supplementation were found in ɛ(diet–propionate) and ɛ(diet–n-valerate), as well as ɛ(diet–acetate; P = 0·019).

Compared with the diets, CH4 ( − 65 to − 73 ‰) was markedly depleted in 13C while, on the other hand, CO2 ( − 11 to − 17 ‰) was enriched in 13C. For both gases, CH4 and CO2, a clear (P < 0·001) basal diet effect was obvious. Additionally, a diet type × monolaurin interaction (P < 0·001) in δ13CH4 occurred, with an increase of 3·8 ‰ found when supplementing monolaurin to the wheat diet, while there was a decrease in all other diets. Monolaurin addition resulted in a 13C-depleted CO2 (P < 0·001). The diet type × monolaurin interaction found in δ13CO2 (P = 0·014) was less clear in that respect. The enrichment factor ɛ(CO2–CH4) was very high (56 to 61 ‰) and was affected by diet type (P < 0·007) and monolaurin supplementation (P < 0·001; mostly decreased by monolaurin). There was an interaction (P < 0·001) based on that ɛ(CO2–CH4) was highest with the wheat diet compared with the other treatments only without, but not with, monolaurin.

Discussion

Lipids are among the most promising nutritional strategies for abating enteric methane formation. Their effectiveness depends on several factors including level of supplementation, fatty acid chain length, and the diet type fed to the ruminant. If lipid supplementation does not exceed 50 g/kg dietary DM, effects on feed intake and digestibility are likely to be low(Reference Doreaux and Chilliard34). Comparing in vivo conditions with a water:food ratio in the rumen of about 4·5(Reference Czerkawski35) and in vitro conditions with water:food ratios of at least ten times higher might have different effects, as the dosage of supplements normally is related to feed and not to ruminal fluid or incubation liquid, respectively. Therefore, in the present in vitro experiment supplementation of lipids was chosen to amount to 50 g related to feed DM. In detail, four basal diets isoenergetic in terms of net energy for lactation but differing in their carbohydrate profile were supplemented with monolaurin, an esterified form of lauric acid. This, and using diets containing either C3 or C4 plants or a mixture of both, was intended to facilitate the expression of differentiation in the effects on methanogenesis and C-isotope fractionation during ruminal fermentation.

Effects on ruminal methanogenesis, nutrient disappearance and formation of short-chain fatty acids

Some of the differences in the effects on fermentation and methanogenesis found among the four basal diets were as expected. These include an increase in the molar proportion of acetate with the hay diet, as it contained more and better degradable fibre. It was somewhat unexpected that this mainly happened in association with lower butyrate and, only less so, propionate proportions. Among the straw–grain-based diets, differences in SCFA were mostly small. Unexpectedly, in the absence of monolaurin, all four diets did not differ very clearly regarding CH4 formation. Hindrichsen et al. (Reference Hindrichsen, Wettstein and Machmüller36) demonstrated that the differences in the methanogenic potential of forage-only diets and diets with a forage:concentrate ratio of 1:1 were smaller than expected from shifts taking place at very high concentrate proportions. Still, the lack of any difference between the hay diet and the wheat diet in the present study was astonishing and may have resulted from the long incubation time of 48 h for all feeds, including concentrate, and the high pH level due to buffering. By contrast, the difference to the maize diet and the maize–wheat diet (with hay being by some 20 % higher) was in the range expected. Starch fermentation favours propionate formation which is inversely related to CH4(Reference Demeyer and Fievez37). As in the absence of monolaurin the propionate proportion of total SCFA was lower in the wheat than in the hay diet; the lack of a CH4 effect seems reasonable despite the concomitant decrease in fibre fermentation.

Monolaurin proved to be effective in suppressing ruminal methanogenesis in some of the basal diets. The mitigation of CH4 formation found with the wheat diet exceeded 50 %, a level similar to that found previously with Rusitec using about the same dietary proportion of non-esterified lauric acid in a mixed forage–concentrate diet(Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer38). Kabara(Reference Kabara23) described monolaurin to have an even higher antimicrobial potential than non-esterified lauric acid when being tested in direct contact with different microbes. However, in the rumen it is more likely that a rapid lipolysis occurs, making monolaurin approximately equally efficient as non-esterified lauric acid. The present experiment was not primarily designed to identify the factors responsible for the anti-methanogenic activity of monolaurin. This leaves open the extent to which a direct suppression of methanogens(Reference Soliva, Hindrichsen and Meile4, Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Wasserfallen5), an indirect suppression via anti-protozoal effects (a considerable proportion of methanogens is associated with protozoa(Reference Dohme, Machmüller and Estermann39); the assessment of effects on protozoa in Rusitec is, however, very limited) and a concomitant decline in nutrient disappearance would explain this effect. The latter had also been found in previous studies with the addition of MCFA(Reference Soliva, Meile and Cieslak8, Reference Machmüller12) and in the present study where monolaurin addition resulted in a reduction in nutrient disappearance. Relating CH4 to the amount of SCFA produced, a measure for nutrient fermentation, did not reveal a monolaurin-induced effect, except for the wheat diet. The shifts towards propionate at the cost of acetate and butyrate, caused by monolaurin, are consistent with the findings on neutral-detergent fibre disappearance. Out of seven cultured rumen bacterial species, those contributing to propionate production were found to be less susceptible to MCFA than the others(Reference Henderson40). The present study again confirmed the different levels of efficiency in suppressing methanogenesis in different diet types. Accordingly, as was also shown earlier in vitro (Reference Machmüller, Dohme and Soliva13) and in vivo (Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer6), the effects of MCFA are much more pronounced in concentrate-based diets than in forage-based or forage-only diets. In the present case, monolaurin even proved to be completely ineffective in the forage-only diet type. Potential reasons for this diet-dependent efficiency of MCFA include binding of the fatty acids to fibre particles(Reference Machmüller, Soliva and Kreuzer6).

Effects on ruminal carbon isotope fractionation

The differences in δ13C between the diets consisting either of C3 or C4 plants were about 13·5 ‰. A difference of about the same magnitude as seen between C3 and C4 plants might be expected in the CH4 produced by cows fed those diets(Reference Levin, Bergamaschi and Dörr21). In the present study, the C-isotope signature was obvious in feed residues and SCFA, but only to a small degree in the fermentation gases. The δ13C values of CH4 resulting from incubating maize (a C4 plant) did not differ from those originating from the grass hay (a C3 plant). Further CH4 from the maize diet was only 8·5 ‰ heavier than the CH4 produced from the wheat diet (another C3 plant). The reason for these findings lies in the experimental design. In the present Rusitec study we used the McDougall buffer solution, which included a considerable amount of chemically pure NaHCO3 with a δ13C of − 4·8 ‰ in order to maintain a favourable pH of about 7. According to the carbonate equilibria, the bicarbonate of the buffer exchanges C-isotopes with the CO2 produced by the fermentation and thus influences the isotope composition of the CO2 used by the methanogens for CH4 formation. Therefore, the differences in δ13C regarding the CO2 of the different treatments were reduced compared with the differences between the diets themselves. However, this has no influence on the C-isotope fractionation and the relative enrichment between CO2 − CH4 as the reduction of CO2 is energetically the most favourable pathway to generate CH4(Reference Baldwin and Allison41). The large 13C–12C fractionation between CO2 and CH4 has also been observed in other studies(Reference Schulze, Lohmeyer and Giese19, Reference Metges, Kempe and Schmidt22). The effect of monolaurin on δ13CO2 may be related to the amount of CO2 that is converted to CH4. Regarding the CO2:CH4 ratio, it seems that relatively more CO2 is converted into CH4 in the unsupplemented treatments. Therefore the remaining CO2 becomes more enriched in the heavy isotope because 12C is preferentially converted to CH4.

The buffer has no influence on the isotope fractionation of diet residues and SCFA, and the different fractionation from diet to SCFA. Concerning influences on the δ13C ratios of individual SCFA, only very little information is available in the literature. Metges et al. (Reference Metges, Kempe and Schmidt22) analysed the SCFA as a whole in the incubation medium of an in vitro experiment. They found ratios in SCFA similar to those of the respective C3 diets. In the present experiment, the smallest enrichment between diet and SCFA was found for propionate, although fractionation differed even among treatments in this SCFA. In almost all treatments acetate was enriched in 13C relative to the diet. This is probably due to the fact that part of the acetate is further transformed to other metabolites, for example, butyrate and amino acids(Reference Hungate42), and accordingly the remaining acetate could be enriched in 13C. Comparable situations might explain the high enrichment factors found for the other SCFA. For instance, iso-butyrate and iso-valerate are derived from the degradation of branched-chain amino acids, and they are used by various bacteria species for the resynthesis of branched-chain amino acids and the de novo synthesis of branched long-chain fatty acids(Reference Allison43). The protein fraction in general is somewhat richer in 12C than the carbohydrate fraction(Reference Gaffney, Irsa and Friedman44). This would explain the fractionation towards 12C observed in the iso-branched-chain SCFA compared with the diet, which consists largely of carbohydrates.

Important effects on C-isotope fractionation included those of monolaurin addition. This supplementation not only strongly influenced ruminal fermentation but also had significant effects on the δ13C of several SCFA and fermentation gases. The most surprising treatment effect with respect to C-isotope fractionation was the interaction of basal diet and monolaurin found in the fermentation gases. The enrichment ɛ(CO2–CH4) was highest with the wheat diet when being unsupplemented and was decreased by 5 ‰ with monolaurin addition. The relatively higher fractionation found with the unsupplemented wheat diet might have resulted from the different carbohydrate composition compared with the other diets. With 277 g/kg DM, the wheat diet contained about 40 % more starch than the maize diet. Methanogens need an anaerobic environment with a redox potential being lower than − 200 mV(Reference Whiticar45). Maybe the redox potential of − 188 mV found with the monolaurin-supplemented wheat diet was a major reason for the low amount of CH4 produced in this treatment. Similar effects have been reported before, with an associated increase of the lactate proportion in ruminal fluid(Reference Marounek, Brezina and Simunek46), which would contribute to an environment not suitable for many of the fibre-degrading ruminal microbes. Usually lactate is rapidly metabolised to propionate by protozoa to prevent acidosis(Reference Jouany and Ushida47), but monolaurin also seemed to act against the protozoa. In turn, the reduction in protozoal counts could explain the high redox potential, as protozoa significantly contribute to a low redox potential(Reference Mathieu, Jouany and Senaud48).

In the present study the largest enrichment of 13C isotopes (2 ‰) in propionate relative to the diet was found in the monolaurin-supplemented mixed diet. With the hay diets the enrichment factor ɛ(diet–propionate) was found to range between − 1·12 and − 1·83 ‰, whereas a depletion in 13C of propionate occurred only in the wheat plus monolaurin treatment (ɛ(diet–propionate) = +1·61 ‰). There are two mechanisms for propionate formation known to exist in the rumen(Reference Baldwin, Wood and Emery49): the randomising (succinate-including) pathway and the non-randomising (acrylate) pathway. The present results suggest that different pathways were used in the different treatments and that C-isotopes were differently discriminated in these two pathways. There is evidence that the contribution of the non-randomising type to propionate formation in hay-only diets is negligible(Reference Machmüller, Dohme and Soliva13). For those treatments having enrichment factors ɛ(diet–propionate) in the same range, the same mode of propionate formation might be expected.

Conclusion

The present results provide evidence that monolaurin is an effective methane-mitigating supplement in vitro, but only when being added to mixed forage–concentrate diets and not to a forage-only diet. One important mediator of the methane-suppressing effect of monolaurin seems to be an adverse effect on ruminal nutrient disappearance. In order to be successfully applied as a methane-abatement strategy in ruminant nutrition, this needs to be largely compensated for by hindgut digestion. The results obtained with the C-isotope fractionation illustrate that during fermentation ruminal microbes perform fractionation to a certain extent. Determining C-isotope fractionation therefore might evolve into a valuable tool to investigate whether changes in ruminal metabolic pathways during fermentation are occurring. Further investigations are required to demonstrate the usefulness of this approach in vivo and to relate the changes to target microbial species.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Vontobel Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland, and the TUMSS (Towards an improved understanding of methane sources and sinks) project of the ETH Zurich, Switzerland. We are grateful to M. Kreuzer for his support in carrying out the present study.

The contributions of the authors were as follows: F. K., carrying out the in vitro experiment, writing the manuscript, statistical analyses; S. M. B., trace gas analyser technique (instruction, advisor) to measure C-isotope composition of fermentation gases, statistical evaluation of the isotope composition of the gases, reviewing and complementing the manuscript; T. B. H., GC-combustion-IRMS (instruction, advisor) to measure C-isotope composition of SCFA, statistical evaluation of the isotope composition of the SCFA, reviewing and complementing the manuscript; J. B., advising and modifying GC-combustion-IRMS technique to analyse C-isotope composition in SCFA of ruminal fluid, writing and reviewing the Materials and methods part of this technique; C. K., optimising and establishing the solid-phase micro extraction technique to catch the SCFA in the incubation fluid for further analyses of the C-isotopes, responsible for all the analyses carried out, contribution in the Materials and methods part; C. R. S., project leader, responsible for the experimental design and the administrative part, extensively reviewing the manuscript.

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1US Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2020, EPA 430-R-06-003. Washington, DC: US-EPA.Google Scholar
2Beauchemin, KA, Kreuzer, M, O'Mara, F, et al. (2008) Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 48, 2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Ajisaka, N, Mohammed, N, Hara, K, et al. (2002) Effects of medium-chain fatty acid-cyclodextrin complexes on ruminal methane production in vitro. Anim Sci J 73, 479484.Google Scholar
4Soliva, CR, Hindrichsen, IK, Meile, L, et al. (2003) Effects of mixtures of lauric and myristic acid on rumen methanogens and methanogenesis in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol 37, 3539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Wasserfallen, A, et al. (2001) Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett Appl Microbiol 34, 4751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR & Kreuzer, M (2003) Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion. Br J Nutr 90, 529540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Odongo, NE, Or-Rashid, MM, Kebreab, E, et al. (2007) Effect of supplementing myristic acid in dairy cow rations on ruminal methanogenesis and fatty acid profile in milk. J Dairy Sci 90, 18511858.Google Scholar
8Soliva, CR, Meile, L, Cieslak, A, et al. (2004) Rumen simulation technique study on the interactions of dietary lauric and myristic acid supplementation in suppressing ruminal methanogenesis. Br J Nutr 92, 689700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR & Kreuzer, M (2003) Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep. Reprod Nutr Developm 43, 4155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Jordan, E, Lovett, DK, Monahan, FJ, et al. (2006) Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. J Anim Sci 84, 162170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Yabuuchi, Y, Matsushita, Y, Otsuka, H, et al. (2006) Effects of supplemental lauric acid-rich oils in high-grain diet on in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim Sci J 77, 300307.Google Scholar
12Machmüller, A (2006) Medium-chain fatty acids and their potential to reduce methanogenesis in domestic ruminants. Agric Ecosyst Environm 112, 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Machmüller, A, Dohme, F, Soliva, CR, et al. (2001) Diet composition affects the level of ruminal methane suppression by medium-chain fatty acids. Aust J Agric Res 52, 713722.Google Scholar
14Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Wasserfallen, A, et al. (2000) Comparative efficiency of various fats rich in medium-chain fatty acids to suppress ruminal methanogenesis as measured with RUSITEC. Can J Anim Sci 80, 473482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Sutter, F, et al. (2004) Digestive and metabolic utilization of lauric, myristic and stearic acid in cows, and associated effects on milk fat quality. Arch Anim Nutr 58, 99116.Google Scholar
16Jones, RJ, Ludlow, MM, Troughton, JH, et al. (1979) Estimation of the proportion of C3 and C4 plant species in the diet of animals from the ratio of natural 12C and 13C isotopes in the faeces. J Agric Sci 92, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Knobbe, N, Vogl, J, Pritzkow, W, et al. (2006) C and N stable isotope variation in urine and milk of cattle depending on the diet. Anal Bioanal Chem 386, 104108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Rust, F (1981) Ruminant methane δ (13C/12C) values: relation to atmospheric methane. Science 211, 10441046.Google Scholar
19Schulze, E, Lohmeyer, S & Giese, W (1998) Determination of 13C/12C-ratios in rumen produced methane and CO2 of cows, sheep and camels. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 34, 7579.Google Scholar
20Bilek, RS, Tyler, SC, Kurihara, M, et al. (2001) Investigation of cattle methane production over a 24-hour period using measurements of δ13C and δD of emitted CH4 and rumen water. J Geophys Res 103, 3751.Google Scholar
21Levin, I, Bergamaschi, P, Dörr, H, et al. (1993) Stable isotopic signature of methane from major sources in Germany. Chemosphere 26, 161177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Metges, C, Kempe, K & Schmidt, HL (1990) Dependence of the carbon-isotope contents of breath carbon dioxide, milk, serum and rumen fermentation products on the δ13C value of food in dairy cows. Br J Nutr 63, 187196.Google Scholar
23Kabara, JJ (1984) Antimicrobial agents derived from fatty acids. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61, 397403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Preuss, HG, Echard, B, Enig, M, et al. (2005) Minimum inhibitory concentrations of herbal essential oils and monolaurin for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Mol Cell Biochem 272, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Soliva, CR & Hess, HD (2007) Measuring methane emission of ruminants by in vitro and in vivo techniques. In Measuring Methane Production from Ruminants, pp. 15135 [Makkar, HPS and Vercoe, PE, editors]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Swiss Federal Research Station for Animal Production (RAP) (1999) Fütterungsempfehlungen und Nährwerttabellen für Wiederkäuer (Recommendations and Nutritional Feeding Tables for Ruminants), 4th revised ed.Zollokofen, Switzerland: LmZ.Google Scholar
27Carro, MD, Lebzien, P & Rohr, K (1995) Effects of pore size of nylon bags and dilution rate on fermentation parameters in a semi-continuous artificial rumen. Small Rum Res 15, 113119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Ehrlich, GG, Goerlitz, DF, Bourell, JH, et al. (1981) Liquid-chromatographic procedure for fermentation product analysis in the identification of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environm Microbiol 42, 878885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Dias, RF & Freeman, KH (1997) Carbon isotope analyses of semivolatile organic compounds in aqueous media using solid-phase microextraction and isotope ratio monitoring GC/MS. Anal Chem 69, 944950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Berg, M, Bolotin, J & Hofstetter, TB (2007) Compound-specific nitrogen and carbon isotope analysis of nitroaromatic compounds in aqueous samples using solid-phase microextraction coupled to GC/IRMS. Anal Chem 79, 23862393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74, 35833597.Google Scholar
32Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1997) Official Methods of Analysis. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
33Whiticar, MJ, Faber, E & Schoell, M (1986) Biogenic methane formation in marine and fresh-water environments – CO2 reduction vs acetate fermentation isotope evidence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50, 693709.Google Scholar
34Doreaux, M & Chilliard, Y (1997) Digestion and metabolism of dietary fat in farm animals. Br J Nutr 78, 1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Czerkawski, JW (1986) An Introduction to Rumen Studies. Oxford/New York: Pergamon International Library.Google Scholar
36Hindrichsen, IK, Wettstein, H-R, Machmüller, A, et al. (2006) Methane emission, nutrient degradation and nitrogen turnover in dairy cows and their slurry at different milk production scenarios with and without concentrate supplementation. Agric Ecosyst Environm 113, 150161.Google Scholar
37Demeyer, D & Fievez, V (2000) Ruminants and environment: methanogenesis. Ann Zootech 49, 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR & Kreuzer, M (2002) In vitro ruminal methane suppression by lauric acid as influenced by dietary calcium. Can J Anim Sci 82, 233239.Google Scholar
39Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Estermann, BL, et al. (1999) The role of the rumen ciliate protozoa for methane suppression caused by coconut oil. Lett Appl Microbiol 29, 187192.Google Scholar
40Henderson, C (1973) Effects of fatty acids on pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J Agric Sci 81, 107112.Google Scholar
41Baldwin, RL & Allison, MJ (1983) Rumen metabolism. J Anim Sci 57, 461477.Google ScholarPubMed
42Hungate, RE (1966) The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
43Allison, MJ (1969) Biosynthesis of amino acids by ruminal microorganisms. J Anim Sci 29, 797807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Gaffney, J, Irsa, A, Friedman, L, et al. (1979) C13-C12 analysis of vegetable-oils, starches, proteins, and soy-meat mixtures. J Agric Food Chem 27, 475478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Whiticar, MJ (1999) Carbon and isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem Geol 161, 291314.Google Scholar
46Marounek, M, Brezina, P, Simunek, J, et al. (1991) Influence of redox potential on metabolism of glucose in mixed cultures of rumen microorganisms. Arch Anim Nutr 41, 6369.Google ScholarPubMed
47Jouany, JP & Ushida, K (1999) The role of protozoa in feed digestion – review. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci 12, 113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Mathieu, F, Jouany, JP, Senaud, J, et al. (1996) The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reprod Nutr Developm 36, 271287.Google Scholar
49Baldwin, RL, Wood, WA & Emery, RS (1963) Conversion of glucose-C14 to propionate by rumen microbiota. J Bacteriol 85, 13461349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets

Figure 1

Table 2 Effects of diet type and fatty acid addition on fermenter fluid traits and degree of ruminal nutrient disappearance (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)(Mean values with pooled standard errors)

Figure 2

Table 3 Effects of diet type and fatty acid addition on the formation of fermentation gases (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)(Mean values with pooled standard errors)

Figure 3

Table 4 13C-isotope abundance (δ13C) values of the diets, residues, SCFA and fermentation gases, and treatment effects on the enrichment factors ɛ(CO2–CH4) and ɛ(diet–SCFA) (averages of days 6–10) (n 6)(Mean values with pooled standard errors)