Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:55:29.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between vitamin D, biomarkers and clinical outcome in hospitalised Covid-19 patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

É. Breslin
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Health Sciences, College of Sciences & Health, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
D. McCartney
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Health Sciences, College of Sciences & Health, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
C. NíCheallaigh
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Department of Internal Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
D. Byrne
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Department of Internal Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Previous research has identified an association between low vitamin D status and the risk and severity of acute respiratory infections1,2, leading to suggestion that correction of vitamin D deficiency may improve outcome in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to elucidate the association between low vitamin D status and adverse clinical outcomes including mortality amongst Covid-19 inpatients.

Two-hundred participants were recruited from St. James Hospital, Dublin. Indices of disease severity included duration of hospitalisation, number of signs and symptoms experienced, requirement for oxygen support and ICU admission and mortality. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between serum vitamin D (25(OH)D), interleukin-6 (IL-6), D-dimer, fibrinogen and CD25 levels and disease outcome.

Overall, 138 patients (69%) had measured 25(OH)D levels; 23% (n = 32) were classified as ‘deficient’ (25(OH)D < 30 nmol/L), 25% (n = 34) were classified as ‘insufficient’ (25(OH)D of 30–49.9 nmol/L) and 52% (n = 72) were classified as ‘sufficient’ (25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l). No significant correlation was observed between circulating 25(OH)D and age. However, serum 25(OH)D was inversely associated with IL-6 (Β = −0.696, p = 0.036) and D-dimer (Β = −13.71, p = 0.002). High IL-6 levels were associated with an increased likelihood of infiltrates on chest X-ray (OR = 3.615, p = 0.044), while high D-Dimer levels were associated with an increased risk of admission to ICU (OR = 15.304, p = 0.012), and an increased likelihood of requiring oxygen support (OR = 4.035, p = 0.004). Clinically, vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk of infiltrates on chest X-ray (OR = 2.253, p = 0.026). There was also a tendency towards lower vitamin D levels in patients who died (n = 15) than in those who survived (n = 123) (21.8 nmol/L vs. 37.8 nmol/L, p = 0.054).

These data suggest that low vitamin D status may be associated with poorer clinical and biometric profiles and increased mortality in hospitalised Covid-19 patients. The association of low vitamin D status with higher IL-6 and higher D-dimer levels, and the association of these biometric markers with more severe clinical outcomes in this and other studies(Reference Jain and Chaurasia3,Reference Baktash and Hosack4) , suggest that these pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic mediators may lie at an intermediate point in the causal pathway between low vitamin D status and poorer clinical outcomes including mortality in hospitalised Covid-19 patients.

References

Martineau, AR, Jolliffe, DA, et al. (2017) BMJ 356, 6583.10.1136/bmj.i6583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J, Yang, J, et al. (2017) Mol Med Rep 16, 74327438.10.3892/mmr.2017.7546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A, Chaurasia, R, et al. (2020) Sci Rep. 10:20191.10.1038/s41598-020-77093-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baktash, V, Hosack, T, et al. (2020). Postgrad Med J 26.Google Scholar