Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:42:05.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

Nicholas Zair
Nicholas Zair
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Orthographic Traditions and the Sub-elite in the Roman Empire , pp. 283 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Adamik, Béla (2020). The transformation of the vowel system in African Latin with a focus on vowel mergers as evidenced in inscriptions and the problem of the dialectal positioning of Roman Africa. Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 56: 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (1977). The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–72). Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (1990). The Latinity of C. Novius Eunus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 82: 227–47Google Scholar
Adams, James N. (1994). Latin and Punic in contact? The case of the Bu Njem ostraca. Journal of Roman Studies 84: 87–112Google Scholar
Adams, James N. (1995). The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report. Journal of Roman Studies 85: 86–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (1999). The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and the centurionate. Journal of Roman Studies 89: 109–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (2003). The new Vindolanda writing-tablets. Classical Quarterly 53: 530–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (2007). The Regional Diversification of Latin, 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (2016). An Anthology of Informal Latin 200 BC–AD 900. Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (in press). Was Classical (late Republican) Latin a ‘standard language’? Transactions of the Philological SocietyGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1978). Vox Latina. The Pronunciation of Classical Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979). Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm. Journal of Roman Studies 69: 125–55Google Scholar
Andreau, Jean (1974). Les affaires de monsieur Jucundus. Rome: École Française de RomeGoogle Scholar
Ax, Wolfram (2011). Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. orat. 1, 4–8). Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin and Boston, MA: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S. and Sheridan, Jennifer A. (1994). Greek and Latin documents from ’Abu Sha’ar, 1992–1993. The Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 31: 109–20Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl (1964). Flauii Sosipatri Charisii Artis Grammaticae Libri V. Second edition. Leipzig: B. G. TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Beltrán Lloris, Francisco (2006). An irrigation decree from Roman Spain: the Lex rivi hiberiensis. Journal of Roman Studies 96: 147–97Google Scholar
Besnier, Maurice (1898). Inscriptions et monuments de Lambèse et des environs. Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire 18: 451–89Google Scholar
Biddau, Federico (2008). Q. Terentii Scauri De orthographia. Hildesheim: Weidmannsche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Biddau, Federico (2016). Le fonte letterarie di interesse ortografico e il loro valore. In Ferri, Rolando and Zago, Anna (eds.), The Latin of the Grammarians. Reflections about Language in the Roman World, 49–68. Turnhout: Brepols PublishersGoogle Scholar
Bispham, Edward (2000). Carved in stone: the municipal magistracies of Numerius Cluvius. In Cooley, Alison E. (ed.), The Epigraphic Landscape of Roman Italy, 18–38. London: University of LondonGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, W. Martin (2013). The ancient child in school. In Grubbs, Judith Evans and Parkin, Tim (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Childhood and Education in the Classical World, 444–62. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, Guillaume (2005). Dosithée. Grammaire latine. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. and Thomas, J. David (1983). Vindolanda: The Latin Writing Tablets. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman StudiesGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. and Thomas, J. David (1994). The Vindolanda Writing Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. and Thomas, J. David (2003). The Vindolanda Writing Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses III). London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A. K., Thomas, J. D. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (2010). The Vindolanda writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses IV, Part 1). Britannia 41: 187–224Google Scholar
Bowman, A. K., Thomas, J. D. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (2011). The Vindolanda writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses IV, Part 2). Britannia 42: 113–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A. K., Thomas, J. D., and Tomlin, R. S. O. (2019). The Vindolanda writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses IV, Part 3): new letters of Iulius Verecundus. Britannia 50: 225–51Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2018). L. Annaeus Cornutus: Greek Theology, Fragments, and Testimonia. Atlanta, GA: SBL PressGoogle Scholar
Cagnat, René, Merlin, Alfred and Chatelain, Louis (1923). Inscriptions latines d’Afrique (Tripolitaine, Tunisie, Maroc). Paris: Éditions Ernest LerouxGoogle Scholar
Camodeca, Giuseppe (1999). Tabulae Pompeianae Sulpiciorum. Edizione critica dell’archivio puteolano dei Sulpicii. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar
Camodeca, Giuseppe (2017a). Tabulae Herculanenses. Edizione e commento. Volume 1. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar
Camodeca, Giuseppe (2017b). Il latino nei documenti della prassi giuridica campana. Linguarum Varietas 6: 19–37Google Scholar
Capini, S. (1999). Molise. Repertorio delle iscrizioni latine. VII. Venafrum. Campobasso: CO.GE.M.Google Scholar
Carnoy, A. (1906). Le latin d’Espagne d’après les inscriptions. Étude linguistique. Second edition. Brussels: Misch & ThronGoogle Scholar
Castagnetti, Sergio (2012). Le ‘leges Libitinariae’ flegree. Edizione e commento. Naples: Satura EditriceGoogle Scholar
Castrén, Paavo and Lilius, Henrik (1970). Graffiti del Palatino II. Domus Tiberiana. Helsinki: TilgmannGoogle Scholar
Cenerini, Francesca (1992). Regio VIII. Aemilia. Forum Livi. Supplementa Italica 10: 33–59Google Scholar
Chahoud, Anna (2019). Lucilius on Latin spelling, grammar and usage. In Pezzini, Giuseppe and Taylor, Barnaby (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, 46–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Jacobus (1889). De apicibus et i longis inscriptionum latinarum. Kiel: H. FrenckeGoogle Scholar
Cignolo, Chiara (2002). Terentiani Mauri. De litteris, de syllabis, de metris. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York, NY: Georg Olms VerlagGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James (2011). Latin inscriptions and documents. In Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 29–39. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James (2015). Latinitas, Ἑλληνισμός and standard languages. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 53.2: 309–30Google Scholar
Clackson, James and Horrocks, Geoffrey (2011). The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Robert (1963). Two linguistic topics in Quintilian. The Classical Quarterly 13: 1–18Google Scholar
Colson, F. H. (1924). M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutiones oratoriae liber I. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Costabile, Felice, Angelelli, Claudia, Musco, Stefano, Baratta, Giulia, Santarelli, M. Laura and Ferrara, Massimiliano (2018). L’archetipo di formula processuale dell’Editto ‘Iudex esto. Si parret …’: l’invenzione di Mucio Scevola delle azioni con intentio certa. La scoperta degli affreschi della ‘Villa del Giurista’ sull’Aniene a Roma. Minima Epigraphica et Papyrologica 21.23: 9–125Google Scholar
Cotugno, Francesca (2015). I longa in iato nel Corpus Vindolandense. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 53: 189–206Google Scholar
Cotugno, Francesca and Marotta, Giovanna (2017). Geminated consonants in the Vindolanda tablets. Empirical data and sociolinguistic remarks. In Molinelli, Piera (ed.), Language and Identity in Multilingual Mediterranean Settings. Challenges for Historical Sociolinguistics, 269–88. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
Courrier, Cyril (2017). Plebeian culture in the city of Rome, from the Late Republic to the Early Empire. In Grig, Lucy (ed.), Popular Culture in the Ancient World, 107–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Michael H. (1996). Roman Statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
Cresci Marrone, Giovanella (2012). Officina sì, officina no, officina come. In Donati, Angela and Poma, Gabriella (eds.), L’officina epigrafica romana, 297–312. Faenza: Fratelli Lega EditoriGoogle Scholar
Cser, András (2020). The Phonology of Classical Latin. Medford, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Cugusi, Paolo (1973). Le più antiche lettere papiracee latine. Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. II.2: Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 107: 641–87Google Scholar
Cugusi, Paulo (1992–2002). Corpus Epistularum Latinarum. Papyris Tabulis Ostracis Servatarum. Florence: Edizioni GonnelliGoogle Scholar
Cugusi, Paolo and Sblendorio Cugusi, Maria Teresa (2008). Carmina Latina Epigraphica Moesica. Carmina Latina Epigraphica Thraciae. Bologna: PàtronGoogle Scholar
De Martino, Marcello (1994). La questione del sonus medius in latino tra filologia, storia ed ermeneutica. Atti dell’ Istituto Veneto di Scienza, lettere ed arte. Classe di scienze morali, lettere ed arti 152: 737–88Google Scholar
de Melo, Wolfgang D. C. (2019). Varro. De lingua Latina. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden and Boston, MA: BrillGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel (2012). Latin deverbal presents in -ā-. In Craig Melchert, H. (ed.), The Indo-European Verb. Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Los Angeles 13–15 September 2010, 315–32. Wiesbaden: Reichert VerlagGoogle Scholar
Decorte, Robrecht P.-J. M. (2015). Latin Legal Language: A Linguistic and Epigraphic Investigation of Roman Statutes. PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Degrassi, Atilio (1947). Inscriptiones Italiae. Vol XIII – fasti et elogia. Fasciculus I – fasti consulares et triumphales. Rome: La Libreria dello StatoGoogle Scholar
Delamarre, Xavier (2003). Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental. Second edition. Paris: Editions ErranceGoogle Scholar
Dessau, Hermann (1892–1916). Inscriptiones latinae selectae. Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar
Di Napoli, Marta (2011). Velii Longi. De orthographia. Hildesheim: Weidmannsche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor (2012–15). The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor (2017). Stories of Daily Life from the Roman World. Extracts from the Ancient Colloquia. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Ernestus (1925–31). Inscriptiones Latinae Christianae Veteres. Berlin: Weidmannsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Dupraz, Emmanuel (2015). Avant la latinisation: l’épigraphie du pays marse aux IIIe et IIe siècles avant notre ère. In Dupraz, Emmanuel and Sowa, Wojciech (eds.), Genres épigraphiques et langues d’attestation fragmentaire dans l’espace méditerranéen, 253–74. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du HavreGoogle Scholar
Eck, Werner, Caballos, Antonio and Fernández Gómez, Fernando (1996). Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred and Meillet, Antoine (1985). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. Fourth edition. Paris: Librairie KlincksieckGoogle Scholar
Étienne, Robert (1965). La naissance de l’amphithéâtre: le mot et la chose. Revue des Études Latines 43: 213–20Google Scholar
Fischer, Iancu (1995). Les normes du latin dans quelques inscriptions officielles de l’Empire. In Callebat, Louis (ed.), Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV. Actes du 4e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen 2–5 septembre 1994, 467–81. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York, NY: Olms-WeidmannGoogle Scholar
Flobert, Pierre (1990). Le témoignage épigraphique des apices et des I longae sur les quantités vocaliques en latin impérial. In Calboli, Gualtiero (ed.), Latin vulgaire, latin tardif II. Actes du IIème Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Boulogne, 29 août–2 septembre 1988), 101–10. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagGoogle Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. (2008). Language and Rhythm in Plautus. Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin and New York, NY: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. (2020). An overlooked usage of apices and i longae? Notes on CIL VI 2080. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 214: 67–79Google Scholar
Foster, Frances (2019). Teaching ‘correct’ Latin in late antique Rome. Language and History 62.2: 57–73Google Scholar
Fries, Simon (2019). Kleines Lautgesetz, große Wirkung. Die Formen nisi, nimis, nihil, mihi, tibi, sibi, iīs und ihre Gemeinsamkeiten. Indogermanische Forschungen 124: 61–114Google Scholar
Gager, John G. (1992). Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. New York, NY: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Garcea, Alessandro (2012). Caesar’s De analogia. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
García González, Juan José (1994). Usos de i longa en los diplomas militares de CIL XVI (c. 50 DC–300 DC). In Anonymous, (ed.), Actas del VIII Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos. Madrid, 23–28 de septiembre de 1991, Volume 1, 519–26. Madrid: Ediciones ClásicasGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Bruce (2011). Latin manuscripts and textual traditions. In Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 40–58. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglioli, G. Q. (1949–50). Noterelle epigrafiche. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 73: 31–54Google Scholar
Glare, P. G. W. (ed.) (2012). Oxford Latin Dictionary. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Glinister, Fay (2007). Constructing the past. In Glinister, Fay and Woods, Clare (eds.), Verrius, Festus and Paul. Lexicography, Scholarship and Society, 11–32. London: University of London, School of Advanced Study, Institute of Classical StudiesGoogle Scholar
González, Julián and Crawford, Michael H. (1986). The Lex Irnitana: a new copy of the Flavian Municipal Law. Journal of Roman Studies 76: 147–243Google Scholar
Gordon, Joyce S. and Gordon, Arthur E. (1957). Contributions to the Palaeography of Latin Inscriptions. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Granino Cecere, Maria Grazia (2005). Supplementa Italica. Imagines. Latium Vetus 1 (CIL, XIV; Eph. Epigr., VII e IX. Latium Vetus praeter Ostiam). Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar
Gregori, Gian Luca and Mattei, Maria (1999). Supplementa Italica. Imagines. Roma (CIL, VI) 1. Musei Capitolini. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar
Grig, Lucy (2017). Introduction. In Grig, Lucy (ed.), Popular Culture in the Ancient World, 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Halla-aho, Hilla (2003). Scribes and the letters of Claudius Terentianus. In Solin, Heikki, Leiwo, Martti and Halla-aho, Hilla (eds.), Latin vulgaire, latin tardif. Actes du VIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Helsinki, 29 août–2 septembre 2000, 246–52. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York, NY: Olms-WeidmannGoogle Scholar
Harris, William V. (1989). Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Harris, William V. (2016). Literacy in everyday ancient life: from Gabii to Gloucestershire. In Kolb, Anne (ed.), Literacy in Ancient Everyday Life, 143–58. Boston, MA, and Berlin: Walter De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Felix (2020). The Scribes of Rome. A Cultural and Social History of the Scribae. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Markus (2005). Die frühlateinischen Inschriften und ihre Datierung. Bremen: Hempen VerlagGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Paul (1975). Cicero leg. agr. 2. 78 and the Sullan colony at Praeneste. Athenaeum 53: 33–56Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. (1982). Inscriptions. Britannia 13: 396–422Google Scholar
Helttula, Anne (2007). Le iscrizioni sepolcrali latine nell’Isola sacra. Rome: Institutum Romanum FinlandiaeGoogle Scholar
Hempenstall, Kerry (2005). The Whole Language–phonics controversy: an historical perspective. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities 10: 105–19Google Scholar
Hinard, François and Dumont, Jean Christian (2003). Libitina. Pompes funèbres et supplices en Campanie à l’époque d’Auguste. Paris: De BoccardGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Louis (1981). Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (ive–ixe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGoogle Scholar
Ihm, M. (1899). Additamenta ad Corporis vol. IX et X. Ephemeris Epigraphica 8: 1–221Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ittzés, Máté (2015). On the chronology and the phonetics of the change o > u in final closed syllables in Latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 120: 329–42Google Scholar
Keegan, Peter (2012). Reading the ‘pages’ of the Domus Caesaris: pueri delicati, slave education, and the graffiti of the Palatine paedagogium. In George, Michele (ed.), Roman Slavery and Roman Material Culture, 69–98. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: Toronto University PressGoogle Scholar
Keil, Heinrich (1855–80). Grammatici Latini. Volumes 1–7. Leipzig: Teubner. Reprint (2009). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiss, Dániel (2015). Introduction: a sketch of the textual transmission. In Kiss, Dániel (ed.), What Catullus Wrote. Problems in Textual Criticism, Editing and the Manuscript Tradition, xiii–xxx. Swansea: The Classical Press of WalesGoogle Scholar
Kolb, Anne (ed.) (2016). Literacy in Ancient Everyday Life. Boston, MA, and Berlin: Walter De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Johannes (1991). Die Verwendung des Apex und P.Vindob. L 1 C. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 88: 141–50Google Scholar
Kroonen, Guus (2013). Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden and Boston, MA: BrillGoogle Scholar
Kropp, Amina (2008a). Defixiones. Ein aktuelles Corpus lateinischer Fluchtafeln. Speyer: Kartoffeldruck-Verlag Kai BrodersenGoogle Scholar
Kropp, Amina (2008b). Magische Sprachverwendung in vulgärlateinischen Fluchtafeln (defixiones). Tübingen: G. NarrGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsov, Alexander (2013). Sweet Protogenes’ grave. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 187: 132–43Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul (1937). Nouvelles inscriptions latines de Philippes. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 61: 410–20Google Scholar
Leppänen, Ville and Alho, Tommi (2018). On the mergers of Latin close‐mid vowels. Transactions of the Philological Society 116: 460–83Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Second edition. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, Godo (2005). Tiburtini versus Pompeiani: CIL IV 4966–4973. Museum Helveticum 62: 56–64Google Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace M. (1894). The Latin Language. An Historical Account of Latin Sounds, Stems, and Flexions. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace M. (1913). Sexti Pompei Festi De verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome, Thewrewkianis copiis usus. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele (2015). Vowel Length from Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Malloch, S. J. V. (2020). The Tabula Lugdunensis. A Critical Edition with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Mancini, Marco (2019). Repertori grafici e regole d’uso: il caso latino <xs>. In Agostiniani, Luciano and Marchese, Maria Pia (eds.), Lingua, testi, storia. Atti della giornata di studi in ricordo di Aldo Luigi Prosdocimi (Firenze, 6 giugno 2017), 13–53. Florence: Giorgio Bretschneider EditoreGoogle Scholar
Marek, Václav (1977). Greek and Latin Inscriptions on Stone in the Collections of Charles University. Prague: Univerzita KarlovaGoogle Scholar
Marengo, Silvia M. (2004). Regio IV. Umbria. Camerinum. Supplementa Italica 22: 161–71Google Scholar
Marichal, Robert (1992). Les ostraca de Bu Njem. Tripoli: Grande Jamahira Arabe, Libyenne, Populaire et SocialisteGoogle Scholar
Marichal, Robert (1998). Les graffites de La Graufesenque. Paris: CNRS ÉditionsGoogle Scholar
Mariotti, Italo (1967). Marii Victorini. Ars grammatica. Florence: Felice Le MonierGoogle Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna (2015). Talking stones. Phonology in Latin inscriptions? Studi e Saggi Linguistici 53.2: 39–63Google Scholar
McDonald, Katherine (2015). Oscan in Southern Italy and Sicily. Evaluating Language Contact in a Fragmentary Corpus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Meiser, G. (1998). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Elizabeth A. (2004). Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World. Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor et al. (1863–). Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Berlin: George Reimer and Walter De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (1998). Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Mullen, Alex and Bowman, Alan (2021). Manual of Roman Everyday Writing. Volume 1. Scripts and Texts. Nottingham: LatinNow ePubs. Available at https://latinnowepubs.github.io/ScriptsandTextsVol1/mobile/index.html (accessed 06/12/2021)Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1958). Catulli carmina. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Nachtergaele, Delphine (2015). The code alternation in the Claudius Terentianus archive. Glotta 91: 208–25Google Scholar
Nikitina, Veronika (2015). Standardisation and Variation in Latin Orthography and Morphology (100 BC–AD 100). DPhil thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Kanehiro (2011). Notes on glide treatment in Latin orthography and phonology: -iciō, seruus, aiō. Historische Sprachforschung 124: 193–209Google Scholar
Oakley, Stephen P. (2021). The manuscripts and transmission of the text. In Quesnay, Ian Du and Woodman, Tony (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Catullus, 263–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Revilo P. (1949). The Claudian letter Ͱ. American Journal of Archaeology 53: 249–57Google Scholar
Oliver, Revilo P. (1966). Apex and sicilicus. American Journal of Philology 87: 129–70Google Scholar
Papini, Alessandro (2017). The <o/u> graphemic oscillation in Latin epigraphy. Some preliminary sociolinguistic remarks. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22: 255–67Google Scholar
Paribeni, R. (1923). Roma. Notizie degli scavi di antichità 20: 349–96Google Scholar
Penney, John (2011). Archaic and old Latin. In Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 220–35. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Bernadotte (1919). Plutarch. Lives, Volume VIII: Sertorius and Eumenes. Phocion and Cato the Younger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Peruzzi, Emilio (1962). Testi latini arcaici dei Marsi. Maia 4: 117–40Google Scholar
Platnauer, Maurice (1951). Latin Elegiac Verse. A Study of the Metrical Usages of Tibullus, Propertius and Ovid. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pokorny, Julius (1959). Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern and Munich: Francke VerlagGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jonathan G. F. (2007). A new text of the Appendix Probi. Classical Quarterly 57: 687–700Google Scholar
Prinz, Otto (1932). De o et u vocalibus inter se permutatis in lingua Latina. Quaestiones epigraphicae. Inaugural dissertation, University of Halle-Wittenberg. Halle: Eduardus KlinzGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. S. (1982). The Tabula Contrebiensis: Roman law in Spain in the early first century BC. Journal of Roman Studies 73: 33–41Google Scholar
Rodríguez Adrados, Jesús Victor (1971). Usos de la Í longa en CIL II. Emerita 39: 159–68Google Scholar
Rolfe, John C. (1922). The use of devices for indicating vowel length in Latin. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 61: 80–98Google Scholar
Romualdi, Antonella (2009). Villa Corsini a Castello. Florence: PolistampaGoogle Scholar
Rosén, Hannah (1999). Latine loqui. Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Literary Latin. Munich: Wilhelm Fink VerlagGoogle Scholar
Russell, Donald A. (2001). Quintilian. The Orator’s Education. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Sarullo, Giulia (2021). Some remarks on the rendering of velars in the archaic Latin inscriptions. In Moncunill Martí, Noemí and Ramírez-Sánchez, Manuel (eds.), Aprender la escritura, olvidar la escritura. Nuevas perspectivas sobre la historia de la escritura en el Occidente romano, 241–61. Vitoria: Universidad del País VascoGoogle Scholar
Scheid, John (2007). Res gestae Diui Augusti. Hauts faits du divin Auguste. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Seidl, Christian (1996). Die finanziellen Schwierigkeiten eines Getreidehändlers und der Profit, den die Linguistik daraus ziehen kann. In Rosén, Hannh (ed.), Aspects of Latin. Papers from the Seventh International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 99–115. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In Morgan, James L. and Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax. Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, 187–214. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Sen, Ranjan (2015). Syllable and Segment in Latin. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sen, Ranjan and Zair, Nicholas (2022). Liquid polarity, positional contrast, and diachronic change: clear and dark /r/ in Latin. Diachronica 39: 409–48Google Scholar
Sigismund-Nielsen, Hanne (2013). Slave and lower-class Roman children. In Grubbs, Judith Evans and Parkin, Tim (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Childhood and Education in the Classical World, 286–301. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew L. (1995). New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, Colin (1983). Vulgar Latin in Roman Britain: epigraphic and other evidence. In Temporini, Hildegard and Haase, Wolfgang (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neuren Forschung, pt. 2, vol 29.2, 893–948. Berlin and New York, NY: Walter De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Solin, Heikki (2003). Contributi sull’epigrafia anziate. Epigraphica 65: 69–116Google Scholar
Solin, Heikki (2020). The wall inscriptions of Ostia. In Karivieri, Arja (ed.), Life and Death in a Multicultural Harbour City. Ostia Antica from the Republic through Late Antiquity, 319–32. Rome: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae & Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar
Solin, Heikki and Itkonen-Kaila, Marja (1966). Graffiti del Palatino I. Paedagogium. Helsinki: TilgmannGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Ferdinand and Pfister, Raimund (1977). Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Eine Einführung in das sprachwissenschaftliche Studium des Lateins. Band I: Einleitung und Lautlehre. Fourth edition. Heidelberg: Carl Winter UniversitätsverlagGoogle Scholar
Somerville, Ted (2007). The orthography of the new Gallus and the spelling rules of Lucilius. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 160: 59–64Google Scholar
Speidel, Michael A. (1996). Die römischen Schreibtafeln von Vindonissa. Lateinische Texte des militärischen Alltags und ihre geschichtliche Bedeutung. Brugg: Gesellschaft Pro VindonissaGoogle Scholar
Speidel, Michael A. (2016). Soldiers and documents: insights from Nubia. The significance of written documents in Roman soldiers’ everyday lives. In Kolb, Anne (ed.), Literacy in Ancient Everyday Life, 179–200. Boston, MA, and Berlin: Walter De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Stauner, Konrad (2016). New documents from the Roman military administration in Egypt’s eastern desert: the Ostraca from the Praesidium of Didymoi. In Takmer, Burak, Akdoğu Arca, Ebru N. and Özdil, Nuray Gökalp (eds.), Vir Doctus Anatolicus. Studies in Memory of Sencer Şahin, 796–815. Istanbul: Kuzgun YayıneviGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Laurence (1985). New evidence concerning iambic and cretic shortening in Classical Latin. Classical Philology 80: 239–44Google Scholar
Stephens, Laurence (1986). The shortening of final -o in Classical Latin: a study in multiple conditioning and lexical diffusion of sound change. Indogermanische Forschungen 91: 236–58Google Scholar
Stoppacci, Patrizia (2010). Cassiodoro. De orthographia. Tradizione manoscritta, fortuna, edizione critica. Florence: Edizioni del GalluzzoGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Martínez, Pedro Manuel (2016). Le medius sonus latin. Glotta 92: 227–36Google Scholar
Tacoma, Laurens E. (2016). Bones, stones, and Monica. Isola Sacra revisited. In Cascio, Elio Lo and Tacoma, Laurens E. (eds.), The Impact of Mobility and Migration in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Rome, 17–19 June 2015), 132–54. Leiden and Boston, MA: BrillGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Lily R. (1961). Freedmen and freeborn in the epitaphs of Imperial Rome. American Journal of Philology 82: 113–32Google Scholar
Thomasson, Bengt E. (1996). Fasti Africani. Senatorische und ritterliche Amtsträger in den römischen Provinzen Nordafrikas von Augustus bis Diokletian. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i RomGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Douglas (2003). Catullus. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Roger S. O. (2016). Roman London’s First Voices. Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–2014. London: Museum of London ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Roger S. O. (2018). Britannia Romana: Roman Inscriptions and Roman Britain. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Toner, Jerry (2009). Popular Culture in Ancient Rome. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, V. (1966). Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees (2002). Dead or alive? The status of the standard language. In Adams, J. N., Janse, Mark and Swain, Simon (eds.), Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Word, 52–74. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Vine, Brent (1993). Studies in Archaic Latin Inscriptions. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar
Vine, Brent (2016). Latin bēs/bessis ‘two-thirds of an as’. In Byrd, Andrew M., DeLisi, Jessica and Wenthe, Mark (eds.), Tavet Tat Satyam: Studies in Honor of Jared S. Klein on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 324–30. Ann Arbor, MI, and New York, NY: Beech Stave PressGoogle Scholar
Wachter, Rudolf (1987). Altlateinische Inschriften. Bern, Frankfurt & New York, NY: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Friedrich (1956–7). Neue Inschriften aus Raetien. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 37/38: 215–64Google Scholar
Walde, A. and Hofmann, J. B. (1938–54). Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Third edition. Heidelberg: Carl WinterGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Rex (2011). The Latin alphabet and orthography. In Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 9–28. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Michael (2010). Observations on the littera rule. Handout, East Coast Indo-European Conference 29, Cornell University, 19 June 2010. Available at www.academia.edu/1709398/Observations_on_the_Littera_Rule (accessed 04/11/2020)Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael (2012). Italo-Celtica: linguistic and cultural points of contact between Italic and Celtic. In Jamison, Stephanie W., Melchert, H. Craig and Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 151–73. Bremen: Hempen VerlagGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Michael (2020). Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Second edition. Ann Arbor, MI, and New York, NY: Beech Stave PressGoogle Scholar
Welles, C. Bradford, Fink, Robert O. and Gilliam, J. Frank (1959). The Excavations at Dura-Europos Conducted by Yale University and the French Academy of Inscriptions and Letters, Final Report V, Part I, The Parchments and Papyri. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Willi, Anna (2021). Manual of Roman Everyday Writing. Volume 2. Writing Equipment. Nottingham: LatinNow ePubs. Available at https://latinnowepubs.github.io/WritingEquipmentVol2/mobile/index.html (accessed 31/08/2021)Google Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael (1970). M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Youtie, Herbert C. and Winter, John G. (1951). Michigan Papyri VIII. Papyri and Ostraca from Karanis. Second Series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Zair, Nicholas (2017). The origins of -urC- for expected -orC- in Latin. Glotta 93: 255–89Google Scholar
Zair, Nicholas (in press). ‘Old-fashioned’ spelling in the Roman Empire. In Roth, Theresa, Dupraz, Emmanuel and Belfiore, Valentina (eds.), Schriftkonventionen in pragmatischer Perspektive. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft (Brüssel, 13–14. September 2018), 321–46. Louvain: PeetersGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, James E. G. (2018). Critics, Compilers and Commentators. An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. New York, NY: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicholas Zair, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Orthographic Traditions and the Sub-elite in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327633.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicholas Zair, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Orthographic Traditions and the Sub-elite in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327633.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicholas Zair, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Orthographic Traditions and the Sub-elite in the Roman Empire
  • Online publication: 25 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327633.028
Available formats
×