Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:35:24.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2022

Benjamin Folit-Weinberg
Benjamin Folit-Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Bristol

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Homer, Parmenides, and the Road to Demonstration , pp. 314 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Works Cited

Ackrill, J. L. 1997. ‘Aristotle’s Distinction between Energeia and Kinēsis’. In Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 142–62.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1985. Poetic Craft in the Early Greek Elegists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adshead, K. 1986. Politics of the Archaic Peloponnese: The Transformation from Archaic to Classical Politics. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 1999. ‘The Beginnings of Cosmology’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46–65.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. 2007. ‘Sense and Sentence Complexity: Sentence Structure, Sentence Connection, and Tense-Aspect as Indicators of Narrative Mode in Thucydides’ “Histories”’. In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. Allan, R. J. and Buijs, M.. Leiden: Brill, 93–121.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. 2009. ‘Towards a Typology of the Narrative Modes’. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. Bakker, S. J. and Wakker, G. C.. Leiden: Brill, 171–203.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. 2013. ‘History as Presence: Time, Tense and Narrative Modes in Thucydides’. In Thucydides between History and Literature, ed. Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 371–90.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 1989. L’aedo e i Tiranni: Ricerche sull’Inno Omerico a Apollo. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 1998. Cantare glorie di eroi: Comunicazione e performance poetica nella Grecia arcaica. Turin: G. B. Paravia.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 2001. ‘The Proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the Circumstances of Its Performance’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 86–105.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 2009. ‘Elegy: Forms, Functions and Communication’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–88.Google Scholar
Anhalt, E. 1993. Solon the Singer. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981. The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Vol. 1: From Parmenides to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 1997. Onomata Allotria: zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2005. ‘Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason’. Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘L’Orientale’ 26: 73–94.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, N. 1975. Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer’s Odyssey. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Austin, N. 1983. ‘Odysseus and the Cyclops: Who Is Who’. In Approaches to Homer, ed. Rubino, C. A. and Shelmerdine, W. W.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 3–37.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 1986. Parmenides: Being, Bounds, and Logic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 2002. ‘Parmenides, Double-Negation, and Dialectic’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 95–99.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 2007. Parmenides and the History of Dialectic: Three Essays. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 2011. ‘Existence and Essence in Parmenides’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 1–8.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 2013. ‘Modality and Predication in Parmenides’ Fragment 8 and in Subsequent Dialectic’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87: 87–96.Google Scholar
Austin, S. 2014. ‘Some Eleatic Features of Platonic and Neoplatonic Method’. Ancient Philosophy 34: 65–74.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. ‘Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel’. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1993a. ‘Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and “Presence” in Homeric Poetry’. Classical Antiquity 12: 1–29.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1993b. ‘Boundaries, Topics, and the Structure of Discourse: An Investigation of the Particle Dé’. Studies in Language 17: 275–311.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1997. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2013. The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, S. J. 2009. ‘On the Curious Combination of the Particles γάρ and οὖν’. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. Bakker, S. J. and Wakker, G C.. Leiden: Brill, 41–61.Google Scholar
Bal, M. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1979. ‘Parmenides and the Eleatic One’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1983. ‘Aphorism and Argument’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 91–109.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P. 1969. ‘Ibycus: To Polycrates’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 16: 119–49.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P. 1984. ‘Ibycus: “Gorgias” and Other Poems’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 31: 13–24.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. ‘Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives’. In Image Music Text, trans. Stephen Heath. London: Harper Collins, 79–124.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L. 2005. ‘Le Vie dell’Hades e le Vie di Parmenide. Filologia, Filosofia e Presenze Femminili nelle Lamine d’oro “orfiche”’. Seminari Romani di cultura greca 8: 67–99.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2005. ‘Odysseus: Narrator, Storyteller, Poet?’ Classical Philology 100: 213–27.Google Scholar
Becker, A. S. 1995. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. 1965. ‘XPH and ΔEI in Plato and Others’. Glotta 43: 285–98.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. 1997. The Bow and the Lyre. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de Linguistique Générale, Tome 1. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergren, A. 1993. ‘The (Re)Marriage of Penelope and Odysseus: Architecture, Gender, Philosophy’. Assemblage 21: 6–23.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and San Cristóbal, A. I. J.. 2008. Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. 2000. ‘Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography’. In The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, ed. Luraghi, N. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–94.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2006. ‘Eschatology and Cosmology: Models and Problems’. In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. Sassi, M. M. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 27–50.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1964. ‘Homeric Battle Narrative and Catalogues’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 345–73.Google Scholar
Bicknell, P.J. 1979. ‘Parmenides, DK 28 B5’. Apeiron 13: 9–11.Google Scholar
Bielohlawek, K. 1940. ‘Gastmahls- und Symposionslehren bei griechischen Dichtern: Von Homer bis zur Theognissammlung und Kritias’. Wiener Studien 58: 11–30.Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. M. 1985. ‘Contrasting Images: Notes on Parmenides B 5’. Apeiron 19: 57–63.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.). 2001. The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boeder, H. 1962. Grund und Gegenwart als Frageziel der früh-griechischen Philosophie. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Böhme, R. 1986. Die verkannte Muse: Dichtersprache und geistige Tradition des Parmenides. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2008. ‘Memory and Visualization in Homeric Discourse Markers’. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: Brill, 35–65.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2012. Homer’s Versicolored Fabric: The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Bormann, K. 1971. Parmenides: Untersuchungen zu den Fragmenten. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
du Bouchet, J. 2006. ‘Remarques sur λαoφόρoς et ἀμαξιτός dans l’iliade’. Revue de Philologie 80: 273–79.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986. ‘Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1926. ‘Homeric Words in Arcadian Inscriptions’. Classical Quarterly 20: 168–78.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1937. ‘The Proem of Parmenides’. Classical Philology 32: 97–112.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. and Wallerstein, I.. 2009. ‘History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée’. Review 32: 171–203.Google Scholar
Bredlow, L. A. 2011. ‘Parmenides and the Grammar of Being’. Classical Philology 106: 283–98.Google Scholar
Bremond, C. 1980. ‘The Logic of Narrative Possibilities’. New Literary History 11: 387–411.Google Scholar
Broneer, O. 1973. Isthmia, Vol. 1: Topography and Architecture. Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1994. ‘The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’. In Companions to Ancient Thought, Vol. 3, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 212–37.Google Scholar
Brulé, P. 2005. ‘Dans le nom, tout n’est-il pas déjà dit? Histoire et géographie dans les récits généalogiques’. Kernos 18: 241–68.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. 2012. Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. 2018. ‘Reconsidering the Authority of Parmenides’ Doxa’. In Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Bryan, J., Wardy, R., and Warren, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 20–40.Google Scholar
Buchan, M. 2004. The Limits of Heroism: Homer and the Ethics of Reading. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2009. ‘Introducing Greek Lyric’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. ed. 2018. Greek Lyric: A Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Haubold, J.. 2008. ‘Reception and Tradition’. In A Companion to Classical Receptions, ed. Hardwick, L. and Stray, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 13–25.Google Scholar
Burford, A. 1960. ‘Heavy Transport in Classical Antiquity’. The Economic History Review 13: 1–18.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2012. ‘Belatedness in the Travels of Odysseus’. In Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral Poetry, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 269–90.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1969. ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’. Phronesis 15: 1–30.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1979. ‘Kynaithos, Polycrates, and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’. In Arktouros. Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, ed. Bowersock, G. W., Burkert, W., and Putnam, M. C. J.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 53–62.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1999. ‘The Logic of Cosmogony’. In From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, ed. Buxton, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–106.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 2001. ‘The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century BC: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus’. In Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad, ed. Cairns, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92–116.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1930. Early Greek Philosophy. 4th ed. London: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Byre, C. S. 1994. ‘The Rhetoric of Description in Odyssey 9.116–41: Odysseus and Goat Island’. The Classical Journal 89: 357–67.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1987. ‘Spartan Genealogies: The Mythological Representation of a Spatial Organisation’. In Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J.. London: Croon Helm, 153–86.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1990. Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien. Légende et culte en Grèce antique. Lausanne: Éditions Payot Lausanne.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2005. Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics, trans. P. Burk. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2006. ‘Logiques catalogales et formes généalogiques’. Kernos 19: 23–29.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2009. Greek Mythology: Poetics, Pragmatics, Fiction, trans. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2011. ‘The Homeric Hymns as Poetic Offerings: Musical and Ritual Relationships with the Gods’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 334–57.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2013. ‘Procédures hymniques dans les vers des sages cosmologues: pragmatique de la poésie didactique (d’Hésiode et Théognis à Empédocle et Parménide)’. In Hymnes de la Grèce antique: approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 Juin 2008. Lyon. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, 59–77.Google Scholar
Camp, J. M. 2001. The Archaeology of Athens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2015. ‘Stesichorus and the Epic Cycle’. In Stesichorus in Context, ed. Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–44.Google Scholar
Cassin, B. 1987. ‘Le chant des Sirènes dans le Poème de Parménide (quelques remarques sur le fr. VIII, 26–33)’. In Études sur Parménide, Tome 2: Problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 163–69.Google Scholar
Cassin, B. 2011. ‘Parmenides Lost in Translation’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 59–80.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 1996. ‘Da Elea a Hipponion e Leontinoi: lingua di Parmenide e testi epigrafici’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 113: 14–20.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 2002. ‘Early Editions of the Greek Epics and Homeric Textual Criticism in the Sixth and Fifth Centuries BC’. In Montanari, (ed.), 105–36.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1974. Travel in the Ancient World. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 1995. ‘Cosmologia dell’Ade in Omero, Esiodo, e Parmenide’. Parola del Passato 50: 437–67.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 1999. ‘La Poesia di Parmenide’. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 63: 7–27.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 2000. Parmenide di Elea, Poema sulla Natura. Introduzione, Testo, Traduzione, e Note; Testo Greco a Fronte. 2nd ed. Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 2011. ‘The Astronomical Section in Parmenides’ Poem’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 21–58.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. et al. 2018. Dall’universo-blocco all’atomo nella scuola di Elea: Parmenide, Zenone, Leucippo, ed. Pulpito, M. and Ranzato, S.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Chappell, M. 2011. ‘The Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Question of Unity’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59–81.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1951. ‘The Characteristics and Effects of Presocratic Philosophy’. Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 319–45.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1977. ‘Ancient Forms of Philosophical Discourse’. In Selected Papers, ed. Tarán, L.. Leiden: Brill, 14–35.Google Scholar
Chevallier, R. 1976. Roman Roads, ed. Field, N. H.. London: B. T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 1989. The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2001. ‘The New Simonides and Homer’s Hemitheoi’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 182–84.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2009. ‘Works and Days: Tracing the Path to Arete’. In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Tsagalis, C., and Rengakos, A.. Leiden: Brill, 71–90.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2011a. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2011b. ‘The Homeric Hymns as Genre’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 232–53.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S 2013. ‘Theology and Religion in the Homeric Hymns’. In Hymnes de la Grèce antique: approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 Juin 2008. Lyon. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, 315–22.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, E. 2014. ‘Structure as Interpretation in the Homeric Odyssey’. In Defining Greek Narrative, ed. Cairns, D. and Scodel, R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 75–100.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 1984. Les deux chemins de Parménide: édition critique, traduction, études et bibliographie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 1987. ‘L’histoire du texte de Parménide’. In Études sur Parménide, Tome 2: problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 3–24.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 2004. By Being, It Is: The Thesis of Parmenides. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 2011. ‘Parmenidean “Physics” Is Not Part of What Parmenides Calls Doxa’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 95–114.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1933. ‘Parmenides’ Two Ways’. Classical Quarterly 27: 97–111.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1952. Principium Sapientiae: The Origins of Greek Philosophical Thought, ed. Guthrie, W. K. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R. 1974. ‘The Kouros Motif in Parmenides: B1.24’. Phronesis 19: 81–94.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R. 2011. ‘The Unknown “Knowing Man”: Parmenides, B1.3’. Classical Quarterly 61: 28–47.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R. 2014. ‘What Are “True” Doxai Worth to Parmenides? Essaying a Fresh Look at His Cosmology’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46: 1–31.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. 1990. Mythe et philosophe chez Parménide. 2nd ed. Brussels: Éditions Ousia.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. 1995. ‘Transfigurations du paradigme de la parenté’. In Le paradigme de la filiation, ed. Gayon, J. and Wunenburger, J.-J.. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. 2006a. ‘Fécondité des pratiques catalogiques’. Kernos 19: 249–66.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. 2006b. ‘Images, mythes, catalogues, généalogies et mythographies’. Kernos 19: 11–21.Google Scholar
Coulton, J. J. 1976. The Architectural Development of the Greek Stoa. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. 2009. The Fragments of Parmenides, ed. McKirahan, R.. 2nd ed. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Crouwel, J. H. 1992. Chariots and Other Wheeled Vehicles in Iron Age Greece. Amsterdam: Allard Pierson Museum.Google Scholar
Crystal, I. 2002. ‘The Scope of Thought in Parmenides’. Classical Quarterly 52: 207–19.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 1998a. ‘Eleatic Arguments’. In Method in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gentzler, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 1998b. The Legacy of Parmenides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 2006. ‘Parmenides and After: Unity and Plurality’. In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, M.-L. and Pellegrin, P.. London: Blackwell, 34–54.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 2011. ‘New Work on the Presocratics’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49: 1–37.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. 2016. ‘Le Proème de Parménide: anabase et /ou catabase?’ Cahiers des études anciennes 53: 39–63.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1992. ‘Pindaro, Peana VIIb (fr.52 h Sn.M.)’. In Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo, 2–9 September 1989, Vol. 1, ed El-Mosalamy, A. H. S.. Cairo: Ain Shams University, Center of Papyrological Studies, 353–73.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1994. ‘The Greek Paean – Lutz Käppel: Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung’. The Classical Review 44: 62–65.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1995. ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. Frr. 1+6 D.-K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–7; Pae. VIIb 10–20)’. Studi italiani di filologia classica 88: 143–81.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2000. Review of S. Schröder, Geschichte und Theorie der Gattung Paian (1999). Bryn Mawr Classical Review. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2000/2000.01.24/.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2004. ‘Precisazioni su Pindaro, Peana 7b’. Prometheus 30: 23–26.Google Scholar
Danek, G. 2002. ‘Odysseus between Skylla and Charybdis’. In La mythologie et l’Odyssée. Hommage à Gabriel Germain. Actes du colloque international de Grenoble, 20–22 mai 1999, ed. Hurst, A. and Létoublon, F.. Geneva: Droz, 15–25.Google Scholar
Danek, G. 2004. ‘Der Schiffskatalog der Ilias: Form und Funktion’. In Ad Fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch, ed. Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K.. Vienna: Phoibos Verlag, 59–72.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. 1959. Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts. Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1939. Euripides: Electra. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1982. ‘The Supplement of Copula: Philosophy before Linguistics’. In Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 175–206.Google Scholar
Despotopoulos, T. 1940. ‘Η οδοποιΐα εν Ελλάδι. Από των αρχαιοτάτων χρόνων μέχρι σήμερον’. Technika Chronika 17: 255–61, 329–38, 530–40.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1996. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1994. The Gardens of Adonis, trans. J. Lloyd. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1998. Apollon le couteau à la main. Une approche expérimentale du polytheisme Grec. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2007. ‘The Wide-Open Mouth of Truth’. In The Greeks and Us: A Comparative Anthropology of Ancient Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Polity Press, 60–75.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2009. Comparative Anthropology of Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P.. 1978. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, ed. and transLloyd, . J.. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, V. 2003. ‘Da Pindaro a Callimaco: peana 7b, vv. 11–14’. Prometheus 29: 269–82.Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1897. Parmenides Lehrgedicht. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. 2005. ‘Chresmologues and Manteis: Independent Diviners and the Problem of Authority’. In Mantikê: Studies in Ancient Divination, ed. Johnston, S. I. and Struck, P. T.. Leiden: Brill, 167–231.Google Scholar
Dillon, M. 1997. Pilgrims and Pilgrimage in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1973. The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dolin, E. F. 1962. ‘Parmenides and Hesiod’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66: 93–98.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 2001. The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dueso, J. S. 2011. ‘Parmenides: Logic and Ontology’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 271–88.Google Scholar
Durante, M. 1976. Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca, Vol. 2: Risultanze della comparazione indoeuropa. Rome: Incunabula Graeca.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 1999. ‘Plain Words in Sophocles’. In Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. Griffin, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 95–107.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. 1989. ‘Wo beginnt der Weg der Doxa? Eine Textumstellung in Fragment 8 des Parmenides’. Phronesis 34: 121–38.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2004. Myths of the Underworld: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. (ed). 2011. The ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets and Greek Religion: Further Along the Path. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1975. ‘Type-Scenes and Homeric Hospitality’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 105: 51–72.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1980. ‘The Structure of Homeric Catalogue’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 110: 81–105.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1991. The Iliad. A Commentary, Vol. V: Books 17–20, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1992. ‘Homer and Oral Tradition: The Type-Scene’. Oral Tradition 7: 284–330.Google Scholar
Ellendt, J. 1864. Drei Homerische Abhandlungen. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Rutherford, I. (eds.). 2005. Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Antiquity: Seeing the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elwick, J. 2012. ‘Layered History: Styles of Reasoning as Stratified Conditions of Possibility’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 619–27.Google Scholar
Ercoles, M. 2013. Stesicoro: Le testimonianze antiche. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.Google Scholar
Fachard, S. and Pirisino, D.. 2015. ‘Routes out of Attica’. In Autopsy in Athens: Recent Archaeological Research on Athens and Attica, ed. Miles, M. M.. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 139–53.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. A. 2006. ‘Stanzaic Structure and Responsion in the Elegiac Poetry of Tyrtaeus’. Mnemosyne 59: 19–52.Google Scholar
Fenik, B. 1968. Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad: Studies in the Narrative Techniques of Homeric Battle Description. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2017. ‘Waking up Sleeping Metaphors: A Cognitive Approach to Parmenides’ Two Ways of Enquiry’. Journal for Ancient Studies 6: 107–30.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2018. ‘“A Path for Understanding”: Journey Metaphors in (Three) Early Greek Philosophers’. In Paths of Knowledge: Interconnection(s) between Knowledge and Journey in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Ferella, C and Breytenbach, C. Berlin: Edition Topoi, 47–74.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 1992. ‘Per il testo dei peani di Pindaro’. Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 28: 143–52.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2002. ‘La carraia di Omero e la via degli dei: sul Peana VIIb di Pindaro’. Seminari Romani di cultura greca 5: 197–212.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2005. ‘L’officina epica di Parmenide: due sondaggi’. Seminari Romani di cultura greca 8: 113–29.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2007. La fonte del cipresso bianco. Racconto e sapienza dall’Odissea alle lamine misteriche. Turin: UTET libreria.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, B. 1984. ‘Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 127: 1–22.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. and Davies, M.. 2014. Stesichorus: The Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. 2015. ‘The State of Stesichorean Studies’. In Stesichorus in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 2017. Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme: A Historical Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1987. ‘Homer’s View of the Epic Narrative: Some Formulaic Evidence’. Classical Philology 82: 135–38.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1998. The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 2000. ‘The Cypria, the Iliad, and the Problem of Multiformity in Oral and Written Tradition’. Classical Philology 95: 1–11.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 2017. ‘Homer at the Panathenaia: Some Possible Scenarios’. In The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies, ed. Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 29–40.Google Scholar
Finley, M. 1965. The World of Odysseus. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. 2008. The Seer in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, E. D. 1992. ‘Why Parmenides Wrote in Verse’. Ancient Philosophy 12: 251–65.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. 1990. Traditional Oral Epic. The Odyssey, Beowulf, and the Serbo-Croatian Return Song. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. 1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. 1999. Homer’s Traditional Art. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. 2010. ‘“Reading Homer” through Oral Tradition’. In Approaches to Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, ed. Myrsiades, Kostas. Oxford: Peter Lang, 15–42.Google Scholar
Folit-Weinberg, B. [forthcoming, 2022]. The Language of Roads and Travel in Homer: hodos and keleuthos’. Classical Quarterly.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. J. 1955. Studies in Ancient Technology, Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. J. 1964. Notes on the History of Ancient Roads and Their Construction. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1992. Homer: Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1997. ‘The Inland Ship: Problems in the Performance and Reception of Homeric Epic’. In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance and the Epic Texts, ed. Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 83–109.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1999. ‘Odysseus after Dinner: Od. 9.2–11 and the Traditions of Sympotic Song’. In Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and Its Legacy in Honor of Dimitrios Marinatos, ed. Rengakos, A. and Kazazis, J.. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 109–23.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2006. ‘The Genre of Genres: Paeans and Paian in Early Greek Poetry’. Poetica 38: 277–95.Google Scholar
Forte, A. S. W. and Smith, C. C.. 2016. ‘New Riders, Old Chariots: Poetics and Comparative Philosophy’. In Universe and Inner Self in Early Indian and Early Greek Thought, ed. Seaford, R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 186–203.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. A. Sheridan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997a. ‘On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997b. ‘Second Thoughts On Closure’. In Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, ed. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, E. 1950. Agamemnon, Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1968. Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. 3rd ed. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1973. Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy, trans. M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford: Alden Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1975. ‘Studies in Parmenides’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 2, ed. Allen, R. E. and Furley, D. J.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1–47.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G. 1986. ‘The Theory of the Opposites and an Ordered Universe: Physics and Metaphysics in Anaximander’. Phronesis 31: 197–228.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von. 1943. ‘NOOΣ and Noein in the Homeric Poems’. Classical Philology 38: 79–93.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. 1945. ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part I. From the Beginnings to Parmenides’. Classical Philology 40: 223–42.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. 1946. ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II. The Post-Parmenidean Period’. Classical Philology 41: 12–34.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1973. ‘Notes on Parmenides’. In Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1–15.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1989. ‘Truth as What Survives the Elenchos: An Idea in Parmenides’. In The Criterion of Truth. Essays Written in Honour of George Kerford Together with a Text and Translation (with Annotations) of Ptolemy’s ‘On the Kriterion and Hegemonikon’, ed. Huby, P. and Neal, G.. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1974. ‘Elements of Eleatic Ontology’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Garden City, NY: Princeton University Press, 241–70.Google Scholar
Gadbery, L. M. 1992. ‘The Sanctuary of the Twelve Gods in the Athenian Agora’. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 61: 447–89.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. 2002. ‘Greek Law and the Presocratics’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 19–24.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. 2009. ‘“Spilling the Sea out of Its Cup”: Solon’s Elegy to the Muses’. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 91: 23–49.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. 2013. Ancestral Fault in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gainsford, P. 2003. ‘Formal Analysis of Recognition Scenes in the Odyssey’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 123: 41–59.Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1979. ‘“Is” Or “Is Not”?’ The Monist 62: 61–80.Google Scholar
Gallop, D 1984. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments. A Text and Translation with an Introduction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, L. F. 2013. Homeric Durability: Telling Time in the Iliad. London: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Garner, R. S. 2005. ‘Epic and Other Genres in the Ancient Greek World’. In A Companion to Ancient Epic, ed. Foley, J. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 386–96.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. 1998. ‘Die Geburt der Erdkunde aus dem Geiste der Geometrie. Überlegungen zur Entstehung und zur Frühgeschichte der Wissenschaftlichen Geographie bei den Griechen’. In Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, ed. Kullmann, W., Althoff, J., and Asper., M. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen, 163–92.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2008. ‘Images and Experience: At the Roots of Parmenides’ Aletheia’. Ancient Philosophy 28: 21–48.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2013. ‘Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienza. Con alcune considerazioni “Inattuali” su Zenone’. In Eleatica 2007. Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 43–126.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse, trans. Lewin, J. E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1982. ‘Frontiers of Narrative’. In Figures of Literary Discourse, trans. Sheridan, A.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 127–46.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Threshholds of Interpretation, trans. J. E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, trans. Cole, A. T.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. 1999. Greek Elegiac Poetry: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Germain, G. 1954. Genèse de l’Odyssée. Le fantastique et le sacré. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. 2004. Polyvalence des images. Testi e frammenti sulla leggenda greca, ed. Soldani, A.. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Giannisi, P. 1997. ‘Chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque’. Quaderni di storia 23: 133–41.Google Scholar
Giannisi, P. 2006. Récits des voies. Chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1945. Der Ursprung der griechischen Philosophie: Von Hesiod bis Parmenides. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1998. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gill, K. 1993. ‘On the Metaphysical Distinction between Processes and Events’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23: 365–84.Google Scholar
Goette, H. R. 2002. ‘Quarry Roads on Mt. Pentelikon and Mt. Hymettus’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 93–102.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2002. The Invention of Prose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2012. Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2017. ‘The Limits of the Case Study: Exemplarity and the Reception of Classical Literature’. New Literary History 48: 415–35.Google Scholar
Goldin, O. 1993. ‘Parmenides on Possibility and Thought’. Apeiron 26: 19–36.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1965. ‘Anaximander’s Apeiron’. Phronesis 10: 37–53.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1996. ‘Pompai in Greece. Some Considerations about Space and Ritual in the Greek Polis’. In The Role of Religion in the Early Greek Polis, ed. Hägg, R.. Stockholm: Paul Åströms Förlag, 55–65.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 1980. States and Performances: Aristotle’s Test. Philosophical Quarterly 30: 117–30.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2002a. ‘Heraclitus and Parmenides’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 27–45.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2002b. ‘La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque’. In Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique?, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 351–80.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2006. Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2008. ‘Heraclitus: Flux, Order, and Knowledge’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–88.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2013. Science Before Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 2002. ‘The Cosmology of Mortals’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 101–16.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 2004. ‘Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 1–17.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 2007. ‘Poetry and Prose: Xenophanes of Colophon’. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 137: 403–33.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 2008. ‘The Proem of Parmenides’ Poem’. Ancient Philosophy 28: 1–20.Google Scholar
Gras, M. and Tréziny, H.. 2001. ‘Mégara Hyblaea. Retours sur l’agora’. In Architettura urbanistica società nel mondo antico. Giornata di studio in ricordo di Roland Martin, ed. Greco, E.. Paestum: Pandemos, 51–63.Google Scholar
Gras, M. and Tréziny, H. 2012. ‘Mégara Hyblaea: le domande e le risposte’. In Alle origini della Magna Grecia: mobilità migrazioni fondazioni. Atti del cinquantesimo convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia: Taranto 1–4 Ottobre 2010. Taranto: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia, 1133–46.Google Scholar
Gras, M., Tréziny, H., and Broise, H.. 2004. Mégara Hyblaea, Vol. 5: La ville archaïque. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2008. ‘The Ancient Reception of Homer’. In A Companion to Classical Receptions, ed. Hardwick, L. and Stray, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 26–37.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2013. ‘The Poet in the Iliad’. In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmadoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J.. 2009. ‘Greek Lyric and Early Greek Literary History’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95–113.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2015. ‘The Homeric Text’. Ramus 44: 5–28.Google Scholar
Greco, E. 1998. ‘Agora eumeghetes: l’espace public dans les poleis d’Occident’. Ktèma 23: 153–58.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2008. ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 128: 27–51.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. ‘Homeric Words and Speakers’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 36–57.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1983. ‘Personality in Hesiod’. Classical Antiquity 2: 37–65.Google Scholar
van Groningen, B. A. 1960. La composition littéraire archaïque grecque. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy: Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1965. A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutting, G. 1989. Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason: Science and the History of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 2002a. ‘Michel Foucault’s Immature Science’. In Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 87–98.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 2002b. ‘Making Up People’. In Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 99–114.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 2012. ‘“Language, Truth and Reason” 30 Years Later’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 599–609.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. 2001. Anaximander and the Architects: The Contributions of Egyptian and Greek Architectural Technologies to the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 4: Books 9–12, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. 1995. ‘How Argive Was the “Argive” Heraion? The Political and Cultic Geography of the Argive Plain, 900–400 B.C.’. American Journal of Archaeology 99: 577–613.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamon, P. and Baudoin, P.. 1981. ‘Rhetorical Status of the Descriptive’. Yale French Studies 61: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2002. ‘Parmenides and the Metaphysics of Changelessness’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 65–80.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 2013. ‘Ibycus and the Muses of Helicon’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 70: 9–36.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1988. The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History, trans. J. Lloyd. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1996. Memories of Odysseus: Frontier Tales from Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1958. ‘Parmenides and Odysseus’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63: 133–43.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1978. The Greek Concept of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1983. ‘The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 7–82.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1833. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Tome 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2000. Introduction to Metaphysics, ed. Fried, G. and Polt, R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. 1974. ‘Qualitative Change in Presocratic Philosophy’. In The Presocratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 86–95.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. 2007. ‘The Muses’ Uncanny Lies: Hesiod, Theogony 27 and Its Translators’. American Journal of Philology 128: 153–75.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1966. ‘Das Wissen des Xenophanes’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 109: 193–235.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1974. Parmenides. Die Anfänge der Ontologie, Logik und Naturwissenschaft. Munich: Ernst Heimeran Verlag.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1997. ‘The Name of the Tree: Recounting Odyssey XXIV 340–2’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 67: 87–116.Google Scholar
Herda, A. 2011. ‘How to Run a State Cult: The Organization of the Cult of Apollo Delphinios in Miletos’. In Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece: Papers Presented at a Symposium at the Swedish Institute of Athens, 17–19 April 2008, ed. Haysom, M and Wallenstein, J. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen, 57–94.Google Scholar
Hermann, A. 2009. ‘Parmenides versus Heraclitus?’ In Nuevos ensayos sobre Heráclito. Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum, ed. Hülsz Piccone, E.. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A. and Hoekstra, A.. 1989. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 2: Books IX–XVI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., Russo, J., and Fernández-Galiano, M.. 1989. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 3: Books XVII–XXIV. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B.. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 1: Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1980. ‘Parmenides’ Cogito Argument’. Ancient Philosophy 1: 5–16.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. 2013. The Symposium in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2002. ‘Ptolis and Agore. Homer and the Archaeology of the City-State’. In Montanari, (ed.), 297–342.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1991. ‘The City of Athens: Space, Symbol, Structure’. In City-States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. A., and Emlen, J.. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 355–80.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1998. ‘Öffentliche Räume in frühen griechischen Städten’. Ktèma 23: 159–70.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1999. Öffentliche Räume in frühen griechischen Städten. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2007. ‘Urban Spaces and Central Places: The Greek World’. In Classical Archaeology, ed. Alcock, S. E. and Osborne, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 164–81.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. 1969. Vom Wesen des Seienden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. 1970. ‘Anaximander and the Beginnings of Greek Philosophy’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 1, ed. Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 281–322.Google Scholar
Holwerda, D. 1963. ‘ΤEΛΟΣ’. Mnemosyne 16: 337–63.Google Scholar
Hopman, M. 2012. Scylla: Myth, Metaphor, Paradox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2009. ‘Greek Lyric and the Politics and Sociologies of Archaic and Classical Greek Communities’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–57.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S. 1995. ‘“Burial Language” in the Archaic and Classical Kerameikos’. Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens 1: 129–91.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S. 1996. ‘The Archaeology of Ideology in the New Kerameikos: New Interpretations of the “Opferrinnen”’. In The Role of Religion in the Early Greek Polis, ed. Hägg, R. Stockholm: Paul Äströms Förlag, 41–54.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S. 2009. ‘Attica: A View from the Sea’. In A Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Raaflaub, K. A. and van Wees, H.. London: Blackwell, 189–211.Google Scholar
Hülsz Piccone, E. 2013. ‘Some Comments on L. Gemelli Marciano’s “Lezioni Eleatiche”’. In Eleatica 2007. Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 149–58.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2014. Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2018. The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1972. The Presocratics. Bristol: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1999. ‘Heraclitus’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 88–112.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 2006. ‘The Beginnings of Science and Philosophy in Archaic Greece’. In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, M. L and Pellegrin, P. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 3–19.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2005. Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1948. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers, trans. E. Robinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1966. Five Essays, trans. A. Fiske. Montreal: Mario Casalini.Google Scholar
Jameson, G. 1958. ‘“Well-Rounded Truth” and Circular Thought in Parmenides’. Phronesis 3: 15–30.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1982. Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 4: Books 13–16, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1998. ‘The Homeric Poems as Oral Dictated Texts’. Clasical Quarterly 48: 1–13.Google Scholar
Janni, P. 1984. La mappa e il periplo: cartografia antica e spazio odologico. Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Jantzen, J. 1976. Parmenides zum Verhältnis von Sprache und Wirklichkeit. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Johnstone, M. A. 2014. ‘On “Logos” in Heraclitus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 1–29.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1992. ‘The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings’. Classical Quarterly 42: 1–11.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2011a. ‘Homer’. In Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: Brill, 21–38.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2011b. ‘Introduction: Narratological Theory on Space’. In Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: Brill, 1–20.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2011c. ‘The Shield of Achilles: From Metalepsis to Mise En Abyme’. Ramus 40: 1–14.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2012. Homer: Iliad XXII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, M. 1994. ‘The Distribution of Sanctuaries in Civic Space in Arkadia’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E. and Osborne, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–30.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 1997. ‘Hexameter Progression and the Homeric Hero’s Solitary State’. In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. Bakker, E. J and Kahane, A. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 110–37.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1970. Review of J. Mansfeld, Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt (1964). Gnomon 42: 113–19.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1973. The Verb ‘Be’ and Its Synonyms, ed. Verhaar, J. W. M.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1994. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2002. ‘Parmenides and Plato’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 81–93.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2003. ‘Writing Philosophy: Prose and Poetry from Thales to Plato’. In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–61.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2009a. ‘A Return to the Theory of the Verb “Be” and the Concept of Being’. In Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–42.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2009b. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2009c. ‘The Thesis of Parmenides’. In Essays on Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–66.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 1992. Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Käppel, L 2002. Review of I. Rutherford, Pindar’s Paeans (2001). Bryn Mawr Classical Review. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2002/2002.10.38/.Google Scholar
Karsten, S. 1835. Parmenidis Eleatae Carminis Reliquiae, Philosophorum Graecorum Veterum, i/1. Amsterdam: J. Müller & Soc.Google Scholar
Kase, E. W. 1973. ‘Mycenaean Roads in Phocis’. American Journal of Archaeology 77: 74–77.Google Scholar
Katz, M. A. 1991. Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavoulaki, A. 1999. ‘Processional Performance and the Democratic Polis’. In Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, ed. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–320.Google Scholar
Kavoulaki, A. 2011. ‘Observations on the Meaning and Practice of Greek Pompe (Procession)’. In Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece: Papers Presented at a Symposium at the Swedish Institute of Athens, 17–19 April 2008, ed. Haysom, M. and Wallenstein, J.. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen, 135–50.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2015. ‘Stesichorus’ Homer’. In Stesichorus in Context, ed. Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1997. ‘Virgilian Epic’. In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. Martindale, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–154.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion, and Will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 1999. In the Dark Places of Wisdom. Inverness, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 2003. Reality. Inverness, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1962. The Songs of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1983. ‘Orality and Sequence’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 83–90.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 1: Books 1–4, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. and Raven, J. E.. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 2007. The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M. 1974. Early Greek Monody: The History of a Poetic Type. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knudsen, R. A. 2014. Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H. 2010. Hesiod: The Other Poet. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Koopman, N. 2018. Ancient Greek Ekphrasis: Between Description and Narration. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Korres, C. J. and Tomlinson, R. A.. 2002. ‘Sphettia Hodos: Part of the Road to Kephale and Sounion’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 43–59.Google Scholar
Korres, M. (ed.) 2012. Αττικής οδοί: Αρχαίοι δρόμοι της Αττικής. Athens: Melissa.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. 2005. Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. 2013. ‘Parmenides’. In Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H., Bremer, D., and Rechenauer, G.. Basel: Schwabe, 441–530.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. 1965. ‘Die Entschuldigung des Sängers (Ilias B 484–493)’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 108: 1–11.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. 1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kroon, C. H. M. 2007. ‘Discourse Modes and the Use of Tenses in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’. In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. Allan, R. J. and Buijs, M.. Leiden: Brill, 64–92.Google Scholar
Kurfess, C. 2016. ‘The Truth about Parmenides’ Doxa’. Ancient Philosophy 36: 13–45.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. 2005. ‘Choral Lyric as “Ritualization”: Poetic Sacrifice and Poetic Ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian’. Classical Antiquity 24: 81–130.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. 2007. ‘Archaic Greek Poetry’. In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–69.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. 1991. Foucault’s Strata and Fields: An Investigation into Archaeological and Genealogical Science Studies. London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2013. ‘Phenomenon and Reference: Revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the Problem of Rationalization’. In Modernity’s Classics, ed. Humphreys, S C. and Wagner, R. G.. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 165–86.Google Scholar
Langdon, M K. 2002. ‘Hymettiana IV: Ancient Roads through Hymettos’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 61–71.Google Scholar
Latona, M. J. 2008. ‘Reining in the Passions: The Allegorical Interpretation of Parmenides B Fragment 1’. American Journal of Philology 129: 199–230.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. 2003. Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1981. ‘Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey’. Phronesis 26: 2–24.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1984. ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking: The Poludêris Elenchos of Fragment 7’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1992. Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1994a. ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 1–34.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1994b. ‘The Significance of κατὰ πάντ ἄ<σ>τη in Parmenides Fr. 1.3’. Ancient Philosophy 14.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1999. ‘Early Interest in Knowledge’. In Cambridge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–49.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 2002. ‘Parmenidean Elenchos’. In Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond, ed. Scott, G. A.. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 19–35.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 2008. ‘The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 458–84.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 2013. ‘A Systematic Xenophanes?’ In Early Greek Philosophy, ed. McCoy, J. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 77–90.Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1961. Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. 1996. ‘The *Da- Root: Partition and Democracy’. In Cleisthenes the Athenian: An Essay on the Representation of Space and Time in Greek Political Thought from the End of the Sixth Century to the Death of Plato, ed. Curtis, D. A. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 128–35.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1996. Cleisthenes the Athenian: An Essay on the Representation of Space and Time in Greek Political Thought from the End of the Sixth Century to the Death of Plato, trans. D. A. Curtis. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. A. 2009. ‘Parmenides’ Modal Fallacy’. Phronesis 54: 1–8.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1979. Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1991a. ‘Greek Cosmologies’. In Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–63.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1991b. ‘Popper versus Kirk: A Controversy in the Interpretation of Greek Science’. In Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–20.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1992. ‘Methods and Problems in the History of Ancient Science: The Greek Case’. Isis 83: 564–77.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2000. ‘Demonstration and the Idea of Science’. In Greek Thought: A Guide to Classical Knowledge, ed. Brunschwig, J., Lloyd, G. E. R., and Pellegrin, P.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 243–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2004. Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections: Philosophical Perspectives on Greek and Chinese Science and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2009. Disciplines in the Making: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2012. Being, Humanity, and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2013. ‘Mathematics and Narrative: An Aristotelian Perspective’. In Circles Disturbed, ed. Mazur, B. and Doxiadis, A.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 389–406.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2015. Analogical Investigations: Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2017a. ‘Fortunes of Analogy: Replies to Commentators’. Australasian Philosophical Review 1: 336–45.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2017b. The Ambivalences of Rationality: Ancient and Modern Cross-Cultural Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Sivin, N.. 2002. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Zhao, J. J. (eds.) 2018. Ancient Greece and China Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H. 2002. ‘Ancient Roads in Attica and the Megaris’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 73–92.Google Scholar
Lolos, Y. A. 2003. ‘Greek Roads: A Commentary on the Ancient Terms’. Glotta 79: 137–74.Google Scholar
Lolos, Y. A. 2011. Land of Sikyon: Archaeology of a Greek City-State. Princeton, NJ: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1963. ‘The Principles of Parmenides’ Cosmogony’. Phronesis 8: 90–107.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1985. ‘Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. 1: Greek Literature, ed. Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–57.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996. ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12: 125–62.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2011. ‘Poets as Philosophers and Philosophers as Poets: Parmenides, Plato, Lucretius and Wordsworth’. In Para/Textuelle Verhandlungen zwischen Dichtung und Philosophie in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Huss, B., Marzillo, P., and Ricklin, T.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 293–308.Google Scholar
Long, C. R. 1987. The Twelve Gods of Greece and Rome. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lord, A. B. 2000. The Singer of Tales. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H. L. 1903. ‘The Country Cart of Ancient Greece’. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 23: 132–51.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Löw, E. 1935. ‘Das Verhältnis von Logik und Leben bei Parmenides’. Wiener Studien 53: 1–36.Google Scholar
Lulli, L. 2011. Narrare in distici. L’elegia greca arcaica e classica di argomento storico-mitico. Rome: Edizioni Quasar.Google Scholar
Lulli, L. 2016. ‘Elegy and Epic’. In Iambus and Elegy, ed. Swift, L. and Carey, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 193–209.Google Scholar
Luther, W. 1954. Weltansicht und Geistesleben. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. 1988. Epos, Word, Narrative and the Iliad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacDonald, W. A. and Rapp, G. R. 1972. The Minnesota Messenia Expedition: Reconstructing a Bronze Age Regional Environment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M. 2015. Presocratic Poetics: Parmenides, Empedocles and Literary Form. Unpublished dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M. 2016. ‘Language and Learning with the Presocratics: Xenophanes and Parmenides as Educators and Linguists’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 26: 25–48.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M. 2017. ‘Parmenides and Early Greek Allegory’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 79: 31–59.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. 1982. ‘Parmenides’ Dilemma’. Phronesis 27: 1–12.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. 1963. Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 1993. Indifference Arguments. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. 2002. ‘Exploring the Validity of the Concept of “Foundation”: A Visit to Megara Hyblaia’. In Oikistes: Studies in Constitutions, Colonies, and Military Power in the Ancient World Offered in Honor of A. J. Graham, ed. Gorman, V. B. and Robinson, E. W.. Leiden: Brill, 195–225.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1964. Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1990. ‘Myth Science Philosophy: A Question of Origins’. In Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1–21.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1995. ‘Insight by Hindsight: Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40: 225–32.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1999. ‘Sources’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–44.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2005. ‘Minima Parmenidea’. Mnemosyne 58: 554–60.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2015. ‘Parmenides from Right to Left’. Études platoniciennes 12.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. C. 2009a. ‘All Roads Lead to Nemea: Physical Evidence for Ancient Roads in the Territory of Kleonai in the Northeastern Peloponnesos’. Archäologischer Anzeiger 2: 1–49.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. C. 2009b. ‘Kleonai, the Corinth–Argos Road, and the “Axis of History”’. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 78: 107–63.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2007. ‘Odysseus and the Historians’. Syllecta Classica 18: 1–79.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 1973. ‘Rapports entre les structures urbaines et les modes de division et d’exploitation du territoire’. In Problèmes de la terre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Finley, M. I. Paris: Mouton & Co., 97–112.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 1983. ‘L’espace civique, religieux et profane dans les cités grecques de l’archaïsme à l’époque hellénistique’. In Architecture et société: De l’archaïsme grec à la fin de la république romaine. Paris: École Française de Rome, 9–41.Google Scholar
Maslov, B. 2012. ‘The Real Life of the Genre of Prooimion’. Classical Philology 107: 191–205.Google Scholar
Maslov, B. 2015. Pindar and the Emergence of Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maslov, B. 2016. ‘The Genealogy of the Muses: An Internal Reconstruction of Archaic Greek Metapoetics’. American Journal of Philology 137: 411–46.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. 1994. Euripides: Phoenissae. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2008. ‘Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. W and Graham, D. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–229.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2010. Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A. 1969. ‘Das methodologische im 5 Fragment des Parmenides’. Classica at medievalia 30: 102–08.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A. 1997. Parmenides Beyond the Gates: The Divine Revelation on Being, Thinking, and the Doxa. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. 2006. Städte und Bauten der Westgriechen: von der Kolonisationszeit bis zur Krise um 400 vor Christus. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Michell, H. 1964. Sparta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 1977. ‘La logique implicite de la cosmogonie d’Hésiode: étude des vers 116 à 133 de la Théogonie’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 82: 289–306.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 1979. ‘Parmenides and the Disclosure of Being’. Apeiron 13: 12–35.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 2001. ‘“First of All”: On the Semantics and Ethics of Hesiod’s Cosmogony’. Ancient Philosophy 21: 251–75.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 2006. ‘Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 1–47.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 1999. ‘Describing and Narrating in Homer’s Iliad’. In Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and Its Influence in the Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: Brill, 49–64.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 2001. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 2008. ‘Spatial Memory and the Composition of the Iliad’. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A. Leiden: Brill, 9–34.Google Scholar
Mogyoródi, E. 2006. ‘Xenophanes’ Epistemology and Parmenides’ Quest for Knowledge’. In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. Sassi, M. M.. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 123–60.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (ed.) 2002. Omero tremila anni dopo. Atti del Congresso di Genova 6–8 luglio 2000. Con la collaborazione di P. Ascheri. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2005. Wandering in Greek Culture. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, A. C. 1959. Studies in the Greek Negatives. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. 1994. ‘The Evolution of a Sacral “Landscape”: Isthmia, Perachora, and the Early Corinthian State’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Clarendon, 105–41.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. 2003. Early Greek States Beyond the Polis. Chicago: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. S. 1955. ‘Parmenides and Er’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 75: 59–68.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1985. The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989. ‘The Structure and Function of Odysseus’ Apologoi’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 15–30.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1999a. ‘The Poetics of Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 332–62.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1999b. ‘From Logos to Mythos’. In From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, ed. Buxton, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2007. ‘ἄλλος δ’ έξ ἄλλου δέχεται: Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic’. In Literatur und Religion, Vol. 1: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei en Griechen, ed. Bierl, A., Wesselmann, K., and Lämmle, R.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 271–302.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. 1974. ‘The End of the Odyssey’. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 15: 153–69.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1965. ‘φράζω and Its Derivatives in Parmenides’. Classical Philology 60: 261–62.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1973. ‘Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naive Metaphysics of Thing’. In Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. N, Mourelatos, A. P. D, and Rorty, R. M. Assen: Van Gorcum, 16–48.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1976. ‘Determinacy and Indeterminacy, Being and Non-Being in the Fragments of Parmenides’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (Supplement 1): 45–60.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1978. ‘Events, Processes, and States’. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–34.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1979a. ‘“Nothing” as “Not-Being”: Some Literary Contexts that Bear on Plato’. In Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, ed. Bowersock, G. W, Burkert, W, and Putnam, M. C. J. New York: De Gruyter, 319–29.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1979b. ‘Some Alternatives in Interpreting Parmenides’. The Monist 62: 3–14.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1981. ‘Pre-Socratic Origins of the Principle that there Are no Origins from Nothing’. The Journal of Philosophy 78: 649–65.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1993. ‘Aristotle’s kinêsis/energeia Distinction: A Marginal Note on Kathleen Gill’s Paper’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23: 385–88.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1999. ‘Parmenides and the Pluralists’. Apeiron 32(2): 117–30.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2002. ‘La terre et les étoiles dans la cosmologie de Xénophane’. In Qu’est-ce que la philosophique présocratique, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 331–50.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008a. ‘The Cloud-Astrophysics of Xenophanes and Ionian Material Monism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P and Graham, D. W. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134–68.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008b. The Route Of Parmenides. 2nd ed. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2013a. ‘Sounds, Images, Mysticism, and Logic in Parmenides’. In Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito., M. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 159–77.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2013b. ‘Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism’. In Early Greek Philosophy, ed. McCoy, J. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 91–112.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2016a. ‘“Limitless” and “Limit” in Xenophanes’ Cosmology and in His Doctrine of Epistemic “Construction” (dokos)’. In Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy: Ancient Epistemology, ed. Ierodiakonou, K and Hasper, P. S. Münster: Mentis, 16–37.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2016b. ‘Two Neo-Analytic Approaches to Parmenides’ Metaphysical-Cosmological Poem’. Rhizomata 4: 257–68.Google Scholar
Muchnová, D. 2003. ‘Epei homérique: sémantique, syntaxe, pragmatique’. Gaia 7: 105–16.Google Scholar
Muchnová, D. 2011. Entre conjonction, connecteur et particule: le cas de ἐπεί en grec ancien. Étude syntaxique, sémantique et pragmatique. Prague: Éditions Karolinum.Google Scholar
Mülke, C. 2002. Solons politische Elegien und Iamben (Fr. 1–13; 32–37 West). Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Leipzig: K. G. Saur Verlag.Google Scholar
Mure, W. 1842. Journal of a Tour in Greece. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1987. Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983. ‘The Symposion in History’. In Tria corda: scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano, ed. Gabba, E. Biblioteca di Athenaeum, 1. Como: Edizioni New Press, 257–72.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1991. ‘War and the Symposium’. In Dining in a Classical Context, ed. Slater, W. J. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 83–104.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2008. ‘The Odyssey as Performance Poetry’. In Performance, Iconography, Reception, ed. Revermann, M and Wilson, P. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–76.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2016. ‘The Symposium between East and West’. In The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposion, ed. Cazzato, V, Obbink, D, and Prodi, E. E. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–27.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1981. ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N. 1980. ‘Entretiens avec Tirésias’. The Classical World 74: 89–106.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N. 1996. ‘Dread Goddess Revisited’. In Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, ed. Schein, S. L. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 141–61.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990a. Greek Mythology and Poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990b. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1996a. Homeric Questions. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1996b. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2014. Review of M. S. Jensen, Writing Homer (2011). Gnomon 86: 97–101.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1999. ‘On Parmenides’ Three Ways of Inquiry’. In Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 125–38.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 2002. ‘Parmenidean Being/Heraclitean Fire’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V and Graham, D. W. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 45–64.Google Scholar
Netz, R. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, R. M. 1987. ‘Odysseus and Hephaestus in the Odyssey’. The Classical Journal 83: 12–20.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 2007. ‘The Philosophers in Archaic Greece’. In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–98.Google Scholar
Niles, J. D. 1978. ‘Patterning in the Wanderings of Odysseus’. Ramus 7: 46–60.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1913. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöse Rede. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Noussia-Fantuzzi, M. 2010. Solon the Athenian, the Poetic Fragments. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2001. ‘The Genre of Plataea: Generic Unity in the New Simonides’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 65–85.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1985. Fortress Attica: Defense of the Athenian Land Frontier 404–322 B.C. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1991. ‘Hoplites and Obstacles’. In Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, ed. Hanson, V. D. London: Routledge, 173–96.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1987. Études sur Parménide, Tome 1: Le poème de Parménide. Texte, traduction, essai critique, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 2000. ‘Parmenides and Plato on What Is Not’. In The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L. M. de Rijk, ed. Kardaun, M and Spruyt, J. Leiden: Brill, 19–104.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. A. 1916. ‘Studies in the History and Topography of Locris’. American Journal of Archaeology 20: 32–61.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 1987. Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Osborne, C. 1997. ‘Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?’ In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C. Bari: Levante Editori, 23–35.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 2004. Presocratic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 2006. ‘Was There an Eleatic Revolution in Philosophy?’ In Rethinking Revolutions Through Ancient Greece, ed. Goldhill, S. and Osborne., R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–45.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 1985. ‘The Erection and Mutilation of the Hermai’. The Cambridge Classical Journal 31: 47–73.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 1994. ‘Archaeology, the Salaminioi, and the Politics of Sacred Space in Archaic Attica’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–60.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 1997. ‘The Polis and Its Culture’. In Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. 1, ed. Taylor, C. C. W.. London: Routledge, 9–46.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2005a. ‘Ordering Women in Hesiod’s “Catalogue”’. In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5–24.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2005b. ‘Urban Sprawl: What Is Urbanization and Why Does it Matter?’ In Mediterranean Urbanization, 800–600 BC, ed. Osborne, R. and Cunliffe., B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2009. Greece in the Making, 1200–479 BC. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1960. ‘Eleatic Questions’. The Classical Journal 10: 84–102.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1974. ‘Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D. Garden City, NY: Princeton University Press, 271–93.Google Scholar
Padel, R. 1992. In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. 1955. The Homeric Odyssey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. 1973. Folktales in Homer’s Odyssey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. 1999. Plato’s Reception of Parmenides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. 2009. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, J. K. 1996. ‘The Original Kerameikos of Athens and the Siting of the Classical Agora’. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 37: 107–29.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1996. Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payen, P. 1997. Les îles nomades: conquérir et résister dans l’enquête d’Hérodote. Paris: L’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Pellikaan-Engel, M. E. 1978. Hesiod and Parmenides: A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam: Verlag Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Peradotto, J. C. 1990. Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perceau, S. 2002. La parole vive: communiquer en catalogue dans l’épopée homérique. Paris: Bibliothèque d’études classiques.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, H. 1975. Die Stellung des parmenideischen Lehrgedichtes in der epischen Tradition. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Pieri, A. 1977. ‘Parmenide e la lingua della tradizione epica greca’. Studi italiani di filologia classica 49: 68–103.Google Scholar
Pike, G. 1967. ‘Pre-Roman Land Transport in the Western Mediterranean Region’. Man 2: 593–605.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, G. A. 1995. Ὁδικὸ δίκτυο καὶ ἄμυνα. Ἀπο τὴν Κόρινθο στὸ Ἄργος καὶ τὴν Ἀρκαδίας. Athens: Horos.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, G. A. 1999. ‘Από την άμαξα στο υποζύγιο και από την οδό στο καλντερίμι’. Ηόρος 13: 245–58.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, G. A. 2002. ’Αρκαδία: Συλλογή μελετῶν. Athens: Horos.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, G. A. 2012. Τὸ ὁδικὸ δίκτυο τῆς Λακωνικῆς. Athens: Horos.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, Y. A. 1999. ‘The Road-Network of Arkadia’. In Defining Ancient Arkadia, ed. Nielsen, T. H and Roy, J. Copenhagen: Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 248–319.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, Y. A. 2007. ‘Travelling by Land in Ancient Greece’. In Travel, Geography and Culture in Ancient Greece, Egypt, and the Near East. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 78–88.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 1994. ‘Mediation, Competition, and Sovereignty: The Evolution of Rural Sanctuaries in Geometric Greece’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–18.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 1995. Cults, Territory, and the Origins of the Greek City-State, trans. J. Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 1999. ‘L’installation des dieux et la genèse des cités en Grèce d’occident, une question résolue? Retour à Mégara Hyblaea’. In La colonisation grecque en Méditerranée occidentale. Paris: École Française de Rome, 209–29.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 2005. ‘Forms and Processes: Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Urbanization in Early Archaic Greece’. In Mediterranean Urbanization, 800–600 BC, ed. Osborne, R and Cunliffe, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–70.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 2006. ‘Analyse de l’espace et urbanisations en Grèce archaïque: quelques pistes de recherche récentes’. Revue Études Anciennes 108: 203–25.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 2009. ‘Sanctuaries and Festivals’. In A Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Raaflaub, K. A and van Wees, H. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 427–43.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F. 2012. ‘Une “voie héracléenne” en Attique?’ In Le banquet de Pauline Schmitt Pantel: Genre mœurs et politique dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine, ed. Azoulay, V., Gherchanoc, F., and Lalanne., S. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 307–16.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1998a. ‘Beyond the Search for Invariants’. In The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment, ed. Petersen, A. F.. London: Routledge, 146–222.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1998b. ‘Can the Moon Throw Light on Parmenides’ Ways?’ In The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment, ed. Petersen, A. F.. London: Routledge, 97–104.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1998c. ‘How the Moon Might Shed Some of Her Light upon the Two Ways of Parmenides (1989)’. In The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment, ed. Petersen, A. F.. London: Routledge, 79–96.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1998d. ‘How the Moon Might Shed Some of Her Light upon the Two Ways of Parmenides (I)’. In The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment, ed. Petersen, A. F. London: Routledge, 68–78.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1998e. ‘The World of Parmenides: Notes on Parmenides’ Poem and Its Origin in Early Greek Cosmology’. In The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment, ed. Petersen, A. F. London: Routledge, 105–45.Google Scholar
Porzig, W. 1942. Die Namen für Satzinhalte im Griechischen und im Indogermanischen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Powell, B. B. 1978. ‘Word Patterns in the Catalogue of Ships (B 494–709): A Structural Analysis of Homeric Language’. Hermes 106: 255–64.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Prier, R. A. 1978. ‘Σῆμα and the Symbolic Nature of Pre-Socratic Thought’. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 29: 91–101.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2013. ‘Le chemin vers la révélation: lumière et nuit dans le proème de Parménide’. Philosophie antique 13: 37–81.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. 1980. Studies in Ancient Greek Topography, Vol. 3. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1987. Odysseus Polytropos. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1996. ‘Between Narrative and Catalogue: Life and Death of the Poem’. Metis 11: 5–24.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1998. The Song of the Sirens. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 2006. ‘Il testo di Tirteo nel tessuto omerico’. In L’autore e l’opera: attribuzioni, appropriazioni, apocrifi nella Grecia antica, ed. Rascalla, F. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 21–41.Google Scholar
Pugliese Carratelli, G. 1988. ‘La ΘΕΑ di Parmenide’. Parola del Passato 43: 337–46.Google Scholar
Pugliese Carratelli, G. 2001. Le lamine d’oro orfiche. Istruzioni per il viaggio oltremondano degli iniziati greci. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. 2004. ‘Topographies of Time in Hesiod’. In Time and Temporality in the Ancient World, ed. Rosen, R. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, 147–68.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quilici, L. 2008. ‘Land Transport, Part 1: Roads and Bridges’. In The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World, ed. Oleson, J. P. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 551–79.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Vergil to Milton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rackham, O. 1990. ‘Ancient Landscapes’. In The Greek City from Homer to Alexander, ed. Murray, O and Price, S. R. F. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 85–107.Google Scholar
Radt, S. L. 1958. Pindars Zweiter und Sechster Paian. Text, Scholien und Kommentar. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Raepsaet, G. 1993. ‘Le diolkos de l’Isthme à Corinthe: son tracé, son fonctionnement, avec une annexe, considérations techniques et mécaniques’. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 117: 233–61.Google Scholar
Ranzato, S. 2015. Il kouros e la verità. Polivalenza delle immagini nel poema di Parmenide. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ready, J. L. 2014. ‘ATU 974 The Homecoming Husband, the Returns of Odysseus, and the End of Odyssey 21’. Arethusa 47: 265–85.Google Scholar
Ready, J. L. 2017. Review of J. M. González, The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft (2013). The Classical Journal 112: 494–504.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1983. ‘The Economic Man’. In Approaches to Homer, ed. Rubino, C. A and Shelmerdine, C. W. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 218–47.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn: Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1996. ‘The Adventures in the Odyssey’. In Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, ed. Schein, S. L. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 63–131.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 1972. The Athenian Boule. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 1981. A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 6: Books 21–24, ed. Kirk, G. S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. 2010. Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. and Piggott, S. 1982. ‘Hesiod’s Wagon: Text and Technology’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 225–29.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. 1976. Temporal and Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Greek, with Special Reference to the Use of [epei] and [hōs] in Herodotus. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. 2002. The Syntax and Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek. 3rd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robb, K. (ed.) 1983. Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute.Google Scholar
Robbiano, C. 2006. Becoming Being: On Parmenides’ Transformative Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Robbiano, C. 2011. ‘What Is Parmenides’ Being?’ In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero., N.-L. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 213–32.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C. 1995. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-Out Rhymes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruijgh, C. J. 1957. L’élément achéen dans la langue épique. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 2008. ‘The Sources for Presocratic Philosophy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P and Graham, D. W. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–54.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1972. History of Western Philosophy. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 1988. ‘Pindar on the Birth of Apollo’. Classical Quarterly 38: 65–75.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001a. Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001b. ‘The New Simonides: Toward a Commentary’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 33–54.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. 2000. ‘Review: The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece by Margalit Finkelberg’. Classical Philology 95: 482–86.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2011. Homer & the Odyssey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Salviat, F. and Servais, J.. 1964. ‘Stèle indicatrice thasienne trouvée au sanctuaire d’Aliki’. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 88: 267–87.Google Scholar
Sammons, B. 2010. The Art and Rhetoric of the Homeric Catalogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. D. R. and Whitbread, I. K.. 1990. ‘Central Places and Major Roads in the Peloponnese’. The Annual of the British School at Athens 85: 333–61.Google Scholar
Santoro, F. 2011. ‘Ta Sêmata: On a Genealogy of the Idea of Ontological Categories’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 233–50.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. 1988. ‘Parmenide al Bivio. Per un’interpretazione del Proemio’. La parola del passato 43: 383–96.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. 2018. The Beginnings of Philosophy in Greece, trans. M. Asuni. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schibli, H. S. 1990. Pherekydes of Syros. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. H. H. 1886. Synonymik der Griechischen Sprache, Vol. 4. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Schmitt Pantel, P. 1992. ‘Le Politique dans les sociétés archaïques: une hypothèse’. In La Cité au banquet: histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome: École Française de Rome, 107–13.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1970. ‘Did Parmenides Discover Eternity?’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52: 113–35.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1987. ‘Review: Coxon’s Parmenides’. Phronesis 32: 349–59.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2003. ‘The Presocratics’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 42–72.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. 1999. Geschichte und Theorie der Gattung Paian: eine kritische Untersuchung mit einem Ausblick auf Behandlung und Auffassung der lyrischen Gattungen bei den alexandrinischen Philologen. Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. 1963. ‘Hesiod und Parmenides. Zur Formung des parmenideischen Prooimions’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 106: 134–42.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2001. ‘Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar’. In Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, ed. Watson, J. Leiden: Brill, 109–38.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2002. Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, and Audience. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2004. ‘The Modesty of Homer’. In Oral Performance and Its Context, ed. Mackie, C. J. Leiden: Brill, 1–19.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2017. ‘Homeric Fate, Homeric Poetics’. In The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies. Studies in Honor of Antonios Rengakos, ed. Tsagalis, C and Markantonatos, A.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 75–93.Google Scholar
Scully, S. 1987. ‘Doubling in the Tale of Odysseus’. Classical World 80: 401–17.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1999. ‘Parmenides and Melissus’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–33.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1962. ‘The Phaeacians and the Symbolism of Odysseus’ Return’. Arion 1: 17–64.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1994. ‘Teiresias in the Yukon: On Folktale and Epic’. In Singers, Heroes, and Gods in the Odyssey. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 187–95.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 1982. Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy, ed. Harari, J. V. and Bell, D. F.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shipp, G. P. 1972. Studies in the Language of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sicking, C. M. J. and van Ophuijsen, J. M.. 1993. Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2006. ‘The New Simonides and the Question of Historical Elegy’. American Journal of Philology 127: 327–46.Google Scholar
Sigelman, A. 2016. Pindar’s Poetics of Immortality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. 2002a. ‘Interpretation, Rationality, and Truth’. In Visions of Politics, Vol 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–56.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. 2002b. ‘The Idea of a Cultural Lexicon’. In Visions of Politics, Vol 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 158–74.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1981. ‘Peace, Symposium and the Poet’. Illinois Classical Studies 6: 205–14.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1990. ‘Sympotic Ethics in the Odyssey’. In Sympotica: A Symposium on the Symposion, ed. Murray, O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–20.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, S. 2003. ‘Of Gods, Philosophers, and Charioteers: Content and Form in Parmenides’ Proem and Plato’s Phaedrus’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 227–53.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. 1997. ‘Adversative Relators between PUSH and POP’. In New Approaches to Greek Particles: Proceedings of the Colloquium Held in Amsterdam, January 4–6, 1996, to Honour C. J. Ruijgh on the Occasion of His Retirement, ed. Rijksbaron, A. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. 2017. ‘Anchoring Innovation: A Classical Research Agenda’. European Review 25: 20–38.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. 2003. Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 2011. Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. 9th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. 2006. ‘Archaeology and the Study of the Greek City’. In Archaeology and the Emergence of Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 268–89.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 1957. ‘La fondation du collège des Naopes et le renouveau politique de l’Amphictionie au IVe siècle’. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 81: 38–75.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 2011. Athenian Myths and Festivals, ed. Parker, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, H. 2018a. Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, H. 2018b. ‘Event and Artefact: The Hymn to Apollo, Archaic Lyric, and Early Greek Literary History’. In Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece, ed. Budelmann, F and Phillips, T. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–71.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. 2017. Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry: Reception and Transformation in the Fifth Century BCE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. 1959. Homer: Odyssey I–XII. 2nd ed. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. and Brown, F.. 1975. ‘The “Inside” and the “Outside”’. The Hudson Review 28: 333–51.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. 2001. ‘A Bard of the Iron Age and His Auxiliary Muse’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 106–19.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. 2006. ‘Solon’s Self-Reflexive Political Persona and Its Audience’. In Solon of Athens: New Historical and Philological Approaches, ed. Blok, J. H and Lardinois, A. P. M. H. Leiden: Brill, 79–113.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 2005. ‘Nautical Matters: Hesiod’s Nautilia and Ibycus Fragment 282 PMG’. Classical Philology 100: 347–55.Google Scholar
Sternberg, M. 1981. ‘Ordering the Unordered: Time, Space, and Descriptive Coherence’. Yale French Studies 61: 60–88.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. 2003. Telling Presences: Narrating Divine Epiphany in Homer and Beyond. Unpublished dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1962. ‘Hesiodic and Milesian Cosmogonies: I’. Phronesis 7: 1–37.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1963. ‘Hesiodic and Milesian Cosmogonies: II’. Phronesis 8: 1–34.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1971. One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1982. ‘A Mégara Hyblaea: le corps géomètre’. Annales, Histoire, Sciences Sociales 37: 953–64.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swift, L. 2012. ‘Archilochus the “Anti-Hero”? Heroism, Flight and Values in Homer and the New Archilochus Fragment (P.Oxy LXIX 4708)’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 132: 139–55.Google Scholar
Swift, L 2019. Archilochus: The Poems: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tandy, D. W. and Neale, W. C.. 1996. Hesiod’s Works and Days: A Translation and Commentary for the Social Sciences. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1965. Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1977. Review of A. P. D. Mourelatos, The Route of Parmenides (1970). Gnomon 7: 651–66.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1979. ‘Perpetual Duration and Atemporal Eternity in Parmenides’. The Monist 62: 43–53.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thanassas, P. 1997. Die erste ‘zweite Fahrt’. Sein des Seienden und Erscheinen der Welt bei Parmenides. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Thanassas, P. 2007. Parmenides, Cosmos, and Being: A Philosophical Interpretation. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Thanassas, P. 2011. ‘Parmenidean Dualisms’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 289–305.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. 1984. Homer’s Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, R. A. 2002. ‘Road Communication in Classical Attica: Athens and the Mesogeia’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 33–42.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2013. ‘Sextus Empiricus on Xenophanes’ Scepticism’. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3: 1–23.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2016. ‘Heraclitus on Apollo’s Signs and His Own: Contemplating Oracles and Philosophical Inquiry’. In Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion, ed. Eidinow, E, Kindt, J, and Osborne, R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 89–116.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2017. Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Travlos, I. N. 1971. Pictorial Dictionary of Ancient Athens. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Tréheux, J. 1955. ‘Une nouvelle voie thasienne’. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 79: 427–41.Google Scholar
Tréziny, H. 1999. ‘Lots et îlots à Mégara Hyblaea. Questions de métrologie’. In La colonisation grecque en Méditerranée occidentale. Paris: École Française de Rome, 141–83.Google Scholar
Tréziny, H. 2002. ‘Urbanisme et voirie dans les colonies grecques archaïques de Sicile orientale’. In Habitat et urbanisme dans le monde grec de la fin des palais mycéniens à la prise de Milet (494 av. J.-C.), ed. Luce, J.-M.. Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail, 268–82.Google Scholar
Tréziny, H. 2006. ‘L’urbanisme archaïque des villes ioniennes: un point de vue occidental’. Revue Études Anciennes 108: 225–47.Google Scholar
Tugwell, S. 1964. ‘The Way of Truth’. Classical Quarterly 14: 36–41.Google Scholar
Tulli, M. 2000. ‘Esiodo nella memoria di Parmenide’. In Letteratura e riflessione sulla letteratura nella cultura classica: tradizione, erudizione, critica letteraria, filologia e riflessione filosofica nella produzione letteraria antica. Atti del convegno, Pisa, 7–9 Giugno 1999, ed. Arrighetti, G. Pisa: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, 65–81.Google Scholar
Tzonis, A. and Lefaivre, L.. 1999. Classical Architecture: The Poetics of Order. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. 1958. Parmenide: testimonianze e frammenti. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2009. ‘Cave Experiences and Ancient Greek Oracles’. Time and Mind 2: 265–86.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2018. Divine Mania: Alteration of Consciousness in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vallet, G. 1973. ‘Espace privé et espace public dans une cité coloniale d’Occident (Mégara Hyblaea)’. In Problèmes de la terre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Finley, M. I. Paris: Mouton & Co., 83–96.Google Scholar
Vanderpool, E. 1978. ‘Roads and Forts in Northwestern Attica’. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 11: 227–45.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. ‘Verbs and Times’. In Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 97–121.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1964. Parmenides: Some Comments on His Poem. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1967. ‘Der Logosbegriff bei Heraklit und Parmenides, II’. Phronesis 12: 99–117.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 1982. The Origins of Greek Thought, trans. J. Lloyd. 2nd ed. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 1990a. ‘Between the Beasts and the Gods’. In Myth and Society in Ancient Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 143–82.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 1990b. ‘Marriage’. In Myth and Society in Ancient Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 55–78.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 1991. ‘Feminine Figures of Death in Greece’. In Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays, ed. Zeitlin, F. I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 95–110.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006a. ‘Geometric Structure and Political Ideas in the Cosmology of Anaximander’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 213–33.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006b. ‘Hesiod’s Myth of the Races: A Reassessment’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 53–89.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006c. ‘Hesiod’s Myth of the Races: An Essay in Structural Analysis’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 25–52.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006d. ‘Hestia-Hermes: The Religious Expression of Space and Movement in Ancient Greece’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 157–96.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006e. ‘Mythic Aspects of Memory’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 115–38.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006f. ‘Space and Political Organization in Ancient Greece’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd and J. Fort. New York: Zone Books, 235–59.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. 2006g. ‘The Formation of Positivist Thought’. In Myth and Thought among the Greeks, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books, 371–98.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 1996. ‘Land Sacrifice in the Odyssey: A Study of Religious and Mythical Meanings’. In Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, ed. Schein, S. L. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 33–55.Google Scholar
Villard, F. 1999. ‘Le cas de Mégara Hyblaea est-il exemplaire?’ In La colonisation grecque en Méditerranée occidentale, Paris: École Française de Rome, 133–40.Google Scholar
Visser, E. 1987. Homerische Versifikationstechnik. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Visser, E. 1997. Homers Katalog der Schiffe. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Vita, A. di. 1996. ‘Urban Planning in Ancient Sicily’. In The Western Greeks: Classical Civilization in the Western Mediterranean, ed. Pugliese Carratelli, G. New York: Rizzoli, 263–308.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1947. ‘Equality and Justice in Early Greek Cosmologies’. Classical Philology 42: 156–78.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1993. ‘Parmenides’ Theory of Knowledge’. In Studies in Greek Philosophy, Vol. 1: The Presocratics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 153–63.Google Scholar
Vogel, C. 2019. ‘Hesiod und das Wissen der Musen’. Working Paper des SFB 980 Episteme in Bewegung 14: 1–26.Google Scholar
Waanders, F. M. J. 1983. The History of ΤΕΛΟΣ and ΤΕΛΕΩ in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar
Wakker, G. C. 1994. Conditions and Conditionals: An Investigation of Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 2009. ‘Braudel on the Longue Durée: Problems of Conceptual Translation’. Review 32: 155–70.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. 1990. ‘What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?’ The Journal of Philosophy 87: 399–419.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2007. Presocratics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wecowski, M. 2014. The Rise of the Greek Aristocratic Banquet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wedin, M. V. 2014. Parmenides’ Grand Deduction: A Logical Reconstruction of the Way of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wersinger, A. G. 2012. ‘Parménide croyait-il dans les signes de l’Être? Remarques sur l’énonciation et la délocution au Fragment 8, Vers 1–11’. Savoirs en Prisme 2: 229–51.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1966a. Hesiod: Theogony. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1966b. ‘Conjectures on 46 Greek Poets’. Philologus 110: 147–68.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1974. Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1975. ‘Some Lyric Fragments Reconsidered’. Classical Quarterly 25: 307–9.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1978. Hesiod: Works & Days. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1983. The Orphic Poems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1985. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Its Nature, Structure, and Origins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1993. ‘Simonides Redivivus’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 98: 1–14.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1999. ‘The Invention of Homer’. Classical Quarterly 49: 364–82.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2003. Homeric Hymns; Homeric Apocrypha; Lives of Homer, with introduction and translation. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2005. ‘Odyssey and Argonautica’. Classical Quarterly 55: 39–64.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2011a. ‘Pindar as a Man of Letters’. In Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, ed. Rutherford, E and Obbink, D. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 50–68.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2011b. ‘Towards a Chronology of Early Greek Epic’. In Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, ed. Andersen, Ø and Haug, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 224–41.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2015. ‘Epic, Lyric, and Lyric Epic’. In Stesichorus in Context, ed. Finglass, P. J and Kelly, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–62.Google Scholar
White, K. D. 1984. Greek and Roman Technology. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. and Scodel, R. 1981. ‘Sequence and Simultaneity in Iliad N, Ξ, and O’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 1–15.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. 2013. The Lyric of Ibycus: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilcox, M. M. 1976. A Companion to the Iliad. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wöhrle, G. 1993. ‘War Parmenides ein schlechter Dichter? Oder: Zur Form der Wissensvermittlung in der frühgriechischen Philosophie’. In Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, ed. Kullmann, W and Althoff, J. Tübingen: Narr, 167–80.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1966. ‘Equinox at Acragas: Pindar, Ol. 2.61–62’. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97: 597–616.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1985. ‘Ibycus and Polycrates’. Phoenix 39: 193–220.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, C. J. 1930. The Composition of Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. A. 2005. ‘Unconcealment’. In A Companion to Heidegger, ed. Dreyfus, H. L and Wrathall, M. A. Oxford: Blackwell, 337–57.Google Scholar
Wrede, H. 1986. Die antike Herme. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. 1997. ‘Philosopher Poets: Parmenides and Empedocles’. In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C. Bari: Levante Editori, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wyatt, W. F. 1969. Metrical Lengthening. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Wyatt, W. F. 1992. ‘The Root of Parmenides’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 113–20.Google Scholar
Young, J. H. 1956. ‘Greek Roads in South Attica’. Antiquity 30: 94–97.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. 1995. ‘Figuring Fidelity in Homer’s Odyssey’. In The Distaff Side: Representing the Female in Homer’s Odyssey, ed. Cohen., B. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1892. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, i. Vorsokratische Philosophie, Zweite Hälfte. 5th ed. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zeller, E 1919. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, i. Allgemeine Enleitung; Vorsokratische Philosophie, Erste Hälfte. 6th ed. ed. Nestle, W. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zerba, M. 2009. ‘What Penelope Knew: Doubt and Scepticism in the Odyssey’. Classical Quarterly 59: 295–316.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Benjamin Folit-Weinberg, University of Bristol
  • Book: Homer, Parmenides, and the Road to Demonstration
  • Online publication: 24 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047562.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Benjamin Folit-Weinberg, University of Bristol
  • Book: Homer, Parmenides, and the Road to Demonstration
  • Online publication: 24 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047562.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Benjamin Folit-Weinberg, University of Bristol
  • Book: Homer, Parmenides, and the Road to Demonstration
  • Online publication: 24 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047562.010
Available formats
×