Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:33:00.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between mitochondrial ND5 gene polymorphisms and in vitro embryo production in Sanjabi sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Fereshteh Teymouri ,
Saheb Foroutanifar Open the ORCID record for Saheb Foroutanifar [Opens in a new window] ,
Alireza Abdolmohammadi  and
Hadi Hajarian
Fereshteh Teymouri
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Saheb Foroutanifar*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Alireza Abdolmohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Hadi Hajarian
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Saheb Foroutanifar. Department of Animal Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, PO Box: 6715685418, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate mitochondrial ND5 gene polymorphisms and their relationship with in vitro maturation (IVM) and in vitro culture (IVC) of Sanjabi sheep. Blood and ovarian samples of adult ewes were obtained from a local slaughterhouse. For each ovarian sample, cumulus–oocyte complexes larger than 3 mm in diameter were aspirated from follicles, and their IVM and IVC rates were recorded. A 666-bp fragment of the ND5 gene was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction. The samples were genotyped using a modified single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) method, and an association study was conducted with IVM and IVC rates. Six different SSCP patterns, designated A, B, C, D, E and F with respective frequencies of 8, 47, 4, 4, 32 and 5%, respectively, were observed. According to the results of association analysis, there was no significant association between the ND1 gene polymorphisms and the IVM and IVC rates (P > 0.05).

Keywords

IVCIVMND5PolymorphismSheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 285 - 287
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassam, BJ and Gresshoff, PM (2007). Silver staining DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Nat Protoc 2, 2649–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X, Wang, D, Xiang, H, Dun, W, Brahi, DOH, Yin, T and Zhao, X (2017). Mitochondrial DNA T7719G in tRNA-Lys gene affects litter size in small-tailed Han sheep. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cognie, Y, Benoit, F, Poulin, N, Khatir, H and Driancourt, MA (1998). Effect of follicle size and of the FecB Booroola gene on oocyte function in sheep. J Reprod Fertil 112, 379–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lechniak, D, Adamowicz, T, Stanisławski, D and Kaczmarek, D (2002). In vitro maturation and fertilisation of bovine oocytes in relation to GH gene polymorphism (Leu/Val). Reprod Nutr Dev 42, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechniak, D, Szczepankiewicz, D, Kauss, D, Szulc, J and Szydłowski, M (2005). IVM media, oocyte diameter and donor genotype at RYR1 locus in relation to the incidence of porcine diploid oocytes after maturation in vitro . Theriogenology 64, 202–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Shi, W, Wang, D and Zhao, X (2019). Association analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms with oocyte number in pigs. Reprod Fertil Dev 31, 805–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, NV, Dirndorfer, D, Lang, S, Resenberger, UK, Restelli, LM, Hemion, C, Miesbauer, M, Frank, S, Neutzner A Zimmermann R, Winklhofer KF and Tatzelt J (2013). Structural features within the nascent chain regulate alternative targeting of secretory proteins to mitochondria. EMBO J 32, 1036–51.Google Scholar
Pradhan, M, Pal, A, Samanta, AK, Banerjee, S and Samanta, R (2018). Mutations in cytochrome B gene effects female reproduction of Ghungroo pig. Theriogenology 119, 121–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Reicher, S, Seroussi, E, Weller, JI, Rosov, A and Gootwine, E (2012). Ovine mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and its association with production and reproduction traits within an Afec-Assaf flock. J Anim Sci 90, 2084–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizos, D, Clemente, M, Bermejo-Alvarez, P, de La Fuente, J, Lonergan, P and Gutiérrez-Adán, A (2008). Consequences of in vitro culture conditions on embryo development and quality. Reprod Domest Anim 43 Supplement 4, 44–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Sutarno Cummins, JM, Greeff, J and Lymbery, AJ (2002). Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms and fertility in beef cattle. Theriogenology 57, 1603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, RW and Turnbull, DM (2005). Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human disease. Nat Rev Genet 6, 389–402.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Blerkom, J, Davis, P and Alexander, S (2000). Differential mitochondrial distribution in human pronuclear embryos leads to disproportionate inheritance between blastomeres: relationship to microtubular organization, ATP content and competence. Hum Reprod 15, 2621–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, DC (2005). A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: a dawn for evolutionary medicine. Annu Rev Genet 39, 359–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, DC, Brown, MD and Lott, MT (1999). Mitochondrial DNA variation in human evolution and disease. Gene 238, 211–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolstenholme, DR (1992). Animal mitochondrial DNA: structure and evolution. Int Rev Cytol 141, 173–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed