Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:02:22.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Porcine oocyte preincubation in oviductal fluid flush before in vitro fertilization in the presence of oviductal epithelial cells improves monospermic zygote production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2021

Ribrio Ivan Tavares Pereira Batista Open the ORCID record for Ribrio Ivan Tavares Pereira Batista [Opens in a new window] ,
Lucia N. Moro ,
Emilie Corbin ,
Carmen Alminana ,
Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza-Fabjan ,
Vicente José de Figueirêdo Freitas Open the ORCID record for Vicente José de Figueirêdo Freitas [Opens in a new window]  and
Pascal Mermillod
Ribrio Ivan Tavares Pereira Batista*
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR7247, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France Laboratório de Fisiologia e Controle da Reprodução, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza-CE, 60714–903, Brazil
Lucia N. Moro
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR7247, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France
Emilie Corbin
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR7247, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France
Carmen Alminana
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR7247, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France
Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza-Fabjan
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Vital Brasil Filho, 64, CEP 24230-340, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Vicente José de Figueirêdo Freitas
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiologia e Controle da Reprodução, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza-CE, 60714–903, Brazil
Pascal Mermillod
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR7247, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France
*
Author for correspondence: Ribrio I.T.P. Batista, Laboratório de Fisiologia e Controle da Reprodução, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza-CE, 60714–903, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of the combination of oviduct fluid flush (OFF) and oviduct epithelial cells (OEC) in modulating the incidence of polyspermy in pigs. Therefore, for in vitro fertilization (IVF), oocyte and sperm were co-cultured in Tris-buffered medium (TBM) either supplemented with 10% OFF (OFFD group), or in the presence of a bovine OEC monolayer (OEC group), or the oocytes were exposed to OFF for 30 min before IVF (OFFB group), or in the presence of an OEC monolayer (OFFB + OEC group). Regardless of sperm concentration used (0.5, 1.5, and 4.5 × 105 cells/ml), supplementation of IVF medium with 10% OFF led to an increased (P < 0.05) monospermy rate, without alteration (P > 0.05) of the penetration rate in comparison with the control and OEC groups. When the IVF medium was supplemented with heparin, an overall increase (P < 0.05) of the final output of the IVF system in terms of zygotes with two pronuclei (2PN) was observed in the OFFD group, compared with the control and OEC groups, at a sperm concentration of 4.5 × 105 cells/ml. At this concentration, OFFB improved the monospermy rate but decreased the penetration rate, resulting in low efficiency of monospermic zygotes production. Despite this, no major effect was observed in the developmental competence of the presumed zygotes up to the blastocyst stage. The combination of OFFB with OEC improved the penetration rate, while maintaining the high monospermic rate induced by OFFB. In conclusion, the combination of treatment of oocytes by diluted OFF 30 min before IVF, followed by IVF in the presence of OEC, improved monospermic zygote production without reducing the penetration rate, when the IVF medium was supplemented with heparin.

Keywords

GlycoproteinOviductal fluidPolyspermySperm–oocyte interactionZona pellucida maturation
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , October 2021 , pp. 350 - 357
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R and De Iuliis, G (2010) On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 16, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Dossary, AA, Strehler, EE and Martin-DeLeon, PA (2013). Expression and secretion of plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase 4a (PMCA4a) during murine estrus: association with oviductal exosomes and uptake in sperm. PLoS One 8, e80181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcântara-Neto, AS, Fernandez-Rufete, M, Corbin, E, Tsikis, G, Uzbekov, R, Garanina, AS, Coy, P, Almiñana, C and Mermillod, P (2020). Oviduct fluid extracellular vesicles regulate polyspermy during porcine in vitro fertilisation. Reprod Fertil Dev 32, 409–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alminãna, C, Corbin, E, Tsikis, G, Alcântara-Neto, AS, Labas, V, Reynaud, K, Galio, L, Uzbekov, R, Garanina, AS, Druart, X and Mermillod, P (2017). Oviduct extracellular vesicles protein content and their role during oviduct–embryo cross-talk. Reproduction 154, 253–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avilés, M, Coy, P and Rizos, D (2015). The oviduct: A key organ for the success of early reproductive events. Anim Front 5, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batista, RITP, Moro, LN, Corbin, E, Alminana, C, Souza-Fabjan, JM, Freitas, VJF and Mermillod, P (2016). Combination of oviduct fluid and heparin to improve monospermic zygotes production during porcine in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 86, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergqvist, AS, Ballester, J, Johannisson, A, Hernández, M, Lundeheim, N and Rodríguez-Martínez, H (2006). In vitro capacitation of bull spermatozoa by oviductal fluid and its components. Zygote 14, 259–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bussiere, JF, Bertaud, G and Guillouet, P (2000). Conservation of boar semen by freezing. Evaluation in vivo after insemination. J Rech Porc Fr 32, 429–32.Google Scholar
Carolan, C, Lonergan, P, van Langendonckt, A and Mermillod, P (1995). Factors affecting bovine embryo development in synthetic oviduct fluid following oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology 43, 1115–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerny, KL, Garrett, E, Walton, AJ, Anderson, LH and Bridges, PJ (2015). A transcriptomal analysis of bovine oviductal epithelial cells collected during the follicular phase versus the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordova, A, Perreau, C, Uzbekova, S, Ponsart, C, Locatelli, Y and Mermillod, P (2014). Development rate and gene expression of IVP bovine embryos cocultured with bovine oviduct epithelial cells at early or late stage of preimplantation development. Theriogenology 81, 1163–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortés, PP, Orihuela, PA, Zúñiga, LM, Velásquez, LA and Croxatto, HB (2004). Sperm binding to oviductal epithelial cells in the rat: role of sialic acid residues on the epithelial surface and sialic acid-binding sites on the sperm surface. Biol Reprod 71, 1262–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coy, P and Avilés, M (2010). What controls polyspermy in mammals, the oviduct or the oocyte? Biol Rev 85, 593–605.Google ScholarPubMed
Coy, P, Cánovas, S, Mondéjar, I, Saavedra, MD, Romar, R, Grullón, L, Matás, C and Avilés, M (2008). Oviduct-specific glycoprotein and heparin modulate sperm-zona pellucida interaction during fertilization and contribute to the control of polyspermy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 15809–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobrinski, I, Suárez, SS and Ball, BA (1996). Intracellular calcium concentration in equine spermatozoa attached to oviductal epithelial cells in vitro. Biol Reprod 54, 783–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubuc, A and Sirard, MA (1995). Effect of coculturing spermatozoa with oviductal cells on the incidence of polyspermy in pig in vitro fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 41, 360–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Hajj, N and Haaf, T (2013). Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: implications for human assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 99, 632–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellington, JE, Ball, BA and Yang, X (1993). Binding of stallion spermatozoa to the equine zona pellucida after co-culture with oviductal epithelial cells. J Reprod Fertil 98, 203–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galantino-Homer, HL, Visconti, PE and Kopf, GS (1997). Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation by a cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate-dependent pathway. Biol Reprod 56, 707–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, RF, Staros, AL and Killian, GJ (2008). Oviductal fluid proteins associated with the bovine zona pellucida and the effect on in vitro sperm egg binding, fertilization and embryo development. Reprod Domest Anim 43, 720–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gualteri, R and Talevi, R (2003). Selection of highly fertilization-competent bovine spermatozoa through adhesion to the fallopian tube epithelium in vitro. Reproduction 125, 251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, A, Garde, J, García-Artiga, C and Vázquez, I (1993). Ram spermatozoa co-cultured with epithelial cell monolayers: an in vitro model for the study of capacitation and the acrosome reaction. Mol Reprod Dev 36, 338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, ESE and Hafez, B (2000). Folliculogenesis, egg maturation, and ovulation. In Hafez, B and Hafez, ESE (eds), Reproduction in Farm Animals 7th edn. Pennsylvania, USA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, YM, Abeydeera, LR, Kim, JH, Moon, HB, Cabot, RA and Day, BN (1999a). Growth retardation of inner cell mass cells in polyspermic porcine embryos produced in vitro. Biol Reprod 60, 1110–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, YM, Wang, WH, Abeydeera, LR, Petersen, AL, Kim, JH and Murphy, C (1999b). Pronuclear location before the first cell division determines ploidy of polyspermic pig embryos. Biol Reprod 61, 1340–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadam, KM, D’Souza, SJ, Bandivdekar, AH and Natraj, U (2006). Identification and characterization of oviductal glycoprotein-binding protein partner on gametes: epitopic similarity to non-muscle myosin IIA, MYH 9. Mol Hum Reprod 12, 275–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawakami, E, Kashiwagi, C, Hori, T and Tsutsui, T (2001). Effects of canine oviduct epithelial cells on movement and capacitation of homologous spermatozoa in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 68, 121–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kervancioglu, ME, Djahanbakhch, O and Aitken, RJ (1994). Epithelial cell co-culture and the induction of sperm capacitation. Fertil Steril 61, 1100–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killian, G (2011). Physiology and endocrinology symposium: evidence that oviduct secretions influence sperm function: a retrospective view for livestock. J Anim Sci 89, 1315–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S Winuthayanon, W (2017). Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development. J Endocrinol 232, R1–R26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopera-Vasquez, R, Hamdi, M, Maillo, V, Gutiérrez-Adán, A, Bermejo-Alvarez, P, Ramírez, MA, Yánez-Mó, M and Rizos, D (2017). Effect of bovine oviductal extracellular vesicles on embryo development and quality in vitro. Reproduction 153, 461–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maillo, V, Gaora, PO, Forde, N, Besenfelder, U, Havlicek, V and Burns, GW (2015). Oviduct–embryo interactions in cattle: two-way traffic or a one-way street? Biol Reprod 92, 144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchal, R, Tomanek, M, Terqui, M and Mermillod, P (2001). Effects of cell cycle dependent kinases inhibitor on nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 60, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, DJ, Winer, MA and Ax, RL (1990). Heparin-binding proteins from seminal plasma bind to bovine spermatozoa and modulate capacitation by heparin. Biol Reprod 42, 899–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondéjar, I, Avilés, M and Coy, P (2013). The human is an exception to the evolutionarily-conserved phenomenon of pre-fertilization zona pellucida resistance to proteolysis induced by oviductal fluid. Hum Reprod 28, 718–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, P, Palma, V, Salgado, AM and Villalón, M (1996). Sperm interaction with human oviductal cells in vitro. Hum Reprod 11, 1504–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, JJ, Susko-Parrish, J, Winer, MA and First, NL (1988). Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 38, 1171–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Cerezales, S, Ramos-Ibeas, P, Acuña, OS, Avilés, M, Coy, P, Rizos, D and Gutiérrez-Adán, A (2018). The oviduct: from sperm selection to the epigenetic landscape of the embryo. Biol Reprod 98, 262–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qu, P, Zhao, Y, Wang, R, Zhang, Y., Li, L, Fan, J and Liu, E (2018). Extracellular vesicles derived from donor oviduct fluid improved birth rates after embryo transfer in mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 31, 324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, G and Stoorvogel, W (2013). Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 200, 373–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romar, R, Coy, P, Campos, I, Gadea, J, Matás, C and Ruiz, S (2001). Effect of co-culture of porcine sperm and oocytes with porcine oviductal epithelial cells on in vitro fertilization. Anim Reprod Sci 68, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romar, R, Coy, P, Ruiz, S, Gadea, J and Rath, D (2003). Effects of oviductal and cumulus cells on in vitro fertilization and embryo development of porcine oocytes fertilized with epididymal spermatozoa. Theriogenology 59, 975–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmaltz-Panneau, B, Locatelli, Y, Uzbekova, S, Perreau, C and Mermillod, P (2015). Bovine oviduct epithelial cells dedifferentiate partly in culture, while maintaining their ability to improve early embryo development rate and quality. Reprod Domest Anim 50, 719–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Therien, I, Bleau, G and Manjunath, P (1995). Phosphatidylcholine-binding proteins of bovine seminal plasma modulate capacitation of spermatozoa by heparin. Biol Reprod 52, 1372–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thery, C (2011). Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol Rep 3, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visconti, PE, Galantino-Homer, H, Moore, GD, Bailey, JL, Ning, X, Fornes, M and Kopf, GS (1998). The molecular basis of sperm capacitation. J Androl 19, 242–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Yao, Y, Ho, P and Yeung, WS (2000). Human oviductal cells produce a factor(s) that maintains the motility of human spermatozoa in vitro. Fertil Steril 73, 479–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeste, M, Lloyd, RE, Badia, E, Briza, M, Bonet, S and Holt, WV (2009). Direct contact between boar spermatozoa and porcine oviductal epithelial cell (OEC) cultures is needed for optimal sperm survival in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 113, 263–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaborowski, MP, Balaj, L, Breakefield, XO and Lai, CP (2015). Extracellular vesicles: composition, biological relevance, and methods of study. Bioscience 65, 783–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, WJ, Zhong, Y and Zhang, CX (2001). Effect of human oviductal epithelial cell cultural medium on cryopreserved human sperm survival. Cell Biol Int 25, 1025–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed