Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:21:22.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ovarian regulation of sperm progression in the Fallopain tubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

R. H. F. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK and University of Montréal, Canada

Extract

Successful liberation and apposition of gametes are essential components of fertility. Normal fertilisation depends upon the establishment of a pre-ovulatory sperm gradient in the female tract between the site of semen deposition and the site of fertilisation in the Fallopian tubes. As a consequence, sperm: egg ratios may be close to unity at the time of activation of most secondary oocytes under conditions of spontaneous mating. In the absence of a sufficient sperm gradient, newly ovulated eggs would be confronted by an excess of spermatozoa resulting in polyspermic fertilisation. Penetration of the vitellus by more than one spermatozoon is pathological in mammals (Beatty, 1957; Austin, 1963). Accordingly, systems that act to regulate sperm progression and competence before the time of ovulation assume a particular importance. During the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, there was much controversy as to the rate of sperm transport into the Fallopian tubes. Because observations failed to focus on those spermatozoa that could fertilise eggs, the controversy was largely sterile. Nor were the disagreements well founded since some experiments employed artificial insemination whilst others used natural mating. These two quite distinct approaches to introducing a sperm suspension into the female tract could not reasonably form the basis of disagreements on the physiological events of cellular progression. More recent studies have been set in perspective by Overstreet (1983), Harper (1988), Yanagimachi (1988), Hunter (1988, 1991, 1995) and Drobnis & Overstreet (1992)After mating at the onset of oestrus, ram and bull spermatozoa require a minimum of 6–8 h to reach the Fallopian tubes in sufficient numbers to promote suc.cessful fertilisation (Hunter et al., 1980; Hunter & Wilmut, 1982). Spermatozoa displaced to the tubes in a small number of minutes are moribund or dead, not.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, C.R.. (1963). Fertilisation and transport of the ovum. In Mechanisms Concerned with Conception, ed CG Hart man, pp. 285320. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Beatty, R.A.. (1957). Parthenogenesis and Polyploidy in Mammalian Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drobnis, E.Z..& Overstreet, J.W.. (1992). Natural history of mammalian spermatozoa in the female reproductive tract. Oxford Rev. Reprod. Biol. 14, 145.Google ScholarPubMed
Harper, MJK. (1988). Gamete and zygote transport. In The Physiology of Reproduction, ed. Knobil, E, Neil, J et al.., pp. 103–34. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF. (1980). Transport and storage of spermatozoa in the female tract. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Madrid, vol. 2, pp. 227–33.Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF. (1981). Sperm transport and reservoirs in the pig oviduct in relation to the time of ovulation. J. Reprod. Fert. 63, 109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, RHF. (1984). Pre-ovulatory arrest and penovulatory redistribution of competent spermatozoa in the isthmus of the pig oviduct. J. Reprod. Fert. 72, 203–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF. (1988). The Fallopian Tubes: Their Role in Fertility and Infertility. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, RHF. (1991). Behaviour of spermatozoa in the oviduct of farm animals. Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. 24, 349–59.Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF. (1993). Sperm:egg ratios and putative molecular signals to modulate gamete interactions in polytocous mammals. Mol. Reprod. Dev.. 35, 324–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF. (1994). Modulation of gamete and embryonic microenvironments by oviduct glycoproteins. Mol. Reprod. Dev. (in press).Google ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF. (1995). Ovarian endocrine control of sperm progression in the Fallopian tubes. Oxford. Rev. Reprod. Biol. (in press).Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF.& Nichol, R.. (1983). Transport of spermatozoa in the sheep oviduct: preovulatory sequestering of cells in the caudal isthmus. I. Exp. Zool.. 228, 121–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF.& Nichol, R.. (1986). A pre-ovulatory temperature gradient between the isthmus and ampulla of pig oviducts during the phase of sperm storage. J. Reprod. Fert.. 77, 599606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, RHF.& Wilmut, I.. (1982). The rate of functional sperm transport into the oviducts of mated cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 5, 167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, RHF.& Wilmut, I.. (1984). Sperm transport in the cow: pen-ovulatory redistribution of viable cells within the oviduct. Reprod. Nutr. Dev.. 24, 597608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF., Nichol, R..& Crabtree, S.M.. (1980). Transport of spermatozoa in the ewe: timing of the establishment of a functional population in the oviduct. Reprod. Nutr. Dev.. 20, 1869–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RHF., Barwise, L..& King, R.. (1982). Sperm transport, storage and release in the sheep oviduct in relation to the time of ovulation. Br. Vet. J. 138, 225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, RHF., Cook, B..& Poyser, N.L.. (1983). Regulation of oviduct function in pigs by local transfer of ovarian steroids and prostaglandins: a mechanism to influence sperm transport. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol. 14, 225–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overstreet, J.W.. (1983). Transport of gametes in the reproductive tract of the female mammal. In Mechanism and Control of Animal Fertilisation, ed. Hartmann, JF, pp. 499543. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, S.S.. (1987). Sperm transport and motility in the mouse oviduct: observations in situ. Biol. Reprod. 36, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R.. (1988). Mammalian fertilisation. In The Physiology of Reproduction, ed. Knobil, E, Neil, J., pp. 135–85. New York: et al Raven Press.Google Scholar