Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:00:01.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observation of the embryonic development in Pseudoplatystoma coruscans (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) under light and scanning electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Camila Marques ,
Laura Satiko Okada Nakaghi ,
Francine Faustino ,
Luciana Nakaghi Ganeco  and
José Augusto Senhorini
Camila Marques*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, UNESP – São Paulo State University, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884–900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Aquaculture Center of UNESP, CAUNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, UNESP – São Paulo State University, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Laura Satiko Okada Nakaghi
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center of UNESP, CAUNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, UNESP – São Paulo State University, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Francine Faustino
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center of UNESP, CAUNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Luciana Nakaghi Ganeco
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center of UNESP, CAUNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
José Augusto Senhorini
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisa e Gestão de Recursos Pesqueiros Continentais – CEPTA/IBAMA, Rod. SP 201, Km 6.5, P.O. Box 64, CEP 13630-970, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to: C. Marques. Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, UNESP – São Paulo State University, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, CEP 14884–900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Tel:/Fax: +55 16 3209-2654 (r. 232). e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pseudoplatystoma coruscans is a very popular species for tropical fish culture as it has boneless meat of delicate taste and firm texture. Few studies on fish reproductive biology refer to the morphological features of eggs. The goal, therefore, of this present work was to perform a structural and ultrastructural analysis of fertilization and embryonic development in P. coruscans. The incubation period, from fertilization to hatching, lasts 13 h at 28/29 °C and 18 h at 27 °C. The oocytes had a mean diameter of 0.95 mm and hatched larvae were 2.55 mm in diameter. Analysing their development, we observed round, yellow oocytes that bore a double chorion membrane and a single micropyle. At 10 s after fertilization, several spermatozoa were detected attached to the oocyte surface. After 1 min of development, a fertilization cone that obstructed the micropyle could be observed. Segmentation started between 20 and 30 min after fertilization, when the egg cell was then formed. The first cleavage occurred between 30 and 45 min after fertilization, prior to reaching the morula stage (75 and 90 min after fertilization). The epiboly movement started at 120 and 180 min after fertilization and ended at 360 and 480 min after fertilization. Differentiation between cephalic and caudal region was detected after 420 and 600 min after fertilization and larvae hatched between 780 and 1080 min after fertilization. Seven main embryonic development stages were identified: egg cell, cleavage, morula, blastula, gastrula, segmentation with differentiation between cephalic and caudal regions, and hatching.

Keywords

EggsEmbryologyMorphologyPseudoplatystoma coruscansSEM
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , November 2008 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botero, M., Fresneda, A., Montoya, A.F. & Ángel, M.O. (2004). Descripción Del desarrollo embrionário de zigotos híbridos obtenidos por el cruce de machos de Cachama Blanca (Piaractus brachypomus) y hembras de Cachama Negra (Colossoma macropomum). Rev. Col. Cienc. Pec. 17, 38–45.Google Scholar
Brasil, D.F., Nakaghi, L.S.O., Leme dos Santos, H.S., Quagio Grassioto, I. & Foresti, F. (2002). Estudo morfológico dos primeiros momentos da fertilização em curimbat Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836). [online], CIVA 2002. http://www.civa2002.org/, pp. 733–47.Google Scholar
Brummett, A.R. & Dumont, J.N. (1979). Initial stages of sperm penetration into the egg of Fundulus heteroclitus. J. Exp. Zool. 201, 417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, E.L., Alves, M.S.D., Ferreira, R.M.A. & Godinho, H.P. (1995). Embryogenesis of the neotropical freshwater Siluriformes Pseudoplatystoma coruscans. Aquat. Living Res. 8, 343–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C.A. & Wourms, J.P. (1991). Cell behavior during early development in the South American annual fishes of the genus Cynolebias. J. Morphol. 210, 247–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castellani, L.R., Tse, H.G., Leme dos Santos, H.S., Faria, R.H.S. & Santos, M.L.S. (1994). Desenvolvimento embrionário do curimbatá Prochilodus lineatus (VALENCIENNES, 1836) (Cypriniformes, Prochidontidae). Rev. Bras. Cienc. Morf. 11, 99–105.Google Scholar
Cussac, V.E., Matkovic, M.V. & Maggese, M.C. (1985). Desarrollo embrionário de Rhamdia sapo (Valenciennes, 1840) Eigenmann Y Eigenmann, 1888 (Pisces, Pimelodidae), I. Organogenesis media organogenesis tardia y eclosion. Rev. Bras. Biol. 45, 149–60.Google Scholar
Faustino, F., Nakaghi, L.S.O., Marques, C., Makino, L. & Senhorini, J.A. (2007) Fertilização e desenvolvimento embrionário: morfometria e análise estereomicroscópica dos ovos dos híbridos de surubins (pintado, Pseudoplatystoma corruscans × cachara, Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum). Acta Sci. 29, 49–55.Google Scholar
Flores, J.C.B., Araiza, M.A.F. & Valle, M.R.G. (2002). Desarrollo embrionário de Ctenopharyngodon idellus (Carpa herbívora). [online], CIVA 2002. http://www.civa2002.org/, pp. 792–7.Google Scholar
Ganeco, L.N. (2003). Análise dos ovos de piracanjuba, Byrcon orbignyanus (Valenciennes, 1894), durante a fertilização e o desenvolvimento embrionário, sob condições de reprodução induzida. Masters degree, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal.Google Scholar
Ganeco, L.N. & Nakaghi, L.S.O. (2003). Morfologia da micrópila e da superfície dos ovócitos de piracanjuba, Byrcon orbignyanus (Osteichthyes, Characidae), sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Acta Sci. 25, 227–31.Google Scholar
Hart, N.H. (1990). Fertilization in teleost fishes: mechanisms of sperm–egg interactions. Int. Rev. Cytol. 121, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwamatsu, T. & Ohta, T. (1981). Scanning electron microscopic observation on sperm penetration in teleostean fish. J. Exp. Zool. 218, 261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, C.B., Ballard, W.W., Kimmel, S.R & Ullmann, B. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203, 253–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, W. & Yamamoto, T. (1981). Fine structure of the micropylar apparatus of the chum salmon egg, with a discussion of the mechanism for blocking polyspermy. J. Exp. Zool. 217, 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubitza, F., Campos, J.L. & Brum, J.A. (1998). Produção intensiva de surubins no projeto Pacu. Ltda. e Agropeixe Ltda. In Anais da Aquicultura, Recife, Pernambuco 1, 393–407.Google Scholar
Laale, W.H. (1980). The perivitelline space and egg envelopes of bony fishes: a review. Copeia 2, 210–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagler, K.F., Bardach, J.E., Miller, R.R. & Passino, D.R.M. (1977). Ichthyology, 2nd edn, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Landines, M.A., Senhorini, J.A., Sanabria, A.I. & Urbinati, E.C. (2003). Desenvolvimento Embrionário do Pintado (Pseudoplatystoma coruscans Agassiz, 1829). Bol. Tec. Cepta 6, 1–13.Google Scholar
Leme dos Santos, H.S. & Azoubel, R. (1996). Embriologia comparada. Jaboticabal: FUNEP.Google Scholar
Lönning, S., Kjorsvik, E. & Davenport, J. (1984). The hardening process of the chorion of the cod, Gadus morhua L. and lampsucker, Cyclopterous lumpus L. J. Fish Biol. 24, 505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matkovic, M.V., Cussac, V.E. & Cukier, M. (1985). Desarrollo embrionário de Rhamdia sapo (Valenciennes, 1840) Eigenmann Y Eigenmann, 1888 (Pisces, Pimelodidae). I. Segmentación, morfogénesis y organogenesis temprana. Rev. Bras. Biol. 45, 39–50.Google Scholar
Morrison, C.M., Miyake, T. & Wright, J Jr. (2001). Histological study of the development of the embryo and early of Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces, Cichlidae). J. Morphol. 247, 172–95.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ninhaus-Silveira, A., Foresti, F. & Azevedo, A. (2006). Structural and ultrastructural analysis of embryonic development of Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836) (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Zygote 14, 217–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakatani, K., Agostinho, A.A., Baumgartner, G., Bialetzki, A., Sanches, P.V. & Cavicchioli, M. (2001). Ovos e larvas de peixes de água doce, desenvolvimento e manual de identificação. Maringá: UEM, Nupélia.Google Scholar
Ohta, T. (1985). Electron microscopy observations on sperm entry and pronuclear formation in naked eggs of the rose bitterling in polyspermic fertilization. J. Exp. Zool. 234, 273–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, C.R., Leme dos Santos, H.S. & Bolzan, A.A. (1995). Estudo comparativo da embriogênese de peixes ósseos (Pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, Tambaqui, Colossoma macropomum e híbrido Tambacu). Rev. Bras. Biol. 55, 65–78.Google Scholar
Rizzo, E. & Bazzoli, N. (1993). Oogenesis, oocyte surface and micropylar apparatus of Prochilodus affinis Reinhardt, 1874 (Pisces Characiformes). Eur. Arch. Biol. 104, 1–6.Google Scholar
Sanches, P.V., Nakatani, K. & Bialetzki, A. (1999). Morphological description of the developmental stages of Parauchenipterus galeatus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Silurifores, Auchenipteridae) on the floodplain of the upper Paraná River. Rev. Bras. Biol. 59, 429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, R.C., Taylor, P.D. & Gross, M.R. (1987). Parental care and evolution of egg size in fishes. Am. Nat. 121, 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shardo, J.D. (1995). Comparative embryology of teleostean fishes. I. Development and staging of the American Shad, Alosa sapidissima (Wilson, 1811). J. Morphol. 225, 125–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, H.I. (1992). Variações na morfologia ovariana e no desenvolvimento do folículo de peixes teleósteos da bacia do rio Paraná no trecho entre a foz do rio Paranapanema e a do rio Iguaçu. Masters Degree, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.Google Scholar
Tolosa, E.M.C., Behmer, O.A. & Freitas-Neto, A.G. (2003). Manual de técnicas para histologia normal e patológica. Barueri–SP: Manole.Google Scholar
Vazzoler, A.E.A.M. (1996). Biologia da reprodução de peixes teleósteos: teoria e prática. NUPÉLIA. Maringá: EDUEM.Google Scholar
Wourms, J.P. & Evans, D. (1974). The embryonic development of the black prickleback, Xiphister atropurpureus, a Pacific Coast blennioid fish. Can. J. Zool. 52, 879–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woynarovich, E. & Hovárt, L. (1983). A propagação artificial de peixes de águas tropicais. Brasília, DF: FAO/CODEVASF–CNPq, (Manual de Extensão, 5).Google Scholar