Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:58:52.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Histone deacetylase inhibition improves meiotic competence but not developmental competence in growing pig oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

J. Petr
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Animal Production, Přátelství 815, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
E. Chmelíková
Affiliation:
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
K. Kheilová*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Czech Republic. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
F. Jílek
Affiliation:
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
*
All correspondence to: Kateřina Kheilová. Department of Veterinary Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Czech Republic. Tel: + 420 224382951. Fax: + 420 234381841. e-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In fully grown pig oocytes, meiotic maturation in vitro is retarded by inhibition of histone deacetylases by trichostatin A (TSA). In growing oocytes with partial meiotic competence, culture with TSA has no significant effect on the meiotic maturation. Growing oocytes treated with TSA mature mainly to metaphase I. The ratio of oocytes that mature to metaphase II is very limited. After transient exposure to TSA, the maturation of growing oocytes with partial meiotic competence takes a different course. When these oocytes are first cultured in a TSA-free medium, then cultured for another 24 h with 100 nM TSA and finally again in a TSA-free medium for 24 h, the ratio of oocytes that mature to metaphase II significantly increases reaching 59%. When oocytes were cultured for the same length of time without transient exposure to TSA, only 19% matured to metaphase II. Those oocytes that matured to metaphase II after transient exposure to TSA were successfully activated using calcium ionophore. However, the subsequent cleavage was very limited. We can conclude that transient exposure of growing pig oocytes with partial meiotic competence to TSA increases oocyte meiotic competence, but it does not enhance developmental competence after parthenogenetic activation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiyama, T., Kim, J.M., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. (2004). Regulation of histone acetylation during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 69, 222–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akiyama, T., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. (2006). Inadequate histone deacetylation during oocyte meiosis causes aneuploidy and embryo death in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7339–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachvarova, R. (1985). Gene expression during oogenesis and oocyte development in mammals. Develop. Biol. 1, 453524.Google ScholarPubMed
Bertos, N.R., Wang, A.H. & Yang, X.J. (2001). Class II histone deacetylases: structure, function and regulation. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 79, 243–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bui, H.T., Van Thuan, N., Kishigami, S., Wakayama, S., Hikichi, T., Ohta, H., Mizutani, E., Yamaoka, E., Wakayama, T. & Miyano, T. (2007). Regulation of chromatin and chromosome morphology by histone H3 modifications in pig oocytes. Reproduction 133, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, D.J., O'Neill, L.P. & Turner, B.M. (1993). Selective use of H4 acetylation sites in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 294 (Pt 2), 557–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endo, T., Naito, K., Aoki, F., Kume, S. & Tojo, H. (2005). Changes in histone modifications during in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 71, 123–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunstein, M. (1997). Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature 389, 349–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeseta, M., Petr, J., Krejcova, T., Chmelikova, E. & Jilek, F. (2008). In vitro aging of pig oocytes: effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Zygote 16, 145–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jilek, F., Huttelova, R., Petr, J., Holubova, M. & Rozinek, J. (2001). Activation of pig oocytes using calcium ionophore: effect of the protein kinase inhibitor 6-dimethyl aminopurine. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 36, 139–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Kageyama, S., Gunji, W., Nakasato, M., Murakami, Y., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. (2007a) Analysis of transcription factor expression during oogenesis and preimplantation development in mice. Zygote 15, 117–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kageyama, S., Liu, H., Kaneko, N., Ooga, M., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. (2007b). Alterations in epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth in mice. Reproduction 133, 8594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J.M., Liu, H., Tazaki, M., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. (2003). Changes in histone acetylation during mouse oocyte meiosis. J. Cell. Biol. 162, 3746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S.T., Choi, M.H., Gong, S.P., Han, J.Y. & Lim, J.M. (2007). Establishment of basic method for manipulating preantral follicles: effects of retrieval method on in vitro growth of preantral follicles and intrafollicular oocytes. Zygote 15, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmorstein, R. & Roth, S.Y. (2001). Histone acetyltransferases: function, structure and catalysis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meglicki, M., Zientarski, M. & Borsuk, E. (2008). Constitutive heterochromatin during mouse oogenesis: the pattern of histone H3 modifications and localization of HP1alpha and HP1beta proteins. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75, 414–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motlik, J. (1989). Cytoplasmic aspects of oocyte growth and maturation in mammals. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 38, 1725.Google ScholarPubMed
Motlik, J. & Fulka, J. (1986). Factors affecting meiotic competence in pig oocytes. Theriogenology 25, 8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motlik, J., Nagai, T. & Kikuchi, K. (1991). Resumption of meiosis in pig oocytes cultured with cumulus and parietal granulosa cells: the effect of protein synthesis inhibition. J. Exp. Zool. 259, 386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noh, E.J. & Lee, J.S. (2003). Functional interplay between modulation of histone deacetylase activity and its regulatory role in G2–M transition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310, 267–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ock, S.-A., Le, S.-L., Kim, J.-G., Kumar, B.-M., Balasubramanian, S., Choe, S.-Y. & Rho, G.-J. (2007). Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods. Zygote 15, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, L.P. & Turner, B.M. (1995). Histone H4 acetylation distinguishes coding regions of the human genome from heterochromatin in a differentiation-dependent but transcription-independent manner. EMBO J. 14, 3946–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ola, S.I., Wang, Q., Ai, J.S., Yin, S., Liang, C.G., Chen, D.Y. & Sun, Q.Y. (2007). Meiotic competence and acetylation pattern of UV light classified mouse antral oocytes after meiotic arrest with isobutylmethylxanthine. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 591–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petters, R.M. & Wells, K. (1993). Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 48, 6173.Google ScholarPubMed
Rybouchkin, A., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (2006). Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod. 74, 1083–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorensen, R.A. & Wassarman, P.M. (1976). Relationship between growth and meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev. Biol. 50, 531–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinaci, M., Seren, E. & Mattioli, M. (2004). Maternal chromatin remodeling during maturation and after fertilization in mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 69, 215–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szybek, K. (1972). In-vitro maturation of oocytes from sexually immature mice. J. Endocrinol. 54, 527–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, L.S., Wang, Q., Xiong, B., Hou, Y., Zhang, Y.Z., Sun, Q.Y. & Wang, S.Y. (2007). Dynamic changes in histone acetylation during sheep oocyte maturation. J. Reprod. Dev. 53, 555–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q., Wang, C.M., Ai, J.S., Xiong, B., Yin, S., Hou, Y., Chen, D.Y., Schatten, H. & Sun, Q.Y. (2006a). Histone phosphorylation and pericentromeric histone modifications in oocyte meiosis. Cell Cycle 5, 1974–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q., Yin, S., Ai, J.S., Liang, C.G., Hou, Y., Chen, D.Y., Schatten, H. & Sun, Q.Y. (2006b). Histone deacetylation is required for orderly meiosis. Cell Cycle 5, 766–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassarman, P.M. (1988). The mammalian ovum. In The Physiology of Reproduction (eds Knobil, E. & Neill, J.), pp. 69102. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Wu, J. & Tian, Q. (2007). Role of follicle stimulating hormone and epidermal growth factor in the development of porcine preantral follicle in vitro. Zygote 15, 233–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed