Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:14:51.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generation of large pig and bovine blastocysts by culturing in human induced pluripotent stem cell medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Qing-Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Long Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Suo Li
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Hai-Ying Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Qing Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Xiao-Chen Li
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Qing-Guo Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Jin-Dan Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Chang-Guo Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Xi-Jun Yin*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
*
All correspondence to: Xi-Jun Yin. Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China. Tel: +86 0433 2435623. Fax: +86 0433 2435622. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

We investigated the effect of human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPS) medium on porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer and bovine in vitro fertilized early blastocysts, in comparison with North Carolina State University (NCSU)-37 medium and in vitro culture (IVC)-II medium. After 2 days of culture, the diameter of the portion of the blastocyst that was extruded from the zona pellucid dramatically differed between porcine blastocysts cultured in hiPS medium and those cultured in NCSU-37 medium (221.47 ± 38.94 μm versus 481.87 ± 40.61 μm, P < 0.01). Moreover, the diameter of the portion of the blastocyst significantly differed between bovine blastocysts cultured in hiPS medium and those cultured in IVC-II medium (150.30 ± 29.49 μm versus 195.58 ± 41.59 μm, P < 0.01). Furthermore, the total number of cells per porcine and bovine blastocyst was more than two-fold higher in blastocysts cultured in hiPS medium than in those cultured in NCSU-37 medium (44.33 ± 5.28 and 143.33 ± 16.05, P < 0.01) or IVC-II medium (172.12 ± 45.08 and 604.83 ± 242.64, P < 0.01), respectively. These results indicate that hiPS medium markedly improves the quality of porcine and bovine blastocysts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arias, M.E., Ross, P.J. & Felmer, R.N. (2013). Culture medium composition affects the gene expression pattern and in vitro development potential of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos. Biol. Res. 46, 452–62.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, S. & Rho, G.J. (2007). Effect of cysteamine supplementation of in vitro matured bovine oocytes on chilling sensitivity and development of embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 98, 282–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckmann, L.S. & Day, B.N. (1993). Effects of media NaCl concentration and osmolarity on the culture of early-stage porcine embryos and the viability of embryos cultured in a selected superior medium. Theriogenology 39, 611–22.Google Scholar
Evans, M.J. & Kaufman, M.H. (1981). Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–6.Google Scholar
Fakruzzaman, M., Bang, J.I., Lee, K.L., Kim, S.S., Ha, A.N., Ghanem, N., Han, C.H., Cho, K.W., White, K.L. & Kong, I.K. (2013). Mitochondrial content and gene expression profiles in oocyte-derived embryos of cattle selected on the basis of brilliant cresyl blue staining. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 142, 1927.Google Scholar
Farin, C.E., Hasler, J.F., Martus, N.S. & Stokes, J.E. (1997). A comparison of Menezo's B2 and tissue culture medium-199 for in vitro production of bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 48, 699709.Google Scholar
Gardner, D.K. & Lane, M. (1993). Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol. Reprod. 48, 377–85.Google Scholar
Ha, A.N., Lee, S.R., Jeon, J.S., Park, H.S., Lee, S.H., Jin, J.I., Sessions, B.R., Wang, Z., White, K.L. & Kong, I.K. (2014a). Development of a modified straw method for vitrification of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts and various genes expression in between the methods. Cryobiology 68, 5764.Google Scholar
Ha, A.N., Park, H.S., Jin, J.I., Lee, S.H., Ko, D.H., Lee, D.S., White, K.L. & Kong, I.K. (2014b). Postthaw survival of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts loaded onto the inner surface of a plastic vitrification straw. Theriogenology 81, 467–73.Google Scholar
Im, G.S., Lai, L., Liu, Z., Hao, Y., Wax, D., Bonk, A. & Prather, R.S. (2004). In vitro development of preimplantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres. Theriogenology 61, 1125–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeong, W.J., Cho, S.J., Lee, H.S., Deb, G.K., Lee, Y.S., Kwon, T.H. & Kong, I.K. (2009). Effect of cytoplasmic lipid content on in vitro developmental efficiency of bovine IVP embryos. Theriogenology 72, 584–9.Google Scholar
Jin, J.X., Li, S., Hong, Y., Jin, L., Zhu, H.Y., Guo, Q., Gao, Q.S., Yan, C.G., Kang, J.D. & Yin, X.J. (2014). CUDC-101, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, improves the in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer pig embryos. Theriogenology 81, 572–8.Google Scholar
Jo, H.T., Bang, J.I., Kim, S.S., Choi, B.H., Jin, J.I., Kim, H.L., Jung, I.S., Suh, T.K., Ghanem, N., Wang, Z. & Kong, I.K. (2014). Production of female bovine embryos with sex-sorted sperm using intracytoplasmic sperm injection: efficiency and in vitro developmental competence. Theriogenology 81, 675–82 e671.Google Scholar
Kang, J.D., Li, S., Lu, Y., Wang, W., Liang, S., Liu, X., Jin, J.X., Hong, Y., Yan, C.G. & Yin, X.J. (2013). Valproic acid improved in vitro development of pig cloning embryos but did not improve survival of cloned pigs to adulthood. Theriogenology 79, 306–11 e301.Google Scholar
Lane, M., Gardner, D.K., Hasler, M.J. & Hasler, J.F. (2003). Use of G1.2/G2.2 media for commercial bovine embryo culture: equivalent development and pregnancy rates compared to co-culture. Theriogenology 60, 407–19.Google Scholar
Laowtammathron, C., Lorthongpanich, C., Ketudat-Cairns, M., Hochi, S. & Parnpai, R. (2005). Factors affecting cryosurvival of nuclear-transferred bovine and swamp buffalo blastocysts: effects of hatching stage, linoleic acid-albumin in IVC medium and Ficoll supplementation to vitrification solution. Theriogenology 64, 1185–96.Google Scholar
Lim, J.M., Okitsu, O., Okuda, K. & Niwa, K. (1994). Effects of fetal calf serum in culture medium on development of bovine oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro . Theriogenology 41, 1091–8.Google Scholar
Lim, K.T., Lee, B.C., Kang, S.K. & Hwang, W.S. (2003). Effects of protein source and energy substrates on the in vitro development of bovine embryos in a two-step culture system. J. Vet. Sci. 4, 73–8.Google Scholar
Liu, Z. & Foote, R.H. (1995). Effects of amino acids on the development of in-vitro matured/in-vitro fertilization bovine embryos in a simple protein-free medium. Hum. Reprod. 10, 2985–91.Google Scholar
Mao, J., Tessanne, K., Whitworth, K.M., Spate, L.D., Walters, E.M., Samuel, M.S., Murphy, C.N., Tracy, L., Zhao, J. & Prather, R.S. (2012). Effects of combined treatment of MG132 and scriptaid on early and term development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell. Reprogram. 14, 385–9.Google Scholar
Martin, G.R. (1981). Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7634–8.Google Scholar
Petters, R.M. & Wells, K.D. (1993). Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 48, 6173.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, C., Dickie, M.B., Auer, W. & Holzmann, A. (1993). [Successful in vitro fertilization in cattle with transmigrated semen without heparin, hypotaurine and adrenaline supplements]. Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau 33, 208–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Sagirkaya, H., Misirlioglu, M., Kaya, A., First, N.L., Parrish, J.J. & Memili, E. (2007). Developmental potential of bovine oocytes cultured in different maturation and culture conditions. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 101, 225–40.Google Scholar
Suzuki, C. & Yoshioka, K. (2006). Effects of amino acid supplements and replacement of polyvinyl alcohol with bovine serum albumin in porcine zygote medium. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 789–95.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Y. & First, N.L. (1992). In vitro development of bovine one-cell embryos: Influence of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, amino acids and vitamins. Theriogenology 37, 963–78.Google Scholar
Thouas, G. A., Korfiatis, N. A., French, A. J., Jones, G. M. & Trounson, A. O. (2001). Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod. Biomed. Online 3, 25–9.Google Scholar
Thomson, J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S.S., Waknitz, M.A., Swiergiel, J.J., Marshall, V.S. & Jones, J.M. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 11451147.Google Scholar
Thomson, J.A., Kalishman, J., Golos, T.G., Durning, M., Harris, C.P., Becker, R.A. & Hearn, J.P. (1995). Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7844–8.Google Scholar
Van Thuan, N., Harayama, H. & Miyake, M. (2002). Characteristics of preimplantational development of porcine parthenogenetic diploids relative to the existence of amino acids in vitro . Biol. Reprod. 67, 1688–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Panter, K.E., Holyoak, G.R., Molyneux, R.J., Liu, G., Evans, R.C. & Bunch, T.D. (1999). Development and viability of bovine preplacentation embryos treated with swainsonine in vitro . Anim. Reprod. Sci. 56, 1929.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, K., Sugimura, S., Wakai, T., Kawahara, M. & Sato, E. (2009). Difference in sensitivity to culture condition between in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs. J. Reprod Dev. 55, 299304.Google Scholar
Yin, X.J., Tani, T., Yonemura, I., Kawakami, M., Miyamoto, K., Hasegawa, R., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (2002). Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol. Reprod. 67, 442–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youngs, C.R., Ford, S.P., McGinnis, L.K. & Anderson, L.H. (1993). Investigations into the control of litter size in swine: I. Comparative studies on in vitro development of Meishan and Yorkshire preimplantation embryos. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1561–5.Google Scholar