Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:44:20.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The behaviour of mitotic nuclei after transplantation to early meiotic ooplasts or mitotic cytoplasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Michal Kubelka  and
Robert M. Moor
Michal Kubelka*
Affiliation:
Development and Differentiation Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
Robert M. Moor
Affiliation:
Development and Differentiation Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
*
M. Kubelka. Permanent address: Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, 277 21 Libechov, Czech Republic.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study evaluates the ability of the cytoplasm to determine the nature of the division cycle (meiotic or mitotic) in nuclei obtained from mitotically dividing cells. Using mouse oocytes in different stages of development two types of cytoplasm were prepared: firstly, early meiotic ooplasts were obtained by enucleation of non-matured, prophase-stage oocytes; secondly, mitotic cytoplasts were prepared by enucleation and activation of metaphase II (Mll)-stage oocytes. These two types of cytoplasts were then used in fusion experiments, in which mouse primitive type A spermatogonia (prospermatogonia) or mouse fibroblasts were used as a source of donor nuclei. While the fusion of prospermatogonia with mitotic cytoplasts resulted, as expected, in normal premature chromosome condensation (PCC) and subsequent pronuclear formation (58.1%), the majority of hybrids obtained by fusion of prospermatogonia with early meiotic ooplasts (40.3%) displayed unique morphology consisting of two sets of chromosomes organised in two spindle centres connected by microtubules. Each set of chromosomes contained the haploid (1n) number of chromosomes as revealed by chromosome analyses. The same morphology was observed also in 44.2% of hybrids in which the differentiated nuclei of fibroblasts were used as a source of donor mitotic nuclei. In both cases the hybrids were blocked at this stage with high activity of maturation promoting factor (MPF), resistant to any kind of activation and not able to undergo further development. These results suggest that the early meiotic ooplasm was able to induce the initiation of a meiosis-like reducing division in mitotic nuclei originating both from the germline cells and from more differentiated somatic cells.

Keywords

ElectrofusionMeioticMitoticProspermatogonium
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 219 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellve, A.R., Cavicchia, J.C., Millette, C.F. & O'Brien, D.A. (1977). Spermatogenic cells of prepubertal mouse: isolation and morphological characterization. J. Cell Biol. 74 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D.K., Park, D., Xu, L. & Kleckner, N. (1992). DMCI: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, H.T., Takahashi, Y. & Kanagawa, H. (1993). Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 48 958–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheong, H.T., Takahashi, Y. & Kanagawa, H. (1994). Relationship between nuclear remodeling and subsequent development of mouse embryonic nuclei transferred to enucleated oocytes Mol. Reprod. Dev. 37 138–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collas, P. & Robl, J.M. (1991). Relationship between nuclear remodeling and development in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol. Reprod. 45 455–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collas, P., Pinto-Correia, C., Ponce de Leon, F.A. & Robl, J.M. (1992). Effect of donor cell cycle stage on chromatin and spindle morphology in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol. Reprod. 46 501–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czolowska, R., Modlinski, J. & Tarkowski, A.K. (1984). Behaviour of thymocyte nuclei in non-activated and activated mouse oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 69 19–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czolowska, R., Szollosi, D. & Szollosi, M. (1992). Changes in embryonic 8-cell nuclei transferred by means of cell fusion to mouse eggs Int. J. Dev. Biol. 36 543–53;Google ScholarPubMed
Engebrecht, J., Hirsch, J. & Roeder, G.S. (1990). Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation Cell 62 927–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structure proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 680–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijer, L. & Pondaven, P. (1988). Cyclic activation of histone H1 kinase during sea urchin egg mitotic divisions. Exp. Cell Res. 174 116–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meistrich, M.L., Bruce, W.R. & Clermont, Y. (1973). Cellular composition of fractions of mouse testis cells following velocity sedimentation separation. Exp. Cell Res. 79 213–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuwissen, R.L.J., Offenberg, H.H., Dietrich, A.J.J., Riesewijk, A., Van Iersel, M. & Heyting, C. (1992). A coiled-coil related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J. 11 5091–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakberg, E.F. (1956 a). A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cell cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am. J. Anat. 99 391–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakberg, E.F. (1956 b). Duration of spermatogenesis in the mouse and timing of changes of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Am. J. Anat. 99 507–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogura, A., Yanagimachi, R. & Usui, N. (1993). Behaviour of hamster and mouse round spermatid nuclei incorporated into mature oocytes by electrofusion. Zygote 1 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otaegui, P.J., O'Neill, G.T., Campbell, K.H.S. & Wilmut, I. (1994). Transfer of nuclei from 1-cell stage mouse embryos following use of nocodazole to control the cell cycle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 39 147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prather, R.S. & First, N.L. (1990). Cloning of embryos by nuclear transfer J. Reprod. Fertil. 41(Suppl) 125–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Rockmill, B. & Roeder, G.S. (1991). A meiosis-specific protein kinase homolog required for chromosome synapsis and recombination. Genes Dev. 5 2392–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roosen-Runge, E.C. (1952). Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 55 574–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarkowski, A.K. (1966). An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarkowski, A.K. & Balakier, H. (1980). Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions in cell hybrids between mouse oocytes, blastomeres and somatic cells. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 55 319–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsunoda, Y., Tokunaga, T. & Imai, H. 1989 Nuclear transplantation of male primordial germ cells in the mouse. Development 107 407–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsunoda, Y., Kato, Y. & O'Neill, G.T. (1992). Cytogenetic analysis of reconstituted one-cell mouse embryos derived from nuclear transfer of fetal male germ cells. J. Reprod. Fertil. 96 275–81.Google ScholarPubMed