Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:05:54.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of hamster and mouse round spermatid nuclei incorporated into mature oocytes by electrofusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Atsuo Ogura ,
Ryuzo Yanagimachi  and
Noriko Usui
Atsuo Ogura
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Hawaii
Ryuzo Yanagimachi*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Hawaii
Noriko Usui
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Hawaii
*
R. Yanagimachi, Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii Medical School, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Round spermatids of the hamster and mouse were electrofused with homologous mature oocytes to examine the behaviour of their nuclei within the ooplasm. A single spermatid was inserted in the perivitelline space of a mature oocyte and an electric fusion pulse given. In the hamster, the best spermatid-oocyte fusion took place when the oocytes were pretreated with neuraminidase, subjected to 30 s AC (2 MHz, 20 V/cm) followed by a single fusion DC pulse (3000 V-cm, 10 μs) and another 30 s AC current. Inclusion of micromolar Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the fusion medium was essential for oocyte activation. Under these conditions all oocytes were activated and 20–40% fused with spermatids. Of these fused oocytes only 5–10% had fully developed spermatid (male) and oocyte (female) pronuclei. In the rest the spermatid-derived pronuclei remained small throughout the pronuclear stage. However, nucleolus-like structures appeared de novo and DNA synthesis occurred in these small pronuclei. Regardless of the size of male pronuclei, chromosomes from the spermatid and oocyte appeared to mingle and participate in the first cleavage. About 70% of the fused oocytes developed into the 2-cell stage. Electrofusion of mouse oocytes with spermatids was less efficient. Even under the best conditions tested, less than 10% of the oocytes fused with spermatids. Here again, most spermatid nuclei remained small throughout the pronuclear stage.

Keywords

FusionHamsterMouseOocyteSpermatid
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, D.K. & Bavister, B.D. (1992) Hypotaurine requirement for in vitro development of golden hamster one-cell embryos into morulae and blastocysts, and production of term offspring from in vitro fertilized ova. Biol. Reprod. 47, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, G.W., Saunders, J.A. & Sowers, A. E. (1987) Electrofusion: principles and applications. In: Cell Fusion, ed. Sowers, A.E., pp. 367–95. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, D.C., Saunders, J.A., Chassy, B.M. & Sowers, A. E. (1992). Overview of electroporation and electrofusion. In: Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion, ed. Chang, D.C., Chassy, B.M., Saunders, J.A. & Sowers, A. E., pp. 1–6. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chatot, C.L., Ziomek, C.A., Bavister, B.D., Lewis, J.L. & Torres, I.. (1989). An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J. Reprod. Fert. 86, 679–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. & Edidin, M.. (1978). Lateral diffusion in plasma membrane of mouse egg is restricted after fertilization. Nature 272, 448–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kono, T. & Tsunoda, Y. (1988). Effects of induction current and other factors on large-scale electrofusion for pronuclear transplantation of mouse eggs. Gamete Res. 19, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naish, S.J., Perreault, S.D., Foehner, A.L. & Zirkin, B.R. (1987). DNA synthesis in the fertilizing hamster sperm nucleus: sperm template availability and egg cytoplasmic control. Biol. Reprod. 36 245–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogura, A. & Yanagimachi, R. (1993). Round spermatid nuclei injected into hamster oocytes form pronuclei and participate in syngamy. Biol. Reprod. (in press).Google Scholar
Onodera, M. & Tsunoda, Y. (1989). Parthenogenetic activation of mouse and rabbit eggs by electric stimulation in vitro. Gamete Res. 22 277–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, R.S. & First, N. L. (1990). Nuclear transfer in mammalian embryos. Int. Rev. Cytol. 120, 169–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.C. & Wilmut, I. (1989). Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1027–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szöllösi, D., Czołowska, R., Szöllösi, M. & Tarkowski, A. K. (1988). Remodelling of mouse thymocyte nuclei depends on the time of their transfer into activated, homologous oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 91, 603–13Google Scholar
Wolf, D.P.. (1981). The mammalian egg's block to polyspermy. In: Fertilization and Embryonic Development In Vitro, ed. (Mastroianni, L. & Biggers, J. D., pp. 183–97. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagida, K., Yanagimachi, R., Perreault, S.D. & Kleinfeld, R. G.. (1991). Thermostability of sperm nuclei assessed by microinjection into hamster oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 44, 440–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R.. (1984). Developmental ability of precociously superovulated golden hamster eggs. Gamete Res. 9, 231–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar