Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:13:04.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of embryonic cell cycle of nuclear donor embryos on the efficiency of nuclear transfer in Japanese black cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2007

M. Kishi ,
R. Takakura ,
Y. Nagao ,
K. Saeki  and
Y. Takahashi
M. Kishi
Affiliation:
Embryo Transplantation Laboratory, Snow Brand Milk Products Co., Ltd. Tomakomai, 059-1365, Japan. Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0818, Japan.
R. Takakura
Affiliation:
Embryo Transplantation Laboratory, Snow Brand Milk Products Co., Ltd. Tomakomai, 059-1365, Japan.
Y. Nagao
Affiliation:
Embryo Transplantation Laboratory, Snow Brand Milk Products Co., Ltd. Tomakomai, 059-1365, Japan.
K. Saeki
Affiliation:
Embryo Transplantation Laboratory, Snow Brand Milk Products Co., Ltd. Tomakomai, 059-1365, Japan.
Y. Takahashi*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0818, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0818, Japan. Tel: +81 11 706 5231. Fax: +81 11 706 5232. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the present study, the development in vitro and in vivo of nuclear transfer (NT) embryos reconstructed with embryonic cells (blastomeres) at the 32- to 63-cell (sixth cell cycle) and 64- to 127-cell (seventh cell cycle) stages was investigated to determine the optimum range of embryonic cell cycles for yielding the highest number of identical calves in Japanese black cattle. Rates of development to the blastocyst stage (overall efficiency) were higher in the sixth cell-cycle stage (45%) than in the seventh cell-cycle stage (12%). After the transfer of the blastocysts reconstructed with blastomeres of the sixth and seventh cell cycle-stage embryos to recipient heifers, there were no differences in the pregnancy (14/35: 40% versus 3/13: 23%, respectively) or calving rates (11/39: 28% versus 3/13: 23%, respectively). These results indicate that the highest number of identical calves would be obtained by using sixth cell cycle (32- to 63-cell)-stage embryos as nuclear donors.

Keywords

BlastomeresEmbryonic cell cycleJapanese black cattleNuclear donorsNuclear transfer
Type
Research Articles
Information
Zygote , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 2007 , pp. 165 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, F., Collas, P., Powel, R., King, W.A., Westhusin, M. & Shepherd, D. (1993). Influence of recipient oocytes cell stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome constitution, and development in nuclear transfer bovine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavister, B.D., Leibfried, M.L. & Lieberman, G. (1983). Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol. Reprod. 28, 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondioli, K.R. (1993). Nuclear transfer in cattle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36, 274–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bondioli, K.R., Westhusin, M.E. & Looney, C.R. (1990). Production of identical bovine offspring by nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 33, 165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, D.L., Chesne, P., Nibart, M., Marchal, J., Humblot, P., Renard, J.P. & Heyman, Y. (1998). Nuclear transfer from sexed parent embryos in cattle: efficiency and birth of offspring. J. Reprod. Fertil. 113, 343–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K.H.S., Loi, P., Cappai, P. & Wilmut, I. (1994). Improved development to blastocyst of ovine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed during the presumptive S-phase of enucleated activated oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 50, 1385–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K.H., Loi, P., Otaegui, P. & Wilmut, I. (1996). Cell cycle coordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev. Reprod. 1, 40–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheong, H.T., Takahashi, Y. & Kanagawa, H. (1993). Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 48, 958–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, N.L., Leibfried-Rutledge, M.L., Northey, D.L. & Nuttleman, P.R. (1992). Use of in vitro matured oocytes 24 hr of age in bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 37, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, F.B., Adams, R., McCann, J.P. & Odde, K.G. (1996). Postnatal characteristics of calves produced by nuclear transfer cloning. Theriogenology 45, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handyside, A.H. & Johnson, M.H. (1978). Temporal and spatial pattern of the synthesis of tissue-specific polypeptides in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 44, 191–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Heyman, Y., Chavatte-Palmer, P., LeBourhis, D., Camous, S., Vignon, X. & Renard, J.P. (2002). Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66, 6–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirooka, H. (2000). Evaluation of testing schemes with clones for carcass traits in beef cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 71, j19–j25 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Kruip, T.A.M. & den Daas, J.H.G. (1997). In vitro produced and cloned embryos: effects on pregnancy, parturition and offspring. Theriogenology 47, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchida, K., Ogasawara, Y., Hidaka, S., Minamihashi, A., Sakai, T. & Yamamoto, Y. (2003). Computer image analysis on similarity of embryonic clones to beef carcass cross section. Anim. Sci. J. 74, 1–7 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Mitani, T., Utsumi, K. & Iritani, A. (1993). Developmental ability of enucleated bovine oocytes matured in vitro after fusion with single blastomeres of eight-cell embryos matured and fertilized in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34, 314–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagao, Y., Saeki, K., Hoshi, M. & Nagai, M. (1995). Early development of bovine embryos. J. Reprod. Dev. 41, j29–j36 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, R., Rowson, L.E.A. & Trounson, A.O. (1976). The entry of superovulated eggs into uterus. In: Egg Transfer in Cattle (ed. L.E.A. Rowson), pp. 1–15. Commission of European Communities, Luxembourg.Google ScholarPubMed
Renard, J.P., Zhou, Q., LeBourhis, D., Chavatte-Palmer, P., Hue, I., Heyman, Y. & Vignon, X. (2002). Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts. Theriogenology 57, 203–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, W.A. & Campbell, K.H.S. (1995). Intracytoplasmic nuclear injection as an alternative to cell fusion for the production of embryos by nuclear transfer. J. Reprod. Fertil. 15, 60.Google Scholar
Saeki, K., Hoshi, M., Leibfried-Rutledge, M.L. & First, N.L. (1990). In vitro fertilization and development of bovine oocytes matured with commercially available follicle stimulating hormone. Theriogenology 34, 1035–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, M. & First, N.L. (1994). Production of calves by transfer of nuclei from cultured inner cell mass cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L.C. & Wilmut, I. (1989). Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1027–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S.L., Everts, R.E., Tian, X.C., Du, F., Sung, L.Y., Rodriguez-Zas, S.L., Jeong, B.S., Renard, J.P., Lewin, H.A. & Yang, X. (2005). Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17582–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stice, S.L. & Keefer, C.L. (1993). Multiple generational bovine embryo cloning. Biol. Reprod. 48, 715–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, Y. & First, N.L. (1992). In vitro development of bovine one-cell embryos: influence of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, amino acids and vitamins. Theriogenology 37, 963–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tani, T., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (2001). Direct exposure of chromosomes to nonactivated ovum cytoplasm is effective for bovine somatic cell nucleus reprogramming. Biol. Reprod. 64, 324–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G. & Rowson, L.E. (1972). Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30, 493–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ushijima, H., Tsunoda, Y., Eto, T. & Imai, H. (1991). In vitro development of bovine reconstituted eggs after fusion with a blastomere from 8-cell to blastocyst stage embryos. Jpn. J. Anim. Reprod. 37, 15–9 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmut, I., Beaujean, N., de Sousa, P.A., Dinnyes, A., King, T.J., Paterson, L.A., Wells, D.N. & Young, L.E. (2002). Somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature 419, 583–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J.M., Williams, J.D., Bondioli, K.R., Looney, C.R., Westhusin, M.E. & McCalla, D.F. (1995). Comparison of birth weight and growth characteristics of bovine calves produced by nuclear transfer (cloning), embryo transfer and natural mating. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 38, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, B.A. & Kraemer, D.C. (1992). Methods in bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 37, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.Z., Jiang, S., Farrell, P., Foote, R.H. & McGrath, A.B. (1993). Nuclear transfer in cattle: effect of nuclear donor cells, cytoplast age, co-culture, and embryo transfer. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 35, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zakhartchenko, V., Reichenbach, H.D., Riedl, J., Palma, G.A., Wolf, E. & Brem, G. (1996). Nuclear transfer in cattle using in vivo-derived versus in vitro-produced donor embryos: effect of developmental stage. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 44, 493–8.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar