Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:33:35.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barth and Debunking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

In commenting on the Hartford Appeal Gregory Baum made some very thoughtful observations on some of my own work. I shall limit myself here to replying to these observations, though, by implication, my reply touches on several points made by other commentators. I would also like to say that I am very grateful to Baum: Few things are as gratifying to an author as having a critic who understands him.

Baum very ably puts his finger on two persisting tensions in my work—the tension between transcendence and humanism on the one hand, and the tension between a radically debunking perspective on society and a distrust of revolutionary ideologies on the other. These tensions, I believe, are not just personal idiosyncractes of mine, but rather are inherent in the phenomena at issue. The same tensions are to be found in the Hartford Appeal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)