Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:23:12.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why compensation cannot replace trade retaliation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

BRYAN MERCURIO
BRYAN MERCURIO*
Affiliation:
Professor of Law, Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout the course of the DSU Review, Members and commentators alike have proposed numerous modifications to the WTO DSU covering a wide range of areas. One area which has received quite a bit of attention is that of retaliatory measures in the implementation phase of the dispute settlement process. This article does not attempt to recap the debate over the appropriateness of trade retaliation or even to discuss all potential amendments targeting this issue. It does, however, identify some of the key criticisms of trade retaliation before analyzing and evaluating the worthiness of trade and/or financial compensation as an alternative. The article finds that neither trade nor financial compensation will do much to resolve the prominent criticisms of trade retaliation while also finding both options would add several uncertainties to the system and, far from increasing compliance with the rulings and recommendations of the DSB, could in fact increase the instances of non-compliance.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 315 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Bryan Mercurio 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks James Hartigan, Jiangyu Wang, Lorand Bartels, Simon Lester, Michael Hahn, Colin Picker and the WTR anonymous referee for their helpful comments. This article is based on a more comprehensive assessment of trade retaliation in the WTO DSU which will be published as ‘Retaliatory Trade Measures in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Are There Really Alternatives?’ in James Hartigan (ed.) Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment (Elsevier/Emerald Ltd., forthcoming 2009).

References

Anderson, Kym (2002), ‘Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement’, CIES Discussion Paper No. 0207/CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3578, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=348582.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude E. (2001), Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization, American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Bello, Judith Hippler (1996), ‘The WTO Dispute Understanding Mechanism: Less is More’, American Journal of International Law, 90: 416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2005), ‘Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties and Free Riders’, World Bank Economic Review, 19: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Hoekman, Bernard M. (2005), ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 861–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuss, Fritz (2005), ‘Economic Integration, EU–US Trade Conflicts and WTO Dispute Settlement’, European Integration Online Papers, 9(12): 1–24, available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2005-012.pdf.Google Scholar
Bronckers, Marco (2001), ‘More Power to the WTO?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and van den Broek, Naboth (2005), ‘Financial Compensation in the WTO. Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Mark and Reinhardt, Eric (2003), ‘Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of World Trade, 37: 719–735.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve (undated), ‘The WTO's Problematic “Last Resort” against Noncompliance’, Working Paper, 1–35, available at www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/charnovitzlastresort.pdfGoogle Scholar
Croome, John (1995), Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round, Diane Books Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Davies, Arwel (2006), ‘Reviewing Dispute Settlement at the World Trade Organization: A Time to Reconsider the Role/s of Compensation?’, World Trade Review, 5: 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. and Garland, David (eds.) (1995), A Reader on Punishment, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eleso, Adebukola (2006), ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: Monetary Compensation as an Alternative for Developing Countries’, American University Working Paper Series, available at http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1378/.Google Scholar
Esserman, Susan and Howse, Robert (2003), ‘The WTO on Trial’, Foreign Affairs, 82(1): 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grané, Patricio (2001), 'Remedies under WTO Law', Journal of International Economic Law, 4: 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2000), ‘WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance’, World Economy, 23: 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. (1990), The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, Butterwoth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. (1993), Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT System, Salem: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. (2000), ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’, Weiss, Friedl and Wiers, Jochem (eds.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, Cameron May.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. (1997), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, American Journal of International Law, 91: 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John H. (2004), ‘International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?’, American Journal of International Law, 98: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Robert Z. (2003), Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO, Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Limao, Nuno and Saggi, Kamal (2006), ‘Tariff Retaliation versus Financial Compensation in the Enforcement of International Trade Agreements’, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3873, available at http://faculty.smu.edu/ksaggi/LIMAO-SAGGI.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan (2004), ‘Improving Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: The Dispute Settlement Understanding Review–Making it Work’, Journal of World Trade, 38(5): 795–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan (2009, forthcoming), ‘Retaliatory Trade Measures in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Are There Really Alternatives?’, in Hartigan, James, Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, Elsevier/Emerald.Google Scholar
Jide, Nzelibe (2005), ‘The Credibility Imperative: The Political Dynamics of Retaliation in the World Trade Organization's Dispute Resolution Mechanism’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 6: 215–254Google Scholar
O'Connor, Bernard and Djordjevic, Margareta (2005), ‘Practical Aspects of Monetary Compensation: The US – Copyright Case’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David (2001), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Compliance with WTO Rulings and other Procedural Problems’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 4(2): 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir (2002), ‘“Inducing compliance” in WTO dispute settlement’, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panitchpakdi, Supachai (2005), ‘The WTO after 10 years: the lessons learned and the challenges ahead’, WTO News: Speech delivered on 11 March 2005, available at http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/spsp_e/spsp35_e.htm.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2000), ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’, American Journal of International Law, 94: 335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2004), ‘WTO Victory on Steel Hides Deficiencies’, Jurist Legal Intelligence, available at http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/Pauwelyn1.phpGoogle Scholar
Plasai, Virachai (2007), ‘Compliance and Remedies Against Non-Compliance Under the WTO System’, ICTSD Issue Paper 3, available online at http://ictsd.net/i/publications/11297/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1980), ‘Retribution and Related Concepts of Punishment’, Journal of Legal Studies, 9: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Warren and Sykes, Alan (2002), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod and Park, Nohyoung (2007), ‘Cessation and Reparation in the GATT/WTO Legal System: A View from the Law of State Responsibility’, Journal of World Trade, 41: 1237–1258.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger (2006), ‘The Myth of “Rebalancing” Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9: 31–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard (2002), ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power?: Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56: 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P. (2007), ‘The WTO Cathedral’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 43: 127–167.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2004), ‘The Future of the WTO: Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium’, Report of the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi, WTO, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yang, Pei-kan (2008). ‘Some Thoughts on a Feasible Operation of Monetary Compensation as an Alternative to Current Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement’, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 3: 423–464.Google Scholar