Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:50:40.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2003

DANIEL C. ESTY
DANIEL C. ESTY
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

David Henderson misreads, misstates, and misunderstands my argument in The World Trade Organization's Legitimacy Crisis. He pejoratively refers to my suggestions for restoring the WTO's legitimacy as ‘radical’ no fewer than three times.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2002 , pp. 297 - 299
Copyright
© 2002 Daniel C. Esty

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)