Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:28:12.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-emergence of Great Power Conflict and US Economic Statecraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2021

Linda Weiss
Linda Weiss*
Affiliation:
Department of Government & International Relations University of Sydney, Australia
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After almost two decades of dealing with asymmetric threats, America's strategic focus on technological superiority carefully honed during the Cold War, began to fracture, eroding its military and economic advantage. But China's recent emergence as a credible geopolitical rival has reinvigorated US efforts to sustain high-tech leadership as the basis of its military primacy. At the center of these efforts are the defense and defense-related agencies of the national security state (NSS) whose mission is to dominate the new technological frontiers of military power and achieve future competitive advantage. Alongside the quest for breakthroughs in foundational technologies, NSS agencies are seeking to correct long neglected deficiencies in advanced manufacturing, by rebuilding the industrial ecosystem's supply chains depleted after decades of offshoring. With this suite of initiatives, the US is following a course of action more consistent with the exercise of (economic) statecraft than industrial policy. However, unlike its authoritarian rival, the US faces the challenge of having to balance security imperatives with commercial interests and, not least, having to contend with a dysfunctional and maladapted presidency.

Type
Original Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Economic Statecraft and Global Trade in the 21st Century , May 2021 , pp. 152 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, V. K. and Reddie, A. W. (2018) ‘Comparative Industrial Policy and Cybersecurity: The US Case’, Journal of Cyber Policy 3(3), 445–466, ODI: 10.1080/23738871.2018.1551910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G C. (2019) ‘Understanding China's AI Strategy: Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Artificial Intelligence and National Security’, Center for a New American Security, February’, https://nsiteam.com/social/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/CNAS-Understanding-Chinas-AI-Strategy-Gregory-C.-Allen-FINAL-2.15.19.pdf.Google Scholar
Berger, S. (2013) Making in America: From Innovation to Market. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Block, F. (2008) ‘Swimming against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States’, Politics and Society 36(2), 169–206, ODI: 10.1177/003232920831871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvillian, W. B. (2017a) ‘Advanced Manufacturing: A New Policy Challenge’, Annals of Science and Technology Policy 1(1), 1–131, DOI: 10.1561/110.00000001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvillian, W. B. (2017b) ‘The Rise of Advanced Manufacturing Institutes in the United States’, The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, W. B. (2018) ‘DARPA and Its ARPA-E and IARPA Clones: A Unique Innovation Organization Model’, Industrial and Corporate Change 27(5), 897–914, DOI: 10.1093/icc/dty026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvillian, W. B. and Singer, P. L. (2018) Advanced Manufacturing: The New American Innovation Policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, D. (2019) ‘China's Military Technology Now Close to Parity with US, Report Warns’, Newsweek, 6 June, www.newsweek.com/china-military-technology-parity-us-report-research-investment-pentagon-1442565.Google Scholar
Breznitz, D. and Murphree, M. (2013) ‘China's Run – Economic Growth, Policy, Interdependencies, and Implications for Diverse Innovation Policies in a World of Fragmented Production’, in Breznitz, D. and Zysman, J. (eds.), The Third Globalization: Can Wealthy Nations Stay Rich in the Twenty-First Century? New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Singh, P. (2018) ‘China's Technology Transfer Strategy: How Chinese Investments in Emerging Technology Enable a Strategic Competitor to Access the Crown Jewels of US Innovation’, Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx), January, https://admin.govexec.com/media/diux_chinatechnologytransferstudy_jan_2018_(1).pdf.Google Scholar
Clausing, K. A. and Hassett, K. A. (2005) ‘The Role of US Tax Policy in Offshoring [with Comment and Discussion]’, Brookings Trade Forum, 457–490, www.jstor.org/stable/25058776.Google Scholar
Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment (1990) Making Things Better: Competing in Manufacturing (OTA-ITE-443), February, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ota/Ota_2/DATA/1990/9028.PDF.Google Scholar
Corrigan, J. (2018) ‘White House Official: Bet on US to Win the AI War’, Nextgov, 10 July, www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2018/07/white-house-official-bet-us-win-ai-war/149591/.Google Scholar
Council on Competitiveness (2014) ‘The Exascale Effect: The Benefits of Supercomputing Investment for US Industry’, Washington, DC, www.compete.org/storage/images/uploads/File/PDF%20Files/Solve_Report_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Defense One (2019) ‘Beyond South China Sea Tensions, Part One: The Tinderbox’, Defense One, 8 February, www.defenseone.com/ideas/2019/02/ep-37-beyond-south-china-sea-tensions-part-one-tinderbox/154753/.Google Scholar
Defense Science Board (1987) ‘Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Semiconductor Dependency’, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defense Science Board (2005) ‘Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply’, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, A. and Laskai, L. (2019) ‘Welcome to the New Phase of US–China Tech Competition’, Center for a New American Security, 3 September, www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/welcome-to-the-new-phase-of-us-china-tech-competition.Google Scholar
Ferdinando, L. (2018) ‘DOD Officials: Chinese Actions Threaten US Technological, Industrial Base’, United States Department of Defense, 21 June, www.defense.gov/Newsroom/News/Article/Article/1557188/DOD-officials-chinese-actions-threaten-us-technological-industrial-base/.Google Scholar
Foot, R. and King, A. (2019) ‘Assessing the Deterioration in China–US Relations: US Governmental Perspectives on the Economic–Security Nexus’, China International Strategy Review 1, 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-019-00005-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, A. L. (2000) In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America's Anti-Statism and Its Cold War Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, E. R. H. and Kirchain, R. (2010) ‘Design for Location? The Impact of Manufacturing Offshore on Technology Competitiveness in the Optoelectronics Industry’, Management Science 56(12), 2323–2349, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1545027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, E. R. (2014) ‘Global Manufacturing and the Future of Technology’, Science 345(6196), 519–20, DOI:10.1126/science.1250193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, C. (2018) Silent Invasion: China's Influence in Australia, Melbourne: Hardie Grant.Google Scholar
Hastie, A. (2019) ‘We Must See China – the Opportunities and the Threats – with Clear Eyes’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 8 August, www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/we-must-see-china-the-opportunities-and-the-threats-with-clear-eyes-20190807-p52eon.html.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Kania, E. B., Allen, G. C., and Scharre, P. (2018) ‘Strategic Competition in an Era of Artificial Intelligence’, Center for a New American Security, 25 July, https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS-Strategic-Competition-in-an-Era-of-AI-July-2018_v2.pdf?mtime=20180716122000.Google Scholar
Interagency Task Force in Fulfillment of Executive Order 13806 (2018) ‘Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency of the United States’, September. Report to President Donald J. Trump, https://media.defense.gov/2018/Oct/05/2002048904/-1/-1/1/ASSESSING-AND-STRENGTHENING-THE-MANUFACTURING-AND%20DEFENSE-INDUSTRIAL-BASE-AND-SUPPLY-CHAIN-RESILIENCY.PDF.Google Scholar
Kania, E. B. (2018a) ‘China's Threat to American Government and Private Sector Research and Innovation Leadership. Testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’, Center for a New American Security, 19 July, www.cnas.org/publications/congressional-testimony/testimony-before-the-house-permanent-select-committee-on-intelligence.Google Scholar
Kania, E. B. (2018b) ‘Tsinghua's Approach to Military–Civil Fusion in Artificial Intelligence’, Center for a New American Security, 12 July, www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/tsinghuas-approach-to-military-civil-fusion-in-artificial-intelligence.Google Scholar
Kania, E. B. (2019) ‘In Military–Civil Fusion, China is Learning Lessons from the United States and Starting to Innovate’, The Strategy Bridge, 27 August, https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2019/8/27/in-military-civil-fusion-china-is-learning-lessons-from-the-united-states-and-starting-to-innovate.Google Scholar
Ketels, C. H. M. (2007) ‘Industrial Policy in the United States’, Journal of Industry Competition and Trade 7(3), 147–167, DOI: 10.1007/s10842-007-0017-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larzelere, A. R. (2009) Delivering Insight: The History of the Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative (ASCI). Lawrence, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Laskai, L. and Sacks, S. (2018) ‘The Right Way to Protect America's Innovation Advantage’, Foreign Affairs, www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-10-23/right-way-protect-americas-innovation-advantage.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, R., Cohen, S., Sanders, G., and Hunter, A. P. (2018) ‘Acquisition Trends 2018: Defense Contract Spending Bounces Back Executive Summary’, CSIS Briefs, 13 September, https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/180913_AquisitionTrends2018.pdf.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. A. (1982) ‘Technocracy and Statecraft in the Space Age – Toward the History of a Saltation’, American Historical Review 87(4), 1010–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeary, P. (2018) ‘Pentagon, Intel Agencies Set Up New AI Joint Office’, Breaking Defense, 13 April, https://breakingdefense.com/2018/04/pentagon-intel-agencies-set-up-new-ai-joint-office/.Google Scholar
Merritt, R. (2018) ‘Moore's Law, China vs. Team USA’, EE Times, 27 July, www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1333519.Google Scholar
Muldavin, J. (2017) ‘Assuring Microelectronics Innovation for National Security and Economic Competitiveness (MINSEC)’, Trusted and Assured Microelectronics (TAME) Forum, 29 November, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
National Security Strategy (2015) ‘National Security Strategy of the United States’, February, Washington DC, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf.Google Scholar
National Security Strategy (2017) ‘National Security Strategy of the United States’, December, Washington DC, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (2019) Strategic Long-Term Participation by DOD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, DOI: 10.17226/25417.Google Scholar
Office of the Secretary of Defense (2019) ‘Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Budget Estimates’, Defense-Wide Justification Book Volume 3 out of 5, March. Washington, DC, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2020/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_Vol3_OSD_RDTE_PB20_Justification_Book.pdf.Google Scholar
O'Mara, M. P. (2005) Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlyk, O. (2019) ‘Pentagon to Debut Intellectual Property Protection Team’, Military.com, 26 August, /www.military.com/daily-news/2019/08/26/pentagon-debut-intellectual-property-protection-team.html.Google Scholar
Peniston, B. (2017) ‘How Will the Pentagon Create Its AIs? The Algorithmic- Warfare Team Is Charting a Path;, Defense One, 13 July, www.defenseone.com/technology/2017/07/artificial-intelligence-pentagon/139402/.Google Scholar
Pisano, G. P. and Shih, W. C. (2011) Producing Prosperity: Why America Needs a Manufacturing Renaissance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2017) ‘Ensuring Long-Term US Leadership in Semiconductors’, Report to the President, January, Washington DC, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_ensuring_long-term_us_leadership_in_semiconductors.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. (2006) Is War Necessary for Economic Growth?: Military Procurement and Technology Development. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santacreu, A. M. and Zhu, H. (2018) ‘R&D: Business Spending Up, Government Spending Flat’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 14 May, www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2018/may/rd-business-spending-up-government-spending-flat.Google Scholar
Sargent, J. F. Jr. (2012) ‘The Obama Administration's Proposal to Establish a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation’, 24 July, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1931&context=key_workplace.Google Scholar
Smil, V. (2013) Made in the USA: The Rise and Retreat of American Manufacturing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, D. T. (2008) Creating the National Security State: A History of the Law that Transformed America. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomhave, K. (2019) ‘New Legislation Would Rein in Corporate Offshoring’, The American Prospect, 18 March, https://prospect.org/economy/new-legislation-rein-corporate-offshoring/.Google Scholar
Thurbon, E. and Weiss, L. (2019) ‘Economic Statecraft at the Frontier: Korea's Drive for Intelligent Robotics’, Review of International Political Economy, ODI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1655084.Google Scholar
Tyson, L. (2018) ‘Avoiding the Sino-American Technology Trap’, Project Syndicate, 18 June, /www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-trump-tariffs-technology-competition-by-laura-tyson-2018-06?barrier=accesspaylog.Google Scholar
Under Secretary of Defense (Aquisition) (1988) ‘Bolstering Defense Industrial Competitiveness: Preserving Our Heritage Base Securing Our Future’, Report to the Secretary of Defense, 15 July, Washington, DC, https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a202840.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Department of Defense (2018) National Defense Strategy of the United States of America, January, www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office (2015) ‘Trusted Defense Microelectronics: Future Access and Capabilities Are Uncertain (GAO-16-185T)’, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, 28 October, Washington, DC, www.gao.gov/assets/680/673401.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office (2017) ‘US Manufacturing: Federal Programs Reported Providing Support and Addressing Trends (GAO-17-240)’, Report to Congressional Requesters, March, Washington, DC, www.gao.gov/assets/690/683753.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office (2019) ‘Advanced Manufacturing: Innovation Institutes Have Demonstrated Initial Accomplishments, but Challenges Remain in Measuring Performance and Ensuring Sustainability (GAO-19-409)’, Report to Congressional Committees, May, Washington, DC, www.gao.gov/assets/700/699310.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Atta, R., and Slusarczuk, M. M. G. (2012) ‘The Tunnel at the End of the Light: The Future of the US Semiconductor Industry’, Issues in Science and Technology 28(3), 53–60, https://issues.org/van_atta/.Google Scholar
Wade, R. H. (2014) ‘The Paradox of US Industrial Policy: The Developmental State in Disguise’, in Transforming Economies: Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs and Development, International Labor Organization, 379–400, www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_315679.pdf.Google Scholar
Wade, R. H. (2017) ‘The American Paradox: Ideology of Free Markets and the Hidden Practice of Directional Thrust’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 41(3), 859–880, DOI: 10.1093/cje/bew064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L. (2014) America Inc? Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. and Thurbon, E. (2020) ‘Developmental State or Economic Statecraft? Where, Why and How the Difference Matters’, New Political Economy 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1766431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy (2018) How China's Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World, June, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Advanced-Manufacturing-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Work, R. O. and Grant, G. (2019) ‘Beating the Americans at Their Own Game: An Offset Strategy with Chinese Characteristics’, Center for a New American Security, 6 June, www.cnas.org/publications/reports/beating-the-americans-at-their-own-game.Google Scholar