Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T04:21:47.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political–Economic Determinants of External Import Protection under a Preferential Trade Agreement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

Patricia Tovar*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima 32, Perú

Abstract

The stalling of WTO multilateralism and the proliferation of preferential trade agreements in recent decades have drawn substantial attention to the impacts of preferential liberalization. A critical question is how they affect the trade barriers imposed against outsiders. I examine the relationship between preferential trade liberalization and protection against non-member countries by testing the predictions of a political–economy model based on the previous literature. Focusing on a specific model allows me to uncover the mechanisms via which preferential liberalization affects external import protection, whereas most of the existing literature has focused on establishing the sign of the effect only. Furthermore, I focus on not only tariffs, as most studies do, but also on the temporary trade barriers of antidumping and safeguards. I test the predictions for Latin America and obtain results that provide solid evidence supporting two mechanisms from the theory, which lead to lower protection against non-members of a preferential trade agreement. First, a lower preferential import protection level means that the increase in preferential imports from increasing the external tariff creates a smaller increase in tariff revenue. Second, as preferential import protection is cut, there is a decrease in the markup and sales of domestic firms, and thus raising the external import protection generates less profit. Moreover, this second effect is present when the political motivation of the government is sufficiently strong.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

web: https://sites.google.com/site/patriciatovarrod/. I thank two anonymous referees for very helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W. (1999) ‘Regionalism and Multilateral Tariff Cooperation’, in Piggott, J. and Woodland, A. (eds.), International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim. New York: St. Martin's Press, 167190.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R.E. and Venables, A.J. (1995) ‘Regional Economic Integration’, in Grossman, G. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 15971644.Google Scholar
Blonigen, B.A. (2005) ‘The Effects of NAFTA on Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Activity’, World Bank Economic Review 19(3), 407424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohara, A.K., Gawande, K., and Sanguinetti, P. (2004) ‘Trade Diversion and Declining Tariffs: Evidence from Mercosur’, Journal of International Economics 64, 6588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C.P. (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Bown, C.P. (ed.), The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers. London: CEPR and the World Bank, 151.Google Scholar
Bown, C.P. (2015) Temporary Trade Barriers Database. Washington DC: The World Bank. http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/.Google Scholar
Bown, C.P. and Tovar, P. (2011) ‘Trade Liberalization, Antidumping, and Safeguards: Evidence from India's Tariff Reform’, Journal of Development Economics 96(1), 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C.P. and Tovar, P. (2016) ‘Preferential Liberalization, Antidumping, and Safeguards: Stumbling Block Evidence from MERCOSUR’, Economics & Politics 28(3), 262294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C.P., Karacaovali, B., and Tovar, P. (2015) ‘What Do We Know about Preferential Trade Agreements and Temporary Trade Barriers?’, in Dür, A. and Elsig, M. (eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C.P., Lederman, D., Pienknagura, S., and Robertson, R. (2017) Better Neighbors: Toward a Renewal of Economic Integration in Latin America. Washington. DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo-Pardo, H., Freund, C., and Ornelas, E. (2011) ‘The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Impact on Trade Flows and External Trade Barriers’, in Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.-W. (eds.), Costs and Benefits of Economic Integration in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2016) ‘Regionalism and Falling External Protection in High and Low Tariff Members’, Journal of International Economics 102, 7084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erosa, A. and Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A. (2008) ‘On Finance as a Theory of TFP, Cross-Industry Productivity Differences, and Economic Rents’, International Economic Review 49, 437473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, A., Freund, C., and Ornelas, E. (2008) ‘Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Nonmembers?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(4), 15321575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, J.M. and Nogués, J.J. (2006) Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin America's Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.Google Scholar
Freund, C. and Ornelas, E. (2010) ‘Regional Trade Agreements’, Annual Review of Economics 2(1), 139166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, K., Krishna, P., and Olarreaga, M. (2009) ‘What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade’, International Organization 63, 491532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1994) ‘Protection for Sale’, American Economic Review 84, 833850.Google Scholar
Karacaovali, B. and Limão, N. (2008) ‘The Clash of Liberalizations: Preferential vs. Multilateral Trade Liberalization in the European Union’, Journal of International Economics 74, 299327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, T.D., Bernhofen, D., and Milner, C. (2015) ‘The Impact of Trade Preferences on Multilateral Tariff Cuts: Evidence for Japan’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 38, 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, T.D., Bernhofen, D., and Milner, C. (2014) ‘Preferences, Rent Destruction and Multilateral Liberalization: The Building Block Effect of CUSFTA’, Journal of International Economics 92, 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, P. (1998) ‘Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 227251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limão, N. (2006) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the United States’, American Economic Review 96, 896914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limão, N. (2016) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements’, in Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. (eds.), Handbook of Commercial Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 279367.Google Scholar
Mai, J. and Stoyanov, A. (2015) ‘The Effect of the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement on Canadian Multilateral Trade Liberalization’, Canadian Journal of Economics 48(3), 10671098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (2011) ‘Argentina: There and Back Again?’, in Bown, C.P. (ed.), The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers. London: CEPR and the World Bank, 317350.Google Scholar
Nicita, A. and Olarreaga, M. (2007) ‘Trade and Production: 1976–2004’, World Bank Economic Review 21(1), 165171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornelas, E. (2005a) ‘Trade Creating Free Trade Areas and the Undermining of Multilateralism’, European Economic Review 49, 17171735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornelas, E. (2005b) ‘Rent Destruction and the Political Viability of Free Trade Agreements’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 14751506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornelas, E. (2007) ‘Exchanging Market Access at the Outsiders’ Expense: The Case of Customs Unions’, Canadian Journal of Economics 40, 207224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagariya, A. (2000) ‘Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments’, Journal of Economic Literature 38, 287331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagariya, A. and Findlay, R. (1996) ‘A Political–Economy Analysis of Free Trade Areas and Customs Unions’, in Feenstra, R., Grossman, G., and Irwin, D. (eds.), The Political Economy of Trade Reform: Essays in Honor of J. Bhagwati. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 265288.Google Scholar
Prusa, T.J. and Teh, R.. (2010) ‘Protection Reduction and Diversion: PTAs and the Incidence of Antidumping Disputes’, NBER Working Paper No. 16276.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. (1993) ‘Endogenous Protection and Trade Diversion’, Journal of International Economics 34, 309324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. (1994) ‘Why a Free Trade Area? The Tariff also Rises’, Economics and Politics 6, 7996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sáez, S. (2006) ‘Keeping Animal Spirits Asleep: The Case of Chile’, in Michael Finger, J. and Nogués, J.J. (eds.), Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin Americas Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 109135.Google Scholar
Tabakis, C. (2010) ‘Customs Unions and Special Protection’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 10, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabakis, C. (2015) ‘Free-Trade Areas and Special Protection’, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 24, 10541076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabakis, C. and Zanardi, M. (2019) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements and Antidumping Protection’, Journal of International Economics 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovar, P. (2012) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements and Unilateral Liberalization: Evidence from CAFTA’, World Trade Review 11(4), 591619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovar, P. (2019) ‘Preferential and Multilateral Liberalization: Evidence from Latin America's Use of Tariffs, Antidumping and Safeguards’, Journal of Development Economics 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar