Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:05:37.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the Presence of Embassies on Trade: Evidence from Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2019

Yusuf Kenan Bagir
Yusuf Kenan Bagir*
Affiliation:
Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
*
Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of the presence of foreign missions on trade using Turkey's unique expansion in its foreign embassy network (39 new embassies in 8 years) as the source of variation in a panel data setting. A majority of the existing empirical studies use cross-sectional bilateral trade data due to lack of variation over time (Rose, 2007; Moons and Bergeijk, 2013). Employing a panel data analysis, this paper is able to address the endogeneity issues that are associated with a standard cross-sectional analysis. The dependent variable in the paper is the trade between Turkey and 190 countries for 2006 to 2016. The results indicate that presence of an embassy increases export value by 30% and this increase comes mainly from the volume effect. Categorizing goods by the Rauch (1999) classification shows that the increase in differentiated goods exports is the main driver of the export surge. The number of exporting firms increases by about 8%. There is no statistically significant impact on the exports of homogeneous goods. Replication of the analysis for imports suggests no impact on imports.

Keywords

economic diplomacyembassyinternational tradeTurkey
Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Yusuf Kenan Bagir 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afman, ER and Maurel, M (2010) Diplomatic Relations and Trade Reorientation in Transition Countries. In Bergeijk, V and Brakman, S, The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albornoz, F, Calvo Pardo, H, Corcos, G, and Ornelas, E (2012) Sequential Exporting. Journal of International Economics 88, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creusen, H and Lejour, A (2013) Market Entry and Economic Diplomacy. Applied Economic Letters 20(5), 504–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2018) Share of EU in the World Trade, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (18 August 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, K and Ries, J (2010) Do Trade Missions Increase Trade? Canadian Journal of Economics 43(3), 754–775.Google Scholar
Moons, SJ and Bergeijk, PA (2017) Does Economic Diplomacy Work? A Meta-analysis of Its Impact on Trade and Investment. The World Economy 40, 336–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, JE (1999) Networks versus Markets in International Trade. Journal of International Economics 48(1), 7–35, see also https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~jrauch/rauch_classification.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, AK (2007) The Foreign Service and Foreign Trade: Embassies as Export Promotion. The World Economy 30(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segura-Cayuela, R and Vilarrubia, JM (2008) The Effect of Foreign Service on Trade Volumes and Trade Partners. Working Paper 0808, Banco de España.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators, http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/ (13 June 2018).Google Scholar
United Nations Statistics Division (2018) GDP and Its Breakdown at Current Prices in National Currency. New York, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnllist.asp (6 May 2018).Google Scholar