Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-55tpx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T03:59:48.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of Aid for Trade: challenges and options

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2013

JEAN-JACQUES HALLAERT
JEAN-JACQUES HALLAERT*
Affiliation:
Groupe d'Économie Mondiale (GEM) at Sciences Po
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Aid for Trade Initiative needs to be revamped. This article describes the challenges the Initiative faces and describes the pros and cons of possible reforms. The Aid for Trade Initiative succeeded in mobilizing quickly a large amount of financial resources. However, because the Doha Round talks stalled, the aid mobilized could not support the implementation of a multilateral agreement. Instead, it was spent on various projects, some of them not clearly related to trade. This affected developing countries confidence in the Initiative. To make matters worse, in the midst of a fiscal crisis that threatens development budgets, the Initiative had difficulties showing convincing results. In order to preserve resource mobilization, the WTO is expanding the scope of the Initiative to new areas only remotely related to trade and the trade and development nexus. This is unlikely to build confidence. The WTO should rather narrow the scope of the Initiative in order to make it more focused and efficient.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 653 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Jean-Jacques Hallaert 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beattie, A. (2005), ‘Experts Say No Need for Freer Trade Aid Fund’, Financial Times, 20 September.Google Scholar
Blustein, P. (2009), Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations – Clashing Egos, Inflated Ambitions, and the Great Shambles of the World Trade System, New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Cadot, O., Fernandes, A. M., Gourdon, J., and Mattoo, A. (2011), ‘Impact Evaluation of Trade Assistance: Paving the Way’, in Cadot, O., Fernandes, A. M., Gourdon, J., and Mattoo, A. (eds.), Where to Spend the Next Million? Applying Impact Evaluation to Trade Assistance, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Cadot, O. and Newfarmer, R. (2011), ‘Does it Work? Aid for Trade Through the Evaluation Prism’, Trade Negotiations Insights, 10(7).Google Scholar
Delpeuch, C., Jouanjean, M. A., Le Vernoy, A., Messerlin, P., and Orliac, T. (2010), Aid for Trade: A Meta-evaluation, Paris: OECD, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/61/47423967.pdf.Google Scholar
Elborgh-Woytek, K., Hallaert, J. J., Lankes, H. P., Sadikov, A., and Smith, D. (2006), Fiscal Implications of Multilateral Tariff Cuts, WP/06/203, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Finger, M. and Schuler, P. (2000), ‘Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge’, The World Economy, 23(4).Google Scholar
Gamberoni, E. and Newfarmer, R. (2009), Aid for Trade: Matching Potential Demand and Supply, Policy Research Working Paper 4991, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hallaert, J. J. (2011), ‘Why Boosting the Availability of Trade Finance Became a Priority during the 2008–2009 Crisis’, in Chauffour, J. P. and Malouche, M. (eds.), Trade Finance During the Great Trade Collapse, Washington, DC: The World Bank, chapter 14, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/TradeFinancech14.pdf.Google Scholar
Hallaert, J. J. (2012), ‘Aid for Trade: Chronicle of a WTO Attempt at Coherence’, GEM Policy Brief, October, Paris: Groupe d'Economie Mondiale, http://gem.sciences-po.fr/content/publications/pdf/Hallaert_Aid%20for%20Trade%20-%20WTO%20coherence2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Hallaert, J. J., Cavazos Cepeda, R., and Kang, G. (2011) Estimating the Constraints to Developing Countries Trade, Trade Policy Working Paper No. 116, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2007), ‘Development, and Trade Agreements: Beyond Market Access’, in Hoekman, B. and Olarreaga, M. (eds.), Global Trade and Poor Nations – The Poverty Impacts and Policy Implications of Liberalization, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Wilson, J. (2010), Aid for Trade: Building on Progress to Date, Korea-World Bank High Level Conference on Post-Crisis Growth and Development.Google Scholar
IMF (2003), ‘Financing of Losses from Preference Erosion, Note on Issue raised by Developing Countries in the Doha Round’, communication to the WTO from the International Monetary Fund, WT/TF/COH/14.Google Scholar
IMF (2004), Fund Support for Trade-Related Balance of Payments Adjustment, Washington, DC: IMF; www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/tim/2004/eng/022704.pdf.Google Scholar
IMF and World Bank (2005a), The Doha Development Round and Aid for Trade, Washington, DC, www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/091905.pdf.Google Scholar
Luke, D., Monge-Roffarello, L., and Varma, S. (2009), ‘Perspectives on Aid for Trade’, in De Lombaerde, P. and Puri, L. (eds.), Aid for Trade: Global and Regional Perspectives, Springer.Google Scholar
OECD (2011), Strengthening Accountability in Aid for Trade, The Development Dimension, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD and WTO (2009), Aid for Trade at a Glance 2009: Maintaining Momentum, Paris and Geneva: OECD and WTO.Google Scholar
OECD and WTO (2011a), Aid for Trade 2011: Results Emerging from the Case Stories, Paris and Geneva: OECD and WTO.Google Scholar
OECD and WTO (2011b), Aid for Trade at a Glance 2011: Showing Results, Paris and Geneva: OECD and WTO.Google Scholar
UNECA (2010), Communiqué – Expert Group Meeting and Workshop on Aid for Trade (AfT) and Africa's Trading Capacity: Supply, Demand and Performance.Google Scholar
WTO (2005), Doha Work Program – Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(05)/DEC, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2006), Recommendations of the Task Force on Aid for Trade, WT/AFT/1, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2011a), Lamy Hails ‘Encouraging’ Third Global Review of Aid for Trade, Geneva: WTO, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl201_e.htmGoogle Scholar
WTO (2011b), Aid-for-trade Work Programme 2012–2013 ‘Deepening Coherence’, WT/COMTD/AFT/W/30, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar