Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:52:10.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Always look at the bright side of non-delivery: WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements, yesterday and today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

PETROS C. MAVROIDIS
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS*
Affiliation:
Edwin B. Parker Professor of Law at Columbia Law School
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The disciplining of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) by the WTO has been ‘relaxed’ recently as a result of the new context (the Transparency Mechanism) within which notified PTAs are being multilaterally reviewed. This is probably a blessing for a number of reasons, including the success of the multilateral trading system in bringing tariffs down over the years (and the ensuing reduced trade diversion), the fact that modern PTAs deal with many non-trade issues as well (for which no WTO disciplines exist), and the recent empirical literature suggesting overall positive welfare implications for those participating in similar schemes. This paper discusses these and other reasons to support the view that the WTO should rather focus on the multilateral agenda instead of diverting its attention towards disciplining PTAs. In more concrete terms, this paper argues in support of the thesis that the Transparency Mechanism should not be simply a de facto substitute of the previous regime (where outlawing a PTA could not a priori be excluded), but the de jure new forum to discuss PTAs within the multilateral trading system, at least for the time being. A first do-no-harm-policy is one of the rationales for the thesis advocated here.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 375 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Petros C. Mavroidis 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Rohini, Crawford, Jo-Ann, Maliszewska, Maryla, and Bernard, Christelle (2011), ‘Landscape’, in Chauffour, Jean-Pierre and Maur, Jean-Christophe (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Acheson, Dean (1969), Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Adlung, Rudolf and Morrison, Peter (2010), ‘Less than the Gats: “Negative Preferences” in Regional Services Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 13: 1103–1143.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2008), ‘Sequencing and Depth of Regional Economic Integration: Lessons for the Americas from Europe’, The World Economy, 31: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1997), ‘The Causes of Regionalism’, The World Economy, 20: 865–888.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1993), ‘On the Measurement of Dynamic Effects of Integration’, Empirica, 20: 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Seghezza, Elena (2010), ‘Are Trade Blocs Building or Stumbling Blocs?’, Journal of Economic Integration, 25: 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltagi, Badi H., Egger, Peter, and Pfaffermayr, Michael (2008), ‘Estimating Regional Trade Agreement Effects on FDI in an Interdependent World’, Journal of Econometrics, 145: 194–208.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish (2008), Termites in the World Trading System, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish (2002), ‘The Unilateral Freeing of Trade versus Reciprocity’, in Bhagwati, Jagdish (ed.), Going Alone: The Case for Relaxed Reciprocity in Freeing Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, Lorenzo and Parro, Fernando (2009), ‘Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA’, mimeo, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Chase, Kerry A. (2006), ‘Multilateralism Compromised: The Mysterious Origins of GATT Article XXIV’, World Trade Review, 5: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, Andoni, Freund, C., and Ornelas, E. (2008), ‘Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization Towards Non-Members?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123: 1531–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, Michael (1993), ‘GATT's Influence on Regional Agreements’, in De Melo, Jaime and Panagariya, Arvind (eds.), New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Molinuevo, Martin (2008), ‘East Asian Preferential Trade Agreements in Services: Liberalization Content and WTO Rules’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11: 263–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, Caroline (2010), ‘Third Country Effects of Regional Trade Agreements’, in Bagwell, Kyle W. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreements: A Law and Economics Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1995), ‘The Politics of Free Trade Agreements’, American Economic Review, 85: 667–690.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sapir, André (2011), ‘MEAs in the WTO: Silence Speaks Volumes’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sapir, André (2010), ‘Beyond the WTO: An Anatomy of the EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’, The World Economy, 33: 1565–1588.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas (1998), ‘Changes in US Tariffs: The Role of Import Prices and Commercial Policies’, American Economic Review, 88: 1015–1026.Google Scholar
Karacaovali, Baybars and Limão, Nuno (2008), ‘The Clash of Liberalizations: Preferential vs. Multilateral Trade Liberalization in the European Union’, Journal of International Economics, 74: 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, Carsten (1990), ‘Welfare and Customs Union’, NBER Working Paper No. 3476.Google Scholar
Krishna, Pravin (1998), ‘Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul (1991), ‘The Move Toward Free Trade Zones’, Economic Review, November–December 1991: 1–24.Google Scholar
Limão, Nuno (2006), ‘Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocs for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US’, American Economic Review, 96: 896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. (2005), ‘If I Don't Do it Somebody Else Will (or Won't)’, Journal of World Trade, 40: 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Bermann, George A., and Wu, Mark (2010), The Law of the WTO, St Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Panagariya, Arvind (2000), ‘Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 287–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Tom and Teh, Robert (2010), ‘Protection Reduction and Diversion: PTAs and the Incidence of Antidumping Disputes’, NBER Working Paper 16276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggi, Kamal and Yildiz, Halis Murat (2010), ‘Bilateralism, Multilateralism, and the Quest for Global Free Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 81: 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggi, Kamal, Woodland, Alan, and Yildiz, Halis Murat (2010), ‘On the Relationship Between Preferential and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Customs Unions’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Sapir, André (1998), ‘The Political Economy of EC Regionalism’, European Economic Review, 42: 717–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, Maurice and Winters, L. Alan (2003), Regional Integration and Development, Washington, DC: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey (1989), ‘More Free Trade Areas?’, in Schott, Jeffrey (ed.), Free Trade Areas and US Trade Policy, Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob (1950), The Customs Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Whalley, John (2008), ‘Recent Regional Agreements: Why So Many, Why So Much Variance in Form, Why Coming So Fast, and Where Are They Headed?’, The World Economy, 31: 517–532.Google Scholar
Winters, Alan and Schiff, Maurice (1998), Regional Integration as Diplomacy, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar