Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:05:48.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access to justice in the World Trade Organization: a case for a small claims procedure?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2008

HÅKAN NORDSTRÖM  and
GREGORY SHAFFER
HÅKAN NORDSTRÖM
Affiliation:
Chief Economist, National Board of Trade, Sweden
GREGORY SHAFFER
Affiliation:
Melvin C. Steen Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School and Senior Research Fellow, International Centre on Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (WTO) creates a particular challenge for WTO Members with limited exports since litigation costs are more or less independent of the commercial stakes involved in a dispute. Small Members with small trade stakes may therefore find it too costly to pursue legitimate claims. Reviewing the aims and practices of small claims procedures at the national and supranational level, we analyse whether a similar institution could be introduced at the WTO. While a strong empirical case can be made for such an innovation, the legal and political challenges should not be underestimated. As an initial step, we make a prima facie case that the current dispute settlement system effectively discriminates against small claims and hence owners of small claims, and thus, in particular, against least developed countries, small island economies and low income developing countries. This empirical task is carried out in Part 2. In Part 3 we explain what small claims procedures are at the national level, what purpose they serve, how they are organized in different jurisdictions involving alternative design features, and what challenges they have faced. Part 4 explores the issues raised by adding a small claims procedure in the WTO context, and indicates specific design features that could address them.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 587 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Håkan Nordström and Gregory Shaffer 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, John (2002), ‘Small Claims Courts’, in Herbert N. Kritzer, 4 Legal Systems of the World: A Political, Social, and Cultural Encyclopedia, ABC-CL10.Google Scholar
Barnett, Stephen R. (2003), ‘No-Citation Rules Under Siege: A Battlefield Report and Analysis’, Journal of Appellate Practice and Procedure, 5: 473–499.Google Scholar
Bekker, Peter H. F. (1993), ‘International Legal Aid in Practice: The ICJ Trust Fund’, American Journal of International Law, 87: 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, Judith (1996), Editorial Comment, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More’, American Journal of International Law, 90: 416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhala, Raj (1999), ‘The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication’ (Part Two of a Trilogy), Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 9(1): 849–882.Google Scholar
Bhala, Raj (2001), International Trade Law: Theory and Practice (2nd edn), p. 240.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2005), ‘Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties and Free Riders’, World Bank Economic Review, 19(2): 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Sykes, O. Alan (2008), ‘The Zeroing Issue: A Critical Analysis of Softwood V’, World Trade Review, 7(1): 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc and Reinhardt, Eric (2000), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes’, Fordham International Law Journal, 24: 158–172.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc, Reinhardt, Eric, and Shaffer, Gregory (2008), ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter?’, ICTSD Working Paper, available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1091435Google Scholar
Caron, David (2005), ‘The United States Compensation Commission for Claims Arising out of the 1991 Gulf War: the “Arising Prior to” Decision’, Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 14(2): 309–334.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve (2005), ‘An Analysis of Pascal Lamy's Proposal on Collective Preferences’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Jeffrey O. (2002), ‘Citability and the Nature of Precedent in the Courts of Appeals’, Indiana Law Review, 35: 423–434.Google Scholar
Cortes, Pablo (2007), ‘Does the Proposed European Procedure Enhance the Resolution of Small Claims?’, available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=983527.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. (2003), ‘The Case for a WTO Permanent Panel Body’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6(1): 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, William J. (2008), ‘Expediting the Panel Process in WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Janow, M. E., Donaldson, V., and Yanovich, A. (eds.), WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries, Juris Publishing.Google Scholar
Dunne, Matthew S. III, (2002), ‘Redefining Power Orientation: A Reassessment of Jackson's Paradigm in Light of Asymmetries of Power, Negotiation and Compliance in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System’, Law and Policy in International Business, 34(1): 277–296.Google Scholar
Elwell, Suzanne, and Carlson, Christopher (1990), ‘The Iowa Small Claims Court: An Empirical Analysis’, Iowa Law Review, 75: 433–526.Google Scholar
Francois, Joseph, and Horn, Henrik (2008), ‘Trading Profiles and Developing Country Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement System (ICTSD)’, available online at http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/iuiwop/0730.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattini, Andrea (2002), ‘The UN Compensation Commission: Old Rules, New Procedures on War Reparations’, European Journal of International Law, 13: 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, David (2002), ‘The Censorial Judiciary’, U.C. Davis Law Review, 35: 1133–1174.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros (2006), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2004: Some Descriptive Statistics’, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros, and Nordström, Hakan (1999), ‘Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?’, Center for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 2340.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert (1987), Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System, published for the Trade Policy Research Centre, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert (1993), Enforcing International Trade Law: the Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System, Salem, NH: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. (1997), Editorial Comment, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, American Journal of International Law, 91: 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Richard, and Sanders, Joseph (1986), An Invitation to Law and Social Science, University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, Donald (2004), ‘What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottage, Hunter (2008), ‘Trade and development’, in Bethlehem, D., McRae, D., Neufeld, R., Van Damme, I. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nottage, Hunter, and Bohanes, Jan (2007), ‘Arbitration as an Alternative to Litigation in the WTO: Observations in the Light of the 2005 Banana Tariff Arbitrations’, in Taniguchi, Yasuhei, Yanovich, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan (eds.), The WTO in the Twenty-first Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen (1992), ‘International Legal Aid: The Secretary General's Trust Fund to Assist States in the Settlement of Disputes Through the International Court of Justice’, Janis, Mark (ed.), International Courts in the Twenty-First Century, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Bernard, and Djordjevic, Margareta (2005), ‘Practical Aspects of Monetary Compensation: The US – Copyright Case’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1): 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parlin, C. Christopher (2000), ‘Operation of Consultations, Deterrence, and Mediation’, Law and Policy in International Business, 31: 565–572.Google Scholar
Pear, Robert (1990), ‘US and Iran move on smaller claims’, New York Times, 8 May 1990, p. A7.Google Scholar
Ruhnka, John, Weller, Steven, and Martin, John (1978), Small Claims Courts: A National Examination, NCJ 054568, NCJRS Library collection.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1976), ‘Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court’, Law and Society Review, 10: 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Warren, and Sykes, Alan (2002), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, Thomas (2007), ‘World Trade Organization Remedies and the Assessment of Proportionality: Equivalence and Appropriateness’, Harvard International Law Journal, 48: 337–382.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2003a), Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation, Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2003b), ‘How to make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for Developing Countries: Some Proactive Developing Country Strategies’, Towards A Development-Supportive Dispute Settlement System in the WTO 5, ICTSD Resource Paper.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2006a), ‘The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation’, World Trade Review, 5(2): 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2006b), ‘What's New in EU Dispute Settlement? Judicialization, Public–Private Networks and the WTO Legal Order’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6): 832–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Sanchez, Ratton Michelle, and Rosenberg, Barbara (forthcoming 2008), ‘The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success’, Cornell International Law Journal, 40(2).Google Scholar
Sovern, Jeff (2001), ‘Protecting Privacy with Deceptive Trade Practices Legislation’, Fordham Law Review, 69(4): 1305–1357.Google Scholar
Sovern, Jeff (2003), ‘The Jewel of Their Souls: Preventing Identity Theft Fraud Through Loss Allocation Rules’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 64: 343–406.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel (2007), ‘The WTO Cathedral’, Stanford Journal of International Law Volume, 43: 127–167.Google Scholar
Turner, James C. and McGee, Joyce A. (2000), ‘Small Claims Reform: A Means of Expanding Access to the American Civil Justice System’, University of the District of Colombia Law Review, 5: 177–188.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. Clifford (2005), ‘Improving the Appellate Process Worldwide Through Maximizing Judicial Resources’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 38: 187–213.Google Scholar
Weidemaier, W. and Mark, C. (2007), ‘Arbitration and the Individuation Critique’, Arizona Law Review, 49: 69–112.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (2001), ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of World Trade, 25: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, William C. (1984) ‘The Small-Case Procedure of the United States Tax Court: A Small Claims Court that Works’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 9: 797–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization (1995), GATT Analtyic Index: Guide to GATT Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Washington, DC: WTO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (1999), ‘Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 2. The Legal Texts: The Results Of The Uruguay Round Of Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, WTO, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization (2004), ‘The Future of the WTO: Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium’, Report of the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi, 51, WTO, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yang, Grant (2004), ‘Can-Spam: A First Step to No-Spam’, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 4(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara, and Hennessey, Patricia (1975), ‘Small Claims, Complex Disputes: a Review of the Small Claims Literature’, Law and Society Review, 9: 219–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalesne, Deborah, and Best, Arthur (1994), ‘Peace, Wealth, Happiness, and Small Claims Courts: A Case Study’, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 21: 343–379.Google Scholar
Zollers, Frances E. (1988), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Product Liability Reform’, American Business Law Journal, 26: 479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, Bruce, and Her, Monica (2003), ‘The People's Court Examined: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Small Claims Court System’, University of San Francisco Law Review, 37: 315–350.Google Scholar