Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T06:17:03.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No More Strategical Neutrality on Technological Neutrality: Technological Neutrality as a Bridge Between the Analogue Trading Regime and Digital Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2021

Dongchul Kwak
Dongchul Kwak*
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Trade, Kyungpook National University
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The World Trade Organization (WTO), a unique multilateral trading regime, has failed to establish its relevance to the digital nature of trade. This article revisits the ‘principle of technological neutrality’ to make the cross-border supply of services by electronic means subject to the current rules-based trading regime. I argue that the principle of technological neutrality could help resolve a number of thorny legal issues: confirming the applicability of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) rules to the delivery of services by electronic means; providing a guideline to determine the likeness of services in the era of digital trade; and backing up an evolutionary approach to interpreting the GATS schedules of commitments. However, the WTO adjudicatory bodies have been reluctant to rely on the principle of technological neutrality, which is referred to as strategic neutrality in this article. This article urges the WTO adjudicatory bodies to abandon their strategically neutral position on technological neutrality immediately. It also explores ways to incorporate the principle of technological neutrality into the world trading system at the bilateral, plurilateral, and multilateral levels.

Keywords

Technological neutralityinternational trade lawdigital tradeGATSlikeness
Type
Original Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 18 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Society of International Economic Law's Asian International Economic Law Network (AIELN) 6th Biennial Conference on 26–27 October, 2019. I would like to thank Professor Dukgeun Ahn and Professor Shin-yi Peng for their valuable comments on earlier draft.

References

Bieron, B. and Ahmed, U. (2012) ‘Regulating E-Commerce through International Policy: Understanding the International Trade Law Issues of E-Commerce’, Journal of World Trade 46(3), 545–570.Google Scholar
Burri, M. (2017) ‘The Regulation of Data Flows Through Trade Agreements’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 48(2), 407–448.Google Scholar
Chander, A. (2013) The Electronic Silk Road: How the Web Binds the World Together in Commerce. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Conconi, P. and Pauwelyn, J. (2011) ‘Trading Cultures: Appellate Body Report on China – Audiovisuals’, World Trade Review 10(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowhey, P. and Aronson, J. (2017) Digital DNA: Disruption and the Challenges for Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, P. (2011) ‘Protecting Public Morals in a Digital Age: Revisiting the WTO Rulings on US–Gambling and China–Publications and Audiovisual Products’, Journal of International Economic Law 14(2), 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, N. (2010) Non-Discrimination in International Trade in Services – ‘Likeness’ in WTO/GATS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, W. (2016) Background Paper for the Workshop on Data Localization and Barriers to Transborder Data Flows, www3.weforum.org/docs/Background_Paper_Forum_workshop%2009.2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Gao, H. (2008) ‘Telecommunications Services: Reference Paper’, in Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P., and Feinäugle, C. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Google (n.d.), Enabling Trade in the Era of Information Technologies: Breaking Down Barriers to the Free Flow of Information, https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/ko//googleblogs/pdfs/trade_free_flow_of_information.pdf.Google Scholar
Hu, J. (2014) ‘When Trade Encounters Technology’, in Mercurio, B. and Ni, K. (eds.), Science and Technology in International Economic Law – Balancing Competing Interests. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. and Engelke, M. (2008) ‘Article XVII GATS’, in Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P., and Feinäugle, C. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Luff, D. (2004) ‘Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services: Considerations for a Convergence Policy at the World Trade Organization Level’, Journal of World Trade 38(6), 1059–1086.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2018) ‘Evolutive Interpretation by the WTO Adjudicator’, Journal of International Economic Law 21(4), 791–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Schuknecht, L. (2000) ‘Trade Policies for Electronic Commerce’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2380, World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. and Mishra, N. (2018) ‘Data at the Docks: Modernizing International Trade Law for the Digital Economy’, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 20(4), 1073–1134.Google Scholar
Monteiro, J. and Teh, R. (2017) ‘Provisions on Electronic Commerce in Regional Trade Agreement’, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2017-11, WTO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauletto, C. (2008) ‘Comment: Digital Trade: Technology versus Legislation’, in Panizzon, M., Pohl, N., and Sauvé, P. (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2010) ‘Squaring Free Trade in Culture with Chinese Censorship: The WTO Appellate Body Report on China – Audiovisuals’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 11, 119–140.Google Scholar
Peng, S. (2009) ‘Liberalization of Trade in Television Services: The Negotiation Dilemma and Challenges for the Future’, Journal of World Trade 43(4), 657–681.Google Scholar
Peng, S. (2012) ‘Renegotiate the WTO “Schedules of Commitments”?: Technological Development and Treaty Interpretation’, Cornell International Law Journal 45(2), 404–430.Google Scholar
Streinz, T. (2019) ‘Digital Megaregulation Uncontested? TPP's Model for the Global Digital Economy’, in Kingbury, B., Malone, D., Mertenskötter, P., Stewart, R., Streinz, T., and Sunami, A. (eds.), Megaregulation Contested – Global Economic Ordering After TPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuthill, L. L. (2016) ‘Cross-Border Data Flows: What Role for Trade Rules?’, in Sauvé, P. and Roy, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on Trade in Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Damme, I. (2009) Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. (2010) ‘Digital Trade in WTO-Law – Taking Stock and Looking Ahead’, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 5(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Willemyns, I. (2018) ‘The GATS (In)Consistency of Barriers to Digital Services Trade’, KU Leuven Working Paper 207, KU Leuven 6.Google Scholar
Willemyns, I. (2019) ‘GATS Classification of Digital Services – Does ‘The Cloud’ Have a Silver Lining?’, Journal of World Trade 53(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
WTO (2018) World Trade Report 2018 – The Future of World Trade: How Digital Technologies Are Transforming Global Commerce. Geneva: WTO Publications.Google Scholar
Wu, T. (2003) ‘Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination’, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law 2, 145–175.Google Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2006) ‘The Internet, Cross-Border Trade in Services, and the GATS: Lessons from US – Gambling’, World Trade Review 5(3), 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2008) ‘Trade Rules for the Digital Age’, in Panizzon, M., Pohl, N., and Sauvé, P. (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, S. and Hold, A. (2012) ‘Towards Coherent Rules for Digital Trade: Building on Efforts in Multilateral Versus Preferential Trade Negotiations’, in Burri, M. and Cottier, T. (eds.), Trade Governance in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, R. (2015) ‘Covered or Not Covered: That is the Question – Services Classification and Its Implications for Specific Commitments under the GATS’, WTO Working Paper ERSD-2015-11, WTO.Google Scholar