Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Tahamtani, Fernanda M.
Forkman, Björn
Hinrichsen, Lena K.
and
Riber, Anja B.
2017.
Both feather peckers and victims are more asymmetrical than control hens.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 195,
Issue. ,
p.
67.
Dawkins, M. S.
2017.
Animal welfare with and without consciousness.
Journal of Zoology,
Vol. 301,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Hartcher, K.M.
and
Jones, B.
2017.
The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems.
World's Poultry Science Journal,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 4,
p.
767.
Louton, H.
Bergmann, S.M.
Rauch, E.
Liebers, C.
Reese, S.
Erhard, M.H.
Hoeborn, C.
and
Schwarzer, A.
2017.
Evaluation of welfare parameters in laying hens on the basis of a Bavarian survey.
Poultry Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 9,
p.
3199.
Cronin, G.M.
Hopcroft, R.L.
Groves, P.J.
Hall, E.J.S.
Phalen, D.N.
and
Hemsworth, P.H.
2018.
Why did severe feather pecking and cannibalism outbreaks occur? An unintended case study while investigating the effects of forage and stress on pullets during rearing.
Poultry Science,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 5,
p.
1484.
Decina, Caitlin
Berke, Olaf
van Staaveren, Nienke
Baes, Christine F.
Widowski, Tina M.
and
Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
2019.
A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in non-cage housing systems.
BMC Veterinary Research,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
Mens, A.J.W.
van Krimpen, M.M.
and
Kwakkel, R.P.
2020.
Nutritional approaches to reduce or prevent feather pecking in laying hens: any potential to intervene during rearing?.
World's Poultry Science Journal,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
591.
Cronin, Greg M.
and
Glatz, Phil C.
2020.
Causes of feather pecking and subsequent welfare issues for the laying hen: a review.
Animal Production Science,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 10,
p.
990.
Yan, Chao
Hartcher, Kate
Liu, Wen
Xiao, Jinlong
Xiang, Hai
Wang, Jikun
Liu, Hao
Zhang, Hui
Liu, Jian
Chen, Siyu
and
Zhao, Xingbo
2020.
Adaptive response to a future life challenge: consequences of early-life environmental complexity in dual-purpose chicks.
Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 11,
Singh, M.
and
Groves, P. J.
2020.
Welfare implications for barn (and aviary) egg production systems.
Animal Production Science,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 10,
p.
837.
Hemsworth, Paul H.
2021.
Cage production and laying hen welfare.
Animal Production Science,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 10,
p.
821.
Petek, Metin
and
Çavuşoğlu, Enver
2021.
Welfare Assessment of Two Free-range Laying Hen Flocks in Turkey.
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
56.
Patt, A.
Halle, I.
Dudde, A.
Olbrich, A.
Sieburg-Rockel, J.
and
Krause, E. T.
2022.
Influence of different dietary fibre contents in the diet on feather pecking, locomotor activity and performance of laying hens.
British Poultry Science,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 5,
p.
571.
Gernand, E.
Ahlers, C.
Huchler, M.
and
Donat, K.
2022.
Plumage damage and back skin lesions in laying hens with untrimmed beak depend on rearing of pullets and genetics.
British Poultry Science,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
274.
Ewuola, E O
and
Olarinre, I O
2023.
Differentiation in poult plumage color of f1 progeny from crosses between white and black indigenous turkeys.
Translational Animal Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
Turner, Ian
Heidari, Davoud
Widowski, Tina
and
Pelletier, Nathan
2023.
Development of a life cycle impact assessment methodology for animal welfare with an application in the poultry industry.
Sustainable Production and Consumption,
Vol. 40,
Issue. ,
p.
30.