Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:38:03.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of the Efficacy and Mechanism of Competitive Exclusion for The Control of Salmonella in Poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

John H. Schleifer
John H. Schleifer
Affiliation:
Georgia Poultry Laboratory, P.O. Box 20, Oakwood, Georgia30566
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 72 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, H. E. and Damassa, A. J. (1980). Effect of ingested lactobacilli on Salmonella infantis and Escherichia coli and on intestinal flora, pasted vents and chick growth. Avian Diseases 24: 868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous. (1976). The National Poultry Improvement Plan and Auxilliary Provisions. NPIP Staff, USDA, ARS, Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (1982). Salmonella surveillance, annual summary 1980. Centers of Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Bare, L. N. and Wiseman, R. F. (1964). Delayed appearance of lactobacilli in the intestines of chicks reared in a “new” environment. Applied Microbiology 12: 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, E. M., Impey, C. S. and Cooper, D. M. (1980a). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the newly hatched chick. Veterinary Record 160: 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, E. M., Impey, C. S. and Cooper, D. M. (1980b). Manipulation of the crop and intestinal flora of the newly hatched chick. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33: 2426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, E. M., Impey, C. S. and Stevens, J. H. (1979). Factors affecting the incidence and anti-salmonella activity of the anaerobic caecal flora of the young chick. Journal of Hygiene 82: 263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, E. M., Mead, G. C., Barnum, D. A. and Harry, E. G. (1972). The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. British Poultry Science 13: 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, T. R. S. and McNabb, G. D. (1980). Dissemination of salmonella in broiler-chicken operations. Avian Diseases 24: 616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchfield, B., Gardiner, M. A. and Pivnick, H. (1982). Nurmi concept for preventing infection of chicks by salmonella: Comparison of faecal suspensions and faecal cultures administered into the crop and in the drinking water. Journal of Food Protection 45: 345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonhoff, M., Miller, C. P. and Martin, W. R. (1964). Resistance of the mouse's intestinal tract to experimental salmonella infection. 1. Factors which interfere with the initiation of infection by oral inoculation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 120: 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, J. R., Sadler, W. W. and Fanelli, M. J. (1970). Role of caeca in intestinal infection of chickens with Salmonella typhimurium. Avian Diseases 14: 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costerton, J. W., Geesey, G. G. and Cheng, K. J. (1978). How bacteria stick. Scientific American. 238: 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farner, D. S. (1943). Gastric hydrogen ion concentration and acidity in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 22: 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. (1977). Epithelial attachment and other factors controlling the colonization of the intestine of the gnotobiotic chicken by lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 45: 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. (1977). The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. British Poultry Science 18: 85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R. and Brooker, B. E. (1974). Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 27: 1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. and Turvey, A. (1971). Bacteria associated with the intestinal wall of the fowl (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 34: 617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, W. J. (1965). Fowl Typhoid. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. (eds. Biester, H. E. and Schwarte, L. H.). pp. 329–330. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Impey, C. S., Mead, G. C. and George, S. M. (1982). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the chick caecum using a defined mixture of bacterial isolates from the caecal microflora of an adult bird. Journal of Hygiene. 89: 479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayne-Williams, D. J. and Fuller, R. (1971). The influence of the intestinal microflora on nutrition. In Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl. Vol. 1. (ed. Bell, D. J. and Freeman, B. M.). pp. 74–92. Academic Press, London, England.Google Scholar
Lafont, J. P., Bree, A., Naciri, M., Yvore, P., Guillot, J. F. and Chaslusdancla, E. (1983). Experimental study of some factors limiting competitive exclusion of salmonella in chickens. Research in Veterinary Science 34: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, A. B., Cumming, R. B. and Kent, R. D. (1977). Prevention of Salmonella typhimurium infection in poultry by pretreatment of chickens and poults with intestinal extracts. Australian Veterinary Journal 53: 82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, G. C. and Adams, B. W. (1975). Some observations on the caecal micro-flora of the chick during the first two weeks of life. British Poultry Science 16: 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynell, G. G. (1963). Antibacterial mechanisms of the mouse gut. II: The role of volatile fatty acids in the normal gut. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 44: 209.Google ScholarPubMed
Milner, K. C. and Schaffer, M. F. (1952). Bacteriologic studies of experimental salmonella infections in chicks. Journal of Infectious Disease 90: 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurmii, E. and Rantala, M. (1973). New aspects of salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241: 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivnick, H., Blanchfield, B. and D'Aoust, J. Y. (1981). Prevention of salmonella infection in chicks by treatment with faecal cultures from mature chickens (Nurmi cultures). Journal of Food Protection. 44: 909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raevuori, M., Seuna, E. and Nurmi, E. (1978). An epidemic of Salmonella infantis infection in Finnish Broiler chickens in 1975-76. Acta Veterinari Scand. 19: 317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. (1974). Cultivation of a bacterial flora able to prevent the colonization of Salmonella infantis in the intestines of broiler chickens, and its use. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scand. 82: 75.Google ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. (1974). Nitrovin and tetracycline: A comparison of their effect on salmonellosis in chicks. British Poultry Science 15: 299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. and Nurmi, E. (1973). Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. British Poultry Science 14: 627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, M. and Nurmi, E. (1974). Hazards involved in the use of furazolidone for the prevention of salmonellosis in broiler chickens. Journal of Hygiene 72: 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, C. R. and Barnum, D. A. (1983). Evaluation of turkey caecal microflora in protecting day-old poults from Salmonella typhimurium challenge. Avian Diseases 27: 632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, C. E. and Pettit, J. R. (1980). Observations on competitive exclusion for preventing. Salmonella typhimurium infection of broiler chickens. Avian Diseases 24: 604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal, W. A. and Mutimer, M. D. (1972). Inhibition of Salmonella typimurium by fowl caecal cultures. Research in Veterinary Science 13: 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, W. W., Brownell, J. R. and Fanelli, M. J. (1969). Influence of age and inoculum level on shed patterns of Salmonella typhimurium in chicks. Avian Diseses 13: 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, D. C. (1972). Survival on mucosal epithelia, epithelial penetration and growth in tissue of pathogenic bacteria. In Microbial Pathogenicity in Man and Animals. (ed. Smith, H. and Pearce, J. H.), pp. 25–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Schneitz, C., Seuna, E. and Rizzo, A. (1981). The anaerobically cultured caecal flora of adult fowls that protects chickens from salmonella infections. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scand. 89: 109.Google ScholarPubMed
Seuna, E. (1979). Sensitivity of young chickens to Salmonella typhimurium var. copenhagen and S. infantis infection and the preventive effect of cultured intestinal microflora. Avian Diseases 23: 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuna, E., Raevuore, M. and Nurmi, E. (1978). An epizootie of Salmonella typhimurium var. copenhagen in broilers and the use of cultured chicken intestinal flora for its control. British Poultry Science 19: 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuna, E., Schneiz, C., Nurmi, E. and Makela, P. H. (1980). Combined therapy of salmonella infection in chickens by antimicrobial agents followed by cultured caecal material. Poultry Science 59: 1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, E. N., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. and Smyser, C. F. (1981). The influence of native gut microflora on the colonization and infection of Salmonella gallinarum in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Soerjadi, A. S. and Weinack, O. M. (1982). Gastro-intestinal colonization by salmonellae and pathogenic Escherichia coli in monoxenic and holoxenic chicks and poults. Avian Diseases 26: 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. and Smyser, C. F. (1978). Protecting chicks from salmonellae by oral administration of “normal” gut microflora. Avian Diseases 22: 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. and Smyser, C. F. (1979). Further studies on competitive exclusion for controlling salmonellae in chickens. Avian Diseases 24: 904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soerjadi, A. S., Lloyd, E. and Summing, R. B. (1978). Streptococus faecalis, a bacterial isolate which protects young chickens from enteric invasion by salmonellae. Australian Veterinary Journal 54: 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soerjadi, A. S., Furner, R., Snoelyenbos, G. H. and Weinack, O. M. (1982). Adherence of salmonellae and native gut microflora to the gastrointestinal mucosa of chicks. Avian Diseases 26: 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soerjadi, A. S., Stehman, S. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. and Smyser, C. F. (1981a). Some measurements of protection against paratyphoid salmonella and Escherichia coli by competitive exclusion in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soerjadi, A. S., Stehman, S. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. and Smyser, C. F. (1981b). The influence of lactobacilli on the competitive exclusion of paratyphoid salmonellae in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stersky, A., Blanchfield, B., Thacker, C. and Pivnick, H. (1981). Reduction of Salmonella excretion into drinking water following treatment of chicks with Numri culture. Journal of Food Protection 44: 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, E. C. D. (1980). Poultry-associated foodborne disease—its occurrence, cost, source and prevention. Journal of Food Protection 43: 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbuli, P. C. B. and Richmond, J. E. (1978). A model of salmonella enteritis: The behaviour of Salmonella enteritidis in chick intestine studied by light and electron microscopy. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 59: 64.Google Scholar
Van Roekel, H. (1965). Pullorum Disease. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. (ed. Biester, H. E. and Schwarte, L. H.), pp. 220–221. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Watkins, B. A. and Miller, B. F. (1983). Competitive gut exclusion of avian pathogens by Lactobacillus acidophilus in gnotobiotic chicks. Poultry Science 62: 1772.;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinack, O. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H. and Smyser, C. F. (1979). A supplemental test system to measure competitive exclusion of salmonellae by native microflora in the chicken gut. Avian Diseases 24: 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinack, O. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H.Emyser, C. F. and Soerjadi, A. S. (1981). Competitive exclusion of intestinal colonization of Escherichia coli in chicks. Avian Diseases 25: 696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinack, O. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Smyser, C. F. and Soerjadi, A. S. (1982). Reciprocal competitive exclusion of salmonella and Escherichia coli by native intestinal microflora of the chicken and turkey. Avian Diseases 26: 585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. E. (1965). Paratyphoid and Arizona infections. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. Biester, H. E., and Schwarte, I. H.). pp. 260–261. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E. (1978). Paratyphoid infections. In Diseases of Poultry, 7th ed. (ed. Hofstad, M. S., Calnek, B. W., Helmboldt, C. F., Reid, W. M. and Yoder, H. W. Jr.), pp. 145–161. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar