Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:49:30.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenotypic characteristic of junglefowl and chicken

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

T.T. DESTA*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Kotebe Metropolitan University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Junglefowl display adaptive characters like seasonal breeding, well-established social hierarchy, explorative behaviour, territoriality, aggression and short ranged flight, however, they are smaller, produce less and mature later than commercial breeds. Non-green junglefowl cocks display eclipse plumage – a reliable indicator of genetic purity and a trait that has been disappeared from chickens. Junglefowl show high sexual dimorphism, however, intra-sex level variation is considerably limited. There are conflicting reports on viability of hybrids from junglefowl, however, red junglefowl crossed with chickens invariably produce fertile offspring. Although junglefowl and chickens share common parasites and diseases, junglefowl exhibit high variability in natural immunity and are relatively resilient to infection. Junglefowl prefer secondary forests and village environs, demonstrating their propensity for human landscapes. Habitat preference and historical, ritual and leisure activities of ancient man might have resulted in junglefowl being recruited for domestication. Particularly, native chickens share a number of phenotypic characters with junglefowl, however, cosmopolitan chickens have experienced high phenotypic input from world-wide dispersal and adaptation to a wide range of management and breeding regimes. Based on morphological scores and behavioural ecology, red junglefowl resembles chickens and amongst the junglefowls, red and Ceylon junglefowl are closely related, whereas grey and green junglefowl have been found to be distant.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADNAN, S. and BABJEE, S.A. (1985) Haematology of the Malaysian jungle fowl. Pertanika 8 (1): 123-126.Google Scholar
AGNVALL, B., ALI, A., OLBY, S. and JENSEN, P. (2014) Red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) selected for low fear of humans are larger, more dominant and produce larger offspring. Animal 8 (9): 498-1505.Google Scholar
AKABOOT, P., DUANGJINDA, M., PHASUK, Y., KAENECHAN, C. and CHINCHIYANOND, W. (2012) Genetic characterisation of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus), Thai indigenous chicken (Gallus domesticus), and two commercial lines using selective functional genes compared to microsatellite markers. Genetics and Molecular Research Journal 11 (3): 1881-1890.Google Scholar
AL-NASSER, A., AL-KHALAIFA, H., AL-SAFFAR, A., KHALIL, F., ALBAHOUH, M., RAGHEB, G., AL-HADDAD, A. and MASHALY, M. (2007) Overview of chicken taxonomy and domestication. World's Poultry Science Journal 63 (2): 285-300.Google Scholar
ARSHAD, M.I. and ZAKARIA, M. (1999) Breeding ecology of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus) in Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 53 (4): 355-365.Google Scholar
ARSHAD, M.I. and ZAKARIA, M. (2009) Roosting habits of red junglefowl in orchard area. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 7 (1): 86-89.Google Scholar
ARSHAD, M.I. and ZAKARIA, M. (2011) Variation in home range size exhibited by red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus) in oil palm plantation habitat, Malaysia. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 43 (5): 833-840.Google Scholar
ARSHAD, M.I., ZAKARIA, M., SAJAP, A.S. and ISMAIL, A. (2000) Food and feeding habits of red junglefowl. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (6): 1024-1026.Google Scholar
BANKS, E.M. (1956) Social organisation in red jungle fowl hens (Gallus gallus Subsp.). Ecology 37: 239-248.Google Scholar
CALLAWAY, E. (2016) When chickens go wild. Nature 529 (7586): 270.Google Scholar
COLLIAS, N.E. and COLLIAS, E.C. (1967) A field study of the red jungle fowl in north-central India. The Condor 69 (4): 360-386.Google Scholar
COLLIAS, N.E. and JOOS, M. (1953) The spectrographic analysis of sound signals of the domestic fowl. Behaviour 5: 175-188.Google Scholar
COLLIAS, N.E. and SAICHUAE, P. (1967) Ecology of the red jungle fowl in Thailand and Malaya with reference to the origin of domestication. The Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 22: 189-209.Google Scholar
COLLIAS, N.E. (1987) The vocal repertoire of the red junglefowl: a spectrographic classification and the code of communication. The Condor 89: 510-524.Google Scholar
CORREA, S.M., ADKINS-REGAN, E. and JOHNSON, P.A. (2005) High progesterone during avian meiosis biases sex ratios toward females. Biology Letters 1 (2): 215-218.Google Scholar
COYNE, J.A., KAY, E.H. and PRUETT-JONES, S. (2007) The genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 62 (1): 214-219.Google Scholar
CRAWFORD, R.D. (1990) Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
DANFORTH, C.H. (1958) Gallus sonnerati and the domestic fowl. Journal of Heredity 49: 167-169.Google Scholar
DARWIN, C. (1868) The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
DELACOUR, J. (1977) The pheasant of the world (2nd edn.). World Pheasant Association and Saiga, Spur Publications, Hindhead, Surrey.Google Scholar
DEL HOYO, J., ELLIOTT, A. and SARGATAL, J. (2001) Hand Book of The Birds of The World. Vol. 2, New World Vultures to Guinea fowl, (Lynx Editions, Barcelona).Google Scholar
DESTA, T.T. and WAKEYO, O. (2012) Uses and flock management practices of scavenging chickens in Wolaita zone of southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44 (3): 537-544.Google Scholar
DESTA, T.T. and WAKEYO, O. (2013) Village chickens management in Wolaita zone of southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 45 (2): 387-396.Google Scholar
DESTA, T.T. (2015) Phenomic and genomic landscape of Ethiopian village chickens. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
DESTA, T.T., DESSIE, T., BETTRIDGE, J., LYNCH, S.E., MELESE, K., COLLINS, M., CHRISTLEY, R.M., WIGLEY, P., KAISER, P., TERFA, Z., MWACHARO, J.M. and HANOTTE, O. (2013) Signature of artificial selection and ecological landscape on morphological structures of Ethiopian village chickens. Animal Genetic Resources 52: 1-13.Google Scholar
EKLUND, B. and JENSEN, P. (2011) Domestication effects on behavioural synchronisation and individual distances in chickens (Gallus gallus). Behavioural Processes 86 (2): 250-256.Google Scholar
ERIKSSON, J., LARSON, G., GUNNARSSON, U., BED'HOM, B., TIXIER-BOICHARD, M., STROMSTEDT, L., WRIGHT, D., JUNGERIUS, A., VEREIJKEN, A., RANDI, E., JENSEN, P. and ANDERSSON, L. (2008) Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000010.Google Scholar
FAVATI, A., ZIDAR, J., THORPE, H., JENSEN, P. and LØVLIE, H. (2015) The ontogeny of personality traits in the red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Behavioral Ecology 27 (2): 484-493.Google Scholar
GANABADI, S., MUTUVIREN, S., HILMI, M.A., BABJEE, S.M.A., YAAKUB, H. and FAKURAZI, S. (2009) Carcass composition of jungle fowl in comparison with broilers and indigenous chicken. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 3 (1): 13-17.Google Scholar
HIMENO, K. and TANABE, Y. (1957) Mechanism of molting in the hen. Poultry Science 36 (4): 835-842.Google Scholar
INTERNATIONAL CHICKEN GENOME SEQUENCING CONSORTIUM (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432 (7018): 695.Google Scholar
JACOBSSON, L. (2005) Genetic dissection of growth and fatness using divergent intercrosses in chickens. Ph. D, Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
JAVED, S.Á.L.I.M. and RAHMANI, A.R. (2000) Flocking and habitat use pattern of the red junglefowl Gallus gallus in Dudwa National Park, India. Tropical Ecology 41 (1): 11-16.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, R.A. (1963) Habitat preference and behavior of breeding jungle fowl in central western Thailand. The Wilson Bulletin 270-272.Google Scholar
KADHIM, K.K., ZUKI, A.B.Z., NOORDIN, M.M., BABJEE, S.M.A. and ZAMRI-SAAD, M. (2011) Activities of amylase, trypsin and chymotrypsin of pancreas and small intestinal contents in the red jungle fowl and broiler breed. African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (1): 108-115.Google Scholar
KANGINAKUDRU, S., METTA, M., JAKATI, R.D. and NAGARAJU, J. (2008) Genetic evidence from Indian red jungle fowl corroborates multiple domestication of modern day chicken. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8 (1): 174.Google Scholar
KELLOGG, F.E., DOSTER, G.L. and JOHNSON, J.K. (1971) Diseases and parasites encountered in pen-raised Indian red junglefowl. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 7 (3): 186-187.Google Scholar
KERJE, S., CARLBORG, Ö., JACOBSSON, L., SCHÜTZ, K., HARTMANN, C., JENSEN, P. and ANDERSSON, L. (2003) The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Animal Genetics 34 (4): 264-274.Google Scholar
KIM, T. and ZUK, M. (2000) The effects of age and previous experience on social rank in female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus spadiceus. Animal Behaviour 60: 239-244.Google Scholar
KINGORI, A.M., WACHIRA, A.M. and TUITOEK, J.K. (2010) Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: a review. International Journal of Poultry Science 9 (4): 309-316.Google Scholar
LOKMAN, I.H., GOH, Y.M., SAZILI, A.Q., NOORDIN, M.M. and ZUKI, A.B.Z. (2015) Meat characteristics of red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus Spadiceus), Malaysian Domestic Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and Commercial Broiler. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 38 (4): 455-464.Google Scholar
MALIK, A., HARON, A.W., YUSOFF, R., NESA, M., BUKAR, M. and KASIM, A. (2013) Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 37 (5): 564-568.Google Scholar
MANK, J.E., NAM, K., BRUNSTRÖM, B. and ELLEGREN, H. (2010) Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27 (7): 1570-1578.Google Scholar
MEKCHAY, S., TRAKOOLJUL, N., PONSUKSILI, S., WIMMERS, K., SCHELLANDER, K., TER MEULEN, U. and VEARASILP, T. (1999) Variation of natural immunity in red jungle fowl, native chicken and commercial chicken. Session: Biodiversity and Development of Animal Genetic Resources. Deutscher Tropentag, Berlin.Google Scholar
MENCH, J. and KEELING, L. (2001) The social behaviour of domestic birds, in: KEELING, L.J. & GONYOU, H.W. (Eds) Social Behaviour in Farm Animals (CABI Publishing).Google Scholar
MOREJOHN, G.V. (1968a) Study of plumage of the four species of the genus Gallus. Condor 70 (1): 56-65.Google Scholar
MOREJOHN, G.V. (1968b) Breakdown of isolation mechanisms in two species of captive junglefowl. Evolution 22 (3): 576-582.Google Scholar
NISHIBORI, M., SHIMOGIRI, T., HAYASHI, T. and YASUE, H. (2005) Molecular evidence for hybridisation of species in the genus Gallus except for Gallus varius. Animal Genetics 36 (5): 367-375.Google Scholar
PETERSON, A.T. and BRISBIN, I.L. (1998) Genetic endangerment of wild red junglefowl Gallus gallus. Bird Conservation International 8 (04): 387-394.Google Scholar
PHEASANTRY, C. and PRADESH, H. (2004) An assessment of important physical traits shown by some captive red junglefowl in India. Current Science 87 (11): 1498.Google Scholar
PIZZARI, T., JENSEN, P. and CORNWALLIS, C.K. (2004) A novel test of the phenotype–linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 271 (1534): 51-58.Google Scholar
RAHAYU, H.I., ZULKIFLI, I., VIDYADARAN, M.K., ALIMON, A.R. and BABJEE, S.A. (2008) Carcass variables and chemical composition of commercial broiler chickens and the red jungle fowl. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21 (9): 1376-1382.Google Scholar
RAMESH, N., SATHYANARAYANA, M.C. and LLOYD, H. (2011) Abundance of grey junglefowl Gallus sonneratii at Theni Forest Division, Western Ghats, India: implications for monitoring and conservation. International Journal of Galliformes Conservation 2 (14): 21.Google Scholar
REMEŠ, V. and SZÉKELY, T. (2010) Domestic chickens defy Rensch's rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. Journal Evolutionary Biology 23 (12): 2754-2759.Google Scholar
ROMANOV, M.N. and WEIGEND, S. (2001) Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science 80 (8): 1057-1063.Google Scholar
SAWAI, H., KIM, H.L., KUNO, K., SUZUKI, S., GOTOH, H., TAKADA, M., TAKAHATA, N., SATTA, Y. and AKISHINONOMIYA, F. (2010) The origin and genetic variation of domestic chickens with special reference to junglefowl Gallus g. gallus and G. varius. PloS one 5 (5): e10639.Google Scholar
SCHÜTZ, K., KERJE, S., CARLBORG, Ö., JACOBSSON, L., ANDERSSON, L. and JENSEN, P. (2002) QTL analysis of a red junglefowl× White Leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits. Behavior Genetics 32 (6): 423-433.Google Scholar
SCHÜTZ, K.E. and JENSEN, P. (2001) Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology 107 (8): 753-765.Google Scholar
SELVAN, K.M. and SRIDHARAN, N. (2012) Grey junglefowl Gallus sonneratii (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4 (1): 2328-2329.Google Scholar
SHIMMURA, T. and YOSHIMURA, T. (2013) Circadian clock determines the timing of rooster crowing. Current Biology 23 (6): R231-R233.Google Scholar
STOKES, A.W. (1971) Parental and courtship feeding in red junglefowl. The Auk 88 (1): 21-29.Google Scholar
SYAHAR, A.A.G., ZAKARIA, M.H., ZUKI, A.B.Z., LOKMAN, H.I. and MAZLINA, M. (2014) The existence of red junglefowls (Gallus gallus) in oil palm plantations in selected states in Malaysia and their morphological characteristics. Malaysian Journal of Veterinary Research 26 (2): 38-40.Google Scholar
SZE´KELY, T., LIKER, A., FRECKLETON, R.P., FICHTEL, C. and KAPPELER, P.M. (2014) Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proceedings of The Royal Society B 281 (1788): 20140342.Google Scholar
ULFAH, M., PERWITASARI, D., JAKARIA, J., MULADNO, M. and FARAJALLAH, A. (2017) Multiple maternal origins of Indonesian crowing chickens revealed by mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 28 (2): 254-262.Google Scholar
VÄISÄNEN, J. and JENSEN, P. (2004) Responses of young red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers to familiar and unfamiliar social stimuli. Poultry Science 83 (3): 335-343.Google Scholar
WORLEY, K., COLLET, J., SPURGIN, L.G., CORNWALLIS, C., PIZZARI, T. and RICHARDSON, D.S. (2010) MHC heterozygosity and survival in red junglefowl. Molecular Ecology 19 (15): 3064-3075.Google Scholar
YOUSAF, M. and CHAUDHRY, A.S. (2008) History, changing scenarios and future strategies to induce moulting in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 64: 65-75.Google Scholar
ZUK, M. and JOHNSEN, T.S. (1998) Seasonal changes in the relationship between ornamentation and immune response in red jungle fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265 (1406): 1631-1635.Google Scholar
ZULKIFLI, I., RAHAYU, H.S., ALIMON, A.R., VIDYADARAN, M.K. and BABJEE, S.A. (2001) Responses of choice-fed red jungle fowl and commercial broiler chickens offered a complete diet, corn and soybean. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 14 (12): 1758-1762.Google Scholar