Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:10:37.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrition as a modulatory factor of the efficacy of live anticoccidial vaccines in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

A. ARCZEWSKA-WŁOSEK  and
S. ŚWIĄTKIEWICZ
A. ARCZEWSKA-WŁOSEK*
Affiliation:
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, ul. Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland
S. ŚWIĄTKIEWICZ
Affiliation:
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, ul. Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the development of natural methods of coccidiosis prophylaxis. Vaccination against coccidiosis with live oocysts is regarded as effective in the control of avian coccidiosis, but in some conditions, such as poor sanitary management or incorrect application of the vaccine, may lead to poorer performance, measured as reduced weight gain and feed efficiency, in comparison with prophylactically medicated birds. Such reports are the reason for widespread reluctance to use anticoccidial vaccine in broilers. This paper reviews broiler studies in which nutritional methods as performance and/or immune-supporting factor with regard to anticoccidial vaccination were investigated. The results of some of the studies presented in the article indicate that feed additives with immunostimulating properties, along with proper protein levels in the diet, may have a beneficial effect in cocci-vaccinated broilers.

Keywords

coccidiosisEimerialive vaccinenutritionfeed additivesbroiler chickens
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 81 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABBAS, R.Z., COLWELL, D.D. and GILLEARD, J. (2012) Botanicals: an alternative approach for the control of avian coccidiosis. World's Poultry Science Journal 68: 203-215.Google Scholar
ALLEN, P.C. (2003) Dietary supplementation with Echinacea and development of immunity to challenge infection with coccidia. Parasitology Research 91: 74-78.Google Scholar
CHAPMAN, H.D. (1997) Biochemical, genetic and applied aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the fowl. Avian Pathology 26: 221-244.Google Scholar
CHAPMAN, H.D., CHERRY, T.E., DANFORTH, H.D., RICHARDS, G., SHIRLEY, M.W. and WILLIAMS, R.B. (2002) Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: The role of live vaccines. International Journal for Parasitology 32: 617-629.Google Scholar
DALLOUL, R.A. and LILLEHOJ, H.S. (2005) Recent advances in immunomodulation and vaccination strategies against coccidiosis. Avian Diseases 49: 1-8.Google Scholar
DANFORTH, H.D. (1998) Use of live oocyst vaccines in the control of avian coccidiosis: Experimental studies and field trials. International Journal for Parasitology 28: 1099-1109.Google Scholar
FARNELL, M.B., LEE, J.T., KLEIN, A.E., STRINGFELLOW, K.D., MOHL, M., BELTRAN, R., SCHATZMAYR, G., FITZ-COY, S., BROUSSARD, C. and CALDWELL, D.J. (2009) Immunomodulation of the avian gastrointestinal tract with probiotics and coccidiosis vaccine. Poultry Science 88 (Supplement 1): 74.Google Scholar
FULLER, R. (1989) Probiotics in man and animals. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66: 365-378.Google Scholar
GIANNENAS, I., FLOROU-PANERI, P., PAPAZAHARIADOU, M., CHRISTAKI, E., BOTSOGLOU, N.A. and SPAIS, A.B. (2003) Effect of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance of broilers after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Archives of Animal Nutrition 57: 99-106.Google Scholar
GUO, F.C., KWAKKEL, R.P., WILLIAMS, B.A., PARAMENTIER, H.K., LI, W.K., YANG, Z.Q. and VERSTEGEN, M.W. (2004) Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides on cellular and humoral immune responses of E. tenella-infected chickens. Poultry Science 83: 1124-1132.Google Scholar
GUO, F.C., KWAKKEL, R.P., WILLIAMS, B.A., SUO, X., LI, W.K. and VERSTEGEN, M.W. (2005) Coccidiosis immunization: effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides on immune responses of chickens with Eimeria tenella. Avian Diseases 4: 70-73.Google Scholar
JIN, L.Z., HO, Y.W., ABDULLAH, N. and JALALUDIN, S. (2000) Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science 79: 886-891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KITANDU, A. and JURANOVÁ, R. (2006) Progress in control measures for chicken coccidiosis. Acta Veterinaria Brno 75: 265-276.Google Scholar
KLEIN, A.E., LEE, J., FARNELL, M., ODEN, L., POHL, S., MOHNL, M., BELTRAN, R., SCHATZMAYR, G., BROUSSARD, C., FITZ-COY, S. and CALDWELL, D. (2009a) Evaluation of probiotic administration on coccidiosis vaccination in broilers: Effects on performance parameters and oocyst output. Poultry Science 88 (Supplement 1): 135.Google Scholar
KLEIN, A.E., LEE, J., FARNELL, M., ODEN, L., POHL, S., MOHNL, M., BELTRAN, R., SCHATZMAYR, G., BROUSSARD, C., FITZ-COY, S. and CALDWELL, D. (2009b) Probiotic administration during coccidiosis vaccination in broilers: Evaluation of protection against clinical Eimeria challenge. Poultry Science 88 (Supplement 1): 158.Google Scholar
KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, K., BOZKURT, M., SELEK, N., GÜVEN, E., EREN, H., ATASEVER, A., BINTAŞ, E., ÇATLI, A.U. and ÇINAR, M. (2012) Effects of vaccination against coccidiosis, with and without a specific herbal essential oil blend, on performance, oocyst excretion and serum IBD titers of broilers reared on litter. Italian Journal of Animal Science 11: e1.Google Scholar
LEE, J.T., BROUSSARD, C., FITZ-COY, S., BURKE, P., ECKERT, N.H., STEVENS, S.M., ANDERSON, P.N., ANDERSON, S.M. and CALDWELL, D.J. (2009) Evaluation of Coccivac®-B or salinomycin for control of field strain Eimeria challenge in broilers on two different feeding programs. Journal of Applied Poultry 18: 458-464.Google Scholar
LEE, J.T., ECKERT, N.H., AMEISS, K.A., STEVENS, S.M., ANDERSON, P.N., ANDERSON, S.M., BARRI, A., McELROY, A.P., DANFORTH, H.D. and CALDWELL, D.J. (2011a) The effect of dietary protein level on performance characteristics of coccidiosis vaccinated and nonvaccinated broilers following mixed-species Eimeria challenge. Poultry Science 90: 1916-1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LEE, S.H., LILLEHOJ, H.S., JANG, S.I., LEE, K.W., BRAVO, D. and LILLEHOJ, E.P. (2011b) Effects of dietary supplementation with phytonutrients on vaccine-stimulated immunity against infection with Eimeria tenella. Veterinary Parasitology 181: 97-105.Google Scholar
LEHMAN, R., MORAN, E.T. and HESS, J.B. (2009) Response of coccidiostat- versus vaccination- protected broiler to gelatin inclusion in high and low crude protein diets. Poultry Science 88: 984-993.Google Scholar
LIU, N., RU, Y.J., COWIESON, A.J., LI, F.D. and CHENG, X.CH. (2008) Effects of phytate and phytase on the performance and immune function of broilers fed nutritionally marginal diets. Poultry Science 87: 1105-1111.Google Scholar
LUQUETTI, B.C., FURLAN, R.L., ALARCON, M.F.F. and MACARI, M. (2012) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall dietary supplementation on the performance and intestinal mucosa development and integrity of broiler chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 14: 89-95.Google Scholar
MANSOORI, B. and MODIRSANEI, M. (2012) Effects of dietary tannic acid and vaccination on the course of coccidiosis in experimentally challenged broiler chicken. Veterinary Parasitology 187: 119-122.Google Scholar
McEVOY, J. (2001) Safe limits for veterinary drug residues: What do they mean? Northern Ireland Veterinary Today Spring: 37-40.Google Scholar
MUSSINI, F.J., GOODGAME, S.D., LU, C., BRADLEY, C.D., FISCUS, S.M. and WALDROUP, P.W. (2012) A nutritional approach to the use of anticoccidial vaccines in broilers: glutamine utilization in critical stages of immunity acquisition. International Journal of Poultry Science 11: 243-246.Google Scholar
NOLLET, L., HUYGHEBAERT, G. and SPRING, P. (2007) Effect of Dietary Mannan Oligosaccharide (Bio-Mos) on Live Performance of Broiler Chickens Given an Anticoccidial Vaccine (Paracox) Followed by a Mild Coccidial Challenge. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16: 397-403.Google Scholar
NRC (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. Ninth Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
OVIEDO-RONDÓN, E.O., CLEMENTE-HERNÁNDEZ, S., SALVADOR, F., WILLIAMS, P., LOSA, R. and STEPHAN, F. (2006a) Essential oils on mixed coccidia vaccination and infection in broilers . International Journal of Poultry Science 5: 723-730.Google Scholar
OVIEDO-RONDÓN, E.O., HUME, M.E., HERNÁNDEZ, C. and CLEMENTE-HENÁNDEZ, S. (2006b) Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poultry Science 85: 854-860.Google Scholar
OVIEDO-RONDÓN, E.O., CLEMENTE-HERNÁNDEZ, S., WILLIAMS, P. and LOSA, R. (2005) Responses of coccidia-vaccinated broilers to essential oil blends supplementation up to forty-nine days of age. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 657-664.Google Scholar
PARKER, J., OVIEDO-RONDÓN, E.O., CLACK, B.C., CLEMENTE-HERNÁNDEZ, S., OSBORNE, J., REMUS, J.C., KETTUNEN, H., MAKIVUOKKO, H. and PIERSON, E.M. (2007) Enzymes as feed additives to aid in response against Eimeria species in coccidia-vaccinated broilers fed corn-soybean meal diets with different protein levels. Poultry Science 86: 643-653.Google Scholar
PELÍCIA, K., MENDES, A.A., SALDANHA, E.S.P.B., PIZZOLANTE, C.C., TAKAHASHI, S.E., GARCIA, R.G., MOREIRA, J., PAZ, I.C.L.A., QUINTEIRO, R.R. and KOMIYAMA, C.M. (2004) Probiotic and prebiotic utilization in diets for free-range broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 6: 99-104.Google Scholar
PEREZ-CARBAJAL, C., CALDWELL, D., FARNELL, M., STRINGFELLOW, K., POHL, S., CASCO, G., PRO-MARTINEZ, A. and RUIZ-FERIA, C.A. (2010) Immune response of broiler chickens fed different levels of arginine and vitamin E to a coccidiosis vaccine and Eimeria challenge. Poultry Science 89: 1870-1877.Google Scholar
REISINGER, N., STEINER, T., NITSCH, S., SCHATZMAYR, G. and APPLEGATE, T.J. (2011) Effects of a blend of essential oils on broiler performance and intestinal morphology during coccidial vaccine exposure. Journal of Applied Poultry 20: 272-283.Google Scholar
SHARMA, V.D., FERNANDO, M.A. and SUMMERS, J.D. (1973) The effect of dietary crude protein level on intestinal and cecal coccidiosis in chicken. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 37: 195-199.Google Scholar
SHARMAN, P.A., SMITH, N.C., WALLACH, M.G. and KATRIB, M. (2010) Chasing the golden egg: vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunology 32: 590-598.Google Scholar
SHAW, A.L., VAN GINKEL, F.W., MACKLIN, K.S. and BLAKE, J.P. (2011) Effects of phytase supplementation in broiler diets on a natural Eimeria challenge in naive and vaccinated birds. Poultry Science 90: 781-790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHIRLEY, M.W., SMITH, A.L. and TOMLEY, F.M. (2005) The biology of avian Eimeria with an emphasis on their control by vaccination. Advances in Parasitology 60: 285-330.Google Scholar
STRINGFELLOW, K., CALDWELL, D., LEE, J., MOHNL, M., BELTRAN, R., SCHATZMAYR, G., FITZ-COY, S., BROUSSARD, C. and FARNELL, M. (2011) Evaluation of probiotic administration on the immune response of coccidiosis-vaccinated broilers. Poultry Science 90: 1652-1658.Google Scholar
VERMEULEN, A.N., SCHAAP, D.C. and SCHETTERS, Th.P.M. (2001) Control of coccidiosis in chickens by vaccination. Veterinary Parasitology 100: 13-20.Google Scholar
WALDENSTEDT, L. (2003) Effect of vaccination against coccidiosis in combination with an antibacterial oregano (Origanum vulgare) compound in organic broiler production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 53: 101-109.Google Scholar
WALK, C.L., COWIESON, A.J., REMUS, J.C., NOVAK, C.L. and MCELROY, A.P. (2011a) Effects of dietary enzymes on performance and intestinal goblet cell number of broilers exposed to a live coccidia oocyst vaccine. Poultry Science 90: 91-98.Google Scholar
WALK, C.L., WYATT, C.L., UPTON, R. and McELROY, A.P. (2011b) Effect of diet and phytase on the performance and tibia ash of broilers exposed to a live coccidia oocyst vaccine. Journal of Applied Poultry 20: 153-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLIAMS, R.B. (1998) Epidemiological aspects of the use of live anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 28:1089-1098.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, R.B. (2002) Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. Avian Pathology 31: 317-353.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, R.B. and GOBBI, L. (2002) Comparison of an attenuated anticoccidial vaccine and an anticoccidial drug programme in commercial broiler chickens in Italy. Avian Pathology 31: 253-265.Google Scholar
ZHAI, Z., YI, I., WU, L., SENCHINA, D.S., WURTELE, E.S., MURPHY, P.A., KOHUT, M.L. and CUNNIK, J.E. (2007) Enhancement of innate and adaptive immune functions by multiple Echinacea species. Journal of Medicinal Food 10: 423-434.Google Scholar