Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:07:38.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation and quantification of prevalent risk factors for the introduction of avian influenza in European poultry farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

B.J. GRABKOWSKY  and
H.-W. WINDHORST
B.J. GRABKOWSKY*
Affiliation:
Lohmann Animal Health GmbH & Co. KG, Heinz-Lohmann-Strasse 4, 27472 Cuxhaven, Germany
H.-W. WINDHORST
Affiliation:
Institute of Spatial Analysis and Planning in Areas of Intensive Agriculture (ISPA), University of Vechta, Driverstrasse 22, 49377 Vechta, Germany
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The following review aims to gain more insight into farm management in European poultry farms, to identify prevalent risk factors for the introduction of avian influenza (AI) and to develop a procedure to assess a farms risk status. Data on farm management were gathered by using questionnaires and visitor books in 343 farms in Austria, Germany, and The Netherlands. In addition, the farmers documented private and production related visitors for 30 days in a logbook. To evaluate the results, an international expert panel defined and weighted the most important risk factors for AI introduction at farm level within a three-stage Delphi study. Based on this evaluation, all farms were assigned to three classes of risk. To communicate the results to the farmers as comprehensible as possible, a traffic-light scheme was used. The highest risk class represented poultry farms with a high potential for AIV introduction.

Keywords

Avian influenzarisk assessmentrisk factorsbiosecurityfarm managementdisease preventionpoultry
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 381 - 398
Copyright
World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BEKMAN, H. (2007) Controlled quality meat: The Dutch experience. Journal of Food Safety 18(4): 363-370.Google Scholar
BETTIO, M., MARANGON, S., FERRÈ, N. and MARTINI, M. (2003) A survey on cattle, pig and sheep herd characteristics in densely and sparsely populated livestock areas of the European Union. Final report on the FAIR project 5-CT97-3566, pp. 40-52, Brussels.Google Scholar
CAPUA, I. and ALEXANDER, D.J. (2004) Avian influenza: recent developments. Avian Pathology 33(4): 393-404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY (EFSA), (2005) Scientific report on animal health and welfare aspects of Avian Influenza. The EFSA Journal 266: 1-21.Google Scholar
EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY (EFSA), (2008) Animal health and welfare aspects of and the risk of its introduction into the EU poultry holdings. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. The EFSA Journal 715: 1-161.Google Scholar
GEENEN, P.L., LONGWORTH N. LIJFTOG, J.T., VAN HORNE, P. and FRANKENA, K. (2007) Contact structures of Dutch broiler and layer farms: an avian influenza perspective. Proceedings of the lustrum symposium of the Dutch and Flemish Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Wageningen, pp. 53-58.Google Scholar
GEENEN, P.L., GRABKOWSKY, B.J., SAATKAMP, H.W. and WINDHORST, H.-W. (2008) Explorative study on avian influenza risk factors in the EU-27: Literature study and expert opinion. Development of new integrated strategies for prevention, control, and monitoring of epizootic poultry diseases (Contract No. SSPE-CT-2004-513737 HEALTHY POULTRY). Final report for the European Commission [In press].Google Scholar
GRABKOWSKY, B., GEENEN, P.L., SAATKAMP, H. and WINDHORST, H-W. (2008) Qualitative GIS-based risk assessment of avian influenza introduction and spread in domesticated poultry in EU-27 regions. Development of new integrated strategies for prevention, control, and monitoring of epizootic poultry diseases (Contract No. SSPE-CT-2004-513737 HEALTHY POULTRY). Final report for the European Commission. [In press].Google Scholar
KORBEL, R. (2005) Aktuelles zur Geflügelinfluenza. Tierärztliche Praxis 33(G): 348-352.Google Scholar
MANNELLI, A., FERRÈ, N. and MARANGON, S. (2006) Analysis of the 1999-2000 highly pathogenic avian influenza (H7N1) epidemic in the main poultry-production area in Northern Italy. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 73: 273-285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
THOMAS, M.E., BOUMA, A., EKKER, H.M., FONKEN, A.J.M., STEGMAN, J.A. and NIELEN, M. (2005) Risk factors for the introduction and spread of high pathogenicity virus into poultry farms during the epidemic in the Netherlands in 2003. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 69: 1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TUMPEY, T.M., SUAREZ, D.L., PERKINS, L.E., SENNE, D.A., LEE, J., LEE, Y.J, MO, I.P., SUNG, H.W. and SWAYNE, D.E. (2003) Evaluation of a high-pathogenicity H5N1 avian Influenza A virus isolated from duck meat. Journal of Avian Diseases 47(3 Suppl): 951-955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VEAUTHIER, A. and WINDHORST, H.-W. (2008) Organisationsformen in der Erzeugung tierischer Nahrungsmittel – Eine vergleichende Analyse zwischen Niedersachsen und seinen bedeutendsten nationalen und internationalen Wettbewerbern. Weisse Reihe 31: Vechta.Google Scholar
WESTBURY, H.A., TURBER, A.J. and KOVESKY, L. (1979) : The patgogenicity of three Australian fowl plagues viruses for chickens, turkeys and ducks. Veterinary Microbiology 4: 223-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WINDHORST, H.-W. (2008) The time-spatial dynamics of global poultry meat production between 1970 and 2006 and perspectives for 2016. Zootecnica International 30(1): 16-31.Google Scholar