Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:58:01.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Gains in Annual Egg Production from Selection on Early Part-Records*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2017

B. B. Bohren
B. B. Bohren
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Get access

Extract

The use of early partial egg records as a selection criterion for improving annual egg production was proposed by Dempster and Lerner (1947). Their proposal was based on the contention of Dickerson and Hazel (1944) that genetic gain should be evaluated per unit of time, and that, under certain conditions, the genetic gain per unit of time could be increased by reducing the age of the parents.

Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 647 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Journal paper No. 4003, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Abplanalp, H. (1957). Genetic and environmental correlations among production traits of poultry. Poultry Sci. 36, 226–228.Google Scholar
Abplanalp, H., Lowry, D. C., Lerner, I. M. and Dempster, E. R. (1964). Selection for egg numbers with X-ray induced variation. Genetics 50, 1083–1100.Google Scholar
Abplanalp, H. (1970). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Andrews, L. D. (1966). Recurrent selection and genetic parameters of economic importance in the domestic fowl. PhD thesis. Univ. of Missouri.Google Scholar
Binet, F. E. (1965). On the construction of an index for indirect selection. Biometrics 21, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohren, B. B., Hill, W. G. and Robertson, A. (1966). Some observations on asymetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. 7. 44–57.Google Scholar
Bohren, B. B., Kinney, T. B., Wilson, S. P. and Lowe, P. C. (1970). Genetic gains in annual egg production from selection on part record percent production in the fowl. Genetics (submitted)Google Scholar
Caceres, O. (1967). Accelerated selection for hen-housed egg production and correlated responses in White Leghorns (Gallus Domesticus). PhD Thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. A. and Robertson, A. (1966). Genetics of changes in economic traits during the laying year. British Poultry Sci. 7, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. V., Biswas, D. K. and Saadeh, H. K. (1969). Genetic variation and correlated responses in chickens selected for part-year rate of lay. Poultry Sci. 48, 1288–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, E. R. and Lerner, I. M. (1947). The optimum structure of breeding flocks 1. Rate of genetic improvement under different breeding plans. Genetics 32, 555–566.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. and Hazel, L. N. (1944). Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in livestock. J. Agr. Res. 69. 459–476.Google Scholar
Eisen, E. J., Bohren, B. B. and McKean, H. E. (1963). Source and age of pullets and storage of eggs as factors affecting Haugh Unit measurements. British Poul. Sci. 4, 123–146.Google Scholar
Erasmus, J. E. (1962). Part period selection for egg production. Proc. 12th World Poultry Congress, Sydney. Sect. papers, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Gowe, R. S. and Strain, J. H. (1963). Effect of selection for increased egg production based on part-year records in two strains of White Leghorns. Canad. Jour. of Genetics and Cytol. 5, 99–100 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Hale, R. W. and Clayton, G. A. (1965). A diallele crossing experiment with two breeds of laying fowl. British Poultry Sci. 6, 153–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, A. F. (1963). A study of egg mass and biomass and of their components in S. C. White Leghorns. Poultry Sci. 42, 1277 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Kempthorne, O. and Nordskog, A. W. (1959). Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15, 10–19.Google Scholar
King, S. C., Carson, J. R. and Doolittle, D. P. (1959). The Connecticut and Cornell Random-bred populations of chickens. World's Poultry Sci. J. 15, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, T. B. (1969). A summary of reported estimates of heritabilities and of genetic and phenotypic correlations for traits of chickens. U.S.D.A.-A.R.S. Agriculture handbook 363.Google Scholar
Kinney, T. B., Bohren, B. B., Craig, J. V. and Lowe, P. C. (1970). Responses to selection for short term rate of egg production by individual, family or index selection. Poultry Science (In press).Google Scholar
Kraszewska-DOMANSKA, B. (1959). Investigation of the winter egg-laying rate. Part 1. Coefficient of correlation between the yearly egg-laying rate and the egg-laying rate in each part of the year. Ann. Univ. M. Curie-Sklodowska. Section E, 15, 283–295. (English Summary).Google Scholar
Kraszewska-Domanska, B. (1962a). Correlation between initial egg production and the production of the remaining months of the laying year in pullets. Bul. de l'Academie des Sci. Serie des Sciences Biologiques. 10, 443–446. (In English).Google Scholar
Kraszewska-Domanska, B. (1962b). An investigation into the initial egg-laying period as a criterion of selection among pullets. Ann. Univ. M. Curie-Sklodowska. Section E, 17, 303–322. (English Summary).Google Scholar
Kraszewska-Domanska, B. (1963). Investigations on the correlation between the hens' initial egg-laying rate and the remaining part of their annual egg production. Rocznicki Nauk Poln. Section B, 82, 375–387. (English Summary).Google Scholar
Kraszewska-Domanska, B. (1964) Evaluation of the genetic effectiveness of selection based on initial egg production. Wyzsza Szkola Rolnicza w Lublinie, Wydzial Zootechniczny, 57 pages. (In Polish).Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. and Cruden, D. M. (1948). The heritability of accumulative monthly and annual egg production. Poultry Sci. 27, 57–78.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. and Dempster, E. R. (1956). An empirical test of part-record selection for egg production. Poultry Sci. 35, 1349–1355.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. E. (1954). The use of partial records in poultry selection. Proc. British Soc. Anim. Prod. pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
Morris, J. A. (1956). Genetic parameters associated with characters affecting egg production in the domestic fowl. II Heritability of egg production for two part-annual periods of measurement and the genetic correlation between them. Aust. Jour. Agr. Res. 7, 630–639.Google Scholar
Morris, J. A. (1963). Continuous selection for egg production using short-term records. Aust. Jour. Agr. Res. 14, 909–925.Google Scholar
Morris, J. A. (1964). The usefulness of early records as selection criteria. Proc. 1964 Australian Poultry Science Convention. pages 7–11.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W. (1970). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., Festing, M. and Verghese, M. W. (1967). Selection for egg production and correlated responses in the fowl. Genetics 55, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, M. M., Bohren, B. B. and Anderson, V. L. (1957). Heritability and selection efficiency of several measures of egg production. Poultry Sci. 36, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saadeh, H. K., Craig, J. V., Smith, L. T. and Wearden, S. (1968). Effectiveness of alternative breeding systems for increasing rate of egg production in chickens. Poultry Sci. 4, 1057–1072.Google Scholar
Turner, H. T. (1958). Relationship among clean wool weight and its components. I. Changes in clean wool weight related to change in the components. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 521–.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. and Doolittle, D. P. (1964). Genetic parameters of monthly egg production in the Cornell Controls. Poultry Sci. 43, 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, F. J., Hunton, P. and Maddison, A. E. (1962). Genetics of a closed Poultry Flock. Variance and covariance analysis of egg production, egg weight and egg mass. British Poultry Sci. 3, 151–159.Google Scholar