Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:21:28.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examining the nutritional and production characteristics of egg-farms in Basmakci County in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

S. Yasar*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey
H. Orhan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey
C. Erensayin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The first attempts in producing table-eggs for the Turkish market on commercial egg farms were initiated in Basmakci County in 1974. Since then farmers have started to produce table-eggs through their own efforts, and as a result of rapid development Basmakci is now the main egg-centre of Turkey. However, there have been several factors having negative impacts on egg production in the region. This study involved investigations into the nutritional and husbandry characteristics of egg production. The present work outlines the structure of egg production along with the present problems of management, nutrition and environment. Egg production for Basmakci's producers can be considered as a secondary commercial activity within the farm enterprise. The producers have set up the Association of Basmakci Egg Producers (ABEP) to deal with the problems of supplying the laying stock and marketing the eggs. However, some important problems were encountered in the form of egg production drops during the course of the present investigation. The older conventional cage systems (A-type and California type) are still preferred by the farmers. Leading international commercial breeds of laying hens have been imported for egg production, but field tests of these breeds have not yet been carried out by the commercial breeding companies under local conditions. Neither laying house environmental conditions nor least-cost feed formulation were found to be well controlled in interests of optimum egg production. The producers failed to keep continuous and meaningful production records, and this causes difficulties in implementing different feeding programmes and management solutions. Manure management and other health-related issues are still being ignored. However, in order to improve the production level we suggest that poultry extension works should be established here with the strong collaboration between the universities, Egg Association, breeding companies and the Agricultural Ministry

Type
Regional Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Akman, M.K. (2000) Poultry meat and egg production in Turkey: Solutions to the problems associated with the consumption and import of poultry products. Turkish Poultry Magazine 195: 1926.Google Scholar
Erensayin, C. (2000) Scientific, technique and practical poultry production: Egg production. Nobel Publications. Volume 2, Kizilay, Ankara, pp472.Google Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1997) Commercial Poultry Production, second edition. University Books, P.O. Box 1326, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, pp197.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.D. and Morris, T.R. (1998) Responses of domestic poultry to various light sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 54: 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portella, F.J., Caston, L.J. and Leeson, S. (1988) Apparent feed particle size preference by laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68: 915922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, J.L., Scheideler, S.E. and Rahn, B.E. (1987) Influence of different phosphorous phase-feeding programs and dietary calcium level on performance and body phosphorus of laying hens. Poultry Science 66: 15241530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SPSS for Windows (1999) Release 10.0.1. Standard version. SPSS inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar