Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:50:10.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Environment and Problems in Selection for Disease Resistance in the Fowl*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Kenneth Goodwin
Kenneth Goodwin
Affiliation:
Heisdorf & Nelson Farms, Inc., Kirkland, Wash., U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1966 , pp. 299 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Abplanalp, H., Marrou, L. F., and Goto, E. 1962. Genotype-environment interaction in laying tests of poultry. Poultry Sci. 41: 927–936.Google Scholar
2.Biggs, P. M. 1964. The avian leukosis complex. World's Poult. Sci. J. 20: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Biggs, P. M. and Payne, L. N. 1964. The relationship of Marek's disease (Neural lym homatosis) to lymphoid leukosis. Intern Conf. Avian tumor viruses, Monograph No. 17 Nat. Cancer Inst. pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
4.Carson, J. R. 1951. Exposure to disease agents of strains of chickens differing in resistance to leukosis. Poultry Sci. 30: 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chang, S. S. and Hildemann, W. H. 1964. Inheritance of susceptibility to polyoma Virus in mice. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 33: 303–313.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Cole, R. K. 1964. Strain differences in response to the JM leukosis virus. Poultry Sci. 43: 1308–1309.Google Scholar
7.Crittenden, L. B., Okazaki, W., and Reamer, R. H. 1964. Genetic control of responses to Rous sarcoma and strain RPL-12 viruses in the cells, embryos and chickens of two inbredlines. Intern. Conf. Avain Turnor Viruses, Monograph No. 17, Nat'l Cancer Inst. pp. 161–177.Google Scholar
8.Crittenden, L. B. 1966. Personal communication.Google Scholar
9.Dickerson, G. E. 1962. Implications of genetic-environmental interaction in animal breeding. Animal Prod. 4: 47–64.Google Scholar
10.Goodwin, K., Dickerson, G. E., Lamoreux, W. F., Schaaf, K., and Urban, W. D. 1956. The role of heterosis in resistance to respiratory lesions in the fowl. Poultry Sci. 35: 915–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Greenwood, A. W., Blythe, J. S. S., and Carr, J. G. 1948. Indications of the heritable nature of non-susceptibility to Rous sarcoma in fowls. Brit. J. Cancer 2: 135–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hanafusa, H., Hanasa, T., and Rubin, H. 1963. The defectiveness of Rous Sarcoma virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 49: 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Heisdorf, A. J., Brewer, N. R., and Lamoreux, W. F. 1947. The genetic relationship between mortality from induced and spontaneous lymphomatosis. Poultry Sci. 26: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hughes, W. F. and Watanabe, D. H. 1963. The development of a chicken flock apparently free of leukosis virus. Avian Dis. 7: 154–165.Google Scholar
15.Hull, P., and Gowe, R. S. 1962. The importance of interactions detected between genotype and environmental factors for characters of economic significance in poultry. Genetics 47: 143–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Hutt, F. B., and Cole, R. K. 1952. Heterosis in an interstrain cross of White Leghorns. Poultry Sci. 31: 365–374.Google Scholar
17.Hutt, F. B. and Cole, R. K. 1953. The interaction of genetic and environmental influences affecting the incidence of avian leukosis. Science 117: 695–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hutt, F. B. 1958. “Genetic Resistance to Disease in Domestic Animals”. Cornell Univ. Press, Itdaca, N.Y., 198pp.Google Scholar
19.Hutt, F. B. and Crawford, R. D. 1960. On breeding chicks resistant to pullorum disease without exposure thereto. Can. J. Gen. and Cytol. 2: 357–370.Google Scholar
20.Hutt, F. B. 1961. Genetic variation in the utilization of riboflavin, thiamine, and other nutrients, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 91: 659–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Hutt, F. B. 1961a. Identification and elimination of defects in animals. In “Germ Plasm Resources” published by AAAS. pp. 355–369.Google Scholar
22.Kantoch, M., Warick, A., and Bang, F. B. 1963. The cellular nature of genetic susceptibility to a virus. J. Exp. Med. 117: 781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.King, S. C. and Henderson, C. R. 1954. Heritability studies of egg production in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 33: 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Lerner, I. M. 1950. “Population Genetics and Animal Improvement”, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
25.Levine, S. and Nelsen, D. 1964. RIF infection in a commercial flock of chickens. Avian Dis. 8: 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Lindenmann, J. 1964. Inheritance of resistance to influenza virus in mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 116: 506–509.Google Scholar
27.Little, C. C. 1954. Genetics, Biological Individuality, and Cancer. Lane Medical lectures. Stanford Univ. Publications, Medical Science 7: 115 pp.Google Scholar
28.Lush, J. L., Lamoreux, W. F. and Hazel, L. N. 1948. The heritability of resistance to death in the fowl. Poultry Sci. 27: 375–388.Google Scholar
29.Mac Laury, D. W. and Nordskog, A. W. 1956. Effects of inbreeding on mortality in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 35: 582–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Nordskog, A. W. and Kempthorne, O. 1960. Importance of genotype-environment interactions in random sample poultry tests. “Biometrical Genetics”. pp. 159–168. Pergamon Press, London. Kempthorne, O., editor.Google Scholar
31.Payne, L. N. and Biggs, P. M. 1964. Differences between highly inbred lines of chickens in the response to Rous sarcoma virus of the chorioallantoic membrane and of embryonic cells in tissue culture. Virology 24: 610–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Prince, A. M. 1958. Quantitative studies on Rous sarcoma virus. II. Mechanism of resistance of chick embryos to chorioallantoic inoculation of Rous sarcoma virus. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 20: 843–850.Google ScholarPubMed
33.Rubin, H. 1960. A virus in chick embryos which induces resistance in vitro to infection with Rous sarcoma virus. Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. U.S. 46: 1105–1119.Google Scholar
34.Rubin, H. 1962. Response of cell and organism to infection with avian tumor viruses. Bact. Review 26: 1–13.Google Scholar
35.Rubin, H. 1965. Genetic control of cellular susceptibility to pseudotypes of Rous sarcoma virus. Virology 26: 270–276.Google Scholar
36.Sevoian, M., Chamberlain, D. M., and Counter, F. T. 1962. Avian lymphonatosis. J. Experimental reproduction of the neural and ocular forms. Vet. Med. 57: 500.Google Scholar
37.Vogt, P. K. and Ishizaki, R. 1965. Reciprocal patterns of genetic resistance to avian tumor viruses in two lines of chickens. Virology 26: 664–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Vogt, P. K. 1966. Personal communication.Google Scholar
39.Von Krosigk, M. 1962. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
40.Waters, N. F., Burmester, B. R., and Walter, W. G. 1958. Genetics of experimentally induced erythroblastosis in chickens. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 20: 1245–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Waters, N. F. and Burmester, B. R. 1961. Mode of inheritance of resistance to Rous sarcoma virus in chickens. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 27: 655–661.Google Scholar