Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:57:49.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Infectious Diseases in Large-Scale Poultry Breeding and Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

J. F. Mészáros
Affiliation:
Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 1581 P. O. Box 18, Hungary.
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, W. H. and Borland, L. J. (1980). A comparison of the immune response and respiratory stress effect of three clone sizes of virus and three ranges of aerosol particle size using the lentogenic Newcastle disease vaccine strain AG68L. Avian Pathology, 9: 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagust, T. J., Grimes, T. M. and Dennett, D. P. (1979). Infection studies on a reticuloendotheliosis virus contaminant of a commercial Marek's disease vaccine. Australian veterinary Journal, 55: 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, R. F. and Lyman, J. F. (1977). Revaccination of chicks for Marek's disease at twenty-one days old. Avian Diseases, 21: 440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxendale, W. (1976). The development of an apathogenic infectious bursal agent vaccine: field trials results. Proceedings of 25th Western Poultry Diseases Conference,Davis, California, 4245 p.Google Scholar
Baxendale, W. (1978). Egg Drop Syndrome '76. Veterinary Record, 102: 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxendale, W., Lutticken, D., Hein, R. and McPherson, I. (1980). The results of field trials conducted with an inactivated vaccine against the egg drop syndrome '76(EDS '76). Avian Pathology, 9: 77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxendale, W. and Lutticken, D. (1981). Proceedings of International Symposium of Aviculture,Lyon, France,June 1981.Google Scholar
Bennejean, G., Guittet, M., Picault, J. P., Bouquet, J. F., Devaux, B., Gaudry, D. and Moreau, Y. (1978). Vaccination of one-day-old chicks against Newcastle disease using inactivated oil adjuvant vaccine and/or live vaccine. Avian Pathology, 7: 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beresford, A. V., Roberts, B. and Robertson, W. W. (1981). Immune responses to combined inactivated emulsion vaccine against infectious bronchitis and Newcastle disease. VIIth International Congress of the World Veterinary Poultry Association,Oslo,July 1-3, 1981 43 p.Google Scholar
Bhatia, T. R. S. and McNabb, G. D. (1980). Dissemination of Salmonella in broiler-chicken operations. Avian Diseases, 24: 616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biggs, P. M. and Milne, B. S. (1972). Biological properties of a number of Marek's disease virus isolates. In: Oncogenesis and Herpesviruses by Biggs, P. M. et al. I. A. R. C. No. 2. pp. 8894 (IARC Lyon).Google Scholar
Bolder, N. M., Van Der Hulst, M. C. and Mulder, R. W. A. W. (1980). Salmonellae in broiler chicks. 6th European Poultry Conference,Hamburg,Sept. 8-12, 1980. Vol. 2. pp. 271279.Google Scholar
Box, P. G., Beresford, A. V. and Roberts, B. (1980). Protection of laying hens against infectious bronchitis with inactivated emulsion vaccines. Veterinary Record, 106: 264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box, P. G., Beresford, A. V. and Roberts, B. (1981). Immune responses of chickens to IB vaccine. Veterinary Record, 108: 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briles, W. E., Stone, H. A. and Cole, R. K. (1977). Marek's disease: effects of B histocompatibility alloalleles in resistant and susceptible chicken lines. Journal National Cancer Institute, 50: 1287.Google Scholar
Churchill, A. E., Payne, L. N. and Chubb, R. C. (1969). Immunization against Marek's disease using a live attenuated virus. Nature, London, 221: 744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crighton, G. W. and Woolcock, P. R. (1978). Active immunization of ducklings against duck virus hepatitis. Veterinary Record, 102: 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darbyshire, J. H. (1980). Assessment of cross-immunity in chickens to strains of avian infectious bronchitis virus using organ cultures. Avian Pathology, 9: 179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darbyshire, J. H. and Peters, R. W. (1980). Studies on EDS '76 virus infection in laying chickens. Avian Pathology, 9: 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davelaar, F. G. and Kouwenhoven, B. (1980a). Effect of the removal of the Harderian gland in 1-day-old chicks on immunity following IB vaccination. Avian Pathology, 9: 489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davelaar, F. G. and Kouwenhoven, B. (1980b). Vaccination of 1-day-old broilers against infectious bronchitis by eye-drop application or coarse droplet spray and the effect of revaccination by spray. Avian Pathology, 9: 499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eidson, C. S. and Kleven, S. H. (1980). Vaccination of chickens with clone-selected Lasota strain of Newcastle disease virus. Poultry Science, 59: 976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eidson, C. S., Villegas, P. and Kleven, S. A. (1980). Field trials with an oil emulsion Newcastle disease vaccine in broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 59: 702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eidson, C. S., Page, R. K. and Kleven, S. A. (1978). Effectiveness of cell-free or cell-associated turkey herpesvirus vaccine against Marek's disease in chickens as influenced by maternal antibody, vaccine dose, and time of exposure to Marek's disease virus. Avian Diseases. 22: 583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredericksen, T. L., Longenecker, B. M. Pazderka, F. Gilmour, D. G. and Ruth, R. F. (1977). A T-cell antigen system of chickens: Ly-4 and Marek's disease. Immunogenetics, 5: 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, G., Moffat, R. and Mukkur, T. K. S. (1977). Fowl cholera: Immunization of chickens with potassium thiocyanate (KSCN) extract of pasteurella multocida serotype 3. Avian Diseases, 21: 543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, R. E., Allan, W. H. and Nedelcin, D. (1977). Immune response to monovalent and bivalent Newcastle disease and infectious bronchitis inactivated vaccines. Avian Pathology, 6: 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, R. E. and Spackman, D. (1981). Studies with inactivated duck virus hepatitis vaccines in breeder ducks. Avian Pathology, 10: 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, R. E., Wyeth, P. J. and Bracewell, D. C. (1981). Immune response of breeding chickens to trivalent oil emulsion vaccines: responses to infectious bronchtis. Veterinary Record, 108: 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, S. A. and Calnek, B. W. (1979). In vitro isolation, propagation, and characterization of duck hepatitis virus type III. Avian Diseases, 23: 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heddleston, K. L., Rebers, P. A. and Wessman, G. (1975). Fowl cholera: Immunologic and serologic response in turkeys to live Pasteurella multocida vaccine administered in the drinking water. Poultry Science, 54: 217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstad, M. S. (1981). Cross-immunity in chicks using seven isolates of avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Diseases, 25: 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J. (1964). Duck plague (a concise survey). Indian Veterinary Journal, 41: 309.Google Scholar
Kawamura, H., Wakabayshi, T., Yamaguchi, S., Taniguchi, T., Takayangi, N., Sato, S., Sekiya, S. and Horiuchi, T. (1976). Inoculation experiment of Marek's disease vaccine contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus. National Institute Animal Health Quarterly, Japan, 16: 135.Google ScholarPubMed
King, D., Page, D. Schat, K. A. and Calnek, B. W. (1981). Difference between influences of homologous and heterologous maternal antibodies on response to serotype-2 and serotype-3 Marek's disease vaccines. Avian Diseases, 25: 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kisary, J. and Mészáros, J. (1977). Vaccination trials against Derzsy's disease (goose influenza). II. Laboratory and field trials. (in Hungarian). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 32: 788.Google Scholar
Kisary, J. and Meszáros, J. (1977). Effect of time of serum treatment on the efficacy of protection against Derzsy's disease (goose influenza). (in Hungarian). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 32: 795.Google Scholar
Kisary, J., Derzsy, D. and Mészáros, J. (1978). Attenuation of the goose parvovirus strain B1. Laboratory and field trials of the attenuated mutant for vaccination against Derzsy's disease. Avian Pathology, 7: 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konobe, T. T., Ishikawa, T. Takahu, U. Ikuta, K. Kitamoto, N. and Kato, S. (1979). Marek's disease virus and herpesvirus of turkeys non-infective to chickens, obtained in in vitro passages. Biken Journal, 22: 103.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. E. (1981). The control of Newcastle Disease, World's Poultry Science Journal, 37: 84.Google Scholar
Landgraf, H. and Vielitz, E. (1972). Versuche zur Immunisierung von Hühnerküken gegen atypische Geflügelpest (Newcastle-Krankheit). Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 79: 493.Google Scholar
Lindgren, N. O. and Sandstedt, K. (1980). An evaluation of an avian salmonellosis control program in Sweden. Proceedings 6th European Poultry Conference(Sept. 8-12, 1980,)(Hamburg), vol. I. 196.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, M. and Helfer, D. H. (1977). A bacterin against fowl cholera in turkeys: protective quality of various preparations originated from broth cultures. Avian Diseases, 21: 382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFerran, J. B., Rowley, H. M. McNulty, M. S. and Montgomery, J. (1977). Serological studies on flocks showing depressed egg production. Avian Pathology, 6: 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFerran, J. B., McCracken, R. M. McKillop, E. R., McNulty, M. S. and Collins, D. S. (1978). Studies on a depressed egg production syndrome in Northern Ireland. Avian Pathology, 7: 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, A., Glier, E. Konshtok, K., Hertmann, I. and Markenson, J. (1979). Attenuated live fowl cholera vaccine. III. Laboratory and field vaccination trials in turkeys and chickens. Avian Diseases, 23: 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnar, I. (1981). Immunization trials against fowl cholera. (In Hungarian). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 36: 415.Google Scholar
Mulder, R. W. A. W. (1980). Control of Salmonellae in poultry feed. Proceedings 6th European Poultry Conference(8-12 Sept. 1980,)(Hamburg), vol. I. pp. 181192.Google Scholar
Muskett, J. C., Hopkins, I. G. Edwards, K. R. and Thornton, D. H. (1979). Comparison of two infectious bursal disease vaccine strains: efficacy and potential hazards in susceptible and maternally immune birds. Veterinary Record, 104: 332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naqui, S. A., Millar, D. L. and Grumbles, L. C. (1980). An evaluation of three commercially available infectious bursal disease vaccines. Avian Diseases, 24: 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, R. M., Hofstad, M. S. and Jeska, E. L. (1981). Cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression demonstrated in Pasteurella multocida-vaccinated chickens. Avian Diseases, 25: 218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurmi, E. (1980). The effect of anaerobic intestinal flora in the prevention and treatment of salmonella infections in broilers and Finnish experiences of the salmonella control methods. Proceedings 6th European Poultry Conference(8-12 Sept. 1980),(Hamburg) vol. I. pp. 183191.Google Scholar
Nurmi, E. and Rantala, M. (1973). New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature (London). 241: 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patrascu, I. V., Calnek, B. W. and Smith, M. W. (1972). Vaccination with lyophilized turkey herpesvirus (HVT): minimum infective and protective doses. Avian Diseases, 16: 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. M. (1973). Vaccination against Newcstle disease: an assessment of haemagglutination inhibition titres obtained from field samples. Veterinary Record, 93: 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebers, P. A. and Heddleston, K. L. (1974). Immunological comparison of Westphal-type lipopolysaccharides and free endotoxins from encapsulated and noncapsulated avian strain of Pasteurella multocida. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 35: 355.Google Scholar
Rispens, B. H., Van Floeten, H., Mastenbroek, N., Maas, H. J. L. And Schat, K. A. (1972). Control of Marek's disease in the Netherlands. II. Field trials on vaccination with an avirulent strain (CVI 988) of Marek's disease virus. Avian Diseases, 16: 126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, W. W. (1981). Use of live and oil emulsion Newcastle disease vaccines on day-old broilers: report on two trials. Veterinary Record, 109: 422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, W. W., Warden, D. and Furminger, I. G. S. (1976). Field evaluation of Newcastle disease immunization by concurrent inactivated oil-emulsion and live B1 vaccines. Veterinary Record, 98: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siemensen, E. and Olson, L. D. (1980). Influence of Pasteurella multocida and high and low environmental temperatures on adrenals and bursa of Fabricius in turkeys.Avian Diseases, 24: 844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeeles, J. K., Lukert, P. D. and Davis, R. B. (1976). Vaccination of maternally immune chickens with an attenuated infectious bursal disease vaccine. Conference Research Workers in Animal Disease,Chicago, 1976.Google Scholar
Skeeles, J. K., Lukert, P. D., Fletcher, O. J. and Leonard, J. D. (1979). Immunization studies with a cell-culture adapted infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Diseases, 23: 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. W. and Calnek, B. W. (1974). Comparative features of low-virulence and high-virulence Marek's disease virus infections. Avian Pathology, 3: 229.Google ScholarPubMed
Spencer, J. L., Grunder, A. A., Robertson, A. and Speckmann, G.W (1972). Attenuated Marek's disease herpesvirus: protection conferred on strains of chickens varying in genetic resistance. Avian Diseases, 16: 94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toth, T. E. (1969). Studies of an agent causing mortality among ducklings immune to duck hepatitis 1969. Avian Diseases, 13: 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Heide, L., Kalbac, H. and Hall, W. C. (1976). Infectious tenosynovitis (vital arthritis): influence of maternal antibodies on the development of tenosynovitis lesions after experimental infection of day-old chickens with tenosynovitis virus. Avian Diseases, 20: 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Heide, L. and Page, R. K. (1980). Field experiments with viral arthritis (tenosynovitis) vaccination of breeder chickens. Avian Diseases, 24: 493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warden, D., Furminger, I. G. S. and Robertson, W. W. (1975). Immunizing chicks against Newcastle disease by concurrent inactivated oil-emulsion and live B1 vaccines. Veterinary Record. 96: 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. E. (1981). Salmonellas in poultry feeds—a worldwide review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 37: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterfield, R. W. and Thacker, H. L. (1978). Immune response and pathogenicity of different strains of infectious bursal disease virus applied as vaccines. Avian Diseases, 22: 721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winterfield, R. W., Dhillon, A. S., Thacker, H. L. and Alby, L. J. (1980). Immune response of White Leghorn chicks from vaccination with different strains of infectious bursal disease virus and in the presence of maternal antibodies. Avian Diseases, 24: 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witter, R. L. and Fadly, A. M. (1978). Characteristics of some selected Marek's disease virus field isolates. Proceedings European Economic Community Symposium, on Resistance and Immunity to Marek's Disease.Berlin, West Germany, 181194.Google Scholar
Witter, R. L. and Linda, Offenbecker (1979). Nonprotective and temperature-sensitive variants of Marek's disease vaccine viruses. Journal National Cancer Institute, 62: 143.Google ScholarPubMed
Witter, R. L., Sharma, J. M. and Fadly, A. M. (1980). Pathogenicity of variant Marek's disease virus isolants in vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens. Avian Diseases, 24: 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. W., Muscett, J. C. and Thornton, D. H. (1981). The interaction of live vaccine and maternal antibody in protection against infectious bursal disease. Avian Pathology, 10: 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, G. W. and Thornton, D. H. (1981). Experimental infection of broiler chickens with an avian reovirus Journal of Comparative Pathology, 91: 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolcock, P. R. and Crighton, G. W. (1981). Duck virus hepatitis: the effect of attenuation on virus stability in ducklings. Avian Pathology, 10:113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyeth, P. J. (1980). Passively transferred immunity to IBD following live vaccination of parent chickens by two different routes. Veterinary Record, 106: 289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyeth, P. J. and Cullen, G. A. (1978). Susceptibility of chicks to infectious bursal disease (IBD) following vaccination of their parents with live IBD vaccine, Veterinary Record, 103: 281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyeth, P. J. and Cullen, G. A. (1979). The use of an inactivated infectious bursal disease oil emulsion vaccine in commercial broiler parent chickens. Veterinary Record, 104: 188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyeth, P. J., Gough, R. E. and Cullen, G. A. (1981). Immune responses of breeding chickens to trivalent oil emulsion vaccines: responses to Newcastle disease and infectious bursal disease. Veterinary Record. 108: 72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyeth, P. J., O'Brien, J. D. P. and Cullen, G. A. (1981). Improved performance of progeny of broiler parent chickens vaccinated with infectious bursal disease oil-emulsion vaccine. Avian Diseases, 25: 228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yadin, H. (1980). Aerosol vaccination against Newcastle disease: virus inhalation and retention during vaccination. Avian Pathology, 9: 163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuasa, N., Yoshida, T. and Taniguchi, T. (1976). Isolation of reticulo-endotheliosis virus from chicken inoculated with Marek's disease vaccine. National Institute Animal Health Quarterly, 16: 141.Google Scholar
Zygraich, N., Vascoboina, E. and Berge, E. (1973). The use of a combined vaccine against Newcastle disease and infectious bronchitis. Veterinary Record, 93: 516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed