Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:30:02.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding for Efficiency of Egg Production*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

A. W. Nordskog ,
H. L. French Jnr. ,
C. R. Arboleda  and
D. W. Casey
A. W. Nordskog
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
H. L. French Jnr.
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
C. R. Arboleda
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
D. W. Casey
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 175 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arboleda, C. R., 1971. Economic feasibility of measuring feed consumption in a poultry breeding operation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.Google Scholar
Arboleda, C. R., Nordskog, A. W. and Harris, D. L., 1971. Economic feasibility of measuring feed consumption in a poultry breeding operation. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1546.Google Scholar
Balloun, S. L. and Speers, G. M., 1969. Protein requirements of laying hens as affected by strain. Poultry Sci. 48(4): 1175–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begin, J. J., 1967. The relation of breed and sex of chickens to the utilization of energy. Poultry Sci. 46: 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begin, J. J., 1968. A comparison of the ability of the Japanese quail and light breed chicken to metabolize and utilize energy. Poultry Sci. 47(4): 1278–1280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernier, P. E. and Arscott, G. H., 1960. Relative efficiency of sex-linked dwarf layers and their normal sisters (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 39: 1234.Google Scholar
Bernier, P. E. and Arscott, G. H., 1966. Growth and feed requirements of dwarf White Leghorn pullets as compared to their normal-sized sisters (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 45: 1070.Google Scholar
Bird, S. and Sinclair, J. W., 1939. Economic aspects of poultry keeping in Canada with special reference to egg production. Sci. Agr. 19: 551–564.Google Scholar
Brody, S., 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Rheinhold Publishing Corp., New York.Google Scholar
Brody, S., Funk, E. M. and Kempster, H. L., 1938. Growth and development: XLIV Energetic efficiency of egg production and the influence of live weight thereon. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 278.Google Scholar
Byerly, T. C., 1967. Efficiency of feed conversion. Science 157: 890–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byerly, T. C., 1941. Feed and other costs of producing market eggs. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. Al.Google Scholar
Calverly, C. E., Palmer, L. S. and Kennedy, C., 1946. Genetic differences in the biochemistry and physiology influencing food utilization for growth in rats. I. Balance of nitrogen and energy during growth and carcass composition of two strains of rats differing in efficiency of food utilization. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 176: 1–28.Google Scholar
Casey, D. W., 1970. Estimation of performance efficiency in the laying hen. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.Google Scholar
Casey, D. W. and Nordskog, A. W., 1971. Genetic variability and predicted selection responses for egg production efficiency. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1562.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. and Grimes, J. C., 1947. Effectiveness of selection for efficiency of gain in Duroc swine. J. of Anim. Sci. 6: 265–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, H. H., 1937. Studies on energy metabolism of the hen. J. of Nutr. 14: 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, T. W. and Bohren, B. B., 1954. An analysis of feed efficiency among breeds of chickens and its relationship to rate of growth. Poultry Sci. 33: 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, B. M., 1963. The gaseous metabolism of the domestic chicken. III. The oxygen requirements of the chicken during the period of rapid growth. Brit. Poultry Sci. 4: 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, H. L., Nordskog, A. W. and Balloun, S. L., 1967. Comparison of feed consumption for body maintenance of cocks with hens. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 46: 1260.Google Scholar
French, H. L., 1969. Differences in feed efficiency between Leghorn lines selected for large and small body size. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.Google Scholar
French, H. L., 1971. Importance of major gene effects on quantitative traits in the fowl. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.Google Scholar
French, H. L., and Nordskog, A. W., 1971. Feed conversion of dwarf chickens compared to normal small-bodied chickens. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1577.Google Scholar
Glazener, E. W., and Jull, M. A., 1946. Feed utilization in growing chickens in relation to shank length. Poultry Sci. 25: 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, J., 1969. Consequences de I'introduction du gene de nanisme dw sur l'utilization alimentaire chez le poussin femelle. Annals de Biologie, Animale, Biochemie, Biophysique 9: 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, C. W., Byerly, T. C. and Jull, M. A., 1941. The efficiency of feed utilization by Barred Plymouth Rock and crossbred broilers. Poultry Sci. 20: 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, C. W. and Jull, M. A., 1948. A study of the inheritance of feed utilization efficiency in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 27: 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, B. C., Shaffner, C. S. and Jull, M. A., 1949. Efficiency of feed utilization in relation to body weight and egg production. Poultry Sci. 28: 301–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M., 1932. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardie 6: 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M., 1947. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27: 511–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, M., 1950. Physiological meaning of regression equations. J. of Appl. Physiol. 2: 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M., 1961. The Fire of Life—an introduction to animal energetics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Knapp, B., and Baker, A. L., 1944. Correlation between rate and efficiency of gain in steers. J. of Anim. Sci. 3: 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M., Swiger, L. A., Chambers, D. and Gregory, K. E., 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. of Anim. Sci. 22(2): 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondra, P. A., and Hodgson, G. C., 1961. Genetic differences in energy protein requirements of chicks. Poultry Sci. 40: 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, A. T. Jr., Siegel, P. B. and Siegel, H. S., 1966. Body weight and surface area of chickens (Gallus domesticus). Growth 30: 229–239.Google ScholarPubMed
Magee, W.T., 1962. Relationship between daily feed consumption and feed efficiency. J. of Anim. Sci. 21: 880–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maijala, K., 1966. Repeatabilities and correlations of economic traits in the Finnish random sample egg-laying test. Ann. Agr. Fenn. 5: 48–63.Google Scholar
McCartney, M. G. and Jull, M. A., 1948. Efficiency of feed utilization in New Hampshires to ten weeks. Poultry Sci. 27: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, N. H., and Foster, W. H., 1969. The relatioionship between financial margin and biological traits for nationally and internationally known entries in the 4th and 5th Gosford, R.S. tests. Brit. Poultry J. 10: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellen, W. J., 1963. Body size and metabolic rate in the domestic fowl. Agr. Sci. Rev. 1: 20–26.Google Scholar
Merat, P., 1969. Etude d'un gene de nanisme lie au sexe chez la poule. 1. Description sommaire et performances. Annales de Genet. Selection Anim. 1: 19–26.Google Scholar
Miller, M. M. and Quisenberry, J. H., 1959. Factors affecting feed efficiency for egg production in selected strains of caged layers. Poultry Sci. 38: 757–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H., Card, L. E. and Haines, W. T., 1927. The effect of age, sex and castration on basal heat production of chickens. J. Agr. Res. 34: 945–960.Google Scholar
Mohammadian, M., 1969. Physiological effects of the sex-linked dwarfing gene, dw, in broilers (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 48: 1845.Google Scholar
Morris, H. P., Palmer, L. S. and Kennedy, C., 1933. Fundamental food requirements for the growth of the rat. VII. An experimental study of inheritance as a factor influencing food utilization in the rat. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 92.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., 1960. Importance of egg size and other factors in determining net income in random sample tests. Poultry Sci. 39: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., and Festing, M., 1962. Selection and correlated responses in the fowl. 12th World's Poultry Cong. Proc. 2: 25–29.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., French, H. L. and Balloun, S. L., 1969. Direct versus indirect estimation of feed efficiency as a measure of performance. Poultry Sci. 48: 1303–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perek, M., and Sulman, F., 1945. The basal metabolic rate in molting and laying hens. Endocrinology 36: 240–243.Google Scholar
Prod'homme, J., and Merat, P., 1969. Etude d'un gene de nanisme lie au sexe dhez la poule. III. Conteneur en calcium de la ration. Annales de Genet. Selection Anim. 1: 135–145.Google Scholar
Rahnefeld, G. W., Comstock, R. E., Boylan, W. J. and Singh, , 1965. Genetic correlation between growth rate and feed per unit gain in mice. J. of Anim. Sci. 24(4): 1061–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvarajah, R., Jerome, F. N., Summers, J. D. and Reinhart, B. S., 1970. Some effects on sex-linked dwarfism in layer-type fowls. Poultry Scil. 49: 1142–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slinger, S. J., Sibbald, I. R. and Pepper, W. F., 1964. The relative abilities of two breeds of chickens and two varieties of turkeys to metabolize dietary nitrogen. Poultry Sci. 43: 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturkie, P. D., 1965. Avian physiology. Second ed. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar