Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:49:34.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative feeding strategies and genetics for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

H.K. BURLEY ,
P.H. PATTERSON  and
K.E. ANDERSON
H.K. BURLEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
P.H. PATTERSON
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
K.E. ANDERSON
Affiliation:
Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Currently, synthetic methionine (Met) use in organic poultry diets in the United States is limited to 1, 1, and 1.5 kg per metric tonne of feed for laying hens, broilers, and turkeys and other poultry, respectively. This limitation, and the push to ban the use of synthetic Met entirely, makes it challenging to formulate diets to meet the requirements of these birds. Methionine levels can be maintained in organic poultry diets without synthetics by dramatic increases in dietary crude protein; however, the ramifications of such high crude protein intake are major increases in feed cost and environmental concerns due to increased nitrogen excretion, rises in ammonia emissions, and subsequent welfare issues. This review examines alternative bird genetics and feeding strategies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for synthetic Met in organic poultry diets. Alterative ‘heritage’ breeds may have lower Met needs as a percentage of the total diet; however, these birds have substantially slower growth and are less productive compared to typical commercial breeds. Feeding strategies that have been examined to reduce Met inclusion in the diet, such as allowing birds to forage, providing low Met density diets to encourage increased feed intake and subsequently make up for the Met deficiency, allowing birds to self select between energy-rich ingredients and protein concentrates to meet their Met needs by instinct, or supplementing methyl donors (betaine or choline) or inorganic sulphate, have been shown to make up for marginal Met deficiencies in some instances. However, there is no one solution to this issue that has been found thus far. A combination of genetics, feeding strategies, and alternative ingredients may provide the most favourable solution in the future.

Keywords

methionineorganicheritagelaying hensbroilersturkeys
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 168 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANDERSON, K.E. (2011) Single production cycle report of the thirty eighth North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test: Alternative Production Environments. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service 38: 1-43.Google Scholar
ATTIA, Y.A., HASSAN, R.A., SHEHATTA, M.H. and ABD EL-HADY, S.B. (2005) Growth, carcass quality and serum constituents of slow growing chicks as affected by betaine addition to diets containing two different levels of methionine. International Journal of Poultry Science 4: 856-865.Google Scholar
AVIAGEN (2009) Ross Broiler Nutrition Supplement. Aviagen (Scotland, UK).Google Scholar
BALUCH, K.J., PATTERSON, P.H., MAYER, A.M., ALP, M., BURLEY, H.K., TOOKER, J.F. and DOUGLAS, M.R. (2014) Feed intake and performance of pastured laying hens. Poultry Science 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 146.Google Scholar
BIZERAY, D., LETERRIER, C., CONSTANTIN, P., PICARD, M. and FAURE, J.M. (2000) Early locomotor behaviour in genetic stocks of chickens with different growth rates. Applied Animal Behavioral Science 68: 231-242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BLAIR, R. (2008) Nutrition and feeding of organic poultry. CABI, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BORNSTEIN, S. and PLAVNIK, Y. (1977) The sparing action of inorganic sulphate on sulphur amino acids in practical broiler diets: Preliminary trials with young chicks 1. British Poultry Science 18: 19-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUNCHASAK, C. (2009) Role of dietary methionine in poultry production. The Journal of Poultry Science 46: 169-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURLEY, H.K. (2012) Enrichment of methionine from naturally concentrated feedstuffs for use in organic poultry diets. Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (University Park, PA, USA).Google Scholar
BURLEY, H.K., PATTERSON, P.H. and ANDERSON, K.E. (2015) Alternative ingredients for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids. World's Poultry Science Journal 71: 493-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CADIRCI, S., SMITH, W.K. and MC DEVITT, R.M. (2009) Determination of the appetite of laying hens for methionine in drinking water by using colour cue. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 73: 21-28.Google Scholar
CAREW, L.B., MCMURTRY, J.P. and ALSTER, F.A. (2003) Effects of methionine deficiencies on plasma levels of thyroid hormones, insulin-like growth factors-I and -II, liver and body weights, and feed intake in growing chickens. Poultry Science 82: 1932-1938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CERRATE, S., WANG, Z., COTO, C., YAN, F. and WALDROUP, P.W. (2007) Choice feeding as a means of identifying nutritional needs with two methods of amino acid formulation. International Journal of Poultry Science 6: 846-854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHANDRA, M., SINGH, B., SONI, G.L. and AHUJA, S.P. (1984) Renal and biochemical changes produced in broilers by high-protein, high-calcium, urea-containing, and vitamin-A-deficient diets. Avian Diseases 28: 1-11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHEE, K.M. and POLIN, D. (1978) Effect of methionine and methods of feeding on feed intake. Poultry Science 57: 1126.Google Scholar
CHERRY, J.A. and SIEGEL, P.B. (1981) Compensatory increases in feed consumption in response to marginal level of the sulphur containing amino acids. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 6: 269-273.Google Scholar
COLLINS, K.E., KIEPPER, B.H., RITZ, C.W., MCLENDON, B.L. and WILSON, J.L. (2014) Growth, livability, feed consumption, and carcass composition of the Athens Canadian Random Bred 1955 meat-type chicken versus the 2012 high-yielding Cobb 500 broiler. Poultry Science 93: 2953-2962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CORZO, A., KIDD, M.T., DOZIER III, W.A., SHACK, L.A. and BURGESS, S.C. (2006) Protein expression of pectoralis major muscle in chickens in response to dietary methionine status. British Journal of Nutrition 95: 703-708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ELWINGER, K., TUFVESSON, M., LAGERKVIST, G. and TAUSON, R. (2008) Feeding layers of different genotypes in organic feed environments. British Poultry Science 49: 654-665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EMMERT, J.L., GARROW, T.A. and BAKER, D.H. (1996) Hepatic betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase activity in the chicken is influenced by dietary intake of sulfur amino acids, choline and betaine. Journal of Nutrition 126: 2050-2058.Google ScholarPubMed
FANATICO, A. (2010) Organic poultry production: providing adequate methionine. ATTRA-National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, 19 pp.Google Scholar
FANATICO, A., PILLAI, P.B., O'CONNOR-DENNIE, T. and EMMERT, J.L. (2006) Methionine requirements of alternative slow-growing genotypes. Poultry Science 85 (Suppl. 1): 110.Google Scholar
FANATICO, A.C., OWENS, C.M. and EMMERT, J.L. (2009) Organic poultry production in the United States: Broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 355-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FANATICO, A.C., PILLAI, P.B., EMMERT, J.L., GBUR, E.E., MEULLENET, J.F. and OWENS, C.M. (2007a) Sensory attributes of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science 86: 2441-2449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FANATICO, A.C., PILLAI, P.B., EMMERT, J.L. and OWENS, C.M. (2007b) Meat quality of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science 86: 2245-2255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FANATICO, A.C., PILLAI, P.B., HESTER, P.Y., FALCONE, C., MENCH, J.A., OWENS, C.M. and EMMERT, J.L. (2008) Performance, livability, and carcass yield of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science 87: 1012-1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FISHER, T.M., PESCATORE, A.J., JACOB, J.P., PAUL, M.A., VAN BENSCHOTEN, M., GOOD, L.R., CANTOR, A.H. and FORD, M.J. (2014) Growth and nutrient intake patterns of meat-type strains and heritage breeds of chickens using a self-selection feeding program. Poultry Science 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 3.Google Scholar
HARPER, H.A. (1965) Review of Physiological Chemistry, 10 Ed. (Lange medical Publications, Los Altose, CA).Google Scholar
HORSTED, K., HAMMERSHØJ, M. and ALLESEN-HOLM, B.H. (2010) Effect of grass–clover forage and whole-wheat feeding on the sensory quality of eggs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90: 343-348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUGHES, B.O. (1979) Appetites for specific nutrients, in: BOORMAN, K.N. & FREEMAN, B.M. (Eds) Food Intake Regulation in Poultry, pp. 141-169 (British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland).Google Scholar
JACOB, J.P., PESCATORE, A.J., CANTOR, A.H., FISHER, T.M. and FORD, M.J. (2014) Evaluation of the methionine requirement for three dual-purpose chicken breeds. Poultry Science 93 (E-Suppl. 1):119-120.Google Scholar
JONES, D.R., ANDERSON, K.E. and DAVIS, G.S.(2001) The effects of genetic selection on production parameters of Single Comb White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science 80: 1139-1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KARSTEN, H.D., PATTERSON, P.H., STOUT, R. and CREWS, G. (2010) Vitamins A, E and fatty acid composition of the eggs of caged hens and pastured hens. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25: 45-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIANG, Y., XIN, H., WHEELER, E.F., GATES, R.S., LI, H., ZAJACZKOWSKI, J.S., TOPPER, P.A., CASEY, K.D., BEHRENDS, B.R., BURNHAM, D.J. and ZAJACZKOWSKI, F.J. (2005) Ammonia emissions from U.S. laying hen houses in Iowa and Pennsylvania. ASABE 48: 1927-1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MELUZZI, A., SIRRI, F., TALLARICO, N. and FRANCHINI, A. (2001) Nitrogen retention and performance of brown laying hens on diets with different protein content and constant concentration of amino acids and energy. British Poultry Science 42: 213-217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MILES, R.D., RUIZ, N. and HARMS, R.H. (1983a) The interrelationship between methionine, choline, and sulphate in broiler diets. Poultry Science 62: 495-498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MILES, R.D., RUIZ, N. and HARMS, R.H. (1983b) The interrelationships between methionine, choline, and sulphate in turkey diets. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 173: 32-34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MORITZ, J.S., PARSONS, A.S., BUCHANAN, N.P., BAKER, N.J., JACZYNSKI, J., GEKARA, O.J. and BRYAN, W.B. (2005) Synthetic methionine and feed restriction effects on performance and meat quality of organically reared broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 521-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRC (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, (Washington, D.C., USA).Google Scholar
PESTI, G.M. (2009) Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 477-486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PILLAI, P.B., FANATICO, A.C., BEERS, K.W., BLAIR, M.E. and EMMERT, J.L. (2006) Homocysteine remethylation in young broilers fed varying levels of methionine, choline, and betaine. Poultry Science 85: 90-95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PONTE, P.I.P., PRATES, J.A.M., CRESPO, J.P., CRESPO, D.G., MOURÃO, J.L., ALVES, S.P., BESSA, R.J.B., CHAVEIRO-SOARES, M.A., FERREIRA, L.M.A. and FONTES, C.M.G.A. (2008) Improving the lipid nutritive value of poultry meat through the incorporation of a dehydrated leguminous-based forage in the diet for broiler chicks. Poultry Science 87: 1587-1594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RACK, A.L., LILLY, K.G.S., BEAMAN, K.R., GEHRING, C.K. and MORITZ, J.S. (2009) The effect of genotype, choice feeding, and season on organically reared broilers fed diets devoid of synthetic methionine. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 54-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBERTS, S.A., XIN, H., KERR, B.J., RUSSELL, J.R. and BREGENDAHL, K. (2007) Effects of dietary fiber and reduced crude protein on ammonia emission from laying hen manure. Poultry Science 86: 1625-1632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHUTTE, J.B., VAN WEERDEN, E.J. and BERTRAM, H.L. (1983) Sulphur amino acid requirement of laying hens and the effects of excess dietary methionine on laying performance. British Poultry Science 24: 319-326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHUTTE, J.B., DE JONG, J. and BERTRAM, H.L. (1994) Requirement of the laying hen for sulphur amino acids. Poultry Science 73: 274-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHUTTE, J.B., DE JONG, J., SMINK, W. and PACK, M. (1997) Replacement value of betaine for DL-methionine in male broiler chicks. Poultry Science 76: 321-325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHAFER, D.J., CAREY, J.B. and PROCHASKA, J.F. (1996) Effect of dietary methionine intake on egg component yield and composition. Poultry Science 75: 1080-1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SIMON, J. (1999) Choline, betaine and methionine interactions in chicken, pigs and fish (including crustateans). World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 353-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUNDRUM, A., SCHNEIDER, K. and RICHTER, U. (2005) Possibilities and limitations of protein supply in organic poultry and pig production: preliminary report. Organic Revision (71 pp).Google Scholar
USDA (2011) National organic program; amendment to the national list of allowed and prohibited substances (livestock). Federal Register 76: 13501-13504.Google Scholar
USDA (2012a) USDA AMS National Organic Program. http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop Accessed Sept. 2012.Google Scholar
USDA (2012b) National list of allowed and prohibited substances. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: Part 205 - National Organic Program.Google Scholar
USDA (2012c) National organic program; amendment to the national list of allowed and prohibited substances (livestock). Federal Register 77: 57985-57990.Google Scholar
VIEIRA, S.L., LEMME, A., GOLDENBERG, D.B. and BRUGALLI, I. (2004) Responses of growing broilers to diets with increased sulphur amino acids to lysine ratios at two dietary protein levels. Poultry Science 83: 1307-1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WANG, Y.Z., XU, Z.R. and FENG, J. (2004) The effect of betaine and dl-methionine on growth performance and carcass characteristics in meat ducks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 116: 151-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WARD, J.M. Jr, MCNABB, R.A. and MCNABB, F.M.A. (1975) The effects of changes in dietary protein and water availability on urinary nitrogen compounds in the rooster, Gallus domesticus - I. Urine flow and the excretion of uric acid and ammonia. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 51: 165-169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WOOD, G.M. (1956) Consumption of forage by chickens. Poultry Science 35: 1083-1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZHAN, X.A., LI, J.X., XU, Z.R. and ZHAO, R.Q. (2006) Effects of methionine and betaine supplementation on growth performance, carcass composition and metabolism of lipids in male broilers. British Poultry Science 47: 576-580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar