Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:54:40.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Poultry welfare and management: WPSA Working Group Nine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2012

H.A. ELSON*
Affiliation:
ADAS Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Nottingham, NG20 9PF, UK
I.C. de JONG
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
J.B. KJAER
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierschutz und Tierhaltung, Dornbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
E.N. SOSSIDOU
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Foundation, Veterinary Research Institute, 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece
R. TAUSON
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agric. Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Centre, 75323 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The introduction of the UK Protection of Animals Act 1911 demonstrates that animal welfare has been of concern for at least a century. The matter came to the fore about 50 years ago, when the welfare of hens in battery cages became an issue. Since then poultry welfare research and the development of superior management and housing systems for poultry have been stimulated by the lobbying of animal welfare organisations along with subsequent policy decisions and legislation. WPSA WG9 was formed in 1972 to encourage scientific studies to inform the poultry welfare debate; its members have positively influenced research and development of welfare-friendly housing systems and husbandry throughout Europe. They have also been active in EU projects aimed at improving the wellbeing of poultry e.g. LayWel, EFSA Opinions and Welfare Quality®. Information derived from such projects has influenced EU Directives and national legislation on the protection and welfare of laying hens and broilers, in particular.

Type
Centenary Papers
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ALGERS, B. and BERG, C. (2001) Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplementum 30: 88-92.Google Scholar
BERG, C. and ALGERS, B. (2004) Using welfare outcomes to control intensification: the Swedish model, in: WEEKS, C.A. & BUTTERWORTH, A. (Eds) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare, pp. 223-229 (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK).Google Scholar
BLOKHUIS, H.J., FIKS VAN NIEKERK, T., BESSEI, W., ELSON, A., GUEMENE, D., KJAER, J.B., LEVRINO, G.A.M., NICOL, C.J., TAUSON, R., WEEKS, C.A. and VAN DE WEERD, H.A. (2007) The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 63:101-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLOKHUIS, H.J., VEISSIER, I., MIELE, M. and JONES, R.B. (2010) The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A, Animal Science 60: 129-140.Google Scholar
BRAMBELL, F.W.R. (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. Command Paper 2836. HMSO. London.Google Scholar
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE, 1999/74/EC (1999) Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L 203/53.Google Scholar
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE, 2007/43/EC (2007) Laying down the minimum rules for the protection of chickens for meat production. Official Journal of the European Communities L 182/19. http://eur-ex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:182:0019:0028:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
CZISZTER, L.T., BOZKURT, Z., SOSSIDOU, E.N., SZÜCS, E., PENEVA, M., VENGLOVSKY, J., KONRÁD, S.Z., GAÁL, K. and ACANTINCĂI, S. (2009) Survey on Romanian consumers‟ willingness-to-pay for animal products obtained in animal welfare conditions. Lucrări Ştiintifice Scientific Papers, ZOOTECNIE ANIMAL SCIENCE, The 38th International Session of Scientific Communications of the Faculty of Animal Science, Bucharest, Romania, Seria D, LII : 246-251.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C. and GUÉMENÉ, D. (2011) Major welfare issues in broiler breeders. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 73-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA, (2010a) Scientific opinion on the effect of genetic selection on the welfare and resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA Journal 2010 8(7): 1666 [82 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA, (2010b) Scientific opinion on welfare aspects of the management and housing of the grand-parent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes. EFSA Journal 2010 8(7):1667 [81 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELSON, H.A. and CROXALL, R.A. (2006) European Study on the comparative welfare of laying hens in cage and non-cage systems. Archiv für Geflügelkunde (European Poultry Science) 70(5): 194-198.Google Scholar
ELSON, H.A. and SOSSIDOU, E.N. (2008) Research activities of WPSA European working group 9 on poultry welfare and management. Proceedings 1st Mediterranean Summit of WPSA, pp. 525-528.Google Scholar
ELSON, H.A. and TAUSON, R. (2011) Furnished cages for laying hens, in: Alternative Systems for Poultry – Health, Welfare and Productivity. CABI Oxford. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIKS VAN NIEKERK, Th.G.C.M. and ELSON, H.A. (2005) Categories of housing system for laying hens. Polish Animal Science Papers and Reports 23(1): 283-284.Google Scholar
HARRISON, R. (1964) Animal Machines. Stuart. London.Google Scholar
KJAER, J.B., GLAWATZ, H., SCHOLZ, B., RETTENBACHER, S. and TAUSON, R. (2011) Reducing stress during welfare inspection: validation of a non-intrusive version of the LayWel plumage scoring system for laying hens. British Poultry Science 52: 149-154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KOSMIDOU, M., SOSSIDOU, E., FORTOMARIS, P., YANNAKOPOULOS, A. and TSERVENI-GOUSSI, A. (2008) Free-range laying hens’ preferences for two cultivated aromatic plants when offered in their pasture area. World's Poultry Science Journal 64 (supplement 1): 24-25.Google Scholar
ROBINS, A. and PHILLIPS, C.J.C. (2011) International approaches to the welfare of meat chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 351-369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCAHAW, (2000) The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out39_en.pdf. 149 pp.Google Scholar
SCIENTIFIC VETERINARY COMMITTEE, (1996) Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. European Commission: Directorate-general for Agriculture V1/B.II.2.Google Scholar
SHERWIN, C.M., RICHARDS, G.J. and NICOL, C.J. (2010) Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in four housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science 51: 488-499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOSSIDOU, E.N., DAL BOSCO, A., ELSON, H.A. and FONTES, M.G.A.C. (2011) Pasture-based systems for poultry production: implications and perspectives. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 47-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOSSIDOU, E.N. and ELSON, H.A. (2009) Hens’ Welfare to Egg Quality. World's Poultry Science Journal 65: 709-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOSSIDOU, E.N., ROSE, S.P., HALL, N.W. and TSERVENI-GOUSSI, A. (2010) Effects of composted vegetable waste as soil medium in free-range laying hens’ production systems on birds’ behaviour, soil structure, grass cover and nematode population. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 74: 81-86.Google Scholar
SOSSIDOU, E.N., ROSE, S.P., SILVA, S.S.P., HALL, N.W. TSERVENI-GOUSSI, A., and CHRISTODOULOU, V. (2008) Different soil media for free-range laying hens’. British Poultry Science 49: 390-395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TAUSON, R., KJAER, J., MARIA, G., CEPERO, R. and HOLM, K-E. (2005) Applied scoring of integument and health in laying hens. Polish Animal Science Papers and Reports 23(1): 153-159.Google Scholar
VAN DE WEERD, H.A., FIKS VAN NIEKERK, Th.G.C.M. and ELSON, A. (2005) Overcoming barriers of study-specific methodology to facilitate meta-analysis of laying hen welfare data in the LayWel project. Polish Animal Science Papers and Reports 23(1): 291-295.Google Scholar
WELFARE QUALITY®, (2009) Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. http://www.welfarequality.net/everyone/43299/7/0/22.Google Scholar
YALCIN, S. and SOSSIDOU, E. (2010) Introducing the Mediterranean Poultry Network of WPSA. World's Poultry Science Journal 66 (Supplement): 202.Google Scholar