Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:53.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Insemination in Poultry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

D. M. Cooper
D. M. Cooper
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, England
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 12 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, T. E. (1957). Artificial insemination of chickens and turkeys. Div. 1, Rep. Div. Anim. Hlth. Prod., C.S.I.R.O. Australia Ser. P. 1, 19 pp. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Anonymous (1960). Peritonitis in turkeys. Report on the Animal Health Services in Great Britain, H.M.S.O. p. 58.Google Scholar
Asmundson, V. S. and Lorenz, F. W. (1955). Pheasant-turkey hybrids. Science 121: 307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmundson, V. S. and Lorenz, F. W. (1957). Hybrids of ring-necked pheasants, turkeys and domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 36: 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, W. P. (1951). Hen batteries. London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Blount, W. P. (1958). B. O. C. M. Quart. Poult. Bull. No. 19, 16.Google Scholar
Burrows, W. H. and Quinn, J. P. (1935). A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 14: 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, W. H. and Titus, H. W. (1938). Vitamin A deficiency and semen production in chickens. Poult. Sci. 17: 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J. D., Lorenz, F. W. and Asmundson, V. S. (1955). Semen production in the turkey male. 2. Age at sexual maturity. Poult. Sci. 34: 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. D., McCartney, M. G., Chamberlin, V. D. and Wyne, J. W. (1957). The effect of storage time and temperature on fertilizing capacity of turkey semen. Poult. Sci. 36: 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, L. G. (1960). Nutrition and reproduction in the domestic fowl. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19: 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D. M. (1955). A note on a collection apparatus for avian semen. Vet. Rec. 67: 331.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. M. and Rowell, J. G. (1957). Laboratory prediction of the fertilizing capacity ofcock semen. Poult. Sci. 36: 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. M. and Rowell, J. G. (1958). Relations between fertility, embryonic survival and some semen characteristics in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 37: 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. M., Chubb, L. G. and Rowell, J. G. (1963). The effect of manganese on reproductionin the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 4: 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, I. (1957). A complete one-man technique for the collection of cock semen and the insemination of caged hens. Poult. Sci. 36: 1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garren, H. W. and Shaffner, C. S. (1952). The effect of temperatute and time of storage on the fertilizing capacity of undiluted fowl semen. Poult. Sci. 31: 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowe, R. S. (1956). Environment and poultry breeding problems. 2. A comparison of the egg production of seven S.C. White Leghorns strains housed in laying cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci. 35: 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. A. (1955). The effect of holding time of turkey semen on fertilizing capacity. Poult. Sci. 34: 1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamar, G. A. R. (1958). The collection of cock's semen without milking the copulatory organ. Poult. Sci. 37: 1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamar, G. A. R. (1960). Seasonal variation in sperm abnormalities. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28: 16.Google Scholar
Kamar, G. A. R. and Badreldin, A. L. (1959). Sperm morphology and viability. Poult. Sci. 38: 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, P. E. (1956). A retarding factor in the problem of fowl semen storage. Proc. IIIrd Int. Congr. Anim. Repr.Cambridge (Sec. 3): 104.Google Scholar
Lake, P. E. (1957). Fowl semen as collected by the massage method. J. agric. Sci. 49: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, P. E. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1956). Diurnal rhythms in semen yields and mating behaviour in the domestic cock. Nature (London) 178: 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, F. W., Abbott, U. K., Asmundson, V. S., Adler, H. E., Kratzer, F. H., Ogasawara, F. X. and Carson, J. D. (1959). Turkey fertility. Circ. Calif. agric. Exp. Sta. Serv. No. 472, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Lorenz, F. W. and Lerner, I. M. (1946). Inheritance of sexual maturity in chickens and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 25: 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, M. G. (1951). The physiology of reproduction in turkeys. I. Effect of method of mating on fertility and hatchability. Poult. Sci. 30: 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, M. G., Chamberlin, V. D., Carter, R. D. and Wyne, J. W. (1959). Factors affecting the artificial insemination of turkeys. Ohio agric. exp. Sta. Res. Circ. 76, 19 pp.Google Scholar
McNiel, E. (1957). Pleuropneumonia-like organisms (PLLO) from the reproductive tract of birds. Poult. Sci. 36: 1140 abst.Google Scholar
Moore, O. K. and Byerly, T. C. (1942). Relation of time of insemination to percent fertility. Poult. Sci. 21: 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moultrie, F. (1956). A new technique for the artificial insemination of caged hens. Poult. Sci. 35: 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, C. D. (1949). Artificial insemination for progeny test breeding. Poult. Sci. 28: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, H. (1952). Studies on the physiology of reproduction in the male fowl. III. On the addition of transparent fluid to the cock's semen. Sci. Bull. Fac. Agric. Kyshu Univ. 12: 269.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, H. and Ogawa, K. (1961). On the function of the vascular body, an accessory reproductive organ of the cock. Jap. J. zootech. Sci. 32: 89. Anim. Breed. Abst. 30, No. 1377.Google Scholar
Parades, J. R. and Garcia, T. P. (1959). Vitamin A as a factor affecting fertility in cockerels. Poult. Sci. 38: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. E. (1945). Relation of time of day of artificial insemination to fertility and hatchability of hen's eggs. Poult. Sci. 24: 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. E. and McSpadden, B. J. (1943). Influence of feed reduction on fertility in male domestic fowls. Poult. Sci. 22: 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, E. H.Hendrix, R. S. and Worden, C. E. (1959). Low fertility in turkeys associated with vibriosis. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 135: 219.Google ScholarPubMed
Polge, C. (1951a). Artificial insemination in the fowl. Proc. Soc. Study Fertil. 2: 16.Google Scholar
Polge, C. (1951b). Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at −79°C. Nature (London) 167: 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeki, Y. and Brown, K. I. (1962). Effect of abnormal spermatozoa on fertility and hatchability in the turkey. Poult. Sci. 41: 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, H., Bornstein, S., Moses, E. and Gabriel, I. (1957). Fertilization rate of chickens inseminated while containing a hard-shelled egg in their uterus. Ktavim Rec. agric. res. Sta. 8: 58.Google Scholar
Schindler, H., Bornstein, S., Moses, E. and Gabriel, I. (1958). Fertilization rate of chickens inseminated in the afternoon or evening. Ktavim Rec. agric. res. Sta. 9: 287.Google Scholar
Schindler, H., Weinstein, S., Moses, E. and Gabriel, I. (1955). The effect of various diluents and storage times on the fertilizing capacity of cock semen. Poult. Sci. 34: 1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffner, C. S. and Andrews, F. N. (1948). The influence of thiouracil on semen quality in the fowl. Poult. Sci. 27: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaller, F. (1951). Artificial insemination applied on a large scale to poultry breeding research. Off. Rep. 9th World's Poult. Congr.(Paris)1951, 124.Google Scholar
Stotts, C. E. and Darrow, M. I. (1955). Application of artificial insemination in turkey breeder flocks. Poult. Sci. 34: 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, G. C. and Gowe, R. S. (1960). Relationship between the dose of undiluted semen and the duration of fertility in chickens. Poult. Sci. 39: 1298 abst.Google Scholar
Taneja, G. C. and Gowe, R. S. (1961). The interrelationship between spermatozoa number and the volume of fluid inseminated on fertility and hatchability in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 40: 1464 abst.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. W., Gunns, C. A., Grau, C. R., and Lepkovsky, S. (1953). The effect of a respiratory disease on reproduction. Poult. Sci. 32: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thumin, A. (1951). Improvement in the technique of artificial insemination of chickens. Off. Rep. 9th World's Poult. Congr.(Paris)1951, 154.Google Scholar
Tulloch, B. R. (1962). A modified technique for the collection of poultry semen. S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 5: 153.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. S. (1948). A one-man technique for collecting cock semen. Poult. Sci. 27: 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, F. H. and Clark, R. G. (1961). Chicken-quail hybrids. J. Hered. 52: 167. Anim. Breed. Abst. 30: No. 1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, A. E., Abplanalp, H. and Ogasawara, F. X. (1961). Egg and semen production performance of turkeys under cage management. Poult. Sci. 40: 884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyne, J. W., Carter, R. D., McCartney, M. G. and Chamberlin, V. D. (1959). Relation of time of insemination to fertility in the turkey. Poult. Sci. 38: 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar