Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:12:19.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding China's Reform Looking beyond Neoclassical Explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Shu-Yun Ma
Shu-Yun Ma
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access

Extract

The relative success of post-Mao reform in China has raised a number of questions regarding the neoclassical perspective: How could China have achieved rapid economic growth without privatization? Why have Chinese officials not been resistant to market reform? What makes the Chinese state developmental rather than predatory? The four recent works reviewed in this article attempt to answer these questions by moving away from the neoclassical approach, yet none offers a better alternative. The search for the secret of China's economic “miracle” must be continued.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , July 2000 , pp. 586 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Oi, Jean C., “Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China,” World Politics 45 (October 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The World Bank, China's Management of Enterprise Assets: The State as Shareholder (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), xiiiGoogle Scholar, italics in original.

3 The World Bank, Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995), 75.Google Scholar

4 Woo, Wing Thye, “The Art of Reforming Centrally Planned Economies: Comparing China, Poland, and Russia,” Journal of Comparative Economics 18 (June 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Wang, Shaoguang, “Learning by Debating: The Changing Role of the State in China's Economy and Economic Theories,” Policy Studies Journal 23 (1995), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Chewier, Yves, “Micropolitics and the Factory Director Responsibility System, 1984–1987,” in Davis, Deborah and Vogel, Ezra F., eds., Chinese Society on the Eve of Tiananmen: The Impact of Reform (Cambridge, Mass.: Council of East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1990), 131.Google Scholar

7 Harris, Nigel and Lockwood, David, “The War-Making State and Privatization,” Journal of Development Studies 33 (June 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Oi (fn. 1), 115–22.

9 Gunnarsson, Christer and Lundahl, Mats, “The Good, the Bad and the Wobbly: State Forms and Third World Economic Performance,” in Lundahl, and Ndulu, Benno J., eds., New Directions in Development Economics (London: Routledge, 1996), 257–58, 270.Google Scholar

10 Oi (fn. 1), 102.

11 Guy Peters, B., Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New “Institutionalism” (London: Pinter, 1999), 43–62.Google Scholar

12 Cheung, Steven N. S., Will China Go ‘Capitalist’? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1986)Google Scholar; Solnick, Steven L., “The Breakdown of Hierarchies in the Soviet Union and China: A Neoinstitutional Perspective,” World Politics 48 (January 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wank, David L., “The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City,” China Quarterly 147 (September 1997).Google Scholar

13 Aslund, Anders, How Russia Became a Market Economy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1995)Google Scholar; Cao, Yuan Zheng, Fan, Gang, and Woo, Wing Thye, “Chinese Economic Reforms: Past Successes and Future Challenges,” in Woo, Parker, Stephen, and Sachs, Jeffrey D., eds., Economies in Transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar

14 Goldman, Marshall I., Lost Opportunity: Why Economic Reforms in Russia Have Not Worked (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996)Google Scholar; and Naughton, Barry, “China's Economic Success: Effective Reform Policies or Unique Conditions?” in Poznanski, Kazimierz Z., ed., The Evolutionary Transition to Capitalism (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1995).Google Scholar