Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:59:00.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Structure and Political Orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Thus it is well known that, at least until very recently, the main government of Harvard University has been in the hands of “solid men of Boston.” Harvard has certainly done its share in the education of their sons and the sons of others like them, but its function certainly has not been confined to that, as witness the steadily declining proportion of private-school boys admitted to Harvard College. These “upper-uppers” have promoted not simply a device for consolidating their own power and social position, but a national university in the broadest sense.

2 On McCarthyism in this connection, see Parsons, Talcott, Structure and Process in Modern Societies, Glencoe, Ill., 1960Google Scholar, ch. 7, “Social Strains in America.”

3 Cf. Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N., Voting, Chicago, 1954.Google Scholar

4 On this point and the general functioning of the American electoral system, cf. my paper, “‘Voting’ and the Equilibrium of the American Political System,” in Burdick, Eugene and Brodbeck, Arthur J., eds., American Voting Behavior, Glencoe, Ill., 1959.Google Scholar