Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:29:52.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on Korean Communism: Promise versus Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Samuel S. Kim
Samuel S. Kim
Affiliation:
Monmouth College
Get access

Abstract

Research on Korean communism is clearly subsumed under a new field of inquiry known as “comparative study of communism” or “studies of comparative communism.” Developed in the wake of the Sino-Soviet conflict, the comparative study of communism claims greater conceptual and methodological potency through the use of “value-neutral” models and theories developed in the social and behavioral sciences. The author critically examines the performance of current scholarship on North Korean politics in light of the promise of the comparative study of communism. Specifically, he first identifies key normative, conceptual, and methodological problems that plague the current lines of inquiry in the field. He then probes the areas of substantive strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in our present knowledge about the North Korean political system, focusing on two issues of normative and policy importance to both domestic and foreign policy—legitimacy and chuch'e. The author suggests several alternative methods and approaches for liberating the field from its intellectual isolationism and for charting a path toward a cumulative, orderly, and systematic way of building a body of knowledge about Korean communism.

Type
Review Articles
Information
World Politics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , January 1980 , pp. 281 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Transliteration of Korean into English throughout this paper follows the McCune-Reischauer system, except for the names of prominent Koreans whose personal preferences are known: Syngman Rhee, Kim II Sung, Park Chung Hee, as well as the authors of Pukhan Oekyo-ron, do not follow the McCune-Reischauer system of romanization.

2 See Fleron, Frederic J. Jr., ed., Communist Studies and Social Sciences: Essays on Methodology and Empirical Theory (Chicago: Rand McNally 1969)Google Scholar; Johnson, Chalmers, ed., Change in Communist Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1970)Google Scholar; Kanet, Robert E., ed., The Behavioral Revolution and Communist Studies (New York: Free Press 1971)Google Scholar.

3 See Johnson, Chalmers, “The Role of Social Science in China Scholarship,“ World Politics, xvii (January 1965), 256–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Onate, Andres D., “The Case for the Integrity of Social Science Research in Chinese Studies,” Asian Forum, viii (Spring 1976), 50–72Google Scholar; Whiting, Allen S., “Chinese Foreign Policy: A Workshop Report,” SSRC Items, xxxi (March/June 1977), 1–3Google Scholar.

4 Scalapino, and Lee, , Communism in Korea (Berkeley: University of California Press 1972), viiGoogle Scholar.

5 For a detailed critique, see my “Research on Contemporary Communism: The Korean Case,“ Journal of Korean Affairs, v (April 1975), 52–68Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., 67.

7 Tedeschi, James T. and others, “A Reinterpretation of Research on Aggression,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 81 (September 1974), 557–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 See Green, R. T. and Santori, G., “A Cross Cultural Study of Hostility and Aggression,” Journal of Peace Research, vi, No. 1 (1969), 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Koh, Byung Chul, The Foreign Policy of North Korea (New York: Praeger 1969)Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., viii, xx.

11 See Lee, Chae-Jin, “South Korea: The Politics of Domestic-Foreign Linkage,“ Asian Survey, xiii (January 1973), 94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In response to increasing internal opposition as well as to a rapidly changing international situation, Park Chung Hee abruptly proclaimed martial law on October 17, 1972, and subsequently called for the preparation of a new constitution. The latter was euphemistically called Yushin (revitalizing reform); hence the Yushin Constitution or system.

12 Scalapino, Robert A., “The Two Koreas—Dialogue or Conflict?” in Barnds, William J., ed., The Two Koreas in East Asian Affairs (New York: New York University Press 1976), 75Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 72.

14 Ibid., 68; emphasis added.

15 See Angell, Robert C. and others, “Social Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes of Soviet and American Elites,“ Journal of Conflict Resolution, viii (December 1964), 329–491Google Scholar; Holsti, Ole R., Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1969)Google Scholar; Lasswell, Harold D., Propaganda Technique in the World War (New York: Knopf 1927)Google Scholar; Pool, Ithiel de Sola, Symbols of Internationalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1951)Google Scholar.

16 Scalapino and Lee (fn. 5), x.

17 See White, , “Report from Korea: The Democratic People's Republic of Korea Through the Eyes of a Visiting Sinologist,” China Quarterly, No. 63 (September 1975), 515–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “North Korean Chuch'e: The Political Economy of Independence,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (April-June 1975), 44–54.

18 Kim, Young C., “North Korea's Reunification Policy: A Magnificent Obsession,“ journal of Korean Affairs, iii (January 1974), 15–24Google Scholar.

19 Sung, Kim Il, On Juche in Our Revolution, 2 vols. (New York: Weekly Guardian Associates 1977)Google Scholar.

20 Sung, Kim Il, For the Independent Peaceful Reunification of Korea (New York: International Publishers 1975)Google Scholar; Kim Il Sung, For the Reunification of Korea (n.p.: Spark Publications, n.d.).

21 See Axelrod, Robert, ed., Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1976)Google Scholar; Hart, Jeffrey A., “Cognitive Maps of Three Latin American Policy Makers,“ World Politics, xxx (October 1977), 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 For a comprehensive analysis of chuch'e, see Kap-chôl, Kim, Pukhan chôngch'ì iteolrofy punsôk — “chuch'e sasang” ûl chungsimuro [Analysis of North Korean Political Ideology with Emphasis on Chuch'e Ideology] (Seoul: Sôhyangkak 1977)Google Scholar.

23 Cited in Koh, B. C., “Chuch'esông in Korean Politics,” Studies in Comparative Communism, vii (Spring/Summer 1974), 89Google Scholar.

24 Kim Il Sung, I (fn. 19), 136, 139.

25 Mao Zedong sixiang wansui [Long Live Mao Zedong's Thought], (n.p., 1969), 416.

26 Kim Il Sung, I (fn. 19), 428–29.

27 For my analysis leading to this conclusion, see “The Developmental Problem of Korean Nationalism,” in Kim, Se-Jin and Cho, Chang-hyun, eds., Korea: A Divided Nation (Silver Spring, Md.: Research Institute on Korean Affairs 1976), 10–37Google Scholar.

28 Nam, Koon Woo, The North Korean Communist Leadership, 1945–1965. A Study of Factionalism and Political Consolidation (University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press 1974), 142Google Scholar.

29 Scalapino and Lee (fn. 5), 844.

30 Kim Il Sung himself is believed to be fluent in Chinese, while his command of Russian is marginal. See Koh, B. C., “The Impact of the Chinese Model on North Korea,“ Asian Survey, xviii (June 1978), 633Google Scholar.

31 Shinn, Rinn-sup, “Foreign and Reunification Policies,” Problems of Communism xxii (January-February 1973), 71Google Scholar.

32 See Galtung, , Peace: Research, Education, Action, I (Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers 1975)Google Scholar; Methodology and Ideology: Essays in Methodology, I (Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers 1977)Google Scholar; The True Worlds (New York: Free Press 1979)Google Scholar.

33 See Almond, , “Comparative Political Systems,“ Journal of Politics, xviii (August 1956), 391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Almond, Gabriel and Coleman, James S., eds., The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1960)Google Scholar; Almond, Gabriel and Powell, G. Bingham, Comparative Politics (2nd rev. ed.; Boston: Little, Brown 1978)Google Scholar; Almond, , Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown 1970)Google Scholar.

34 Jervis, , Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1976)Google Scholar.

35 The WOMP is a transnational enterprise of scholars that is designed to diagnose global crises and project them over the last quarter of the twentieth century; to build models of preferred futures based on such planetary values as peace, economic well-being, social justice, and ecological balance; and to suggest transition strategies of implementing a preferred world order. See Falk, Richard A., A Study of Future Worlds (New York: Free Press 1975)Google Scholar; Mendlovitz, Saul H., ed., On the Creation of a fust World Order (New York: Free Press 1975)Google Scholar.

36 Sakamoto, Korea As a World Order Issue, WOM P Occasional Paper No. 3 (1978).