Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:49:37.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinventing Welfare Regimes Employers and the Implementation of Active Social Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Cathie Jo Martin
Get access

Extract

Denmark and Britain have adopted quite similar “active” social reforms in which employers play a major role in the programmatic delivery of services; however, the implementation of the programs has differed dramatically in the two countries. Danish firms, despite having had virtually no prior involvement in administering social programs, have participated in far greater numbers than British employers, who, by contrast, have long provided private, employment-based social benefits.

Drawing from interviews with 107 randomly selected British and Danish corporations, this article seeks to explain why Danish employers have participated at higher rates than their British counterparts. Subtle programmatic differences that reflect each country's welfare regime have had profound feedback effects on firms' willingness to participate in the programs; these findings have implications for regimes' capacities both to correct for traps and to revise social protections to meet the needs of the new economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , October 2004 , pp. 39 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Layard, Richard, Nickell, Stephen, and Jackman, Richard, Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labor Market (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

2 Pontusson, Jonas, “Between Neo-Liberalism and the German Model,” in Crouch, Colin and Streeck, Wolfgang, eds., PoliticalEconomy ofModern Capitalism (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997), 55—70Google Scholar.

3 Of course, employment has been highly valued in the social democratic welfare state, and Sweden has had an active labor-market policy since the 1950s; however, Denmark has only adopted active policies quite recently.

4 British training policy and apprenticeship programs in the 1960s differed from this picture. See King, Desmond, Actively Seeking Work? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

5 Esping-Andersen, Gosta, Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (London: Polity Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John, Development and Crisis ofthe Welfare State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pierson, Paul, Dismantling the Welfare State? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Palier, Bruno, “Beyond Retrenchment,” in Clasen, Jochen, ed., What Futurefor Social Security? (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 105–20Google Scholar.

7 Iversen, Torben and Wren, Anne, “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World Politics 50 (July 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, , eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Iversen and Wren (fn. 7); Esping-Andersen, , Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Garrett, Geoffrey, Partisan Politics in the Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Esping-Andersen (fn. 5); Huber and Stephens (fn. 5); Swank, Duane, Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pierson (fn. 5); but see Iversen and Cusack, Thomas R., “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?” World Politics 52 (April 2000)Google Scholar.

11 Gilbert, Neil, “From Entitlements to Incentives,” International Social Security Review 45, no. 3 (1992)Google Scholar; Rhodes, Martin, “The Welfare State,” in Rhodes, Heywood, Paul, and Wright, Vincent, eds., Developments in West European Politics (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Silver, Hilary, “Policies to Reinforce Social Cohesion in Europe,” in Figueiredo, Jose and Haan, Arjan de, eds., Social Exclusion: An ILO Perspective (Geneva: ILO Publications, 199), 38–73Google Scholar; Social Ministry, Det angaar os alle (It concerns us all) (Copenhagen: Social Ministry, January 1999)Google Scholar.

12 Beggand, Iain and Berghman, Jos, Social Exclusion and Reforming the European Social Model (London: Sage, 2002)Google Scholar.

13 Jenson, Jane and Saint-Martin, Denis, “New Routes to Social Cohesion?” Canadian Journal of Sociology 28 (January 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bonoli, Giuliano and Sarfati, Hedva, “Conclusions,” in Bonoli and Sarfati, eds., Labour Market and Social Reforms in International Perspective (Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2002)Google Scholar; Layard, Nickell, and Jackman (fn. 1).

14 Per Kongshaj Madsen, “The Danish Model of Flexicurity,” in Bonoli and Sarfati (fn. 14), 243–65; Martin, John, “What Works among Active Labour Market Policies,” OECD Economic Studies 20 (2000), 92Google Scholar.

15 Ferrera, Maurizio, Hemerijck, Anton, Rhodes, and, The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy (Lisbon: CELTA/Ministerio do Trabalho e da Solidariedade, 2000)Google Scholar.

16 Lipsky, Michael, Street LevelBureaucracy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1981)Google Scholar; Winter, Soren and May, Peter, “Information, Interests, and Environmental Regulation,” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 4 (2002)Google Scholar.

17 Martin (fn. 15), 85; Holt, Helle, En kortlaegning afdansk virksomheders socialansvar (A summary of Danish firms' social responsibility) (Copenhagen: Socialforskningsinstituttet, 1998)Google Scholar; Larsen, Mona and Weise, Hanne, Virksomheders sociale engagement (Firms' social engagement) (Copenhagen: Social-forskningsinstituttet, 1999), 61–70Google Scholar; Hasluck, Chris, The New Deal for Young People, Two Years On (Sheffield, England: Research Management Employment Service, February 2000), 4Google Scholar.

18 Kim Møller and Erik Rasmussen, “Det sociale partnerskab,” Mandag Morgen, March 1995, 23.

19 Cox, Robert Henry, “From Safety Net to Trampoline,” Governance 11 (October 1998), 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abrahamson, Peter, “Efter velfasrdstaten: Ret og pligt til aktivering,” Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid 3, no. 18 (1998), 133–42Google Scholar.

20 Gordon, Colin, “New Deal, Old Deck,” Politics and Society 19 (June 1991)Google Scholar.

21 Olson, Mancur, The Logic of CollectiveAction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965)Google Scholar.

22 In Denmark, for example, the national union (LO) was very involved with the development of active labor-market and social reforms, but some local union leaders opposed the protected jobs programs for the disabled because workers moving into protected jobs would lose their worker fund (A-kasse) benefits (and curb union power); this was resolved in 2002. Interview with LO representative, June 2001; Winkel, Jasper Steen, “Fireparts-krig om det rummelige arbejdsmarked,” Ugebrevet Mandag Morgen 36, October 16, 2000, 5–8Google Scholar.

23 Handler, Edward and Mulkern, John, Business in Politics (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1982), 8, 27Google Scholar.

24 Burgoon, Brian, “Globalization and Welfare Compensation,” International Organization 55 (Summer 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Esping-Andersen (fn. 5); Castles, Francis, Families ofNations (Brookfield: Dartmouth Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

26 Swank (fn. 10).

27 The categories come from Huber and Stephens (fn. 5). On skills, see Hall, Peter and , David Soskice, eds., Varieties of Capitalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Margarita Estevez-Abe, Iversen, and Soskice, “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills,” in Hall and Soskice; King and Stewart Wood, “The Political Economy of Neoliberalism,” in Kitschelt, Lange, Marks, and Stephens (fn.6).

28 Cox, , “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany,” World Politics 53 (April 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thelen, Kathleen, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schmidt, Vivien, “Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment,” in Scharpf, Franz and Schmidt, , eds., Welfare to Work in the Open Economy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 229–309Google Scholar.

29 Hall, , “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State,” Comparative Politics 25 (April 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds., Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weir, Margaret, Politics andJobs (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

31 Pierson, , “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change,” World Politics 45 (July 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Skocpol, , Protecting Mothers and Soldiers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Soss, Joe, “Lessons of Welfare,” American Political Science Review 93 (June 1999), 363–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mettler, Suzanne, “Bringing the State Back in to Civic Engagement,” American Political Science Review 96 (June 2002), 351–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, Andrea Louise, “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation of Senior Citizens,” American Political Science Review 96 (September 2002), 565–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kumlin, Staffan, “Institutions—Experiences—Preferences,” in Rothstein, Bo and Steinmo, Sven, eds., Restructuring the Welfare State (New York: Palgrave, 2002), 20–50Google Scholar.

33 Martin, Cathie Jo, Stuck in Neutral (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Hacker, Jacob, Boundary Wars (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

34 Goodin and Rein rightly point out that some countries with similar regime types differ in their chosen arena for implementation; yet despite these differences in the arenas of implementation, one might still observe regime-derived patterns stemming from programmatic choices. See Goodin, Robert and Rein, Martin, “Regimes on Pillars,” Public Administration 79, no. 4 (2001)Google Scholar.

35 Schneider, Anne and Ingram, Helen, “Social Construction of Target Populations,” American Political Science Review 87 (June 1993), 334–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 OECD Statistics Canada, Literacy in the Information Age (Paris: OECD, 2000), 136Google Scholar.

37 Hacker, and Pierson, , “Business Power and Social Policy,” Politics and Society 30 (June 2002)Google Scholar.

38 Soss (fn. 32).

39 Rothstein, , Just Institutions Matter (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Knudsen, Tim, “State Building in Scandinavia,” in Knudsen, ed., Welfare Administration in Denmark (Copenhagen: Publikationscentralen, 1991)Google Scholar; Andersen, Jorgen Goul, “The Scandinavian Welfare Model in Crisis?” Scandinavian Political Studies 20, no. 1 (1997)Google Scholar; Christensen, Jergen Grannegard, “The Scandinavian Welfare State,” Scandinavian Political Studies 20, no. 4 (1997)Google Scholar.

41 Rhodes, R. A. W., “Traditions and Public Sector Reform,” Scandinavian Political Studies 22, no. 4 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

43 Martin (fn. 33).

44 McCartney, John and Teague, Paul, “Workplace Innovation in the Republic of Ireland,” Economic and Social Review 28, no. 4 (1997)Google Scholar.

45 Martin, Cathie Jo and Swank, , “Does the Organization of Capital Matter?” American Political Science Review 98 (November 2004)Google Scholar; Streeck, , SocialInstitutions andEconomic Performance (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1992)Google Scholar.

46 Due, Jesper, Madsen, Jergen Steen, Jensen, Carsten Strøby, and Petersen, Lars Kjerulf, The Survival ofthe Danish Model (Copenhagen: DJOEF Publishing, 1994)Google Scholar.

47 Department for Education and Employment, United Kingdom EmploymentAction Plan (London: DFEE, 1999)Google Scholar; Labor Ministry, Danmarks Rationale Handlingsplan for Beskaeftigelse 1999 (Danish national action plan for employment 1999) (Copenhagen: Arbejdesministeriet, May 1999)Google Scholar.

48 Jon Kvist, “Conceptualisation, Configuration and Classification” (Manuscript, Socialforskningsinstitut, 2004).

49 King and Wickham-Jones, Mark, “Training without the State,” Policy and Politics 26, no. 4 (1998)Google Scholar.

50 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), “Statistical Annex,” in OECD, Employment Outlook 2004 (Paris: OECD, 2004), 320, 327; Niels Westergaard-Nielsen, “Danish Labour Market Policy: Is It Worth It?” (Working Paper 01–10, Centre for Labour Market and Social Research, Aarhus, Denmark, November 2001); Bell, Brian, Blundell, Richard, and Reenen, John van, “Getting the Unemployed Back to Work: The Role of Targeted Wage Subsidies,” International Tax and Public Finance 6 (1999), 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Teknologisk Institut, Fleksjob pä fremtidens arbejdsmarked (Flexjobs in the labor market's future) (Aarhus, Denmark; Teknologisk Institut, May 2000), 11.

52 OECD(fn.50), 320, 327.

53 Arbejdsmarkedstyrelsen (Labor Market Administration), Midtvejsstatus for handlingsplan til fremme af privat jobtraening (The midpoint status of the plan to promote private job training) (Copenhagen: Arbejdsmarkedstyrelsen, March 16,2000); Hans Bach and Anne-Birte Kylling, “New Partnership for Social Cohesion: The Danish Partnership Concept” (Copenhagen: Socialforskningsinstitutted, May 1997).

54 Wood, , “Labour Market Regimes under Threat?” in Pierson, ed., New Politics of the Welfare State (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 394–98Google Scholar; King, and Rothstein, , “Institutional Choices and Labor Market Policy,” Comparative Political Studies 26, no. 2 (1993), 147–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Blair has more recently tried to do more on skills development.

55 Teknologisk Institut (fn. 51).

56 Interviews with government policymakers, January and April, 2001.

57 Interview with industry respondent.

58 OECD (fn. 50), 320, 327.

59 Interviews with managers, March 1, 2001; March 13, 2001; and April 26, 2001. It is also possible that this reflects Britain's more daunting social problems. Yet in pilot projects in which the New Deal programs have been connected to serious training efforts, employers have been satisfied with the skills of the clientele, even in the worst inner city areas.

60 Interviews with managers, January 26, 2001; January 31, 2001; February 1, 2001; June 11, 2001; and June 13, 2001.

61 Danish companies could develop protected jobs for their own workers at the risk of unemployment (due to reduced working capacities), but few employers used the jobs only for this group.

62 Interviews with managers, December 12, 2000; January 26, 2001; and February 20, 2001.

63 Interviews with managers, January 29, 2001; March 1, 2001; April 4, 2001; and June 13, 2001.

64 Interviews with managers, January 31, 2001; and May 3, 2001.

65 Interviews with managers, January 26, 2001; March 12, 2001; and April 24, 2001.

66 Interviews with managers, January 23, 2001; March 16, 2001; June 4–5, 2001; June 12–13, 2001; and June 30, 2001.

67 Interviews with managers, November 7, 2000; December 12, 2000; December 22, 2000; February 20, 2001; March 26, 2001; April 19, 2001; April 24, 2001; May 29, 2001; and December 20, 2001.

68 The sample was randomly drawn from the Danish Bersen top five hundred list of employers in Denmark and the British Financial Times list. Active companies were more likely to meet than inactive ones, which created some selection bias; yet some inactive firms met to learn more about the policies while some activists declined to meet. Visits to corporate headquarters were primarily made between November 2000 and June 2001; the Danish interviews were largely conducted by the author in Danish. Interview data were supplemented with Amadeus Company Reports and the firms' annual reports.

69 Commission of the European Communities, “Employment Package I: Commission Adopts Draft Report on Member States Employment Policies,” RAPID (September 1999); Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Employment Outlook (Paris: OECD, June 2000). Confederation for British Industry and Trades Union Congress, The UK Productivity Challenge,” http://www.tuc.org.uk/economy/tuc-3928-fo.cfm2001 (accessed Summer 2002).

70 Department for Education and Employment (fn. 47); Labor Ministry (fn. 47).

71 Tabachnik, Barbara and Fidell, Linda, Using Multivariate Statistics (New York: Harper and Row, 1989), 7–9Google Scholar.

72 Stephens, , The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Swenson, Peter, Capitalists against Markets (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.