Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:12:46.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Promise of Geocentric Politics

Review products

SpiroHerbert J.World Politics: The Global System, The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois, 1966, 345 pp. $6.75

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (New York 1966Google Scholar); see also Hoffmann, Stanley, The State of War: Essays on the Theory and Practice of International Politics (New York 1965Google Scholar), Chap. 1; Tucker, Robert W., “Peace and War,” World Politics, xvii (January 1965), 310CrossRefGoogle Scholar–33.

2 Rummel, Rudolph, “Indicators of Cross-National and International Patterns,” American Political Science Review, LXIII (March 1969), 128Google Scholar.

3 And reported in Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N., eds., Contending Approaches to International Politics (Princeton 1969Google Scholar).

4 See also Modelski, George, “Simulations, ‘Realities,’ and International Relations Theory,” Simulation and Games (June 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

5 Wight, Martin, “Why Is there no International Theory?” International Relations, xi (April 1960), 3548CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 62.

6 Spiro's procedural politics brings to mind Confucianism, the political philosophy of the Chinese world state, with its emphasis upon ritual, manners, and correct behavior-the philosophy that grew out of revulsion from the chaos, disorder, and confusion of the period of the Warring States.

7 Spiro, 249, 121; the only document in the appendix to the book is the 1963 treaty to ban nuclear tests; why this particular document and not, say, the United Nations Charter, the Antarctic Treaty, the Austrian State Treaty, the Laotian Neutralization Agreements, or a dozen other equally significant items?

8 See correspondence in the American Political Science Review, LXII (December 1968Google Scholar), 1268, and LXIII (March 1969), 170–71.

9 It was in opposition to the Hegelian “system” that Kierkegaard formulated his existential philosophy.

10 “The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation,” Columbia Journal of World Business, iv (January-February 1969), 918Google Scholar.